Friday, 11 January 2013 09:04

Details on Sens Schedule

While the league has yet to release the official schedule for the shortened 48 game season, details on who the Ottawa Senators will play against are beginning to emerge.

What we know for sure at this point is that the first game will come on Saturday, the 19th against the Winnipeg Jets.  Following that afternoon affair, the Sens are expected to play their home opener on the Monday night when they welcome back Filip Kuba, maybe Alex Kovalev and the rest Florida Panthers.

I have been doing some digging in an attempt to determine what the rest of the schedule looks like but details are limited.  The team’s second home game will come on Sunday the 27th  when Sidney Crosby and the Pittsburgh Penguins come to town. 

Apparently the Toronto Maple Leafs will be at Scotiabank Place three times this year.  That means the Leafs are one of the divisional opponents that Ottawa will play five times.  The Habs will be in town just twice.

What I do know is that the schedule is complete at this point.  The league is simply waiting for the players to vote on the new CBA before releasing all the details.  The NHLPA player vote is expected to wrap up on Saturday morning.

And on another note, there really does seem to be a lot of trade winds swirling around the Ottawa Senators right now.  The Sens are deep at forward and in goal and could use that depth to shore up the back end.  Safe to assume the buzz will increase once the CBA becomes official this weekend. 

Would not be at all surprised to see Bryan Murray pull the trigger on something before the season opens on January 19th.

Comments   Jump to Last Post

 
0 #1 NikoTn 2013-01-11 09:29
As long as they leave Lehner alone, I am OK. As much as I love Bishops finesse in goal and his puck handling abailities as well, I just think that Lehner is more of a show stopping goaltender and the type to absolutely dominate a game in the future.

I think they try out free agency befre they make a trade.
Quote
 
 
+1 #2 FBP 2013-01-11 09:43
No Fri or Sat night home game for three weeks eh? Hrmpf.
Quote
 
 
0 #3 WolfInSheepsClothes 2013-01-11 09:47
If, for any reason, BM feels like he HAS to make a move and is considering moving a goalie it should be Andy... It really pains me to write that because I love his play and team first mentality but we're "supposed to be" still building for the future. Moving either one of 2 incredibly solid goalie prospects (I'd argue they are NHL ready) to benefit the here and now would set us back. We finally have real good goaltenders.

What we do have that we can comfortably move is forward depth. As good as Puempel and Noesen may be, it's not written in stone and I think there could be high demand for forwards like them (not necessarily them in particular).
Quote
 
 
0 #4 Spazza 2013-01-11 09:47
Seth Jones would look great in a sens jersey. I would look on making a deal with Columbus
Quote
 
 
+1 #5 Alcatraz 2013-01-11 09:49
Quoting Spazza:
Seth Jones would look great in a sens jersey. I would look on making a deal with Columbus


Damn, Yakupov would have been good also, we should have made a move with Edmonton

Get real
Quote
 
 
+3 #6 Alcatraz 2013-01-11 09:53
Quoting AParadiseLost:
If, for any reason, BM feels like he HAS to make a move and is considering moving a goalie it should be Andy... It really pains me to write that because I love his play and team first mentality but we're "supposed to be" still building for the future. Moving either one of 2 incredibly solid goalie prospects (I'd argue they are NHL ready) to benefit the here and now would set us back. We finally have real good goaltenders.

What we do have that we can comfortably move is forward depth. As good as Puempel and Noesen may be, it's not written in stone and I think there could be high demand for forwards like them (not necessarily them in particular).


I don't agree at all. I think any rebuilding team has to have a veteran goalie that can handle pressure, high volume shotload and can motivate a team

Edmonton had the right idea with khabibulin but he was too old and injury prone. But look at that team when Dubnyk struggles, they crumble

Rebuilding with two young goalies is a recipe for disaster and thats why columbus sucked as soon as they let Mathieu Garon walk

Anderson provides stability on a team that will inevitably have high and lows

If we are to trade a goalie it should and will be Bishop simply because Anderson is locked up, can be a starter now, is getting older and I don't see him mind gearing down into a split load with lehner in a year or two and then ultimately being a veteran backup

We shouldn't have to question our goaltending for a while shoudl that strategy play itself out
Quote
 
 
0 #7 WolfInSheepsClothes 2013-01-11 09:55
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting AParadiseLost:
If, for any reason, BM feels like he HAS to make a move and is considering moving a goalie it should be Andy... It really pains me to write that because I love his play and team first mentality but we're "supposed to be" still building for the future. Moving either one of 2 incredibly solid goalie prospects (I'd argue they are NHL ready) to benefit the here and now would set us back. We finally have real good goaltenders.

What we do have that we can comfortably move is forward depth. As good as Puempel and Noesen may be, it's not written in stone and I think there could be high demand for forwards like them (not necessarily them in particular).


I don't agree at all. I think any rebuilding team has to have a veteran goalie that can handle pressure, high volume shotload and can motivate a team

Edmonton had the right idea with khabibulin but he was too old and injury prone. But look at that team when Dubnyk struggles, they crumble

Rebuilding with two young goalies is a recipe for disaster and thats why columbus sucked as soon as they let Mathieu Garon walk

Anderson provides stability on a team that will inevitably have high and lows

If we are to trade a goalie it should and will be Bishop simply because Anderson is locked up, can be a starter now, is getting older and I don't see him mind gearing down into a split load with lehner in a year or two and then ultimately being a veteran backup

We shouldn't have to question our goaltending for a while shoudl that strategy play itself out


Touche
Quote
 
 
-1 #8 Spazza 2013-01-11 09:59
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting Spazza:
Seth Jones would look great in a sens jersey. I would look on making a deal with Columbus


Damn, Yakupov would have been good also, we should have made a move with Edmonton

Get real


With Columbus having 3 first round picks , I think they can spare one for the likes of a Goaltender and Zibby + 3 round pick? we are so loaded up front we can afford to give something up.
Quote
 
 
0 #9 Alcatraz 2013-01-11 10:05
Quoting Spazza:
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting Spazza:
Seth Jones would look great in a sens jersey. I would look on making a deal with Columbus


Damn, Yakupov would have been good also, we should have made a move with Edmonton

Get real


With Columbus having 3 first round picks , I think they can spare one for the likes of a Goaltender and Zibby + 3 round pick? we are so loaded up front we can afford to give something up.


They just traded for bobvroski and have the awful mason

they aren't going to trade a top end pick for a goalie. put it this way what would you rather have:

Bishop (we aren't trading lehner) + zibby + 3rd pick

or

a d core of Murray-Jones-Ja ck Johnson with a later 1st round pick spent on a goalie
Quote
 
 
0 #10 AlfieforMayor11 2013-01-11 10:08
So if Murray makes a deal for a good top four dman, which prospects do you guys think should be untouchable. As far as prospects go, we know that Silfverberg and Lehner aren't going anywhere, and I'd like to think that Stone and Noesen are worth holding on to as well. Other than that I wouldn't be too sad to see any of our prospects or depth players go depending on who we get in return.
Quote
 
 
0 #11 Alcatraz 2013-01-11 10:11
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
So if Murray makes a deal for a good top four dman, which prospects do you guys think should be untouchable. As far as prospects go, we know that Silfverberg and Lehner aren't going anywhere, and I'd like to think that Stone and Noesen are worth holding on to as well. Other than that I wouldn't be too sad to see any of our prospects or depth players go depending on who we get in return.


Depending on type of dman I could see:

Zib going for a 2/3 dman

Puemple + pick for a 3/4 dman

combination of pageau/prince/p etersson/hoffma n + pick for a 4/5 dman
Quote
 
 
0 #12 AlfieforMayor11 2013-01-11 10:11
Chirp, have you heard any names that Murray may be talking to other GMs about?
Quote
 
 
0 #13 boom 2013-01-11 10:12
Has anyone heard whether Binghamton plans on sitting anyone tonight? We'd know, for sure, who they are inviting to camp, if so.
Quote
 
 
+3 #14 SensChirp 2013-01-11 10:21
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
Chirp, have you heard any names that Murray may be talking to other GMs about?

Hjalmarsson keeps coming up but I really think that's because there was interest there before. Not sure if that is still an option.

Will pass along more when/if possible.
Quote
 
 
0 #15 MethotToMyMadness 2013-01-11 10:32
@boom - No info is ever reported about who's playing in the A, or not playing. It may come from local radio, but we never hear about it and I can never find sources online. If anyone has a spot they get that info, please pass it on to me.

This is one thing that has always bothered me about the AHL, the lack of info you get. You never hear anything about injuries beyond the initial problem. You never get any details on game day starting rosters. It really does make it hard to be a fan of the AHL, when you don't get all the same details the NHL throws in your face daily.

If the AHL came up with more info regularly, especially during the lockout, I think it would have attracted many more hardcore NHL fans, who follow that stuff on a daily basis. But, as is the case... with the NHL taking back to the Ice, most fans who did start following the A, will more than likely tune out again.

I did hear a report that Zibanejad has been back on the ice in a full training practice and has had no problems since Tuesday between skating and the gym. They are saying he could play this weekend. Bingo does play Friday and Saturday, so I wouldn't expect him in both games. I'd have to think that if Ottawa doesn't pull Silf and the gang for tonight's game, they more than likely won't be playing Saturday. And that's when Zib will probably lace them up to try and make up a little of what was lost. It's hard to say though.
Quote
 
 
0 #16 boom 2013-01-11 10:38
@MethotToMyMadness

Thanks for that. You are right about the lack of info coming from the AHL. I know that OC sat out Eberle et al as soon as they knew the lockout was over, and I guess i thought The Sens would do the same with their top guys...
Quote
 
 
+3 #17 Sens Saint .... the former #1 fan of Spezzafan19! 2013-01-11 10:41
A stay-at-home 3/4 D man we can all agree on is what we need, but realistically I don't think a trade happens out of the gate till BM sees how one or two of our B-Sens play back there.

And for the Anderson trade yalpers - come on guys, besides Hasek - Craig's been our most dependable puck-stopper .... when it matters. Sorry Lalime - truth hurts - I'm still in therapy dealing with issues from the '04 ECF game 7 goal & your melt down vs the Leafs the following year.

Anderson is a keeper!
Quote
 
 
+2 #18 WolfInSheepsClothes 2013-01-11 10:44
Quoting #1 Fan of SpezzaFan19!!!!:
A stay-at-home 3/4 D man we can all agree on is what we need, but realistically I don't think a trade happens out of the gate till BM sees how one or two of our B-Sens play back there.

And for the Anderson trade yalpers - come on guys, besides Hasek - Craig's been our most dependable puck-stopper .... when it matters. Sorry Lalime - truth hurts - I'm still in therapy dealing with issues from the '04 ECF game 7 goal & your melt down vs the Leafs the following year.

Anderson is a keeper!


Pun intended?
Quote
 
 
+1 #19 AlfieforMayor11 2013-01-11 10:51
Quoting #1 Fan of SpezzaFan19!!!!:
A stay-at-home 3/4 D man we can all agree on is what we need, but realistically I don't think a trade happens out of the gate till BM sees how one or two of our B-Sens play back there.

And for the Anderson trade yalpers - come on guys, besides Hasek - Craig's been our most dependable puck-stopper .... when it matters. Sorry Lalime - truth hurts - I'm still in therapy dealing with issues from the '04 ECF game 7 goal & your melt down vs the Leafs the following year.

Anderson is a keeper!


I disagree with the stay at home d, we need a guy who can contribute offensively and on the powerplay as well as being solid defensively. Hjalmarsson fits the role perfectly.
Quote
 
 
0 #20 WolfInSheepsClothes 2013-01-11 10:53
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
Quoting #1 Fan of SpezzaFan19!!!!:
A stay-at-home 3/4 D man we can all agree on is what we need, but realistically I don't think a trade happens out of the gate till BM sees how one or two of our B-Sens play back there.

And for the Anderson trade yalpers - come on guys, besides Hasek - Craig's been our most dependable puck-stopper .... when it matters. Sorry Lalime - truth hurts - I'm still in therapy dealing with issues from the '04 ECF game 7 goal & your melt down vs the Leafs the following year.

Anderson is a keeper!


I disagree with the stay at home d, we need a guy who can contribute offensively and on the powerplay as well as being solid defensively. Hjalmarsson fits the role perfectly.


And Z. Michalek
Quote
 
 
+1 #21 AlfieforMayor11 2013-01-11 10:57
Quoting AParadiseLost:
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
Quoting #1 Fan of SpezzaFan19!!!!:
A stay-at-home 3/4 D man we can all agree on is what we need, but realistically I don't think a trade happens out of the gate till BM sees how one or two of our B-Sens play back there.

And for the Anderson trade yalpers - come on guys, besides Hasek - Craig's been our most dependable puck-stopper .... when it matters. Sorry Lalime - truth hurts - I'm still in therapy dealing with issues from the '04 ECF game 7 goal & your melt down vs the Leafs the following year.

Anderson is a keeper!


I disagree with the stay at home d, we need a guy who can contribute offensively and on the powerplay as well as being solid defensively. Hjalmarsson fits the role perfectly.


And Z. Michalek


I was hoping Murray would sign him when he has a FA, instead we got lame ass Gonchar.
Quote
 
 
0 #22 Sens Saint .... the former #1 fan of Spezzafan19! 2013-01-11 10:57
Pun intended?

Hahaha - you got it!
Quote
 
 
0 #23 DenisVial 2013-01-11 10:59
Quoting AParadiseLost:
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
Quoting #1 Fan of SpezzaFan19!!!!:
A stay-at-home 3/4 D man we can all agree on is what we need, but realistically I don't think a trade happens out of the gate till BM sees how one or two of our B-Sens play back there.

And for the Anderson trade yalpers - come on guys, besides Hasek - Craig's been our most dependable puck-stopper .... when it matters. Sorry Lalime - truth hurts - I'm still in therapy dealing with issues from the '04 ECF game 7 goal & your melt down vs the Leafs the following year.

Anderson is a keeper!


I disagree with the stay at home d, we need a guy who can contribute offensively and on the powerplay as well as being solid defensively. Hjalmarsson fits the role perfectly.


And Z. Michalek


I still don't understand why Phoenix brought him back when they have so many stud D prospects. I think he'd be a good addition as well.
Quote
 
 
0 #24 WolfInSheepsClothes 2013-01-11 11:00
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
Quoting AParadiseLost:
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
Quoting #1 Fan of SpezzaFan19!!!!:
A stay-at-home 3/4 D man we can all agree on is what we need, but realistically I don't think a trade happens out of the gate till BM sees how one or two of our B-Sens play back there.

And for the Anderson trade yalpers - come on guys, besides Hasek - Craig's been our most dependable puck-stopper .... when it matters. Sorry Lalime - truth hurts - I'm still in therapy dealing with issues from the '04 ECF game 7 goal & your melt down vs the Leafs the following year.

Anderson is a keeper!


I disagree with the stay at home d, we need a guy who can contribute offensively and on the powerplay as well as being solid defensively. Hjalmarsson fits the role perfectly.


And Z. Michalek


I was hoping Murray would sign him when he has a FA, instead we got lame ass Gonchar.


We could try to trade for him as well! Phoenix has too many "NHL ready" D and need forward prospects (since we fleeced them for Turris).

This year:
Methot-Karlsson
Hjalmarsson-Michalek
Phillips-Gonchar

Next year:
Cowen-Karlsson
Hjalmarsson-Michalek
Phillips-Methot

Kinda sexy... We'd probably have to give too much to get that though.... One or the other would be good.
Quote
 
 
0 #25 EMG 2013-01-11 11:10
FYI: Spezza and McLean will be at the Jules Morin Park for an outdoor rink Grand-opening ceremony at 1pm... I also got word that it might be pushed back 30 minutes.
Quote
 
 
0 #26 383 2013-01-11 11:16
This year:
Methot-Karlsson
Hjalmarsson-Michalek
Phillips-Gonchar

Next year:
Cowen-Karlsson
Hjalmarsson-Michalek
Phillips-Methot

Kinda sexy... We'd probably have to give too much to get that though.... One or the other would be good.

Wishful thinking I'm assuming, but no way we get BOTH Hjalmarsson and Michalek. I could see us MAYBE getting one or the other, more realistically, Hjalmarsson out of Chi town-they need a goalie, Bishop would fit perfect with them, doesn't make that much and could push for the starting job.

I'm assuming we would have to package a 3rd rounder/or prospect??
Quote
 
 
0 #27 CarloswSPECR1 2013-01-11 11:17
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
I disagree with the stay at home d, we need a guy who can contribute offensively and on the powerplay as well as being solid defensively. Hjalmarsson fits the role perfectly.


Washington tried that system under Boudreau where they played a very offense-oriente d system.

It worked great in the regular season, getting them 1st/2nd in the Conference.

But they struggled in the post-season when Defence plays a more major part of the overall game.

And you don't want to rely on the PowerPlay to win you series... Just ask Vancouver 2 years ago, when they were diving all over the place to force a penalty call.
Quote
 
 
0 #28 WolfInSheepsClothes 2013-01-11 11:19
Quoting 383:
This year:
Methot-Karlsson
Hjalmarsson-Michalek
Phillips-Gonchar

Next year:
Cowen-Karlsson
Hjalmarsson-Michalek
Phillips-Methot

Kinda sexy... We'd probably have to give too much to get that though.... One or the other would be good.


Wishful thinking I'm assuming, but no way we get BOTH Hjalmarsson and Michalek. I could see us MAYBE getting one or the other, more realistically, Hjalmarsson out of Chi town-they need a goalie, Bishop would fit perfect with them, doesn't make that much and could push for the starting job.

I'm assuming we would have to package a 3rd rounder/or prospect??



Most definitely wishful thinking and not very realistic. One can dream....
Quote
 
 
0 #29 Hax 2013-01-11 11:24
Quoting NikoTn:
As long as they leave Lehner alone, I am OK. As much as I love Bishops finesse in goal and his puck handling abailities as well, I just think that Lehner is more of a show stopping goaltender and the type to absolutely dominate a game in the future.

I think they try out free agency befre they make a trade.


Yeah I would have to assume Lehner is the least likely to be dealt unless it's for a bonafide blue chipper. Even then it would be a gamble of sorts.

Bishop is the easiest to give up given his contract and that he's sort of less ready "now" than Anderson but less of a prospect than Lehner. But he also probably brings the least in return.
Quote
 
 
0 #30 Hax 2013-01-11 11:26
Quoting 383:
This year:
Methot-Karlsson
Hjalmarsson-Michalek
Phillips-Gonchar

Next year:
Cowen-Karlsson
Hjalmarsson-Michalek
Phillips-Methot

Kinda sexy... We'd probably have to give too much to get that though.... One or the other would be good.


Thanks - I have been looking for some ideas for D in my NHL13 team. I rarely play past one season so I'm fine with giving up a ton of prospects to make those trades happen.

But yeah, in real life that's a big dream. Either of those guys (without giving up anything too crazy) would be HUGE and I think possible.
Quote
 
 
0 #31 Andrews Theory 2013-01-11 11:39
Chicago has 3 guys that could be available all of whom come at a different price but each of them brings different advantages/disa dvantages.

Really depends on whether management makes this a long term acquisition or a stop gap, do they want a two way dman or a shut down guy.

outside of Hjalmarsson, there is also Nick Leddy (awesome) and Rozsival who would be more of a temporary fix until next year, he logged over 20 minutes a night last year in Phoenix.
Quote
 
 
-1 #32 Dirtysweet 2013-01-11 11:43
Michael Stone sounds like he'd fit our system and might have a "lesser" asking price....(d-Pho enix)
Quote
 
 
0 #33 Alcatraz 2013-01-11 11:45
NHL has changed sked format again. Teams will only play teams in same div. 4x. More details coming. (twitter kukla korner)

interesting, so that would be 4x4 for 16 games leaving 32 games for remaining 10 conference teams...makes no sense lol

unless it will actually be a 46 game season then it makes sense of 4 games vs division and 3 games vs conference teams
Quote
 
 
0 #34 WantEggRoll 2013-01-11 11:47
Quoting Dirtysweet:
Michael Stone sounds like he'd fit our system and might have a "lesser" asking price....(d-Phoenix)


What would the team do for jerseys though!?

M. Stone I
M. Stone II?

Seems like a problem that would be hard to overcome.
Quote
 
 
+1 #35 bsensblaster 2013-01-11 11:50
Seems like no one has the sae attitude as TM. Give the prospects a chance THEN go looking for help. By bringing someone in right away they would be telling the prospects that you are not good enough. Especially since two of the spots are injury related.
Quote
 
 
0 #36 Digital Sens Fan 2013-01-11 11:58
My attempt at Air chair GM.

Murray should trade Anderson AND Gonchar while he can. Gonchar is in great shape and ready to compete. Anderson's value is high coming off almost upsetting NYR last spring.

So you ask who are potential trade partners.
Washington, Florida, Philadelphia and Edmonton.

Philadelphia is only there because of the chance to get Gonchar as a rental and buying out Bryzgalov possibly. Anderson gives them the goaltending stability they need and the Flyers window is closing.

Washington, Florida and Edmonton all have depth up front and are missing a legitimate starting goalie. (GOnchar is only a rental for a playoff run).

What we get in return it all depends but based on trends the past few season I would expect a top 4 D man, Prospect and a pick for both Anderson and Gonchar.
Quote
 
 
0 #37 AlfieforMayor11 2013-01-11 12:04
Quoting CarloswSPECR1:
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
I disagree with the stay at home d, we need a guy who can contribute offensively and on the powerplay as well as being solid defensively. Hjalmarsson fits the role perfectly.


Washington tried that system under Boudreau where they played a very offense-oriented system.

It worked great in the regular season, getting them 1st/2nd in the Conference.

But they struggled in the post-season when Defence plays a more major part of the overall game.

And you don't want to rely on the PowerPlay to win you series... Just ask Vancouver 2 years ago, when they were diving all over the place to force a penalty call.


What are you talking about? What does one player have to do with the entire system? A two-way dman fits in with Maclean's system far more than a one dimensional stay at home dman. We have Cowen. Methot, Phillips, and Boro who are more stay at home dman, now we need a multi-dimension al guy like Hjalmarsson or Michalek who can play a regular shift on the powerplay, who are mobile and who are solid defensively and can play regularly on the pk.
Quote
 
 
0 #38 SensChirp 2013-01-11 12:05
Quoting Alcatraz:
NHL has changed sked format again. Teams will only play teams in same div. 4x. More details coming. (twitter kukla korner)

If true, that means the schedule Ottawa received yesterday has been changed. Definitely had the Leafs here three times. Bizarre that they would change that now...
Quote
 
 
0 #39 Andrews Theory 2013-01-11 12:05
bringing in a defensman right now does not tell the prospects they aren't good enough but it does tell the guys already on the team that they believe in them and feel with the right addition we are competitive.

players dont jump from the AHL to a top 4 role in the NHL right away or at least very, very seldom -it's a recipe for disaster for the team and hinders the players long term developoment.

young defensemen need to be isolated and graduate through the process at the NHL level, this includes watching games from upstairs some nights.

With all due respect, there is way too much concern from fans about players feelings specific to where they fit at the NHL level...if you are the best option you play, if you aren't, you don't.

Lastly, Flyers aren't buying out Bryzgalov- they just signed him...
Quote
 
 
0 #40 SensChirp 2013-01-11 12:07
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting Alcatraz:
NHL has changed sked format again. Teams will only play teams in same div. 4x. More details coming. (twitter kukla korner)

If true, that means the schedule Ottawa received yesterday has been changed. Definitely had the Leafs here three times. Bizarre that they would change that now...

Think that may be misinformation. They will play some division teams 4 times, some 5.
Quote
 
 
0 #41 Hax 2013-01-11 12:11
Quoting WantEggRoll:
Quoting Dirtysweet:
Michael Stone sounds like he'd fit our system and might have a "lesser" asking price....(d-Phoenix)


What would the team do for jerseys though!?

M. Stone I
M. Stone II?

Seems like a problem that would be hard to overcome.


Ma Stone and Mi Stone (is typically what they do)
Quote
 
 
0 #42 WantEggRoll 2013-01-11 12:20
Quoting Hax:
Quoting WantEggRoll:
Quoting Dirtysweet:
Michael Stone sounds like he'd fit our system and might have a "lesser" asking price....(d-Phoenix)


What would the team do for jerseys though!?

M. Stone I
M. Stone II?

Seems like a problem that would be hard to overcome.


Ma Stone and Mi Stone (is typically what they do)


Honestly it is ridiculous that they both just don't have their singular last name. You would think with the player's number plastered in fifty different locations they would not even be looking at the name plate at this point.
Quote
 
 
0 #43 Andrews Theory 2013-01-11 12:35
This is what I had thought about the Ceci to camp thing...TM confirms it...it's really more about his development than thinking he might make the team..


"I think what we want to do here with Cody is reset him, reset his season. This certainly is no disreprect to the 67's, they've had a tough year...he's part of it. He's gonna move on now to a better team, obviosuly [sic] when you get traded from a low team to a higher team. He's gonna be counted on there heavily, and he's gotta be ready for that. And I think by coming in here, and getting a little bit of coaching from our guys on what we expect in the second half from him - it's a different situation so expectations are different. Put a lot of the onus on him to step up his game, and I think by starting him here with good players here it gives him a chance to just walk in there and you know have no issues on changing teams."
Quote
 
 
0 #44 Hax 2013-01-11 12:40
Quoting Andrews Theory:
This is what I had thought about the Ceci to camp thing...TM confirms it...it's really more about his development than thinking he might make the team..


"I think what we want to do here with Cody is reset him, reset his season. This certainly is no disreprect to the 67's, they've had a tough year...he's part of it. He's gonna move on now to a better team, obviosuly [sic] when you get traded from a low team to a higher team. He's gonna be counted on there heavily, and he's gotta be ready for that. And I think by coming in here, and getting a little bit of coaching from our guys on what we expect in the second half from him - it's a different situation so expectations are different. Put a lot of the onus on him to step up his game, and I think by starting him here with good players here it gives him a chance to just walk in there and you know have no issues on changing teams."


Totally agree - this also takes the pressure of him and might see a better mini-camp from him. Chance is 1% that he makes the team in any event, so it makes sense to focus on his development. Similar situation for Noesen.
Quote
 
 
+2 #45 ZachPraiseTheSwedes 2013-01-11 12:43
I like the idea of Hjalmarson however think that Bogosian is a much better player and could have a much bigger role on our team.

Bogosian could and should be a 1st pairing Dman. He however could also be very good as a 2nd pairing guy with Gonchar. He moves the puck great but his primary focus is defene. That's exactly what we need. The best part about him is he is still under contract for this year so would essentially be playing for a long term contract/spot along side the top defenceman in the world.

I'm not sure he's available but Murray could tempt them by offering Zibanejad and/or Bishop because A) their forward prospect depth isn't the greatest and B) Pavelec is their clear starter but has been having trouble plus did just have a DUI so they may want a backup whose capable of pushing for a starter position.

My biggest concern when discussing a trade for a Dman is that we don't need a 3/4 or 5/6 guy. We have plenty of those for the future and no point of trading for a guy for a short term fix. We need a 2/3 guy. We all know Methot is nowhere near good enough to be a 1st pairing guy so he's just there temporarily. Many here think/hope that Cowen will be good enough to be that guy some day. While I do believe he's a very good player and will only improve, I strongly feal as though he's best served to be on the 2nd pairing and truly dominate teams 2nd lines.

Bogosian is just as strong and good defensively but moves much better. He can keep up with the Ovechkin's and Stamkos' of the league no problem. If Cowen does end up improving to the point where he simply has to be onthe 1st pairing, then great. Then Bogosian would be excellent on the 2nd and at the same time not cost too much
Quote
 
 
0 #46 Tookie 2013-01-11 12:53
Quoting WantEggRoll:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting WantEggRoll:
Quoting Dirtysweet:
Michael Stone sounds like he'd fit our system and might have a "lesser" asking price....(d-Phoenix)


What would the team do for jerseys though!?

M. Stone I
M. Stone II?

Seems like a problem that would be hard to overcome.


Ma Stone and Mi Stone (is typically what they do)


Honestly it is ridiculous that they both just don't have their singular last name. You would think with the player's number plastered in fifty different locations they would not even be looking at the name plate at this point.


60 is Mark Stone and the other is whatever he chose...simple.
Quote
 
 
0 #47 SensChirp 2013-01-11 13:00
Now hearing that there may in fact be an altered schedule making the rounds this morning. Can't imagine how frantic it is for individual teams to organize heading into a shortened season.

Will pass along some details when/if I can.
Quote
 
 
0 #48 Dirtysweet 2013-01-11 13:17
Is there a specific time/day when trades will be allowed to commence?
Quote
 
 
0 #49 ZachPraiseTheSwedes 2013-01-11 13:20
So just found out Bogosian is actually injured. He had a ligament tear in his wrist and had surgery in August with a 6 month recovery period.

He did skate yesterday with his team and could take passes and what not but cant shoot just yet. Knowing him and his freakish weight room abilities, he will probably be bad, fairly soon and be stronger than ever.

So as long as Murray is willing to stay with our current prospects for the first 2-3 weeks of the season my hypothesis would still be possible. And Murray did say he wanted to give his guys a try to see how it went before making a move. So who knows..
Quote
 
 
0 #50 ZachPraiseTheSwedes 2013-01-11 13:20
Back fairly soon*
Quote
 
 
0 #51 Alcatraz 2013-01-11 13:21
Quoting ZachPraiseTheSwedes:
So just found out Bogosian is actually injured. He had a ligament tear in his wrist and had surgery in August with a 6 month recovery period.

He did skate yesterday with his team and could take passes and what not but cant shoot just yet. Knowing him and his freakish weight room abilities, he will probably be bad, fairly soon and be stronger than ever.

So as long as Murray is willing to stay with our current prospects for the first 2-3 weeks of the season my hypothesis would still be possible. And Murray did say he wanted to give his guys a try to see how it went before making a move. So who knows..


He was one of a select few NHLers who were never actually locked out. He earned all his salary during the lockout, was allowed to use all their team services. BAsically he had the locker room to himself since September
Quote
 
 
0 #52 SensChirp 2013-01-11 13:25
Quoting SensChirp:
Now hearing that there may in fact be an altered schedule making the rounds this morning. Can't imagine how frantic it is for individual teams to organize heading into a shortened season.

Will pass along some details when/if I can.

Being told the info above is still accurate. Panthers for the opener, Pens on the 27th, Leafs three times, Habs twice.
Quote
 
 
0 #53 nicholas19 2013-01-11 13:25
We are not trading Zibby, bottom line.
Quote
 
 
0 #54 Hax 2013-01-11 13:36
Quoting Dirtysweet:
Is there a specific time/day when trades will be allowed to commence?


Once the NHLPA ratifies (Saturday noonish I think)
Quote
 
 
0 #55 Sensnation 2013-01-11 13:50
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
So if Murray makes a deal for a good top four dman, which prospects do you guys think should be untouchable. As far as prospects go, we know that Silfverberg and Lehner aren't going anywhere, and I'd like to think that Stone and Noesen are worth holding on to as well. Other than that I wouldn't be too sad to see any of our prospects or depth players go depending on who we get in return.


I think my untouchable list is pretty similar to your's Lehner and Noesen should never be traded imo. After that I'd hope they keep Silfverberg, Stone, and obviously Ceci. Anyone else I could live with being moved in the right deal, and by that I assume any Zibanejad move is to get a key top 4 D or top 3 sniper.
Quote
 
 
+1 #56 Sensnation 2013-01-11 13:53
Quoting nicholas19:
We are not trading Zibby, bottom line.


It's interesting you say that when he was one of the key pieces going to Columbus in the Rick Nash trade. I'm not saying the Sens should look to trade him, but he's obviously not untouchable.
Quote
 
 
+1 #57 ZachPraiseTheSwedes 2013-01-11 14:30
Quoting Sensnation:
Quoting nicholas19:
We are not trading Zibby, bottom line.


It's interesting you say that when he was one of the key pieces going to Columbus in the Rick Nash trade. I'm not saying the Sens should look to trade him, but he's obviously not untouchable.


I agree, we shouldn't look to trade him but he is the one prospect who has such high value on the market where it would exceed the value he brings or would bring to our team.

Everyone else would either really hurt us in the long run if we traded them (Lehner or Silfverberg for example) or just don't bring high enough value on the market where we could justify trading them since they could still bring really high value to our own team (Stone or Noesen).

I personally think our best assets to use in acquiring a big piece for us such as a 1st line winger or 2/3 Dman are Zibanejad, Bishop and Puempel
Quote
 
 
0 #58 Hax 2013-01-11 14:46
Quoting ZachPraiseTheSwedes:
Quoting Sensnation:
Quoting nicholas19:
We are not trading Zibby, bottom line.


It's interesting you say that when he was one of the key pieces going to Columbus in the Rick Nash trade. I'm not saying the Sens should look to trade him, but he's obviously not untouchable.


I agree, we shouldn't look to trade him but he is the one prospect who has such high value on the market where it would exceed the value he brings or would bring to our team.

Everyone else would either really hurt us in the long run if we traded them (Lehner or Silfverberg for example) or just don't bring high enough value on the market where we could justify trading them since they could still bring really high value to our own team (Stone or Noesen).

I personally think our best assets to use in acquiring a big piece for us such as a 1st line winger or 2/3 Dman are Zibanejad, Bishop and Puempel


I'm not sure Zibby is at peak value with the injury problems he's had. Some GM out there might have him really high but I would think his value would be greater over the summer (assuming he has a good winter/spring in Bingo or even Ottawa). I don't think I'd have him on my list of guys to offer if I were Murray - more because I don't expect any GMs to give me a max return for him.

Add to that the fact that I'd only move Zibanejad for something huge and it's safe to say he wouldn't get moved if I were GM. Of course, if someone offered me a blue chip d-man I'd listen.
Quote
 
 
0 #59 Andrews Theory 2013-01-11 14:53
the thing with Zibanejad is that he projects to be an ideal 2nd line center with jam....

there are a ton of teams out there missing a legit 1st or 2nd line center and he could be a building block for their future.

playing devils advocate, a team like Edmonton has no one penciled in long term for the 2nd line ctr role... not that they have a plethora of defenseman they'd be willing to part with other than Smid potentially.

I'm not saying to trade him but as others have pointed out there could be some significant interest and with the addition of Turris, Zibby is somewhat expendable.
Quote
 
 
0 #60 nicholas19 2013-01-11 14:53
Quoting Sensnation:
Quoting nicholas19:
We are not trading Zibby, bottom line.


It's interesting you say that when he was one of the key pieces going to Columbus in the Rick Nash trade. I'm not saying the Sens should look to trade him, but he's obviously not untouchable.

so was Lehner, but im pretty damn glad we didnt get Nash, i was against that trade from day 1.
I had the pleasure of attending the wjc here in calgary a couple years ago and saw how zib plays when the game is on the line and its exactly what we need to go further in the post season. i know the points havent come to him yet in bingo but i am willing to bet its due to his concussion issues.
Quote
 
 
0 #61 Dirtysweet 2013-01-11 15:07
Thanks Hax.
Quote
 
 
0 #62 sprucesens 2013-01-11 15:09
Ideas on a bogosian trade. If he is in fact injured and cannot play just yet, but will in the near future, he would be an excellent aquisition. Imagine

Cowen-karlsson
methot-Bogosian
phillips-wiercioch

with ceci bumping methot down next year and possibly no more phillips, or keep phillips and demote/trade wiercioch

to get bogosian, and one of the jets ahl goalies, a trade of puempel and bishop and maybe 2nd or 3rd round pick. Puempel and bishop are close to equalling 2 firsts for bogosian who was a high first. Both aren't quite proven yet, hence the additional pick to make up for it. the ahl goalie has to come back, as we would need someone in the ahl, with lehner and anderson for the forseeable future in ottawa. The pick could also be swapped with someone like petersson, dacosta and so on, who have less of a chance of ever making ottawa
Quote
 
 
0 #63 ZachPraiseTheSwedes 2013-01-11 15:12
Quoting sprucesens:
Ideas on a bogosian trade. If he is in fact injured and cannot play just yet, but will in the near future, he would be an excellent aquisition. Imagine

Cowen-karlsson
methot-Bogosian
phillips-wiercioch

with ceci bumping methot down next year and possibly no more phillips, or keep phillips and demote/trade wiercioch

to get bogosian, and one of the jets ahl goalies, a trade of puempel and bishop and maybe 2nd or 3rd round pick. Puempel and bishop are close to equalling 2 firsts for bogosian who was a high first. Both aren't quite proven yet, hence the additional pick to make up for it. the ahl goalie has to come back, as we would need someone in the ahl, with lehner and anderson for the forseeable future in ottawa. The pick could also be swapped with someone like petersson, dacosta and so on, who have less of a chance of ever making ottawa



That's what I'm talking about! Would make us a legit contender as early as this year
Quote
 
 
0 #64 ZachPraiseTheSwedes 2013-01-11 15:14
Apart from all the previously stated reasons why Bogosian would be better than Hjalmarson, we also could keep Z. Smith. I think from Murray's standpoint is huge as he clearly likes what he brings since he signed him to a pretty lengthy contract
Quote
 
 
0 #65 MethotToMyMadness 2013-01-11 15:33
New Post up. 2 in one day, that's a SensChirp record lately.
Quote
 
 
0 #66 SensChirp 2013-01-11 15:59
Quoting MethotToMyMadness:
New Post up. 2 in one day, that's a SensChirp record lately.

Just gettin' warmed up!
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

SensChirp Details on Sens Schedule

SensChirp Articles