Feature Story

  • Thank You

    Without overstating it, this really was the best season I have had as a fan of the Ottawa Senators.

    And while many fans will quickly default to the Stanley Cup run,there was just something about this team that made this lockout shortened season extra special. Cheering for and blogging about the underdog Ottawa Senators team was the most thrilling, unexpected, delightful experience I've had as a sports fan.

    Written on Saturday, 25 May 2013 00:13
    Comments (5) Read 95 times
  • Sponsor 2

  • Sponsor

Wednesday, 16 March 2011 09:04

Sens Fall on Home Ice-O'Brien/Benoit to Bingo

(UPDATE 8:35 PM)- Old news by now but the Sens demoted Andre Benoit and Jim O'Brien this morning. They also announced that defenceman Matt Carkner is likely done for the season after having knee surgery.

When the Sens sold off a number of players before the NHL trade deadline, I think all fans expected that there were going to be some pretty rough nights.

Last night was one of those nights.

Really not a ton of good to take from last night's beat down at the hands of the Pittsburgh Penguins.

The Penguins were the better team from start to finish. Ottawa really couldn't get anything going offensively and struggled to register any sort of chances on Brent Johnson. Couple in a rough night from Craig Anderson and you have the recipe for a blowout.

If I had to take a positive away from this one, it would have to be the play of Chris Neil. He had energy all night and did his best to get his struggling teammates going.

The loss means the Sens hold on to the 29th spot in the NHL. They trail the Avs by just one point but have played two more games. Colorado takes on Vancouver tonight.


 

Plenty of talk about NCAA free agents and the Sens are looking at two in particular. Paul Thompson out of New Hampshire and Stephane Da Costa from Merrimack College go head to head in the Hockey East semifinals.

Ottawa has a serious interest in both of them. There are a number of teams watching both of those players.

That game goes on Friday night.

Last modified on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 19:35

Comments   Jump to Last Post

 
0 #1 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 09:23
Sens have now lost 2 in a row, and of course the only positive aspect from these losses, is the fact that they are improving their chances at top players in the draft .

Totally outplayed, outhustled, and of corse outscored, by
a Pens team decimated with many players out with injuries, especially Crosby and Malkin.

This team is playing like a "pack", term used by Coach Bylsma, and they are winning more games than losing some.

Should Crosby return soon, they will be a much stronger team offensively !
Quote
 
 
+13 #2 krod84 2011-03-16 09:27
I would never hope for my Sens to lose a game, but the thought of Landeskog wearing a Sens jersey makes games like last night's a lot more tolerable as a fan!
Quote
 
 
+1 #3 Johne 2011-03-16 09:32
@Snoopy

???? 3 in a row? 2 in a row.....
Quote
 
 
-1 #4 Johne 2011-03-16 09:36
Anderson has not looked good in his last two starts, I feel that he was really in the zone since the trade and taking him out against Tampa probably broke that confidence he was having. Not trying to downplay what Anderson has done, but this is what typically happens to Ottawa goalies. Hard to gauge what we have in Anderson with the lineup we're putting on the ice, but I think the realistic expectations for signing him is probably 75% what we saw at the start and 25% what we've seen in the last 2 games.
Quote
 
 
+1 #5 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 09:37
Quoting Johne:
@Snoopy

???? 3 in a row? 2 in a row.....

As I looked at it again, I realized you are correct.
We did beat Tampa Bay 3 games ago !
Quote
 
 
-1 #6 WeAreSensFans! 2011-03-16 09:38
time to play mcliney for a string of games to evealute him, stop showing anderson how bad we are defensively so he resigns and fix the problem over the summer.

this teams defence is horrible, i still believe cloutson's system is causing most of these mistakes at the moment.
Quote
 
 
+10 #7 Sens Saint .... the former #1 fan of Spezzafan19! 2011-03-16 09:39
@ the tyrant ....
No need to respond to your 'attempt at humour' from yesterday, which I should warn you will only rack up more thumbs downs votes.

I think you're real concern is that you've talked smack to a lot of posters for a long time and now you're concerned with the fact that you can't see the lack of love your peers have from some of your negative dribble that bounces onto this site. There's no need to make people feel like shit for something they feel is a 'good idea' or something they want to share.

Be courteous to people's thoughts and comments. They may not be what you think they should be, but on the other hand we all can't call ourselves 'the tyrant'.

On a positive note, you like everybody here makes this site what it is. We all bleed Red & White for the same team! Go Sens!
Quote
 
 
-12 #8 Goober McFly 2011-03-16 09:43
I suspect Murray and the Anderson camp have come to an agreement on terms for a new contract. The Sens then said to Anderson, "We know what you can do. Stop doing it for the rest of the season so we can improve out draft position."

If they announced the contract and started faltering, either the fans would revolt or the NHL would think they're tanking on purpose.
Quote
 
 
+1 #9 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 09:57
I hope others are starting to see Anderson for what he is. This is exactly why I wanted to let him play out the year before thinking of the term and money for his next contract. He's a definite NHL starter, but he is no savior. He's more reliable then Elliott or Leclaire ever were, but let's not mistake improvement for success.

That Pitt team is so deep, if Crosby comes back they have to still be considered one of the top 5-7 teams for the playoffs.
Quote
 
 
+3 #10 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 09:58
[quote name="Sens Saint"]@ the tyrant ....
No need to respond to your 'atte

I must applaud you for your analysis on The Tyrant !

He is what he is, but most posters on here will give him credit for sane comments , and knock him for his arrogant and condescending statements !

Wonder what his reply will say, if he does reply !
Quote
 
 
-1 #11 Tookie 2011-03-16 10:01
Im still not sold on Karlsson, sure he puts up points, but how many is he responsible for?

+- does come into play when it reaches absurd new lows like Karlsson's. He was -3 last night and got completely outplayed by everyplayer going against him.
Quote
 
 
+1 #12 Johne 2011-03-16 10:03
@JABS

I was pretty skeptical of Anderson as well, he never really impressed me, but that run he had really showed potential, lets just hope and pray for more of that next year.
Quote
 
 
+5 #13 Tookie 2011-03-16 10:05
Quoting JABSmilez:
I hope others are starting to see Anderson for what he is. This is exactly why I wanted to let him play out the year before thinking of the term and money for his next contract. He's a definite NHL starter, but he is no savior. He's more reliable then Elliott or Leclaire ever were, but let's not mistake improvement for success.

That Pitt team is so deep, if Crosby comes back they have to still be considered one of the top 5-7 teams for the playoffs.


I dont think anyone pegged him as being the savior, I think he is a competent goalie thats going to help us through the rebuild.
Quote
 
 
0 #14 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 10:12
Quoting Tookie19:

I dont think anyone pegged him as being the savior, I think he is a competent goalie thats going to help us through the rebuild.


Plenty of people on here were pegging him as a savior and clamoring to sign him asap. Some had some pretty ridiculous term and money amounts too. Others blamed BM for not having signed him immediately. Not sure where you've been, but several comments definitely went that far.

He's good, and like any goalie he'll have stretches where he looks great, but he's no Hasek or Miller, he needs a pretty good team in front of him long term.
Quote
 
 
+1 #15 Johne 2011-03-16 10:22
Craig Anderson not on the ice this morning with the Sens. McElhinney the only goalie out there.
Quote
 
 
-2 #16 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 10:25
I totally agree with JABS, and would even say, that he is not worth more than $2.0 to 2.5 million and for 1 or 2 years at the most.
Emery cost us a lot of wasted money , and Leclaire will walk away with almost $ 8 million, for 2 years of playing when healthy ( 14 games this year) ??

To me, the posters that were suggesting $3.0 to $3.5 million
over 3 years, thought we had a Roy or Brodeur on our team ??
Quote
 
 
-1 #17 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 10:30
Quoting SNOOPY SENIOR:
I totally agree with JABS, and would even say, that he is not worth more than $2.0 to 2.5 million and for 1 or 2 years at the most.
Emery cost us a lot of wasted money , and Leclaire will walk away with almost $ 8 million, for 2 years of playing when healthy ( 14 games this year) ??

To me, the posters that were suggesting $3.0 to $3.5 million
over 3 years, thought we had a Roy or Brodeur on our team ??


Agreed, he's definitely no Roy or Brodeur. I imagine Anderson will get the 2.5-3mil or so from someone, but some suggested upwards of 4. Let's just be sure we're not so desperate for a date we go out with the ugly girl who put on makeup for the first time!
Quote
 
 
+4 #18 Ctea 2011-03-16 10:30
Quoting Tookie19:
Im still not sold on Karlsson, sure he puts up points, but how many is he responsible for?

+- does come into play when it reaches absurd new lows like Karlsson's. He was -3 last night and got completely outplayed by everyplayer going against him.


Karlsson looked so lost on the ice. In our defensive zone, he didn't have his head on a swivel and because of that, he was always late picking up his man. I wonder what the coaching staff said to him afterwards.
Quote
 
 
+6 #19 Overmind 2011-03-16 10:32
Loved the Neil hits on kovalev, you can tell there was some animosity there.

As much as i love to see Ottawa lose at this point blowouts like this are brutal. Still like Andersons game though, hopefully a string of a few bad games drives down his asking price.
Quote
 
 
+14 #20 TrueSensFan 2011-03-16 10:39
Yeah the Neil hit on floatalev was pretty great. I thoroughly enjoyed that.

I am surprised no on has mentioned the Spezza hit on Cooke. HAHAH I laughed so hard. I was right up close and you could actually see the WTF look on Cooke's face
Quote
 
 
-22 #21 Prime 2011-03-16 10:45
Neil only shows up like that when the team is getting killed. Any other time he's invisible
Quote
 
 
+1 #22 Captain Alfie 2011-03-16 10:52
I was impressed with Andersiv but the last few games he has been out of position and let in some Elliott-esque softies.
Quote
 
 
-1 #23 Tookie 2011-03-16 11:06
Quoting JABSmilez:
Quoting Tookie19:

I dont think anyone pegged him as being the savior, I think he is a competent goalie thats going to help us through the rebuild.


Plenty of people on here were pegging him as a savior and clamoring to sign him asap. Some had some pretty ridiculous term and money amounts too. Others blamed BM for not having signed him immediately. Not sure where you've been, but several comments definitely went that far.

He's good, and like any goalie he'll have stretches where he looks great, but he's no Hasek or Miller, he needs a pretty good team in front of him long term.


Yeah I havent been around much lately (work) but I think the high range was to make a point of we have to reach the cap floor and giving him 3/3.5/4 Mil would be justified in that case?

I wouldnt sign him 3 years tho.
Quote
 
 
+2 #24 JRMcPeeWee 2011-03-16 11:25
Was great to see Speeza throw a hit on Cooke he is really trying to lead by example. You can really see Shannons downside when he was on the PK and couldn't move Staal.
Quote
 
 
+4 #25 Timmac 2011-03-16 11:25
@Snoopy SeniouQuoting SNOOPY SENIOR:
I totally agree with JABS, and would even say, that he is not worth more than $2.0 to 2.5 million and for 1 or 2 years at the most.
Emery cost us a lot of wasted money , and Leclaire will walk away with almost $ 8 million, for 2 years of playing when healthy ( 14 games this year) ??

To me, the posters that were suggesting $3.0 to $3.5 million
over 3 years, thought we had a Roy or Brodeur on our team ??


I think it's unlikely that Anderson can be gotten for that money. He'll go elsewhere. But it is absurd to claim that people asking for him to be signed at 3m for 3years thought he was "Roy or Brodeur". Really? Brodeur is past his prime and still make 5.2m per year. Thomas makes $5m. Luongo 6.7m.
I'd be fine with Anderson at 3 years for 3m. Ge is an above average goaltender.
Quote
 
 
-1 #26 Peter Sidorkeiwicz 2011-03-16 11:32
Craig Anderson - newest corpse in Ottawa's goalie graveyard ?
Quote
 
 
-2 #27 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 11:48
@ Timmac,

Why do you want to throw money ,when we are still paying over a $1million in total, to Emery this year and next ? Also blew $8 million on Leclaire.

Anderson is an average good goalie, earning $1,812,500 on his last contract. Signing him for $3million is a 50% increase, and for 3 years is at least $9 million.

Let's see how he pans out in balance of games before he signs on the dotted line !
Quote
 
 
-1 #28 Sudsy 2011-03-16 12:01
Give Karlsson 'til trade deadline next year to see if he can fix (or reduce dramatically) his defensive woes. If not, trade him for a nice package (top 6 f, pick, etc) while his value is still high.
Quote
 
 
+1 #29 Dork 2011-03-16 12:13
I have a hard time believing Karlsson will ever fully stop being a defensive liability. He needs o be bigger but he'll lose mobility if he puts on a substantial amount of weight.
Quote
 
 
+6 #30 Peter Sidorkeiwicz 2011-03-16 12:18
King Karlsson can learn to be average plus defensively but he needs BETTER COACHING to teach him how.
Quote
 
 
+6 #31 sick twig 2011-03-16 12:20
Whats with the odd post on trading Karlsson. He is TWENTY!!! Yes I know Karlsson's defensive game is bad. He has a lot of time before he hits his prime, and to suggest trading him over poor defence at his age with his potential is ridiculous. Lets trade him evryone and then five years from now wish we never dealt this kid because he will be a worldclass pro. Sudsy, Im sure his trade value will be high for many years beyond the 2012 deadline. I don't want to sound harsh, we just have different opinions.
Quote
 
 
0 #32 Overmind 2011-03-16 12:22
Quoting Peter Sidorkeiwicz:
King Karlsson can learn to be average plus defensively but he needs BETTER COACHING to teach him how.


agreed. Better coaching all around is needed for this team.
Quote
 
 
+1 #33 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 12:24
@ Peter S,

So, Luke Richardson as the Coach of the defencemen, is responsible for the defensive teaching of Karlsson .

Hope they work dilligently on improving his skills as soon as possible .
Quote
 
 
+4 #34 AlfieforMayor11 2011-03-16 12:26
Let's not forget that Karlsson is playing on a team with a sub-par group of defenseman around him, and limited offensive talent to work with, and he's still on pace to put up 47 pts as a 20 year old sophomore on the second worst team in the NHL. Call me overly-optimist ic if you want, but he has the potential consistently to put up Mike Green numbers, north of 60-70 points.

Only way trading Karlsson would ever make sense is if we ended up drafting Larsson or another highly touted top defenseman in the next couple drafts, and even then it could be a terrible move.

I'm okay with Karlsson being a defensive liability just as long as he puts up his points and is surrounded by other reliable defenseman and a solid goaltender.
Quote
 
 
+1 #35 Dork 2011-03-16 12:27
So much draft/Anderson talk, I've been worried about Melnyk/Murray.

Check out the Ottawa Sun's (I know, I know) article about how Melnyk views the rebuild. Murray apparently told him it could be 1-2yrs insted of 3-5.

Doesn't this worry anybody else? We see a bunch of kids have a few good games with no pressure near season's end and all of the sudden Melnyk thinks we could be competitive next year?!?!?

This males me think 1) Murray will be here next year and 2) He will not take the patient route where you refrain from dangerous UFA signing
Quote
 
 
0 #36 sensfan19 2011-03-16 12:27
I think next year Cowen would be a great partner for Karlsson, similar to what Hal Gill is to Subban in Montreal.
Quote
 
 
0 #37 sick twig 2011-03-16 12:43
Senior snoopy, I dont thnik Luke is around much in that role. This has been a mess, do you really think Luke has been a great defensive minded influence on Karlsson this year??? I don't.
Quote
 
 
+1 #38 ClearTheZone 2011-03-16 12:53
Karlsson does have to pick up his game in the defensive zone, and while he's at it, teach Butler a few pointers. Sniper or not, Butler is weak on defense. Either he does not play with the energy he does in the O zone or he does not know where to go or what to do on defense. Minus 2 every game it seems, and even Clouston highlighted how bad he was his first 9 games. He got better because he scored some goals but bottom line, he needs to improve his 2-way game.

Snipers get a free pass it seems, but if a team has poor D, then the entire team needs to pick it up and play a better team defensive game. Minus 17 in 24 games, bad team or not, is horrible.
Quote
 
 
-3 #39 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 13:03
Quoting Tookie19:

Yeah I havent been around much lately (work) but I think the high range was to make a point of we have to reach the cap floor and giving him 3/3.5/4 Mil would be justified in that case?

I wouldnt sign him 3 years tho.


My argument was I'd rather pay Bryzgalov or Vokoun 5-6 mil and know we have a top end goalie then 4 mil on Anderson who is up and down. I agree close to the 3mil range makes sense, but given he turned down a 2 year/7.5 mil extension from Colorado, and he's supposedly turned down a 2yr 4mil per season offer from the Sens, he's either looking for the cup contender or serious star goalie type of cash.

I don't think he deserves either one.
Quote
 
 
+1 #40 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 13:10
Quoting sick twig:
Senior snoopy, I dont thnik Luke is around much in that role. This has been a mess, do you really think Luke has been a great defensive minded influence on Karlsson this year??? I don't.


Agree that Richardson has probably not tutored Karlsson too much, as this young defenceman has produced a whole lot of the Sens offense throughout the year.

Now that they know his weakness on defensive side of his game, I'm sure they will remedy that situation gradually.
His greatest assets defensively, are his speed and poke check and moving puck up the ice himself or by pinpoint passing .
Quote
 
 
-1 #41 PraiseAlfie84 2011-03-16 13:10
Anderson is looking more like 2011 and less like 2010....Ah well....
Quote
 
 
-1 #42 sensarmy 2011-03-16 13:13
I too like the idea of signing Breezy. He has to be the least-noticed goalies in the NHL because of the fact that he plays in Phoenix. Can't believe burke let him go for nothing although Hiller is a nice goalie is his own right
Quote
 
 
-1 #43 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 13:20
Quoting JABSmilez:
[quote name="Tookie19"]
Yeah I havent been around much lately (work) but I think the high range was to make a point of we have to reach the cap floor and giving him 3/3.5/4 Mil would be justified in that case?

I wouldnt sign him 3 years tho.


My argument was I'd rather pay Bryzgalov or Vokoun 5-6 mil and know we have a top end goalie then 4 mil on Anderson who is up and down. I agree close to the 3mil range mak


If what you wrote above is an actual fact, and that he turned down 2 above offers, he is being unrealistic in
wanting something higher than his worth in my books !

He will be pricing himself out of the market .
Quote
 
 
+2 #44 nuffsaid 2011-03-16 13:21
i could not see much of the game last night, but from the highlites im glad. Anderson is finally starting to show cracks but to be fair, he had to have SOME weaknesses. The poor guy came in here and stunned us all by blanking the Leafs in TO and than kept on rolling with brilliant save and save which is unfortunate because now he has set the bar extremely high and here in ott were hungry for a great goalie. No he is not going to be the next Brodeur or Roy but the guys is a bonified #1 which is something i havent seen in OTT since Lalime (not including hasek because of the injury...and screw hasek) so lets just man up and put the pen to the paper. we have cap and claim were not gunna go out and chase big names in the off season so give him a 2yr deal at about 3.5 (even 4mill for all i care) and lets build around him, spezza and karlsson and hope to christ we draft well and that Lehner gets his stuff together.
Quote
 
 
-1 #45 jamrich82 2011-03-16 13:21
Just reported from Ottawa Sun Anderson is injured.
Quote
 
 
+8 #46 The Dutch Treat 2011-03-16 13:21
Jeez Louise people, can fans on this board be more schizophrenic? First people whine and moan when the team is winning while preparing a gold bust of Craig Anderson for the entrance to the city. Now after two sub-par games where the overall team defense has been horrendous, people are whining and moaning about the losses and are ready to run Craig Anderson out of town.

When Anderson was playing perfectly, the team salvaged 1-0 and 2-1 wins. When he even struggles just a little, it becomes 6-4 and 5-1. MAYBE, it's the team of kids and sh!tty d-men in front of him? BRIAN LEE is in our top pair right now. Let that soak in. Sure he's playing good, but would Brian Lee be in any team's top pair?

Keep a level head people. THIS IS A REBUILD.
Quote
 
 
+1 #47 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 13:30
I agree with The Dutch Treat, that many posters are slamming Anderson, when clearly in the losses we sustained , it was because of the poor play of the forwards not backcheking, and the defense running around and leaving Anderson alone to face the shooting gallery !
Quote
 
 
-1 #48 Doc 2011-03-16 13:43
Anderson injured:

http://www.ottawasun.com/sports/hockey/2011/03/16/17640021.html
Quote
 
 
-3 #49 Mitchell 2011-03-16 13:46
I think Anderson for more then 2 Years is too long, unless in his third year he will play back up to Robin Lehner.

it looks as Chris Phillips has taken Jared Cowen spot on the roster next season. I don't see him fitting the Bill and buying out Kuba is not an option considering Senators want to shred unwanted contracts not keep them on the books.
Quote
 
 
-3 #50 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 14:01
Quoting The Dutch Treat:
...

When Anderson was playing perfectly, the team salvaged 1-0 and 2-1 wins. When he even struggles just a little, it becomes 6-4 and 5-1. MAYBE, it's the team of kids and sh!tty d-men in front of him? BRIAN LEE is in our top pair right now. Let that soak in. Sure he's playing good, but would Brian Lee be in any team's top pair?

Keep a level head people. THIS IS A REBUILD.


My position on Anderson hasn't changed, it's just no longer in a clear minority now that others realize he's no star goalie. This guy has 1 good season as a starting goalie in him and wants a lot of money, good term and to be on a good team.

The losses aren't all his fault, just like they weren't all Elliott's fault either, but the wins also aren't all his doing. Let's just ride out the season and see how reasonable his contract expectations are, that's all I've been preaching.
Quote
 
 
-4 #51 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 14:07
Quoting SNOOPY SENIOR:

If what you wrote above is an actual fact, and that he turned down 2 above offers, he is being unrealistic in
wanting something higher than his worth in my books !

He will be pricing himself out of the market .


It's a rumor for sure, but here's 1 of several places I've seen it http://www.edmontonjournal.com/sports/What+about+Lehner/4391959/story.html
Quote
 
 
-2 #52 Tookie 2011-03-16 14:20
Im not for trading Karlsson, right now, I know he's young but what you see is what you get with Karlsson, he will get a bit better on D but his priority is offense. To me, having that point getter on the backend is a nice thing but I just dont know if he scores more than he gives up, if he doesnt then its a lost battle. If we could somehow in a few years get better by trading Karlsson for a top 6 who puts up the same numbers, we get rid of the defensive liablity but keep the pts.

That is only IF Karlsson doesnt get MUCH better on D. Right now he cant even stop Nathan Gerbe...
Quote
 
 
+5 #53 The Dutch Treat 2011-03-16 14:25
I think you are still in a clear minority with respect to your opinion on Anderson because most level-headed fans can look at his entire body of work and see a number 1 goaltender. I love hearing he had "one good year" in Colorado. It is laughable because he had two good years putting up similar numbers splitting duty with Vokoun - the goalie you want to give $6 million dollars a year to with just as many playoff wins as Anderson.

When a goalie stops more than 35+ shots a game and the team wins by a 2-1 margin, that's called "stealing games". I know it's a strange phenomena in Ottawa as it rarely happens, but during Anderson's hot streak, he carried this team through it. Now that he's slightly "cooled off" - the vultures are out to throw him under the bus because he dare have the audacity to sign a term deal with numbers in the $3 million to $4 million range.
Quote
 
 
+4 #54 The Dutch Treat 2011-03-16 14:25
Harping on the guy after two bad games that followed 10 amazing ones is silly. Bryz is NOT coming here. Neither is Vokoun, unless you offer them some ridiculous contract and term. And that's how you get stuck with a contract like Sergei Gonchar's.
Quote
 
 
0 #55 PraiseAlfie84 2011-03-16 14:28
Chirp: If Anderson is out, who do the sens plan on bringing back up? Lehner is out too, so is Brust gonna get the call?
Quote
 
 
+2 #56 meadowdog 2011-03-16 14:38
Quoting Dork:

Check out the Ottawa Sun's (I know, I know) article about how Melnyk views the rebuild. Murray apparently told him it could be 1-2yrs insted of 3-5.

Doesn't this worry anybody else? We see a bunch of kids have a few good games with no pressure near season's end and all of the sudden Melnyk thinks we could be competitive next year?!?!?

This males me think 1) Murray will be here next year and 2) He will not take the patient route where you refrain from dangerous UFA signing


If Melnyk has indeed bought into the one to two year re-build stategy I think it's fair to say that we are not in the process of building a Stanley Cup winner. We might wind up with a team that can make the playoffs but seldom, if ever, gets by the first round. I never realyy thought Melnyk would have the patience for a proper re-build and I'm still hoping to be wrong about that but this is very disturbing news.
Quote
 
 
+3 #57 AlfieforMayor11 2011-03-16 14:41
Brust can't be called up unless we give him some kind of NHL contract. His current contract is only good for the ECHL and AHL.

As for Anderson, the guy is the goaltender we need. He has one of the best records in the NHL the last few years when facing a lot of shots, and this Senators team is one that will be out-shot more often than not.

The Sens have a ridiculous amount of holes in their roster, so what is the point in going out and signing a Bryzzy or Vokoun for twice the money that Anderson will command, when they won't give us much better results.

I know I would feel very comfortable to see Andy between the pipes for the next few seasons at 3 mill per, but not much more than that.
Quote
 
 
-6 #58 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 14:43
Quoting The Dutch Treat:


I think you're missing the point. I'm not coming out like a vulture I'm saying the same thing I've said before. Also, he's not looking for a 3-4mil contract for 2 years, he's looking for more and longer.

As for the Florida backup references, not sure how you give him credit as a starter for what he did there as a backup. There's no doubting he's a starter, it's whether he's a top 10 starter or just average at best. I'm pretty sure he's in the average at best category.
Quote
 
 
-12 #59 TheTyrantWee 2011-03-16 14:45
@Sens Saint

Thanks for the pop-culture psychology. I particularly enjoyed your lame assumptions about how I feel. Let me kindly inform you that there is no special reason. I will respond to your retarded post with a pop quiz.

If I gave a shit how people responded to me would I...
A) Change my behavior
B) Continue to be condescending, rude, and a straight up asshole to those who post opinions I think are stupid.

I'm aware that I'm a condescending know-it-all prick who thinks most hockey fans are drooling morons who's knowledge of the game is about as deep as a thimble. I'm quite happy to endorse the reputation. I just genuinely think +/- is useless if you can't see your own. That's all. There is no special psychological reason.
Quote
 
 
+1 #60 AlfieforMayor11 2011-03-16 14:45
If Melnyk and Murray believe this could be a 1-2 year rebuild it simply means that they see the players currently in the organization to be far enough in their development to bring this team back to the playoffs sooner rather than later. Which in that case is great news.

Murray's probably telling Melnyk that just so he can get that extension though.
Quote
 
 
+2 #61 meadowdog 2011-03-16 14:47
The idea of signing a 5-6 million dollar goalie for a bottom feeding team in re-build mode is ludicrous on so many levels that I just can't believe someone would suggest it.
Quote
 
 
+3 #62 The Dutch Treat 2011-03-16 14:49
Quoting JABSmilez:
Quoting The Dutch Treat:


I think you're missing the point. I'm not coming out like a vulture I'm saying the same thing I've said before. Also, he's not looking for a 3-4mil contract for 2 years, he's looking for more and longer.


This whole post smacks of speculation. You have no idea what Anderson has been offered, what he wants, etc. other than what you've read reported from an Edmonton journalist and a Colorado journalist. Chirp has reported that Anderson is looking for 3-4 years around the $3 to $3.5 million mark. Is that out of whack for a goalie with his stats?

If you're pretty sure he's in the "average at best" category, I'd like to see who you think is better than him. Especially in the FA market. If he's "average at best", that would still be better than the crap we've had between our pipes for 20 years.
Quote
 
 
-6 #63 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 14:50
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:

...
The Sens have a ridiculous amount of holes in their roster, so what is the point in going out and signing a Bryzzy or Vokoun for twice the money that Anderson will command, when they won't give us much better results.

I know I would feel very comfortable to see Andy between the pipes for the next few seasons at 3 mill per, but not much more than that.


If Anderson comes in at half the contract that Bryzgalov and Vokoun get he's worth it, I'm not arguing that, I'm saying it doesn't sound like he's willing to accept that little. 5-6mil for a star I'll do. 2.5-3.5 for an average goalie I'd do. 4 mil plus for an average goalie I won't.
Quote
 
 
+7 #64 The Dutch Treat 2011-03-16 14:50
Quoting TheTyrantWee:
@Sens Saint

Thanks for the pop-culture psychology. I particularly enjoyed your lame assumptions about how I feel. Let me kindly inform you that there is no special reason. I will respond to your retarded post with a pop quiz.

If I gave a shit how people responded to me would I...
A) Change my behavior
B) Continue to be condescending, rude, and a straight up asshole to those who post opinions I think are stupid.

I'm aware that I'm a condescending know-it-all prick who thinks most hockey fans are drooling morons who's knowledge of the game is about as deep as a thimble. I'm quite happy to endorse the reputation. I just genuinely think +/- is useless if you can't see your own. That's all. There is no special psychological reason.



Tyrant's right...there's no psychological reason. He's just a bitter sad f#ck because no one bothered to read his sh!tty blog.
Quote
 
 
0 #65 Darcy Loewen 2011-03-16 14:54
Anyone here think the Sens will try any offer sheets? I think Runblad will make an immediate impact but IMO Cowen needs a little pro seasoning in the minors.
Quote
 
 
-14 #66 TheTyrantWee 2011-03-16 14:56
Oh and please go stuff it where the sun don't shine if you're one of those "all opinions have value" sorts of people because sorry to inform you but it's just not true. Not all opinions are created equal. You wouldn't take the advice of a day labourer if you were looking to build a space shuttle. You know why so many people who can't sing show up at American Idol auditions? It's because people like you tell them they can sing and to keep working at it in the name of being nice. Unlike you I just refuse to do that. I won't pretend something has value if it's clearly awful or stupid. I do my civic duty and inform those people that they are morons. I bet you also laugh at bad jokes. I hate people like you.
Quote
 
 
+1 #67 AlfieforMayor11 2011-03-16 14:58
I really doubt Anderson is looking for $4 million per year. I've learned over time not to read too much into something written in the news or on the internet, especially when it's a publication like the Edmonton Journal writing about the Sens. It's just like if the Ottawa Sun wrote an article on what Ales Hemsky was looking for in his next contract. It's a lot of rumors and speculation which means very little at the end of the day.

I can tell you one thing, if Anderson is looking for $4 a year, Murray would say see ya later! Just like he would if Bryz and Vokoun's asking price is as high as expected. We may have the cap space but both Murray and Melnyk have stated that they have restructured the budget and won't be looking to spend as much dough as they have in the last few years.

The team can't afford to dish out that kind of cash right now.
Quote
 
 
+3 #68 Jon1234 2011-03-16 15:08
Anyone wondering if the Penguins are officiated to a different standard need look no further than the call after Kovalev was dropped to the ice in the first period. That happened about 5 times per game when he was a Senator, and NEVER got called!
Quote
 
 
0 #69 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 15:09
Hey Chirp,

Amazing the bombardment of opinions, posted all in a bunch, over Anderson potential contract, which is still not even
done and signed !

I truly like the performances of Anderson. He is a quality goalie, but not an elite one.

His last contract, as I posted earlier was for $1,812,500.
Top goaltenders are in $5 to $6million , and he is not even close to being a top goalie.

We gave Kovalev about $9million for 1.75 of a seson.
Pens picked up the other$1 million.
Gave Leclaire $8 million for a few games in 2 years.

I say give Anderson $2.5 to $3.0 for 2 years, and if we make the playoffs in those 2 years , sign him for 3 years at higher rate. But produce first, then get paid !!
Quote
 
 
-1 #70 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 15:19
@Dutch Treat - Just because those are the only 2 places you see it, doesn't mean those must be the only places I've heard it. I straight up said it was a rumor from every source I've heard or seen it from, but I've been told the same thing from others.

4 years for Anderson IS too much.

Top 10 goalies in the NHL (no particular order): Luongo, Brodeur, Miller, Lundqvist, Thomas, Price, Hiller, Bryzgalov, Vokoun, Ward ... that's without even mentioning Quick, Rinne, Fleury, Backstrom, Kiprusoff, Halak, Rask who all deserve top 10 consideration well before Anderson.

I love how somehow on this site I'm the crazy one in this conversation. Anderson isn't even in the top half of goalies in the league. He might not even crack top 20. If u can't see that now, there's not much else for me to say.
Quote
 
 
+1 #71 PraiseAlfie84 2011-03-16 15:29
4 Years for Anderson wouldn't be that bad if we gave him a front loaded contract. I realize the cap hit would be the same but at that 3-4 year juncture we'll have Lehner ready to sign for cheap....
Quote
 
 
+4 #72 meadowdog 2011-03-16 15:38
How dare the Dutch treat bring in Andersons' fine play in Florida. He only played 31 games that year and we all know that teams don't try as hard against backups because it might hurt their feelings. Dutch Treat has insulted the two greatest hockey minds in the universe today and should be ashamed of himself.
Quote
 
 
+3 #73 The Dutch Treat 2011-03-16 15:42
Quoting JABSmilez:


4 years for Anderson IS too much.

Top 10 goalies in the NHL (no particular order): Luongo, Brodeur, Miller, Lundqvist, Thomas, Price, Hiller, Bryzgalov, Vokoun, Ward ... that's without even mentioning Quick, Rinne, Fleury, Backstrom, Kiprusoff, Halak, Rask who all deserve top 10 consideration well before Anderson.


Why would term be a problem? Are you clairvoyant enough to know the state of the team in 4 years so much so that Anderson's $3.5 million deal would be an albatross? What would Bryzgalov or Vokoun making $6 million in year 4? A good idea?

So of those 15 goalies you listed, do you honestly believe ANY of them will sign with Ottawa - if they were free agents?

Secondly "might not even crack top 20". So you're saying if we were to sign Anderson for 3 to 4 years, we'd be in the bottom third of the league in goaltending. I don't even know where to begin with that.
Quote
 
 
-5 #74 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 15:43
@meaQuoting meadowdog:
How dare the Dutch treat bring in Andersons' fine play in Florida. He only played 31 games that year and we all know that teams don't try as hard against backups because it might hurt their feelings. Dutch Treat has insulted the two greatest hockey minds in the universe today and should be ashamed of himself.


Honestly man, after the shit you pulled in that other thread, your input means absolutely nothing. If you can't understand the points being made, leave the conversation to people who actually know their shit.
Quote
 
 
+3 #75 meadowdog 2011-03-16 15:47
Jabsmilez has spent the entire year advocating a Toronto Maple Leaf strategy of adding high priced pieces to a bad team thus destroying our draft position and he claims to be someone who knows his shit. Please.
Quote
 
 
+2 #76 The Dutch Treat 2011-03-16 15:51
Quoting JABSmilez:
@Dutch Treat - Just because those are the only 2 places you see it, doesn't mean those must be the only places I've heard it. I straight up said it was a rumor from every source I've heard or seen it from, but I've been told the same thing from others.


Here's the thing about rumors and the internet. All one has to do is report it and others pick it up and pass it off as their own, possibly by adding something dumb to it to call it all their own.

It's like the game "Telephone" - if it was played by retarded monkeys.

Unless Chirp or Yost said it, then I don't care about it. Yost and Chirp have both said Anderson's agent is looking for 3 years around $3.5 million. We have an advantage because he likes it here and his agent already represents many Senators.
Quote
 
 
+1 #77 bfalcone11 2011-03-16 15:52
im pretty curious about these college prospects, anyone know anything about them?
Quote
 
 
-4 #78 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 15:57
@The Dutch Treat
He is unproven, you don't give him that kind of term. Simple as that. I've also not said we'd offer Bryzgalov or Vokoun that kind of term either, but I would be more open to it than Anderson. Personally I feel we need a bridge goalie for 3 years, but I'd make Bryzgalov THE goalie for longer if the money was decent and he was interested.

The goalie market has been shit the last few years as we all saw with Niemi and Nabokov last offseason. Who knows what these goalies may have to accept if they want to stay in the NHL instead of going to KHL or Europe. There are only a few teams looking for a goalie every year. Phoenix would be crazy not to sign Bryzgalov, but weirder shit has happened, especially with all the uncertainty there. So yes it's a POSSIBILITY!
Quote
 
 
-4 #79 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 15:58
I clearly demonstrated a list of goalies that are better then Anderson. If you disagree with that list, that should be where you begin. If you don't, you really can't act like I'm out to lunch anymore then.
Quote
 
 
-3 #80 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 16:01
Quoting The Dutch Treat:

Unless Chirp or Yost said it, then I don't care about it. Yost and Chirp have both said Anderson's agent is looking for 3 years around $3.5 million. We have an advantage because he likes it here and his agent already represents many Senators.


Then don't respond to what I post if you don't care about it. I'm allowed to post my opinion and knowledge on this shit. If you don't care about it unless it comes from those 2, that's fine, but don't bash me just because you don't care about my opinion.
Quote
 
 
+6 #81 Sens Saint .... the former #1 fan of Spezzafan19! 2011-03-16 16:01
@ The Dutch Treat (& to a lesser extent the tyrant)

The tyrant had a blog that nobody cared to read, let alone comment on? Now it now makes much more sense...


@ the tyrant

It's OK, there are very few out there that can produce a first rate site like SensChirp does each and everyday.

My thinking is maybe all you need is a giant SensChirp group hug and some hot coco. Heck, if it puts a smile back on your face, I'll even throw in my game worn Yashin, Daigle & Hasek jerseys.

Tyrant, we want to like you, you just have to like yourself first.

GO SENS GO!
Quote
 
 
-5 #82 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 16:02
Quoting meadowdog:
Jabsmilez has spent the entire year advocating a Toronto Maple Leaf strategy of adding high priced pieces to a bad team thus destroying our draft position and he claims to be someone who knows his shit. Please.


I've never once advocated a TML style, thanks for proving my point about you.
Quote
 
 
+1 #83 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 16:04
@ The Dutch Treat,

Show me your abilities over 2 years, and then I might DOUBLE your salary !??

Do not have your agent try to get you DOUBLE your last contract, before earning all of it !!

The problem is always the same, "Show me the money".
Quote
 
 
+2 #84 NickG 2011-03-16 16:26
I thought Neil had a great game. Last game too. He's been skating very well, breaking into the offensive zone, and trying to make something happen. His stone hands don't help so much for putting it in the net, but that's not what he's on the team for.
Spezza had some nice moments too.
Shannon's effort levels have been amazing the last little while. I think he's gunning for Fisher's place on the team.
Quote
 
 
+5 #85 defplayer 2011-03-16 16:34
180 74 68 20 14 2.77 .913

258 120 96 — 16 2.55 .914

Who's stats are who's? Bryz vs Anderson

According to the almighty posters, one is worth double the other. And we would be crazy to give one of the above 3 year $10m but crazy not to give the other guy 3 year $15m???

WTF?
Quote
 
 
+3 #86 The Dutch Treat 2011-03-16 16:42
Quoting JABSmilez:
I clearly demonstrated a list of goalies that are better then Anderson. If you disagree with that list, that should be where you begin. If you don't, you really can't act like I'm out to lunch anymore then.


You clearly demonstrated a list of goalies that you think is better than the "unproven" Anderson (I guess 3 years of consistent play isn't proof enough these days), but you have yet to answer my question, WHO of those goalies would be wearing a Senators jersey next year. If you think Bryzgalov or Vokoun at double the salary and term of Anderson is a good move to make for a rebuilding franchise at least 2 years away from being a competitor, then again, I don't know what to tell you.

And re: my line about "I don't care", I wasn't talking about your opinion, I was talking about not validating rumors of guys from the Edmonton Journal or Eklund over guys like JC and Yost. Relax.
Quote
 
 
+3 #87 NickG 2011-03-16 16:44
Quoting defplayer:

180 74 68 20 14 2.77 .913

258 120 96 — 16 2.55 .914

261 264 41 - 43 2.56 .917
Who's stats are who's? Bryz vs Anderson vs Vokoun

Don't forget, all those people also wanted Vokoun at a Kovalchuk rate.
Quote
 
 
+2 #88 The Dutch Treat 2011-03-16 16:47
Quoting SNOOPY SENIOR:
@ The Dutch Treat,

Show me your abilities over 2 years, and then I might DOUBLE your salary !??

Do not have your agent try to get you DOUBLE your last contract, before earning all of it !!

The problem is always the same, "Show me the money".



Sadly Snoop, that's not how it works in the NHL. You tell any player who knows that there is a free agent market for him: "Here's a low ball salary, if you play well, then we'll double it", you can forget about it signing him or any talented player to any deal.

Again, for those of you saying: "If Anderson wants anything more than x amount over x years then forget it!" WHO will you sign in his place? Overpay for Vokoun or Bryz? Settle for Theodore or Matthieu Garon? What? We all know Lehner isn't ready and won't be for two years MINIMUM. What are our options?
Quote
 
 
+3 #89 SensChops 2011-03-16 16:47
I've heard that both Bryz and Vokoun want to re-sign or sign with a sure playoff contender. I would say the latter is more inclined to sign with another team that is likely going to make it through after the regular season. The Sens have been tagged as a team rebuilding. This would likely turn both of these elite tenders away from here. Vokoun is getting older (34) and wants a chance at winning the cup.

I highly doubt either are interested in coming to Ottawa unless we offer something ridiculous that bites us in the ass in the future.
Quote
 
 
-2 #90 conor smythe 2011-03-16 16:49
Ilove this thumbs up, thumbs down thing

Its kinda misleading though, just like plus minus in the NHL.

Somebody could post something, like 'trade chris kelly' and get a whole lot of haters

But a few months later you look at it, and it turns out to be a good move.

will be interesting to see if all the people giving the thumbs downs actually know what they're talking about, or if they're just haters..
Quote
 
 
+5 #91 NickG 2011-03-16 16:53
Quoting conor smythe:
Ilove this thumbs up, thumbs down thing

Its kinda misleading though, just like plus minus in the NHL.

Somebody could post something, like 'trade chris kelly' and get a whole lot of haters

But a few months later you look at it, and it turns out to be a good move.

will be interesting to see if all the people giving the thumbs downs actually know what they're talking about, or if they're just haters..

Well, most Sens fans are fairly balanced. At least there's no Habs fans here. We'd all be minus a million by now.
Quote
 
 
+1 #92 conor smythe 2011-03-16 16:59
Quoting defplayer:
180 74 68 20 14 2.77 .913

258 120 96 — 16 2.55 .914

Who's stats are who's? Bryz vs Anderson

According to the almighty posters, one is worth double the other. And we would be crazy to give one of the above 3 year $10m but crazy not to give the other guy 3 year $15m???

WTF?



Def, those stats don't belong to either of them...check your source
Quote
 
 
+1 #93 NickG 2011-03-16 17:06
Anderson:
93w - 87L - 21otL :: 2.81gaa - .912sv% - 15so

Bryzgalov:
151w - 113L - 33otL :: 2.55gaa - .915sv% - 22so

Vokoun:
261w - 264L - 43otL :: 2.56gaa - .917sv% - 43so

Source TSN (NHL Totals)
Quote
 
 
-1 #94 defplayer 2011-03-16 17:08
Quoting conor smythe:
Quoting defplayer:
180 74 68 20 14 2.77 .913

258 120 96 — 16 2.55 .914

Who's stats are who's? Bryz vs Anderson

According to the almighty posters, one is worth double the other. And we would be crazy to give one of the above 3 year $10m but crazy not to give the other guy 3 year $15m???

WTF?



Def, those stats don't belong to either of them...check your source


GD Wikipedia
Quote
 
 
+12 #95 Carmelo 2011-03-16 17:12
Dany heatley suspended two games for his hit on Ott.

haha dick.
Quote
 
 
+3 #96 Timmac 2011-03-16 17:19
Quoting SNOOPY SENIOR:
@ Timmac,

Anderson is an average good goalie, earning $1,812,500 on his last contract. Signing him for $3million is a 50% increase, and for 3 years is at least $9 million.

Let's see how he pans out in balance of games before he signs on the dotted line !


What is an "average good goalie" and how does that differ from an "above average goalie"? Would you say he is an experienced NHL starter? Because they generally get paid more than 1,812,500. The guy has two shaky games and all the sudden he is only worth $2m. He is the best shot the team has at solid goaltending for the next couple of years. Unless you want to overpay for Vokoun? To be confident in that position for the rebuild is good for 3m/year. Which must be about an average price for a veteran starter on his second contract.
Quote
 
 
-2 #97 JABSMilez 2011-03-16 17:45
In no way has Anderson's play this year been consistent. So you have last year, and half a year before that? As I said, he's unproven as a starter, but good enough to start. But he is not in the top half of the nhl goaltenders and whether for next year, 3 years from now or 5 years from now, I would do what it takes to have a top end goaltender.

The roster that's been playing this year since the deadline, and the roster with Spezza before his injury, was getting points in close to 50% of the games with no #1 goalie for almost 2/3 of that time. The team next year will not be a bottom feeder unless Spezza, Alfie and Michalek are injured long term again. This team has a chance at making the playoffs next year if not the year after, so yes I want to give them the best shot at competing.

My philosophy is much like BM's, hence why I agree with a lot of what he does. There is no need for a 3-5+ year rebuild, and the team is already better then that.
Quote
 
 
-2 #98 SNOOPY SENIOR 2011-03-16 17:58
@ The Dutch Treat,

He is a slightly above average goalie, I will give you that.
An increase of $500,000 to $1,187,500, brings him to : $2,312,500 up to $3,000,000 for 2 year contract.

How do we know that he will perform as a slightly above average goalie ?? What if he turns into a Leclaire or Elliott ??

Curtis McElhinney played very well against the Lightning, and he might be a great backup to Anderson in the rebuild.
We do not need a Bryzg nor a Vokoun ever.

Simply never overpay for a goalie, but consider investing in 2 snipers for Spezza.
Quote
 
 
+6 #99 MehadiK 2011-03-16 17:59
In other news heatley got 2 games; I surely thought he would've demanded a trade to the KHL for this
Quote
 
 
-5 #100 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 18:50
Nice to see the same 3-5 people putting negative ratings on posts, even the ones that aren't stating something that can be rated as a plus or minus.

But somehow defplayer posts incorrect stats and gets a +5 rating lol, what a joke!

The best part of that thumbs up thumbs down system is I now realize how much of a waste of time trying to be rational with some of you has been. Best of luck in your bubbles.
Quote
 
 
0 #101 Yann 2011-03-16 19:23
B-Sens are losing tonight 3-2 !! Wick with 2 goals, one of then is a SG.
Quote
 
 
+2 #102 SensChirp 2011-03-16 19:28
Finally some action in the comment section! A little dispute between posters is always good for the comment count.
Quote
 
 
0 #103 SensChirp 2011-03-16 19:32
Maybe we could use the Yost section for a Chirp of the Week feature while we wait for Yost's arrival. Got something on your mind? Send it to
Quote
 
 
+3 #104 defplayer 2011-03-16 20:01
@JABZ

Deep breathe. The stats I posted were once correct (haha). The 'to date' stats paint the same picture.

The point I was trying to make, which was missed by the comment section guru of goalies, is that all have similar numbers. Yet, two are valued as true number ones and one is "not yet proven" and thus not worth the estimated $3.5 per that has been discussed. Whereas, if the other two were made offers $3.5m would be a steal.

If you play 150 games in front of terrible and/or developing hockey teams and post a above .9% saves percentage while winning games for your team, do you not think that $3.5 million is fair?

What the hell does this guy have to do to prove he is a true number one worth $3.5m? Take a puck in the face while sitting on the bench?
Quote
 
 
+3 #105 Sandy 2011-03-16 20:03
@JABS

The goalies on that list are very good indeed. But I do remember earlier this season very bad stretches for Brodeur, Kiprusoff, Lundquist, Miller, Halak.

Even great goalies go through rough patches.

Anderson is probably tier 2 goalie. No one, that I can remember reading referred to him as a Brodeur or Roy... because he certainly was not that.

He has played some very good games for this team. The last 2 not so well. But where was he help.. NOWHERE.
I can't remember what goal it was last night.. but Kuba was caught up ice with an odd-man rush the other way... then he lazily skates back to the Sens end too late to do anything.
No wonder Karlsson struggles when playing with Kuba. I don't think Kuba will be with the Sens next season.. the question is how do you get rid of him.
Quote
 
 
+3 #106 The Dutch Treat 2011-03-16 20:06
Quoting JABSmilez:
Nice to see the same 3-5 people putting negative ratings on posts, even the ones that aren't stating something that can be rated as a plus or minus.

But somehow defplayer posts incorrect stats and gets a +5 rating lol, what a joke!

The best part of that thumbs up thumbs down system is I now realize how much of a waste of time trying to be rational with some of you has been. Best of luck in your bubbles.


Again, you haven't answered my question: if Anderson is "unproven" then who does team sign? Vokoun & Bryzgalov are not coming here. Despite your optimism, a team led by Spezza, Michalek (both of which haven't played a full season in 2 years) and an aging Alfredsson, littered with youth and a sub-par defense will find it hard to compete next year. Who will be the goalie for this team while it rebuilds over the next 2-3 years?

Back to my "bubble".
Quote
 
 
+3 #107 Andrews Theory 2011-03-16 20:15
i think anderson is the right goalie for this team for the next few years. he brings better tending than we`ve had in quite some time but more importantly veteran leadership and a good personality.

not really sure why people care whether we pay him 2 million or 4 million, we aren`t going to be against the cap and we aren`t in a position where an elite goalie is the best fit for us.

personally i have no issue with the sens re-signing both goalies we have now. i`d go two years on anderson and 1 year on mc.
Quote
 
 
+2 #108 Sandy 2011-03-16 20:17
Quoting NickG:
Anderson:
93w - 87L - 21otL :: 2.81gaa - .912sv% - 15so

Bryzgalov:
151w - 113L - 33otL :: 2.55gaa - .915sv% - 22so

Vokoun:
261w - 264L - 43otL :: 2.56gaa - .917sv% - 43so

Source TSN (NHL Totals)


Thanks for the update on these stats.

Pretty close save % for all 3 -- with Anderson being the younger of the 3 and probably less playing time.

Vokoun & Bryz will not be in Ottawa. They will want to go where they get a chance at the Cup -- and with Ottawa that's not happening any time soon. If Philly has the Cap Space they will land one of these two.

Just think Murray had the chance to grab Bryz off of waivers and did not.. just think there would have been no Glascal Leclaire/
Quote
 
 
0 #109 Andrews Theory 2011-03-16 20:23
chrip,

how come some comments dont offer the thumbs up / thumbs down?
Quote
 
 
0 #110 NickG 2011-03-16 20:24
Quoting Andrews Theory:
chrip,

how come some comments dont offer the thumbs up / thumbs down?

Only your own won't show up.
Quote
 
 
0 #111 Andrews Theory 2011-03-16 20:27
really?

i hopped on the site with a different computer and it appeared the same. that being said i had logged on with that computer in the past.
Quote
 
 
0 #112 Sandy 2011-03-16 20:32
Bingo lost the game tonight. They are losing their grip on a playoff position.
Sens have to send some better players down to help or there will be no playoffs at all.

Brust was in net tonight..

Too bad some of the prospects in Europe & College aren't available yet.. Rundblad's team, being the underdog, beat a strong team of Petersson's HV71... so he still keeps on playing.

Does anyone know if Petersson's injury is still bothering him? Is it possible to get him signed to play some games the rest of the season?
Quote
 
 
0 #113 Sandy 2011-03-16 20:36
Update on Rundblad's regular season:

http://www.silversevensens.com/2011/3/6/2033477/swedish-elite-league-playoffs-begin-tomorrow
Quote
 
 
+3 #114 MoeDozer 2011-03-16 20:41
this is a bit irrelevant but did anyone see the dirty elbow by Heatley on Ott. he got a 2 game suspension and he will forfeit $80,645.16 in salary
Quote
 
 
-1 #115 JABSmilez 2011-03-16 21:22
@defplayer - Please read where this all started. I've said several times I'm not against signing Anderson if he's the best left and 3 mil area is where I'd envision him being a good price. He is not equal to Bryzgalav though, I hope you can agree with that, it goes beyond just the stats, but even the stats show it.

@Sandy - I agree about all goalies having bad stretches and good stretches. I actually made a similar statement earlier in this thread. I completely admit he's a starter in the nhl, I just put him in the bottom half.

@The Dutch Treat - I've mentioned several times over the last few months my order for UFA goalies is Bryzgalov, Vokoun, Anderson. Howard used to be above Anderson, but that is my list. You are discussing as if I am 100% against signing him, he's 3rd on the list and not worth overpaying.
Quote
 
 
0 #116 NickG 2011-03-16 22:27
In my mind, Howard is still backing up Osgood. haha
Quote
 
 
0 #117 tambbeef 2013-01-31 23:27
buy a ralph lauren purple labelfake chanel handbagshermes replica bagsaaa replica bagspolo ralph lauren childrenhermes birkin pricepolo ralph lauren hoodiegucci online shoppolo black ralph laurenboutique vuittonugg boot sale uk AsvDhLnx [URL=http://www .top--designer- brands.net/ - 7 star replica handbags[/URL - [URL=http://www .gucci-outlet20 13.net/ - fake gucci bags[/URL - [URL=http://www .replica-handba gs2013.com/ - designer bags for less[/URL - [URL=http://www .chanel--online -shop.org/ - chanel outlet[/URL - [URL=http://www .spyder-jackets 2013.com/ - spyder ski jackets[/URL - [URL=http://www .ugg-boots-uk20 13.com/ - ugg store uk[/URL - [URL=http://www .ralph--lauren. org/ - ralph lauren ties[/URL - [URL=http://www .hermes-outlet2 013.com/ - hermes outlet online[/URL - [URL=http://www .ugg-boots-uk20 13.com/ - genuine ugg boots uk[/URL - [URL=http://www .ralph--lauren. org/ - ralph lauren polos[/URL - [URL=http://www .ralph--lauren. org/ - ralph lauren promo code[/URL - to take huge discount zyneaByM http://www.louis-vuitton-outlet2013.com/
Quote
 
 
0 #118 tambbeef 2013-01-31 23:27
buy a ralph lauren purple labelfake chanel handbagshermes replica bagsaaa replica bagspolo ralph lauren childrenhermes birkin pricepolo ralph lauren hoodiegucci online shoppolo black ralph laurenboutique vuittonugg boot sale uk AsvDhLnx [URL=http://www .top--designer- brands.net/ - 7 star replica handbags[/URL - [URL=http://www .gucci-outlet20 13.net/ - fake gucci bags[/URL - [URL=http://www .replica-handba gs2013.com/ - designer bags for less[/URL - [URL=http://www .chanel--online -shop.org/ - chanel outlet[/URL - [URL=http://www .spyder-jackets 2013.com/ - spyder ski jackets[/URL - [URL=http://www .ugg-boots-uk20 13.com/ - ugg store uk[/URL - [URL=http://www .ralph--lauren. org/ - ralph lauren ties[/URL - [URL=http://www .hermes-outlet2 013.com/ - hermes outlet online[/URL - [URL=http://www .ugg-boots-uk20 13.com/ - genuine ugg boots uk[/URL - [URL=http://www .ralph--lauren. org/ - ralph lauren polos[/URL - [URL=http://www .ralph--lauren. org/ - ralph lauren promo code[/URL - to take huge discount zyneaByM http://www.louis-vuitton-outlet2013.com/
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Senschirp Blog Sens Fall on Home Ice-O'Brien/Benoit to Bingo

Contact SensChirp

About SensChirp

  • Welcome to the new and I believe, improved SensChirp. It's the same old blog - breaking news, insider info and everything Sens.