Feature Story

  • Another Playoff Moment

    Something I learned at a young age, is that if you approach playoffs with the "Cup or bust" mentality, you'll completely miss the real beauty of this magical time of year.

    Playoffs are all about those "moments". Those where were you when, kind of moments. The ones that stick with you for days, weeks, even years to come. And as Ottawa Senators fans, we have been pretty spoiled the last couple of seasons.

    Written on Monday, 20 May 2013 19:15
    Comments (18) Read 1679 times
  • Sponsor

  • Sponsor 2

Wednesday, 08 August 2012 10:10

Early August Rumblings

With a week already gone in the month of August, the start of NHL training camp is suddenly just a little over a month away.

Obviously that statement comes with a significant asterisk as CBA negotiations continue to loom over the start of the 2012/2013 season.  The NHLPA is expected to make a counter proposal in the next couple of days and the current feeling from both sides is that it will be tough to get something in place before September 15th when the old CBA expires.

That doesn't necessarily mean the start of the season will be delayed but it's not exactly a good sign for fans that are hungry for the start of the next NHL season.

As we enter the dog days of summer, there has been an obvious lull in Sens related news.

And while there's still time for the Senators to make another move to shore up their top six, it sounds like things are fairly quiet for Murray and his staff right now.  They have kept a close eye on the Anaheim Ducks but according to people I have spoken with, the price is far too high for Murray's liking right now.

And really, why wouldn't Ducks GM Bob Murray ask for the world? 

Despite the public comments made by Ryan, the Ducks are not in a situation where they have to move the New Jersey native.  They can listen to offers but if the interested General Managers aren't meeting his asking price, he can hang on to the winger.  The Ducks will be interesting to watch over the next 11 months or so.  With both Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry set to become unrestricted free agents, difficult decisions will have to be made in Anaheim.

The Sens will continue to monitor the situation with Ryan closely but as of right now, I would call it a long shot.

  • Have read some talk about the possibility of moving Sergei Gonchar the past couple days.  Can confirm that while the Senators have explored that option and will continue to, there isn’t a whole lot going on right now.  The Flyers would be an interesting option but moving Gonchar would leave a fairly significant void on the Sens blue line and would see them slide another $5 mil below the cap floor.  Also important to note that Gonchar has a full no-trade clause right now and on January 1, 2013, can submit a ten team trade list.
Last modified on Wednesday, 08 August 2012 09:11

Comments   Jump to Last Post

 
-2 #1 AlfieforMayor11 2012-08-08 09:21
Our defense already isnt very impressive as it stands. Trading Gonchar who can still play in the top four on the Sens would be a big mistake unless they can replace him with another puck moving defenseman.

Like chirp mentioned, Gonchar has a full NMC until January first when he must submit a list of ten teams he would accept a trade to. I don't think that Murray trades Gonch until the deadline and that's only if we don't have a shot of making the playoffs.

I know Gonchar's game leaves a lot to be desired, especially at a price tag of 5.5 million, but whether we like it or not we still need the guy.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 Hoeeeeeeeeee 2012-08-08 09:22
Gonchar + Bishop
for
Simmonds?
Quote
 
 
0 #3 AlfieforMayor11 2012-08-08 09:35
Quoting Hoeeeeeeeeee:
Gonchar + Bishop
for
Simmonds?


Wishful thinking my friend. Simmonds would be too sick. Don't think Philly considers that trade for a second.
Quote
 
 
+1 #4 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-08-08 09:43
Although many posters and fans would love to see Gonchar
moved, the timing is not the best right now.

He might be slow and older, but he can still mentor a few young guys, till the end of his contract.

He is also a great asset on our Power Play, and can play both on left or right side, which not too many defencemen can accomplish !

Most important, is his chemistry with Jared Cowen :

Cowen- Gonchar !!!!!!!
Quote
 
 
-2 #5 WeAreSensFans! 2012-08-08 09:44
gonchar, bishop, weircroitch and 1st for ryan...

Anaheim seems to believe in the fountain of youth so why not?

it would be a steal for us, and make it a 2014 1st (close to 30th pick...)

then we fleeced them
Quote
 
 
-1 #6 WeAreSensFans! 2012-08-08 09:47
gonchar and a 2nd for toffoli?

that would be another decent fleece.
Quote
 
 
0 #7 C.J. 2012-08-08 09:48
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
Quoting Hoeeeeeeeeee:
Gonchar + Bishop
for
Simmonds?


Wishful thinking my friend. Simmonds would be too sick. Don't think Philly considers that trade for a second.


I really don't think a trade like that is too far off, maybe if we add a 2nd rounder from this year or 2014 1st rounder we could get a top six forward out of Philly, they do have 8 of them... Haha. I'd be incredibly happy to see Simmonds or Hartnell come our way!
Quote
 
 
-2 #8 NikoTn 2012-08-08 09:50
I am one guy who does not want to see Gonchar moved at this point in time.

He is a veteran presence and no matter how much you bad mouth him, he was one of the premier defenseman in the league and still is highly serviceable and a power-play specialist.

And after what Malkin said about him at the awards, and with the youth on this team, nobody should be pushing him out of town just yet. We have no one to replace him at all.

Depending on this season and if he regresses, I'd even re-sign him.
Quote
 
 
+2 #9 WeAreSensFans! 2012-08-08 09:55
Quoting NikoTn:
I am one guy who does not want to see Gonchar moved at this point in time.

He is a veteran presence and no matter how much you bad mouth him, he was one of the premier defenseman in the league and still is highly serviceable and a power-play specialist.

And after what Malkin said about him at the awards, and with the youth on this team, nobody should be pushing him out of town just yet. We have no one to replace him at all.

Depending on this season and if he regresses, I'd even re-sign him.


i forgot we need gonchar to mentor our other russian born player... some guy named filatov
Quote
 
 
-4 #10 filliam 2012-08-08 09:57
Random question I've always wondered about: Why do you people think Murray thinks the game is trending towards the need for puck moving defencemen? The only thing I can think of is the elimination of the 2 line pass rule, but that has been gone for several years now.
Quote
 
 
0 #11 NikoTn 2012-08-08 09:59
Quoting WeAreSensFans!:
Quoting NikoTn:
I am one guy who does not want to see Gonchar moved at this point in time.

He is a veteran presence and no matter how much you bad mouth him, he was one of the premier defenseman in the league and still is highly serviceable and a power-play specialist.

And after what Malkin said about him at the awards, and with the youth on this team, nobody should be pushing him out of town just yet. We have no one to replace him at all.

Depending on this season and if he regresses, I'd even re-sign him.


i forgot we need gonchar to mentor our other russian born player... some guy named filatov



What I am saying is that he is a good mentor for young players; being Russian has nothing to do with it.
Quote
 
 
-4 #12 filliam 2012-08-08 10:07
Why did I get a minus for my post I was asking a question about a thought that Murray has expressed several times in interviews. I don't understand why Murray says that and I was hoping someone would inform me...
Quote
 
 
+2 #13 Sens-sational 2012-08-08 10:09
Unless we can trade him for His replacement (Bowmeester...) , then we keep Gonchar and look at our options come trade deadline. His value then might be much higher than it is now, and a contender looking to bolster their blue line might salivate at the potential addition of Gonchar to put them over the top. For now, let him and Cowen continue their work. This team still needs his veteran presence.
Quote
 
 
-2 #14 C.J. 2012-08-08 10:12
Quoting filliam:
Why did I get a minus for my post I was asking a question about a thought that Murray has expressed several times in interviews. I don't understand why Murray says that and I was hoping someone would inform me...


Hahaha honestly what the hell
Quote
 
 
+2 #15 Tcharger 2012-08-08 10:14
Who cares why...I think people use the +/- for shits and giggles.
Quote
 
 
+3 #16 RUSHRLZ 2012-08-08 10:16
Quoting Sens-sational:
Unless we can trade him for His replacement (Bowmeester...), then we keep Gonchar and look at our options come trade deadline. His value then might be much higher than it is now, and a contender looking to bolster their blue line might salivate at the potential addition of Gonchar to put them over the top. For now, let him and Cowen continue their work. This team still needs his veteran presence.


This. Not only may his value skyrocket around that time, it will also allow us to figure out how we are doing in the standings at that point in time and possibly need to keep him for a run.
Quote
 
 
+9 #17 Dirtysweet 2012-08-08 10:22
Hartnell=suck it Phaneuf
Quote
 
 
0 #18 Sens-sational 2012-08-08 10:22
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Quoting Sens-sational:
Unless we can trade him for His replacement (Bowmeester...), then we keep Gonchar and look at our options come trade deadline. His value then might be much higher than it is now, and a contender looking to bolster their blue line might salivate at the potential addition of Gonchar to put them over the top. For now, let him and Cowen continue their work. This team still needs his veteran presence.


This. Not only may his value skyrocket around that time, it will also allow us to figure out how we are doing in the standings at that point in time and possibly need to keep him for a run.


Exactly! At peak value, he may very well land us a lower 1st round pick. And realistically, this team is more in need of defensive depth than offensive depth. Our prospect cupboard is loaded at forward positions, but not so much on the blue line. I don't see the point in losing Gonchar for another forward. Of course, I'd be interested in Ryan, but less so in Simmonds etc. Wouldn't that just create a bigger problem in 2-3 years when Zibanejad, Noesen, Silfv, Stone, etc are roster players. Teams don't carry 4 scoring lines.
Quote
 
 
-4 #19 Sens-sational 2012-08-08 10:30
Latest Consensus?

Michalek - Spezza - Silfverberg
Latendresse - Turris - Alfie
Greening - Zbad/Regin - Condra
OBrien - Smith - Neil
Daugavins - Butler

I'm uncomfortable with line 3. Swap Condra for Neil?
Quote
 
 
+2 #20 SkipOPot2Mus 2012-08-08 10:31
No way we would get hartnell. I think its safe to say our roster is pretty much set. I was all for bobby ryan but if the price is WAY to high then its not worth screwing up the rebuild.

michalek spezza silfverberg
latendresse turris alfie
greening smith/regin condra
daugavins obrien/smith neil

Karlsson Methot
Cowen Gonchar
Phillips lundin

Anderson
Bishop/lehner
Quote
 
 
+7 #21 NikoTn 2012-08-08 10:32
Quoting Sens-sational:
Latest Consensus?

Michalek - Spezza - Silfverberg
Latendresse - Turris - Alfie
Greening - Zbad/Regin - Condra
OBrien - Smith - Neil
Daugavins - Butler

I'm uncomfortable with line 3. Swap Condra for Neil?


Butler isn't on the team anymore.
Quote
 
 
+1 #22 Sens-sational 2012-08-08 10:36
Quoting NikoTn:
Quoting Sens-sational:
Latest Consensus?

Michalek - Spezza - Silfverberg
Latendresse - Turris - Alfie
Greening - Zbad/Regin - Condra
OBrien - Smith - Neil
Daugavins - Butler

I'm uncomfortable with line 3. Swap Condra for Neil?


Butler isn't on the team anymore.


My bad!
Is Smith quality enough to play 3C? IMO, one of the most wide open spots on the roster is the 3C. Smith, Regin, Zibanejab are all fighting for that spot. I like Smith on 4 personally. I feel it adds more depth. Hoping Regin shows us why we held on for so long...
Quote
 
 
+2 #23 Sensnation 2012-08-08 10:42
To me the "should we trade Gonchar or not" comes down to 2 players. If either of Ceci or Wiercioch are ready this year, move him, if not keep him until the deadline and see what you can get for him then.
Quote
 
 
0 #24 RUSHRLZ 2012-08-08 10:44
Get to know your "insiders". I saw @HockeyyInsider r Tweet this 16 hours ago. Lucky guess?

Jeff Skinner and #Canes have agreed to multi year extension. #DoneDeal to be announced within 48 hours. #CONFIRMED

People slam some of these guys like @incarceratedbo b for example I have followed for almost 2 years and he pulls shit like this constantly, in his case NFL news predominantly.

Me might say (just an example) #Sens shopping Gonchar, So far interest from #Flyers #Stars and #Wings.

Maybe Gonch to those three teams might never pan out but it doesn't meant here wasn't interest, and he will often do #CONFIRMED deals 2 days before the mainstream media gets wind.
Quote
 
 
+1 #25 C.J. 2012-08-08 10:48
Quoting Sens-sational:
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Quoting Sens-sational:
Unless we can trade him for His replacement (Bowmeester...), then we keep Gonchar and look at our options come trade deadline. His value then might be much higher than it is now, and a contender looking to bolster their blue line might salivate at the potential addition of Gonchar to put them over the top. For now, let him and Cowen continue their work. This team still needs his veteran presence.


This. Not only may his value skyrocket around that time, it will also allow us to figure out how we are doing in the standings at that point in time and possibly need to keep him for a run.


Exactly! At peak value, he may very well land us a lower 1st round pick. And realistically, this team is more in need of defensive depth than offensive depth. Our prospect cupboard is loaded at forward positions, but not so much on the blue line. I don't see the point in losing Gonchar for another forward. Of course, I'd be interested in Ryan, but less so in Simmonds etc. Wouldn't that just create a bigger problem in 2-3 years when Zibanejad, Noesen, Silfv, Stone, etc are roster players. Teams don't carry 4 scoring lines.


Well keep in mind not all of these prospects listed here will become top sixers, and even if they all did let's say, since when does having an excess of top six forwards pose a problem? Haha. Worst case scenario trade the excess forward for whatever you're lacking. Problem solved.

I'm just worried Gonchar will have a crap year and we get absolutely nothing for him, at least right now he could peak the interest of the Flyers, and maybe help with our rebuild by getting us a solid return.
Quote
 
 
0 #26 NikoTn 2012-08-08 10:52
Quoting Sensnation:
To me the "should we trade Gonchar or not" comes down to 2 players. If either of Ceci or Wiercioch are ready this year, move him, if not keep him until the deadline and see what you can get for him then.


I'd say keep him until the deadline regardless, his value can't be less than it is now. Besides, it is a contract year.
Quote
 
 
-3 #27 SensFanInMTL 2012-08-08 10:53
Why do most of you guys constantly not include/ forget about Puempel? Was he not a 1st rounder? Murray could've said "fuck it, I'm happy with two 1st rounders, let the other 6 be selected and we'll move onto the 2nd round." Is he not a point per game player for his entire junior career? Am I the only one who thinks this kid could be a threat down the middle with a playmaking centreman?

Thumbs up for you guys for never including him as part of the Noesen, Zibanejad, Stone, Silfverberg rebuilding tools. Thumbs down for you guys for never including him as part of the Noesen, Zibanejad, Stone, Silfverberg rebuilding tools.
Quote
 
 
+1 #28 Sensnation 2012-08-08 10:57
Quoting NikoTn:
Quoting Sensnation:
To me the "should we trade Gonchar or not" comes down to 2 players. If either of Ceci or Wiercioch are ready this year, move him, if not keep him until the deadline and see what you can get for him then.


I'd say keep him until the deadline regardless, his value can't be less than it is now. Besides, it is a contract year.


What do you mean? His value can easily decrease either through injury or a further noticeable decrease in his skill level. Right now, while it's summer time, people forget that he was not one of the main catalysts to our big run last year. His value is pretty good right now, the only way it goes higher is if he stays healthy and performs better than he did last year, leading up to the deadline. Personally I'd rather not have to wait and hope that everything goes perfectly for him.
Quote
 
 
0 #29 Sensnation 2012-08-08 10:59
Quoting SensFanInMTL:
Why do most of you guys constantly not include/ forget about Puempel? Was he not a 1st rounder? Murray could've said "fuck it, I'm happy with two 1st rounders, let the other 6 be selected and we'll move onto the 2nd round." Is he not a point per game player for his entire junior career? Am I the only one who thinks this kid could be a threat down the middle with a playmaking centreman?

Thumbs up for you guys for never including him as part of the Noesen, Zibanejad, Stone, Silfverberg rebuilding tools. Thumbs down for you guys for never including him as part of the Noesen, Zibanejad, Stone, Silfverberg rebuilding tools.


He's included pretty often on this site by posters. The difference you need to realize is that he's normally not included when talked about for this coming year's roster because his chance of making it is about 1%. He had a tough injury riddled season last year and will need a bit more time before he's ready to start making a run at the NHL roster.

Most posters do include him though when talking about our core in 2-3 years. Also though, don't forget, he was the high risk high reward pick of that draft, so that already means he's not guaranteed to become an NHL player.
Quote
 
 
+3 #30 WeAreSensFans! 2012-08-08 11:04
Quoting SensFanInMTL:
Why do most of you guys constantly not include/ forget about Puempel? Was he not a 1st rounder? Murray could've said "fuck it, I'm happy with two 1st rounders, let the other 6 be selected and we'll move onto the 2nd round." Is he not a point per game player for his entire junior career? Am I the only one who thinks this kid could be a threat down the middle with a playmaking centreman?

Thumbs up for you guys for never including him as part of the Noesen, Zibanejad, Stone, Silfverberg rebuilding tools. Thumbs down for you guys for never including him as part of the Noesen, Zibanejad, Stone, Silfverberg rebuilding tools.


Puempel will be good, there's little doubt. He's just not nearly ready enough to be involved in the NHL talk yet... his time will come, but just not this year.
Quote
 
 
0 #31 Sandy 2012-08-08 11:09
Gonchar wants to play in Sochi in 2014.. So he needs to play 2 more NHL seasons... 1 with Ottawa. In order for him to get a decent contract in the NHL next year should be motivation enough for him to have a good year this next season.

What if Malkin wants to walk away from Pitts in 2 yrs as he doesn't want to play 2nd fiddle to Crosby his entire career... signing Gonchar -- may help if Ottawa makes a bid for Malkin as a UFA... It may be worth it to keep Gonchar past this season, even if he has declined, in order to get a shot at one of the best players in the game.. put him on Spezza's wing.. and holy cow...

Crazy thinking?
Quote
 
 
+1 #32 Rover 2012-08-08 11:09
I would say that very few posters on this site include Puempel when making their list of untradeable/unt ouchable assets. I would say that's fairly reasonable given the high risk high reward label he was given.If we are doing a Q4Q trade, we want the proven asset and someone else gets the risk...
Quote
 
 
+1 #33 AlfieforMayor11 2012-08-08 11:11
Quoting Sandy:
Gonchar wants to play in Sochi in 2014.. So he needs to play 2 more NHL seasons... 1 with Ottawa. In order for him to get a decent contract in the NHL next year should be motivation enough for him to have a good year this next season.

What if Malkin wants to walk away from Pitts in 2 yrs as he doesn't want to play 2nd fiddle to Crosby his entire career... signing Gonchar -- may help if Ottawa makes a bid for Malkin as a UFA... It may be worth it to keep Gonchar past this season, even if he has declined, in order to get a shot at one of the best players in the game.. put him on Spezza's wing.. and holy cow...

Crazy thinking?


You're such a dreamer Sandy haha I like the way you think but Malkin is a stretch.
Quote
 
 
+5 #34 The Apostle 2012-08-08 11:22
The only way I want Gonchar to end next season as a Senator is if he is wearing a cap with Stanley Cup Champion written on it.
Quote
 
 
0 #35 Sandy 2012-08-08 11:26
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
Quoting Sandy:
Gonchar wants to play in Sochi in 2014.. So he needs to play 2 more NHL seasons... 1 with Ottawa. In order for him to get a decent contract in the NHL next year should be motivation enough for him to have a good year this next season.

What if Malkin wants to walk away from Pitts in 2 yrs as he doesn't want to play 2nd fiddle to Crosby his entire career... signing Gonchar -- may help if Ottawa makes a bid for Malkin as a UFA... It may be worth it to keep Gonchar past this season, even if he has declined, in order to get a shot at one of the best players in the game.. put him on Spezza's wing.. and holy cow...

Crazy thinking?


You're such a dreamer Sandy haha I like the way you think but Malkin is a stretch.


Nothing wrong with being a dreamer... But it's not a stretch to think that Malkin could walk away from the Pens. He plays his best when Crosby is out... so any other team he would go to he would arguably be the best player... but yes it is a stretch by a long shot to think Ottawa would be in the running for Malkin.. but don't underestimate his feelings for Gonchar.. it's akin to Karlsson and Alfie...
Quote
 
 
0 #36 Rover 2012-08-08 11:34
http://www.towntopics.com/wordpress/2012/08/08/after-3rd-prospects-camp-with-ottawa-senators-pu-hockeys-sdao-getting-comfortable-with-club/

great little article on Sdao
Quote
 
 
0 #37 NikoTn 2012-08-08 11:56
Quoting Sensnation:
Quoting NikoTn:
Quoting Sensnation:
To me the "should we trade Gonchar or not" comes down to 2 players. If either of Ceci or Wiercioch are ready this year, move him, if not keep him until the deadline and see what you can get for him then.


I'd say keep him until the deadline regardless, his value can't be less than it is now. Besides, it is a contract year.


What do you mean? His value can easily decrease either through injury or a further noticeable decrease in his skill level. Right now, while it's summer time, people forget that he was not one of the main catalysts to our big run last year. His value is pretty good right now, the only way it goes higher is if he stays healthy and performs better than he did last year, leading up to the deadline. Personally I'd rather not have to wait and hope that everything goes perfectly for him.


Unless you name is Glen Sather, people don't forget how a player was last season.

Gonchar had a good season last year. I thought he was great in the playoffs. If Ottawa trades him now, that is a HUGE gap to fill. Especially salary wise where we would be around 9 mill under the cap....

This means we'd either have to sign a retarded contract (Doan) or we'd be taking back salary which would clutter our team anyway.

I just don't think he gets moved now and that he is underestimated in fans minds. That is all.
Quote
 
 
-1 #38 ZipZapRap 2012-08-08 12:01
To lose Gonchar is to lose a guy who has given up, a guy who has zero passion or heart in a sens jersey, We will lose a player who gets boo'd at the season opener and is a terrible example for our young D men.

Yeah dont trade that guy, he is exactly what the wannabe sens fans our looking for. A name, "But it's Gonchar" "GONCHAR!!!" he has a coool name and he was once good so lets keep him. His name is so cool and familiar that he might be good on the top line with Spezza.

Yeee hawwwwww

Lets resign mike fisher based on his smile, seems like a good move right fans?
Quote
 
 
+1 #39 Sandy 2012-08-08 12:06
Quoting Rover:
http://www.towntopics.com/wordpress/2012/08/08/after-3rd-prospects-camp-with-ottawa-senators-pu-hockeys-sdao-getting-comfortable-with-club/

great little article on Sdao


Very good article. I like what he said that Ottawa is a great city... too bad more NHL players don't realize that...

6'4" -- 230 lbs? Wow.. combine him with Ben Blood 6'3 and listed as 212.. Then Eric Gryba at 6'4" and 222 lbs.. Also Borowiecki and Methot...

If these guys do make the NHL wow.. what a tough defense added to Karlsson, Cowen, Weircoch, Ceci...

That has the potential to be a highly skilled and one tough mean in your face defense in the future.

I know in the immediate future we say there is no depth on defense.. but 4 or 5 yrs down the road.. there could well be...
Quote
 
 
0 #40 Sandy 2012-08-08 12:07
Quoting ZipZapRap:
To lose Gonchar is to lose a guy who has given up, a guy who has zero passion or heart in a sens jersey, We will lose a player who gets boo'd at the season opener and is a terrible example for our young D men.

Yeah dont trade that guy, he is exactly what the wannabe sens fans our looking for. A name, "But it's Gonchar" "GONCHAR!!!" he has a coool name and he was once good so lets keep him. His name is so cool and familiar that he might be good on the top line with Spezza.

Yeee hawwwwww

Lets resign mike fisher based on his smile, seems like a good move right fans?



Let me tell you, as part of the female hockey fans in this City.. there is a lot more to Mike Fisher than his smile!! LOL
Quote
 
 
0 #41 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-08-08 12:09
Quoting ZipZapRap:
To lose Gonchar is to lose a guy who has given up, a guy who has zero passion or heart in a sens jersey, We will lose a player who gets boo'd at the season opener and is a terrible example for our young D men.

Yeah dont trade that guy, he is exactly what the wannabe sens fans our looking for. A name, "But it's Gonchar" "GONCHAR!!!" he has a coool name and he was once good so lets keep him. His name is so cool and familiar that he might be good on the top line with Spezza.

Yeee hawwwwww

Lets resign mike fisher based on his smile, seems like a good move right fans?


The guy that wrote that, was talking about Malkin on a line with Spezza, not Gonchar.

Go back and read it again !!
Quote
 
 
0 #42 AlfieforMayor11 2012-08-08 12:11
. I'm not a fan of Gonchar... Never have been and I never will be, but people undervalue what he brings to this team.

If we trade Gonchar we are left with Karlsson as our one and only offensive defenseman. Cowen, Phillips, Methot, Borowiecki are all rather one dimensional, stay at home guys. Cowen will likely develop until more than that but it will take time.

Anyone who knows hockey will tell you need a decent powerplay, strong breakouts and a good transition game to have success in the NHL. This is where Gonchar helps our team. I only support a Gonchar trade now if we can replace him with an equal or better player that brings offense from the back end.

Someone like Yandle or Bouwmeester would be awesome in my opinion, preferably Yandle. If we trade Gonchar, Murray will spend the entire season looking for another offensive defenseman to replace him with.
Quote
 
 
0 #43 Sandy 2012-08-08 12:16
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
People undervalue what Gonchar brings to this team. I'm not a fan of his.. Never have been and I never will be.

If we trade Gonchar we are left with Karlsson as our one and only offensive defenseman. Cowen, Phillips, Methot, Borowiecki are all rather one dimensional, stay at home guys. Cowen will likely develop until more than that but it will take time.

Anyone who knows hockey will tell you need a decent powerplay, strong breakouts and a good transition game to have success in the NHL. This is where Gonchar helps our team. I only support a Gonchar trade now if we can replace him with an equal or better player that brings offense from the back end.

Someone like Yandle or Bouwmeester would be awesome in my opinion, preferably Yandle. If we trade Gonchar, Murray will spend the entire season looking for another offensive defenseman to replace him with.


Bouwmeester is an offensive defenseman that was playing in a defensive minded system.

What would be his upside playing with the Sens where it is an up-tempo rush the puck system. He is a good skater that may benefit in this type of game play. It would certainly get the Sens over the cap floor... It would be for 2 yrs.. so nothing really long term... a stop gap until Ceci is ready?
Quote
 
 
0 #44 GDS86 2012-08-08 12:53
i would hang on to gonchar until near trade deadline, depends on where we are in the standings, if we are out of a spot, than i would move him and get 1 or 2 pieces we can keep building with moving forward.
Quote
 
 
-1 #45 Lukus & Sens 2012-08-08 12:53
Would Calgary do this?

To OTT:
- Bowmeester

To CGY:
- Gonchar
- Bishop

Might need some tweaking but is it something that fits in their plan? I have heard rumours they might be shopping Bowmeester and Kiprusoff.
Quote
 
 
-1 #46 Lukus & Sens 2012-08-08 12:56
Quoting Sandy:
Gonchar wants to play in Sochi in 2014.. So he needs to play 2 more NHL seasons... 1 with Ottawa. In order for him to get a decent contract in the NHL next year should be motivation enough for him to have a good year this next season.

What if Malkin wants to walk away from Pitts in 2 yrs as he doesn't want to play 2nd fiddle to Crosby his entire career... signing Gonchar -- may help if Ottawa makes a bid for Malkin as a UFA... It may be worth it to keep Gonchar past this season, even if he has declined, in order to get a shot at one of the best players in the game.. put him on Spezza's wing.. and holy cow...

Crazy thinking?


Yes, it doesn't get any crazier than that!
Quote
 
 
+2 #47 Tcharger 2012-08-08 12:59
Quoting Lukus & Sens:
Would Calgary do this?

To OTT:
- Bowmeester

To CGY:
- Gonchar
- Bishop

Might need some tweaking but is it something that fits in their plan? I have heard rumours they might be shopping Bowmeester and Kiprusoff.



God no....yes it gets crazier....this
Quote
 
 
+1 #48 Sandy 2012-08-08 13:04
Quoting Lukus & Sens:
Quoting Sandy:
Gonchar wants to play in Sochi in 2014.. So he needs to play 2 more NHL seasons... 1 with Ottawa. In order for him to get a decent contract in the NHL next year should be motivation enough for him to have a good year this next season.

What if Malkin wants to walk away from Pitts in 2 yrs as he doesn't want to play 2nd fiddle to Crosby his entire career... signing Gonchar -- may help if Ottawa makes a bid for Malkin as a UFA... It may be worth it to keep Gonchar past this season, even if he has declined, in order to get a shot at one of the best players in the game.. put him on Spezza's wing.. and holy cow...

Crazy thinking?


Yes, it doesn't get any crazier than that!


Hey people can dream.... nothing wrong with wishful thinking...
Quote
 
 
0 #49 Lukus & Sens 2012-08-08 13:06
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting Lukus & Sens:
Quoting Sandy:
Gonchar wants to play in Sochi in 2014.. So he needs to play 2 more NHL seasons... 1 with Ottawa. In order for him to get a decent contract in the NHL next year should be motivation enough for him to have a good year this next season.

What if Malkin wants to walk away from Pitts in 2 yrs as he doesn't want to play 2nd fiddle to Crosby his entire career... signing Gonchar -- may help if Ottawa makes a bid for Malkin as a UFA... It may be worth it to keep Gonchar past this season, even if he has declined, in order to get a shot at one of the best players in the game.. put him on Spezza's wing.. and holy cow...

Crazy thinking?


Yes, it doesn't get any crazier than that!


Hey people can dream.... nothing wrong with wishful thinking...


That's true, Sandy but this is one dream that would turn into a nightmare. :-P
Quote
 
 
0 #50 Tcharger 2012-08-08 13:08
Not that it will happen but i would take Malkin a million time over before Bowmeester
Quote
 
 
-2 #51 Dave_Sens 2012-08-08 13:08
Probably some of you will think i'm crazy, but i like Gonchar. He had a terrible year in 2010-2011 like the rest of the team for sure, but he had a good season this year overall. Yes he made some mistakes and he is not fast, but when you log 28 minutes on the ice every game, that's simply normal. What he brings to the team??

- Leadership
- Power Play
- Help young defencemen

He has only 1 year left on his contract and trading him for a second round pick would make the sens awful on the blue line. I don't want a kid to take the Gonchar's minutes on the ice because we are not supposed to finish last this year. We are suppose to be in a playoff hunt. We will not be in any hunt with Ceci and Boro in the line up this year!!


So just relax and chill out...I know some of you are Gonchar's hater because he make 5.5 millions, but we are under the cap space with him in the line up and i prefer to have him in the sens jersey than a «no where pick» who will help us in 4 years.

Compare Kovalev with Gonchar and your love for the russian defenceman will quickly increase. Gonch want to play here, choose the Sens and want to help the team to be better again this year.
Quote
 
 
0 #52 Sandy 2012-08-08 13:17
Quoting Lukus & Sens:
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting Lukus & Sens:
Quoting Sandy:
Gonchar wants to play in Sochi in 2014.. So he needs to play 2 more NHL seasons... 1 with Ottawa. In order for him to get a decent contract in the NHL next year should be motivation enough for him to have a good year this next season.

What if Malkin wants to walk away from Pitts in 2 yrs as he doesn't want to play 2nd fiddle to Crosby his entire career... signing Gonchar -- may help if Ottawa makes a bid for Malkin as a UFA... It may be worth it to keep Gonchar past this season, even if he has declined, in order to get a shot at one of the best players in the game.. put him on Spezza's wing.. and holy cow...

Crazy thinking?


Yes, it doesn't get any crazier than that!


Hey people can dream.... nothing wrong with wishful thinking...


That's true, Sandy but this is one dream that would turn into a nightmare. :-P


Having Malkin on your team would be a nightmare? I can see Gonchar, yes, -- but, if free of injury I see a good year for him as he wants to play until 2014... Unless he plays in the KHL next season - my guess is he wants to play in the NHL.

Look -- that 99.9% will never happen (Malkin signing in Ottawa).. but with the friendship between the two and how much Malkin looks to Gonchar... you can never say absolutely no.

Hockeyy Insiderr is at it again. There are Western Conference teams interested in Gonchar...
Quote
 
 
+1 #53 Sensnation 2012-08-08 13:27
Quoting Dave_Sens:
Probably some of you will think i'm crazy, but i like Gonchar. He had a terrible year in 2010-2011 like the rest of the team for sure, but he had a good season this year overall. Yes he made some mistakes and he is not fast, but when you log 28 minutes on the ice every game, that's simply normal. What he brings to the team??

- Leadership
- Power Play
- Help young defencemen

He has only 1 year left on his contract and trading him for a second round pick would make the sens awful on the blue line. I don't want a kid to take the Gonchar's minutes on the ice because we are not supposed to finish last this year. We are suppose to be in a playoff hunt. We will not be in any hunt with Ceci and Boro in the line up this year!!


So just relax and chill out...I know some of you are Gonchar's hater because he make 5.5 millions, but we are under the cap space with him in the line up and i prefer to have him in the sens jersey than a «no where pick» who will help us in 4 years.

Compare Kovalev with Gonchar and your love for the russian defenceman will quickly increase. Gonch want to play here, choose the Sens and want to help the team to be better again this year.


Why are we supposed to make the playoffs this year? According to just about everyone but me we had no chance last year and were 2-3 years of rebuild away from seriously being playoff ready. Why would making it in year 1 mean you have to make it in year 2 as well? The goal is still the long term development of the overall young core, so if playing a Ceci, Borowiecki or Wiercioch a bit more than expected in exchange for improvement at forward or a longer term prospect, is the cost, I'm all for it.

I think we'll challenge for the playoffs either way this year, but if we miss out for some reason, it's not a disaster on the rebuild path.
Quote
 
 
+6 #54 AlfieforMayor11 2012-08-08 13:28
Jaybo would be an awesome addition to this team. He would thrive in Ottawa with our up tempo, puck possession style. Him and Karlsson would give us the two best skating defenseman in the league. It would be fun to watch.
Quote
 
 
+2 #55 Lukus & Sens 2012-08-08 13:42
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting Lukus & Sens:
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting Lukus & Sens:
Quoting Sandy:
Gonchar wants to play in Sochi in 2014.. So he needs to play 2 more NHL seasons... 1 with Ottawa.

What if Malkin wants to walk away from Pitts in 2 yrs as he doesn't want to play 2nd fiddle to Crosby his entire career... signing Gonchar -- may help if Ottawa makes a bid for Malkin as a UFA... It may be worth it to keep Gonchar past this season, even if he has declined, in order to get a shot at one of the best players in the game.. put him on Spezza's wing.. and holy cow...

Crazy thinking?


Yes, it doesn't get any crazier than that!


Hey people can dream.... nothing wrong with wishful thinking...


That's true, Sandy but this is one dream that would turn into a nightmare. :-P


Having Malkin on your team would be a nightmare? I can see Gonchar, yes, -- but, if free of injury I see a good year for him as he wants to play until 2014... Unless he plays in the KHL next season - my guess is he wants to play in the NHL.

Look -- that 99.9% will never happen (Malkin signing in Ottawa).. but with the friendship between the two and how much Malkin looks to Gonchar... you can never say absolutely no.

Hockeyy Insiderr is at it again. There are Western Conference teams interested in Gonchar...


No, having Gonchar for another 2 seasons is a nightmarish scenario. I would do it just so IT may influence Malkin. Not a gamble I'm willing to pay.
Quote
 
 
-2 #56 Lukus & Sens 2012-08-08 13:43
I wouldn't do it is what i meant to say.
Quote
 
 
-1 #57 Sens-sational 2012-08-08 13:51
JBo for Gonchar and Bishop...? I would consider that- want a touch more in return though.
Quote
 
 
+1 #58 Lukus & Sens 2012-08-08 14:08
Quoting Sens-sational:
JBo for Gonchar and Bishop...? I would consider that- want a touch more in return though.


You mean Calgary would have to add? Not sure about that. Was thinking maybe Ottawa would have to add a little.
Quote
 
 
0 #59 Sens-sational 2012-08-08 14:27
My concern with the offer is that we lose our goalie depth. I think Bishops value will only increase as he gets better. So to trade an offensive defenseman and good prospect/near NHL-ready goalie for an offensive defenseman whose already being shopped by his team seems a little off... Cgy wants to trade Jbo's contract away, so I don't think they would mind.. That being said, Gonchar has a no trade clause and would never accept a trade to Feasterland.
Quote
 
 
-3 #60 Tookie 2012-08-08 14:34
Quoting Dave_Sens:

- Leadership
- Power Play
- Help young defencemen


Havent seen any leadership from him yet, he quits on plays and his body language is terrible for young kids to see.

Our powerplay was 11th in the league at 18.2, behind teams like Florida, Edmonton, Toronto... Not exactly lighting it up.

Cowen has shown signs of being a great player but has been terribly inconsistant playing alongside Gonchar...

I dont see where Gonchar helps at all.
Quote
 
 
+3 #61 Ronnie 2012-08-08 14:39
I Would do a gonchar straight up for boom.

Calgary gets rid for his contract

We get a defensive that like playing up tempo

But gonchar wouldnt want to go there
Quote
 
 
+2 #62 chadillac 2012-08-08 14:40
Gonchar was one of our best D in the Rangers' series. He has likely taught Karlsson a couple of things about being an effective D man. Sergei is overpriced, but he holds value on this team. We cannot simply trade him without getting a comparable Dman in return. Anyone that's a hater doesn't realize that he's still an effective player. Our team would have a big hole without him in the lineup.
Quote
 
 
0 #63 Lukus & Sens 2012-08-08 14:43
Quoting Sens-sational:
My concern with the offer is that we lose our goalie depth. I think Bishops value will only increase as he gets better. So to trade an offensive defenseman and good prospect/near NHL-ready goalie for an offensive defenseman whose already being shopped by his team seems a little off... Cgy wants to trade Jbo's contract away, so I don't think they would mind.. That being said, Gonchar has a no trade clause and would never accept a trade to Feasterland.


I have heard that comment about our goalie depth many times and I just don't get it. We currently have 3 NHL ready goalies. The only thing that would be affected if we traded one of our goalie prospects is our AHL team. We drafted a couple more goalies this summer. Those guys will be in Binghamton within 2 or 3 yrs. We can't NHL-ready goalies rot on the sideline when we already have a solid #1 signed for 3 more years. We need to use that extra asset to shore up our defense.
Quote
 
 
0 #64 Ronnie 2012-08-08 14:44
Gonchar will prabrobly be traded at the deadline. That's it that's all !
Quote
 
 
-3 #65 Tcharger 2012-08-08 14:49
If all we got for one of our three goalies was jaybo I would be livid...maybe if he was still tearing it up sure....but he isnt so next

i would do gonch for Jaybo straight....may be with a late pick
Quote
 
 
0 #66 Lukus & Sens 2012-08-08 14:49
Quoting chadillac:
Gonchar was one of our best D in the Rangers' series. He has likely taught Karlsson a couple of things about being an effective D man. Sergei is overpriced, but he holds value on this team. We cannot simply trade him without getting a comparable Dman in return. Anyone that's a hater doesn't realize that he's still an effective player. Our team would have a big hole without him in the lineup.


While I agree we can't just get rid of Gonchar without replacing him, I have to disagree with the rest of what you said. Tookie said exactly why Gonchar isn't liked. Has nothing to do with his salary and everything to do about his game.
Quote
 
 
+1 #67 Lukus & Sens 2012-08-08 14:57
Quoting Tcharger:
If all we got for one of our three goalies was jaybo I would be livid...maybe if he was still tearing it up sure....but he isnt so next

i would do gonch for Jaybo straight....maybe with a late pick


Did we not acquire Bishop for a 2nd pick? So you'd be livid if we basically acquired Jaybo for a 2nd pick? As much as I like Bishop, he hasn't increased in value since we acquired him.
Quote
 
 
-2 #68 Tcharger 2012-08-08 15:01
Quoting Lukus & Sens:
Quoting Tcharger:
If all we got for one of our three goalies was jaybo I would be livid...maybe if he was still tearing it up sure....but he isnt so next

i would do gonch for Jaybo straight....maybe with a late pick


Did we not acquire Bishop for a 2nd pick? So you'd be livid if we basically acquired Jaybo for a 2nd pick? As much as I like Bishop, he hasn't increased in value since we acquired him.


The trade was Gonchar/Bishop. ...so its hardly just a 2nd

and yes, I would much prefer to have depth in Goal then have Jaybo on our team...we already have Gonchar, who we get rid of this year. Why would I want someone making more for two seasons?? Oh and throw in a highly touted goalie prospect too?

the trade makes zero sense man..

Wow
Quote
 
 
-1 #69 GDS86 2012-08-08 15:08
i would not trade for JBOw, why would u want 2, its not like he has done anything with calgary, just cuz he has a fancy name people want him, he isnt what this team needs, we dont need him.
Quote
 
 
+2 #70 Sens-sational 2012-08-08 15:15
Quoting Lukus & Sens:
Quoting Tcharger:
If all we got for one of our three goalies was jaybo I would be livid...maybe if he was still tearing it up sure....but he isnt so next

i would do gonch for Jaybo straight....maybe with a late pick


Did we not acquire Bishop for a 2nd pick? So you'd be livid if we basically acquired Jaybo for a 2nd pick? As much as I like Bishop, he hasn't increased in value since we acquired him.


We fleeced St.L in that deal- they had to trade him given the contract details (especially since Elliott decided to show up and play last year)!
Quote
 
 
-2 #71 Tcharger 2012-08-08 15:15
Seriously

Gonchar(makes 5.5 contract over after this season...so deadline trade bait...maybe a 2nd round pick if we are lucky?)
+
Bishop(makes 650k so nothing...25 yrs old, considered a very good goalie prospect again contract is up after this season so potential trade bait)

For

Jaybo(makes 6 680 000, scores less than Gonchar, has another year at that rate)

so we essentially replace a contract we are about to get rid of for a more expensive less effective player and keep him for a year.

Seriously, someone break down why we are even discussing this trade? I honestly can not come up with a single valid reason to move Gonchar/Bishop for him.
Quote
 
 
0 #72 Mickey 77 2012-08-08 15:18
With Alfie likely only a season away from retirement, it would be an interesting scenario to see if Murray would consider going after Corey Perry, who's only 27 yrs old and he's going to be a UFA after this season, with no no-trade/moveme nt clause. He's a solid RW who can come to Ottawa with experience and move right to the top of the list of consideration for captaincy after Alfie. Problem is that a ton of teams will be going after him unless given an extension by Bob sometime soon. Somehow the rumours are out there that they might consider moving he, Ryan, and Getzlaf ???
Quote
 
 
0 #73 GDS86 2012-08-08 15:21
i would rather get Mark Giordano and late pick

for Gonchar

Gio is a player that would fit well on our blueline

and his cap is just over 4 mill till 2016
Quote
 
 
+1 #74 C.J. 2012-08-08 15:49
Quoting Tcharger:
Seriously

Gonchar(makes 5.5 contract over after this season...so deadline trade bait...maybe a 2nd round pick if we are lucky?)
+
Bishop(makes 650k so nothing...25 yrs old, considered a very good goalie prospect again contract is up after this season so potential trade bait)

For

Jaybo(makes 6 680 000, scores less than Gonchar, has another year at that rate)

so we essentially replace a contract we are about to get rid of for a more expensive less effective player and keep him for a year.

Seriously, someone break down why we are even discussing this trade? I honestly can not come up with a single valid reason to move Gonchar/Bishop for him.


Well his cap hit could help us reach the floor, and the fact that he's 28 means he could easily have a rebound year with a team that actually has a system of play in place like Ottawa (unlike Calgary). He's also pretty sound defensively and would set a better example of responsible play than Gonchar at this point in Gonchar's career.

I think it would be worth it to give him a shot, but only if its Gonchar and a pick no higher than the 3rd round.
Quote
 
 
-1 #75 Ronnie 2012-08-08 15:51
Quoting Mickey 77:
With Alfie likely only a season away from retirement, it would be an interesting scenario to see if Murray would consider going after Corey Perry, who's only 27 yrs old and he's going to be a UFA after this season, with no no-trade/movement clause. He's a solid RW who can come to Ottawa with experience and move right to the top of the list of consideration for captaincy after Alfie. Problem is that a ton of teams will be going after him unless given an extension by Bob sometime soon. Somehow the rumours are out there that they might consider moving he, Ryan, and Getzlaf ???



Going for Corey Perry. Did you ask yourself first

Are they gonba resign him before the deadline?

What would be a asking price for a rental player?

Would he resign and committe to the orgasination and the city after the season Or playoff are over?

I for one would not give a shit load that his on a contract year that for sure.

Something like

1st pick ( depending on are position ) something like 6th overall and down
A prospect
Roster player
Quote
 
 
+1 #76 Tcharger 2012-08-08 15:52
See that sort of deal I may be able to get behind...still not a huge fan strictly due to the extra year...but I do agree it is possible he rebounds and ends up being worth keeping around.
Quote
 
 
+1 #77 jakester 2012-08-08 15:53
Why are people worried about trading a goalie for heaven's sake! We just drafted 2 goalies and signed Lawson. Hell, if we can trade a goalie to get better on the backend or in a package for a top 6 then go FOR IT! Not all 3 will be in nets this year in Ottawa. Anderson will be playing close to 60 games for sure. I think one of Bishop or Lehner will be traded.
Quote
 
 
-6 #78 Tcharger 2012-08-08 15:59
I'm fine with moving one of them...just not for fucking jaybo.

I would be OK for someone like Ryan/Nash(ignor ing his doucheness)/E Kane

Jaybo IMO is not a big enough upgrade...espec ially considering the hypothetical offer being discussed here.
Quote
 
 
+2 #79 Hoeeeeeeeeee 2012-08-08 16:23
Lol at JayBo, stay the fuck away from him if we ever want to get a taste of playoff hockey ever again. That guy has yet to be in a playoff hockey team.
Quote
 
 
-4 #80 Tcharger 2012-08-08 16:28
Quoting Hoeeeeeeeeee:
Lol at JayBo, stay the fuck away from him if we ever want to get a taste of playoff hockey ever again. That guy has yet to be in a playoff hockey team.



So I am not the only sane person here....thank you
Quote
 
 
+1 #81 HolyPuck 2012-08-08 16:32
Forget Calgary, Gonchar would never want to go there. Somewhere like Detroit is much more likely... Gonchar and a prospect for Filppula?
Quote
 
 
0 #82 MoeDozer 2012-08-08 17:04
are some really arguing the thoughts of adding j-bo ?

thought that was clearly discussed several times in last few months that he is an overrated curse..

and as some pointed, gonchar has a NTC.. why would he want to move to calgary..?

dont think he wants to move anywhere at this point of his career, he is clearly liked in the lockerroom and like it or not, he is a veteran that younger Dmen do look up to.
Quote
 
 
0 #83 timwrx 2012-08-08 17:14
Chirp,

Joy Lindsey is not covering the B-Sens anymore. Her last post was today. Just a heads up if you are looking for info.
Quote
 
 
+1 #84 Spinorama 2012-08-08 17:24
Quoting HolyPuck:
Forget Calgary, Gonchar would never want to go there. Somewhere like Detroit is much more likely... Gonchar and a prospect for Filppula?


Yeah I could see that. Detroit has been looking for some D help and aren't afraid of veterans and he would fit in nicely there also. Coach Mac has inside on who he'd like back from Detroit that can play top 6 here, could be a good trading partner there.

Filpula for Gonchar, DaCosta and a pick ??
Quote
 
 
-1 #85 Hoeeeee 2012-08-08 18:42
Errr need a little bit more than that for their 60 point center.

I dont think this is the year to trade prospects as we still dont know what we have. We still dont know what most of them are capable of in the pro game like Zibby/ Silfver/ Stone would be playing their first pro season. We go through this season with what we have and then next summer we should look at trading or signing a big piece ( Perry pls)
Quote
 
 
-2 #86 HolyPuck 2012-08-08 19:26
Quoting Hoeeeee:
Errr need a little bit more than that for their 60 point center.

I dont think this is the year to trade prospects as we still dont know what we have. We still dont know what most of them are capable of in the pro game like Zibby/ Silfver/ Stone would be playing their first pro season. We go through this season with what we have and then next summer we should look at trading or signing a big piece ( Perry pls)


Ok, so Filppula for Gonchar and Zibby and a pick. Detroit's prospect pool isn't that deep, and they have space for a veteran D after Lidstom's retirement.
Quote
 
 
0 #87 Dave_Sens 2012-08-08 19:31
Quoting HolyPuck:
Quoting Hoeeeee:
Errr need a little bit more than that for their 60 point center.

I dont think this is the year to trade prospects as we still dont know what we have. We still dont know what most of them are capable of in the pro game like Zibby/ Silfver/



Stone would be playing their first pro season. We go through this season with what we have and then next summer we should look at trading or signing a big piece ( Perry pls)


Ok, so Filppula for Gonchar and Zibby and a pick. Detroit's prospect pool isn't that deep, and they have space for a veteran D after Lidstom's retirement.


Oh my god

Some guys here are smoking some dopes too often...
Quote
 
 
-1 #88 Dirtysweet 2012-08-08 20:08
Haha.... K I'll bite... Gonchar (+) for Johan Franzen?????? (pardon my spelling)
Quote
 
 
0 #89 Andrews Theory 2012-08-08 21:06
Quoting HolyPuck:
Quoting Hoeeeee:
Errr need a little bit more than that for their 60 point center.

I dont think this is the year to trade prospects as we still dont know what we have. We still dont know what most of them are capable of in the pro game like Zibby/ Silfver/ Stone would be playing their first pro season. We go through this season with what we have and then next summer we should look at trading or signing a big piece ( Perry pls)


Ok, so Filppula for Gonchar and Zibby and a pick. Detroit's prospect pool isn't that deep, and they have space for a veteran D after Lidstom's retirement.


UH No.

Zibby plus someone for Evander Kane maybe but I dont want Filppula at that price.
Quote
 
 
0 #90 Sandy 2012-08-08 21:07
Quoting HolyPuck:
Forget Calgary, Gonchar would never want to go there. Somewhere like Detroit is much more likely... Gonchar and a prospect for Filppula?


What chance would they have in a trade.. Gonchar for Jarnkrok (sp?)
Quote
 
 
+1 #91 Floridasensfan 2012-08-08 22:11
I hear the idea of trading Gonchar at the deadline but I would rather have another player learning the position all season, if we keep him until deadline we will be tempted to keep him past that.

Everyone is talking about what we would lose in Gonchar but what we would gain in the trade.
I would take a top line forward and give a young D guy a shot all day long for Gonchar +
we would not lose cap hit if we have cap coming back.
Quote
 
 
+2 #92 kingalfredsson 2012-08-09 02:52
pleaseeeeeeeeee eee trade gonchar, every time i watch him play he plays like he doesn't give a shit. i obviously would take j-bow in a second if we had the chance, he's a great skater and can play the big minutes. in the end, don't we need some cap.. ? so j-bow wouldn't be so bad

as for the flyers... i wouldn't mind meszaros coming back pr getting simmonds but that would probably never happen lol
Quote
 
 
+1 #93 sben 2012-08-09 05:48
Kind of like Stone last year when he was part of a crazy line that was getting tons of points Noeson is this year. He is with aa sharks prospect and a wild prospect and they have 16 points in 4 games.
Quote
 
 
-1 #94 Ronnie 2012-08-09 07:22
Lets try grabbing Tatar from detroit?
Quote
 
 
-1 #95 Spinorama 2012-08-09 07:52
Quoting Ronnie:
Lets try grabbing Tatar from detroit?


Their best prospect ! Would be nice but would be expensive. Possible, if they are interested in Bishop. Tatar is NHL ready and should be on the Wings this year.
Quote
 
 
+2 #96 spezzerman 2012-08-09 08:11
Quoting Tcharger:
Quoting Hoeeeeeeeeee:
Lol at JayBo, stay the fuck away from him if we ever want to get a taste of playoff hockey ever again. That guy has yet to be in a playoff hockey team.



So I am not the only sane person here....thank you


you get pretty upset when someone has a different opinion than you eh? Jay B isnt as bad as you think he is. How much of his game did you watch this year? so what he isn't scoring off the charts. Put him with Karlsson and that is guaranteed to change plus you get a very solid d-man who easily logs 25 minutes a game. 6.8M for a top pairing d-man who logs 25 minutes a game is about the going rate.

So what he hasn't made the playoffs, like it is his fault alone. He is not a game changer. And maybe he is slightly overpaid but only for two more years. He improves our d leaps and bounds if he comes here and doesn't cost us out of anything we'd want down the road.

IMO adding Bouwmeester to our lineup makes us better than if we added Ryan.

It's a moot point anyway, Gonchar would NEVER waive his no trade clause to go to Calgary.

BUt I do agree with one thing, I wouldn't include Bishop in that trade.
Quote
 
 
-1 #97 Tcharger 2012-08-09 08:26
Quoting spezzerman:
Quoting Tcharger:
Quoting Hoeeeeeeeeee:
Lol at JayBo, stay the fuck away from him if we ever want to get a taste of playoff hockey ever again. That guy has yet to be in a playoff hockey team.



So I am not the only sane person here....thank you


you get pretty upset when someone has a different opinion than you eh?
IMO adding Bouwmeester to our lineup makes us better than if we added Ryan.

It's a moot point anyway, Gonchar would NEVER waive his no trade clause to go to Calgary.

BUt I do agree with one thing, I wouldn't include Bishop in that trade.

So you agree? lol....and no I don't get upset couldn't care less if fans want to make a horrible move. I would on the other hand if Murray did.

My main point is including Bishop would be absolutely retarded, I would rather have the goalie depth then Jaybo, I honestly wouldn't likely support a Gonchar for Jaybo straight up...the cap relief from him coming off the books after this year is more appealing to me.
Quote
 
 
0 #98 spezzerman 2012-08-09 08:30
we don't need cap relief, we need good defensemen.
Quote
 
 
-1 #99 Tcharger 2012-08-09 08:36
If that is what you want we can get a better player via trade than Jaybo...Especia lly when including a strong goalie
Quote
 
 
+2 #100 Tcharger 2012-08-09 08:47
WOOOOHOOOO BRONZE FOR THE GIRLS!!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #101 Tcharger 2012-08-09 08:54
This announcer is pissing me off...they probably didn't deserve it if you go just by the play...yeah you are fucking right we deserved silver or gold.
Quote
 
 
+4 #102 SensChirp 2012-08-09 09:02
Quoting Tcharger:
WOOOOHOOOO BRONZE FOR THE GIRLS!!!!

Amazing moment in sports. It's not the shot at gold they deserved but amazing to see those women come through for bronze.

A team Canadians should be proud of.
Quote
 
 
0 #103 EMG 2012-08-09 09:10
HEADS UP PEEPS!!!

Cody Ceci about to jump on the ice for Team Canada. The Canada -Russia Challenge starts in less than 1 hour!
Quote
 
 
0 #104 Tcharger 2012-08-09 09:12
Quoting EMG:
HEADS UP PEEPS!!!

Cody Ceci about to jump on the ice for Team Canada. The Canada -Russia Challenge starts in less than 1 hour!


Is it being broadcast anywhere?
Quote
 
 
0 #105 EMG 2012-08-09 09:14
TSN2 Today and tomorrow, then TSN for the last two games
Quote
 
 
0 #106 Tcharger 2012-08-09 09:15
Nice thank you!
Quote
 
 
0 #107 C.J. 2012-08-09 09:20
^ Jealous wish I could watch :(
Quote
 
 
0 #108 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-08-09 10:11
Quoting C.J.:
^ Jealous wish I could watch :(


Apparently Cody Ceci is a healthy scratch for this first game in Russia ??
Quote
 
 
0 #109 Leisure Suit Larry 2012-08-09 10:55
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting Tcharger:
WOOOOHOOOO BRONZE FOR THE GIRLS!!!!

Amazing moment in sports. It's not the shot at gold they deserved but amazing to see those women come through for bronze.

A team Canadians should be proud of.


Win the game they should have lost and lose the game they should have won.

Kicky Ball is soooooo strange.
Quote
 
 
0 #110 Sensnation 2012-08-09 11:15
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting Tcharger:
WOOOOHOOOO BRONZE FOR THE GIRLS!!!!

Amazing moment in sports. It's not the shot at gold they deserved but amazing to see those women come through for bronze.

A team Canadians should be proud of.


What a great Olympics for these women! I was really impressed with their games and start to finish efforts. Completely agree chirp!
Quote
 
 
0 #111 Sandy 2012-08-09 11:29
Team Canada has 10 defenseman with them. I assume they will rotate in and out of the lineup. They are using all 3 goalies in this series...

It's now 2-1 for Canada.

It's great watching hockey. Love watching the World Juniors and this is akin to that... Great young players.

Congrats to the Woman's Soccer team for winning Bronze. I hope Japan beats the asses of the USA team.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Senschirp Blog Early August Rumblings

Contact SensChirp

About SensChirp

  • Welcome to the new and I believe, improved SensChirp. It's the same old blog - breaking news, insider info and everything Sens.