Feature Story

  • Right Back In It

    (UPDATE 10:23 AM)- Appropriate timing I would say.  This morning, the NHL announced that Ottawa Senators Captain Daniel Alfredsson has been nominated for the Mark Messier Leadership Award.  Pretty special year for Alfie as he has helped lead a team that looked down and out after a series of injuries, to the 2nd round of the playoffs.  A well deserved honour for the best Captain in the game.  Jonathan Toews and Dustin Brown are the other nominees.

    Written on Monday, 20 May 2013 03:38
    Comments (22) Read 921 times
  • Sponsor

  • Sponsor 2

Tuesday, 24 April 2012 09:00

Rangers Force Game 7- (Alfie a Masterton Finalist)

(UPDATE 11:11 AM)- Senators Captain Daniel Alfredsson has been named a finalist for the Bill Masterton Trophy awarded to the player who best exemplifies the qualities of perseverance, sportsmanship, and dedication to hockey. Congratulations Alfie! Well deserved! Joffrey Lupul and Max Pacioretty are the other two finalists.

A sold out crowd at Scotiabank Place did everything they could.  20,500 packed the seats at SBP to cheer on their beloved Ottawa Senators.

In the end it wasn't enough.  Chris Neil opened the scoring and Jason Spezza added a Baconator goal in the final minute but the Rangers held on for a 3-2 victory to force a deciding seventh game at MSG on Thursday night.

For the Sens, that extra day off could not come at a better time.

From top to bottom, the Senators seemed uncharacteristically sloppy on a night where they had a chance to close out the top seed in the Eastern Conference.

As Paul MacLean mentioned in post game address, they just seemed to lack focus on a night where it was needed more than ever.  That lack of focus eventually led to Paul MacLean benching the likes of Daniel Alfredsson and Jason Spezza in the third period, including a full two minute power play.

While he has earned the respect and a I hesitate to second guess a guy that has pushed all the right buttons this season, benching those two guys at this point in a series was a mistake.  Alfredsson was clearly unhappy with the decision and took his anger out on his stick and water bottle in a meltdown caught by television cameras.

Alfredsson, Spezza and MacLean had better get back on the same page heading into Thursday night.

Obviously excuses do very little at this time of year but the Sens were the victims of some momentum changing penalties.  The boarding penalty on Jakob Silfverberg, where he appeared to be trying to hold up the Rangers defender, was a joke.  The hooking call on Kuba was soft.  And the goalie interference call, that gave the Rangers a go-ahead 5 on 3 goal, was completely unacceptable in a playoff game.

Spoke with someone after the game who told me that the Director of Officiating met with the game officials after the game and was livid about some of the calls and asked for a separate room to review the game tapes.  Although I'm sure part of that anger had to do with a questionable goal Ottawa scored in the final minute.

The Senators now must refocus and prepare for game seven at Madison Square Garden, beginning with a practice today at noon. 

If at the beginning of the year, I told you the Ottawa Senators would be in a Game 7 situation, with a chance to knock out the top team in the East and move on to the second round of the playoffs, you would have jumped at the opportunity.

All season long this team has proven people wrong.  Why stop now?

GO SENS GO!

Last modified on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 10:12

Comments   Jump to Last Post

 
+4 #1 MethotToMyMadness 2012-04-24 08:02
I have a general idea of what everyone is talking about today. Spezza not taking shots, ref's calls/non calls, should/shouldn' t they have played Silf, etc?

So here are my thoughts. We owned the 1st period. We played solid, closed out the gaps, Rangers had no room. But then we entered the 2nd period and while it started out good, Rangers began to gain momentum. Call it ref'ing, or our inability to stay calm, or Neil's fighting antics that pumped up the Rangers. That perfect storm of events was the downfall and we couldn't climb back after it. Sure, we entered the last 5 minutes of the 3rd showing promise, as this club has done all season and while we were even rewarded with a goal, we still didn't have the extra gear to burry it. So all that said, we need to dust ourselves off, take a step back and reflect on what happened and learn from it. I have a feeling they will do that in game 7. The sh!+ty part is we have to wait till Thursday. Maybe I will get some work done this week now, lol

But seriously, the ref's need to decide before the game how they plan to call the shots. Because the entire first period layed the foundation for what happened, allowing small pokes to become larger shots. Small hits after the play to extend to 3 or 4 seconds after the play. They need to set the tone in the first 10 minutes so players know what they are in for. What really angered me was the non call on the over the glass puck by the Rangers while we were on the PP. The fact that they just made the call and didn't even talk about it possibly going over, or not hitting a stick made me furious. They didn't even show a 2nd or 3rd reply, which they do for EVERY other play that happens.

To end my rant I just want to see our PP take shots. I'm getting tired of watching the stretch passes through the middle that get eaten up and thrown down ice.

Here's to game 7, Go Sens Go!!
Quote
 
 
+2 #2 Sens of Peskyville 2012-04-24 08:03
What did people think of JS33's game?

I thought he looked good on occasion, and a little lost on occasion. I hope he gets to play again Thursday after a few practices.
Quote
 
 
-4 #3 MethotToMyMadness 2012-04-24 08:05
Chirp, great writeup. But I have a question, we would have jumped at the opportunity for what?
Quote
 
 
+1 #4 Dirk Diggler 2012-04-24 08:09
Yes! We can and will win it in game 7! We have to play more disiplined and hopefully the refs will call it properly for both sides. Last night was so frustrating.

The crowd also was not quite into it compared to game 4! That was the best it's ever been.
Quote
 
 
+3 #5 SensChirp 2012-04-24 08:12
Quoting madpajamma:
Chirp, great writeup. But I have a question, we would have jumped at the opportunity for what?

To have a one game showdown with a chance to move on to the second round.

It's disappointing to miss a chance to close this series out but they get another shot on Thursday.
Quote
 
 
0 #6 MethotToMyMadness 2012-04-24 08:12
Quoting DajaSens:
What did people think of JS33's game?

I thought he looked good on occasion, and a little lost on occasion. I hope he gets to play again Thursday after a few practices.


I watched for him but didn't see much besides the 1st shift he had, in which case he had some jump, but we spent so much time on the PK, and he's not a PK guy. He had that trip up just outside our crease, believe he upended Michalek. And he got a shock when the real hitting starting. I think it's Mainly newbie jitters, shouldn't take too long for that to subside. If Maclean had the itch to play him last night, no reason they won't give the kid a 2nd chance on Thursday.
Quote
 
 
0 #7 Kielbasa 2012-04-24 08:12
I honestly think part of what helped turn things around for the Rangers last night was the Neil fight. It came at a point in the game, where Ottawa had control and held the lead. The fight was pointless as Neil and the Sens were under the skin of the Rangers and had complete control of the tempo. Then Neil decides to fight and heads of the ice with his arm pumping to get the crowd going. Usually that doesn't bother me, but at this point in the game, it was a stupid move. Don't give fuel to the Rangers fire with stupid antics like that. Don't give the refs something to hang over your heads.

In the end, the refs handed this one to the Rangers, but the Sens didn't help matters by letting the Rangers take the helm and control the remainder of the game after that fight.

It isn't over yet. The Sens have shown all season how strong willed and hungry they are. Go back into MSG and take control like they know how to do.

GO SENS GO!!!
Quote
 
 
+1 #8 Kielbasa 2012-04-24 08:14
Quoting DajaSens:
What did people think of JS33's game?

I thought he looked good on occasion, and a little lost on occasion. I hope he gets to play again Thursday after a few practices.



I don't know if it was jetlag or stars in his eyes, but he was non-existent after his first shift.
Quote
 
 
0 #9 onthebeachblogger 2012-04-24 08:18
Too bad the refs had such a big part in the outcome of a game like that. Game 7 is going to be off the charts with intensity!
Quote
 
 
+2 #10 scocamp 2012-04-24 08:24
-1 to Alfie for his meltdown. Having a tantrum, when things don't go your way, is a bad example to set for this young, rebuilding team. He's the leader and should have been the one settling everyone else down. I trust him as a leader and have faith that he rights this wrong, either vocally in the room, or with his play in game 7. Go Sens!
Quote
 
 
+5 #11 taxman 2012-04-24 08:26
If you think about it, just about everything that could go wrong last night, did:
- Spezza refused to shoot the puck
- Alfie got uncharacteristi cally frustrated
- Niel let his emotions get the better of him and instead of demoralizing the Rangers with his fight, actually fired them up with his showboating
- Anderson was ok, not good
- Officiating was pathetic
- PM didn't call a time-out after the 2nd Ranger goal, and in hindsight, maybe shouldn't have kept tinkering with the line-up
- The Ranger powerplay woke up

And all that being said, I love our chances going into Game 7. If all of that went wrong, and the Sens only lost by a goal, we're in really good shape next game. Not to mention that road teams have a serious advantage in this year's playoffs.
Quote
 
 
+3 #12 hello_gary 2012-04-24 08:28
Anyone else think "Alfie is Angry! Alfie Smash!" outburst was his way of saying to Paulrus and the rest of the guys "My window is almost closed - why the f$%& are you not playing me?" added with a little bit of "wake the eff up guys - let's get something going"...
Thursday is going to be a really, really REALLY tough game for them to win. They've faced intense opponents before, but NYR has the momentum going in to this next game. Ottawa could have played a bit smarter, tightened up in the second and we would have had this.
Quote
 
 
+1 #13 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 08:28
Disappointing tilt last night, the good news is we can play so much better and have a couple days to hold a tough practice and figure out the battle plan for game 7. If we are calm and prepared and inflict every ounce of our determination on the game, we'll be moving onto the second round.

Nice to see a new post up and the regulars back to good hockey talk. The dipshits really come out of the woodwork during the game, especially when we are losing, and I find the shitty attitudes and attacks on our players disgraceful, something I'd expect from Leafs fans.

It's going to be a long couple of days and Paulrus has a plethora of roster options now. Can't wait to get this settled on Thursday!

Go Sens! Keep your chins up!
Quote
 
 
+2 #14 SensChirp 2012-04-24 08:30
Quoting hello_gary:
Anyone else think "Alfie is Angry! Alfie Smash!" outburst was his way of saying to Paulrus and the rest of the guys "My window is almost closed - why the f$%& are you not playing me?" added with a little bit of "wake the eff up guys - let's get something going"...
Thursday is going to be a really, really REALLY tough game for them to win. They've faced intense opponents before, but NYR has the momentum going in to this next game. Ottawa could have played a bit smarter, tightened up in the second and we would have had this.

Momentum is definitely in the Rangers corner which is why it's nice to have that extra day off.
Quote
 
 
+1 #15 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 08:31
@taxman

Yeah I totally agree with that assessment. Also as has plagued us the entire series we need to stop being so fancy with passes in the Rangers end, more than 5 passes, especially on the PP is very frustrating.

Same goes for clearing our own zone. Those soft exit passes up the middle, they just gotta give Anderson nightmares.
Quote
 
 
+1 #16 hello_gary 2012-04-24 08:34
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting hello_gary:
Anyone else think "Alfie is Angry! Alfie Smash!" outburst was his way of saying to Paulrus and the rest of the guys "My window is almost closed - why the f$%& are you not playing me?" added with a little bit of "wake the eff up guys - let's get something going"...
Thursday is going to be a really, really REALLY tough game for them to win. They've faced intense opponents before, but NYR has the momentum going in to this next game. Ottawa could have played a bit smarter, tightened up in the second and we would have had this.

Momentum is definitely in the Rangers corner which is why it's nice to have that extra day off.



Agree Chrip - maybe Alfie played hurt as well in game 6 and needs an extra day of rest to fix his brain.
This week is going to go by so slow, can't wait till Thursday.

Do you think Henry will get a fine for his comments regarding Spezza's goal being a "joke"...?
Any other thoughts on this guys?
Quote
 
 
+2 #17 Johne 2012-04-24 08:34
Greening looked dominate at times last night which was good to see, I think Turris was obviously hurt from that blocked shot, because he had a more average game than usual. I really, really have liked O'Brien's game this postseason. I think Stone should go in over Silfverberg, just for the simple fact that he is used to playing on NA ice. I really liked what I saw from #33, but I think he is going to need some time to adjust to less time and space out there. As said before, unacceptable referring out there last night. I think othere series including Game 1 has factored into very 'soft' calls this playoffs which SUCKS, cause no one wants a game decided on the man advantage, unless it's blatant. and last night it was.
Quote
 
 
+2 #18 NikoTn 2012-04-24 08:38
I really hope McLean knows what he is doing. I trust him, I just don't think Alfie has ever been sat down before.
Quote
 
 
+2 #19 beeblebrox 2012-04-24 08:39
Hey all, new member, long-time reader.

It was frustrating to see the Sens play like an eighth place team last night. It's still great to see them not play like a fourteenth or fifteenth place team, though.

IMHO, they have the pugnacity, belligerence and truculence they need. What they need now it the restraint and swagger that will just tick their opponents off. For example, in Game 2, kudos to Carkner for going after Boyle, but he shouldn't have hit him when he went down. A cocked arm, a look, and then skate away. It was the punch that Mohammed Ali didn't throw.

Similarly, last night, Neil obviously was winning the fight, but at the end he shouldn't have showboated. Just skate away. The fight itself could have stood on its own.

Dear God, I'm agreeing with Cherry...

Looking forward to Thursday. Should be a hell of a contest.
Quote
 
 
0 #20 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 08:39
Quoting hello_gary:

Do you think Henry will get a fine for his comments regarding Spezza's goal being a "joke"...?
Any other thoughts on this guys?


Ohhh that goal...
I first saw it, I immediately said no ways that's a goal, it was obviously kicked in...

They were reviewing the play and I was saying no-goal, why even bother? But then they found the angle that despite the extremely clear kicking motion, he never actually managed to kick the puck, it just went in.

Whether Lundquist gets a fine or not I don't think that matters. It's an interesting sub plot though, he can either get angry-focused and play even better, or he can get angry-frustrate d and start to cave. I hope it is the latter obviously. :)
Quote
 
 
0 #21 Tcharger 2012-04-24 08:39
Momentum may be in their corner but so is absolutely all of the pressure...I am not too worried about our situation.

Had you told me 88 games ago that we would have a legit shot at going into the 2nd round in a game 7 I would have said you were absolutely batshit insane.

Personally I hope we go back to JS33(said why in the other thread)....he really out of Butler/Stone/33 is the only one ready to play ridiculously important minutes(and has more serious experience...al beit non-nhl experience). Two days of practice and rest to recover from jetlag will likely make an absolute world of difference for his game, and we will see a huge improvement and more familiarity with the ice surface.

****PLAYOFF POOL UPDATE****

T1 T265 -- tcharger 95
T1 T265 -- Misaow 95
T3 T327 -- Kratos71 94
T3 T327 -- DenisVial 94
T3 T327 -- nyjets1967 94
T6 T411 -- Bluenose 93
T6 T411 -- Eagle8 93
T6 T411 -- Bradweiser 93
T9 T494 -- PaskySensFan 92
T9 T494 -- RUSHRLZ 92

Oh and ALfie...he looked uncharacteristi c all game, I suspect he is aware his window is closing and is extremely upset that he was hurt for half of what looks like a very winnable series.
Quote
 
 
0 #22 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 08:45
^----- quite the crazy log jam in the pool, the top 10 only separated by 3 points!

Most of the series are done now, so which of us might have players still active this round might shuffle the standings a bit but probably not too much. Second round picks coming up near the end of the week!
Quote
 
 
-1 #23 Tcharger 2012-04-24 08:46
Yeah I need to totally redo my team if we lose

If not and Washington wins I love my team
Quote
 
 
0 #24 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 08:50
Well surely all of us will have some players that got knocked out, so I think pretty much everyone will reevaluate their picks for round 2.
Quote
 
 
-1 #25 Tcharger 2012-04-24 08:51
Yeah half my team is booted out haha. I have it set up currently for how I want the last few games to go.

Not sure though I absolutely need Wash to win and ideally us
Quote
 
 
+2 #26 Kratos83 2012-04-24 09:00
figures chirp would put up a new post while I am working on my most wordy post here ever lol :P so copying it over here.

cooler heads need to prevail here...yeah Sens stunk it up a bit, refs may have had a hand in it too, but with all that, we still only lost 3-2 against the supposed top team in the East....forget it...and get ready for the 1 and done on Thursday...than kfully I am sure the team is not dwelling on this loss, same with the coaching staff. Even if Ottawa loses game 7...this season is still a huge success...they qualified for the playoffs in a year where they were picked by everyone to be a bottom feeder, then once they made it, they were picked to be gone in 4 or 5 games by experts all over the place, however, they never listened to any of it, and have given the Rangers everything they could handle. The pressure is still on the Rangers here, not the Sens, they have the expectations of the fans/league to move on, but for us, this is all gravy. That being said, I am not ready to shave off this playoff beard and not yet ready to give up watching hockey. I won't call this a rant, and am sure a lot of this negativity I am seeing is just a knee jerk reaction to an undesired result, just wipe the slate clean, move on, and look forward to Thursday night where all the pressure is on the Rangers, and last time they were in that situation, Ottawa fared pretty well riding the play of Anderson. Believe fans...Believe. ..we are not done yet....the young kids from the B-Sens were in this position just last year in game 7's, so to be honest, am liking how most of our team may have more experience in this kind of scenario than the Rangers. Now comes the excruciating wait until Thursday night..... Go Sens Go

sorry for the long winded rant peeps.
Quote
 
 
+2 #27 Kielbasa 2012-04-24 09:05
Another thought. Foligno needs a restraining order that keeps him a certain distance away from any goaltenders area. Even if the call was completely bogus last night, he is getting the reputation around the league for goaltender interference. The refs are going to call him for just looking at the goalie at this point.
Quote
 
 
-1 #28 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 09:08
From the last thread but applies here

Im not gunna say who should play and who shouldn't play. Silfverberg didn't lose us the game, nor did Foligno. Like a poster previously said, taking 3 penalties 200 feet away from your own net in a 10 minute span will kill any team. We just need to be more discipline

Now my biggest issue. I know he is having a great series on the draw and killing penalties, but Kenopka was played wayyyy to much last night. Maclean is getting wrapped up in the hype of winning face offs and line matching here in the playoffs. For the life of me I can't understand why a guy who was virtually benched and scratched the entire 2nd half of the year can then play meaningful minutes in the playoffs including 20 shifts and 15 minutes in the most pivitol game 6

Also, no one here talking about Matt Carkner not returning to the game and only played 6 minutes, which means Gilroy could draw into the lineup for game 7

Finally only alfie, michalek and spezza played more than Kenoopka amongst our forwards. That can't happen in game 7 regardless how good kenopka is on the draw.
Quote
 
 
+1 #29 FlickerFlash 2012-04-24 09:12
What's with the "Spezza has to shoot more" crap. He and Foligno had the most shots in the game for both teams with 4 a piece.
Quote
 
 
+2 #30 db7568 2012-04-24 09:22
On Maclean benching the big boys: PM played for a long time in the NHL, plus payed his dues to get the head coaching job with the Sens. If he benches someone, theres a reason, and he'll let the player know why, thats for sure. From what I saw of the big three, they need to simplify their game, just get pucks to the net, crash the net and bang away at it until it goes in, hockey 101 folks, it works!

On Ottawa's shooting problem: If you get a team that likes to block shots, start shooting high, hurt them abit so that they wont want to block shots anymore. I fully understand and support the concept of drawing players to you to open up a shooting lane for someone else, but you have to draw the line somewhere

On Ottawa's shooting problem again: Alot of times, I will see Sens dmen take a second to wind up a big slapper from the point. While it is ideal to get thsoe kind of shots in, the most important thing is to get the puck to the net. This does not require a howitzer everytime. Sometimes a wrist or snap shot might work, or a small slapper. It cuts down on time for the oppsoing player to clog the shooting lane, and cuts down the time for the goalie to get set.

The Sens just have to simplify their game abit. I really believe that we can send the Rangers packing on thursday, just have to BELIEVE
Quote
 
 
+5 #31 BeastMode 2012-04-24 09:22
Am I the only one that noticed Alfie's meltdown happened immediately after he took a hit in the corner? Could it be he noticed concussion symptoms coming back and was pissed off?
Quote
 
 
0 #32 OttawaInsurance 2012-04-24 09:22
I thought that in the second period Alfi was trying to do too much (not keeping it simple) and Spezza wasn't shooting. Spezza had a good year this year because he started shooting. That's why they were both benched. Turris on the other hand was playing well and was creating offensive chances. You can't play your best players if they're not playing like your best players. Much needed few days to refocus. Aswell, it does suck for Alfredsson because he isin't going to get many more years to do this (I would have lost my shit getting benched too). In hindsight PM should have called a timeout in the second. This was unfortunate because the refs. really impacted the game. Consistency of calls was none existent. How was Staal's flip over the glass not a penalty?? Anyhow, not blamming the refs. for the loss but shit man, is the new rule for the playoff hockey "players bring there best game and refs. bring there worst"? Not just a sens biased but other series too have had terrible refing (impacting the outcome of games and series)
Quote
 
 
0 #33 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 09:24
uh oh

Darren Dreger ‏ @DarrenDreger
M.Michalek may face sup disc for shoving (kicking)Girard i with his skate last night.Very similar to Skinner in March which earned 2 gm susp.
Quote
 
 
0 #34 AlfieforMayor11 2012-04-24 09:25
I haven't had a chance to read through the comment section yet but I will say a few things.

The officiating was bad on both sides of the puck. This has been the story of the playoffs so far. Just brutal fucking officiating all over the NHL. It's a goddamn joke. There were missed calls on both teams last night and a number of ridiculous "make-up" calls.

We lost this game in the final 5 minutes of the second period. It all started by sloppy plays made on our powerplay, especially by Spezza. The Rangers ended up spending most of our powerplay in our zone and the boys just stood around watching the puck.

It definitely wasn't just Spezza though. A good number of our players were responsible for careless, soft, casual plays that caused us to lose possession time after time.
Quote
 
 
-1 #35 EH_Matt 2012-04-24 09:25
Quoting FlickerFlash:
What's with the "Spezza has to shoot more" crap. He and Foligno had the most shots in the game for both teams with 4 a piece.

He had plenty more opportunities to shoot but instead decided to take it to the side of the net and look for the pass. If he would have shot on all of his opportunities he'd be closer to 10 shots last night and probably a couple of goals.
Quote
 
 
0 #36 Shiner 2012-04-24 09:26
Not timing shifts, my thought when Alfie went off was that he was angry with himself for not being able to go full-steam. Didn't it happen right after he was forced to ditch the puck while trying to dodge a hit? He's obviously not at 100%, in hindsight may have been better to keep him out.

Bad officiating at both ends, on both teams, but it was the 3rd goal that killed them. Sens just had a really sloppy 2nd, loads of groan-inducing passes.

Upside, they should know by now that the Rangers can't, or won't, beat them 5-on-5. Hope the day off helps them calm down, especially Neil.
Quote
 
 
0 #37 AlfieforMayor11 2012-04-24 09:30
I have no problem with Maclean benching Alfie, Milo, and Spezza. As the captain of this team Alfie can't have a meltdown like that. He lost his composure way before being benched. He needs to be a calming influence for this team and he wasn't. How is the team supposed to keep it together when their captain is acting like that?

Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't recall Spezza and Milo seeing any ice time in the first 5 minutes or so of that 3rd period. It could have been more but I'm not sure.

I understand your frustration Chirp but while Alfie, Spezz, and Milo were sitting on the bench, our second powerplay unit had a number of scoring chances including Phillips ringing one off the iron.
Quote
 
 
0 #38 Shiner 2012-04-24 09:31
One more thing: Nice to see that, for the most part, the Sens Army is reality based. Lose a tough game, with plenty of reason to complain, but you don't see most Ottawa fans claiming some grand conspiracy at all levels of the NHL to keep us from moving on.
Quote
 
 
0 #39 AlfieforMayor11 2012-04-24 09:32
The momentum may seem like it's in favor of New York, but the one great thing about the Sens this season has been their ability to bounce back. I expect they'll do that in game 7. Anderson needs to have another strong game, Spezza needs to play smarter, and Alfie needs to lead by example like he usually does.

Sens win on thursday night and advance to the second round.
Quote
 
 
-1 #40 Tcharger 2012-04-24 09:34
I am actually less worried about this coming game..everytime this season it looks like it should be an easy win there is a let down...when the cards are stacked against us tho we play amazingly
Quote
 
 
+1 #41 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 09:40
If Michalek gets suspended (and dreger seems convinced he will be)

what are your lines? I think it goes:

Silfverberg-Spezza-Alfie
Stone-Turris-Foligno
Greening-Smith-Neil
Condra-Kenopka-O'Brien
Quote
 
 
0 #42 darthsens911 2012-04-24 09:46
ALFIE IS ANGRY

ALFIE SMASH

LMAO, Love it!!!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #43 Tcharger 2012-04-24 09:46
If he is judging by his recent play it may be a blessing in disguise
Quote
 
 
+1 #44 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 09:50
Quoting Tcharger:
If he is judging by his recent play it may be a blessing in disguise


If your referring to Michalek don't start drinking zipzapcrap koolaid

Michalek played over 4 min of PK last night. And even though he may have had an off night, without him in the lineup, NY defense first mentality will simply zero in on Spezza and Alfie. Michalek grinds through checks, takes a beating in front of the net, and often gives Spezza room to create in the OZ simply because he parks in rear in front of the net, forcing the NYR to collapse. Butler will not and does not do this. Stone/Silfverbe rg could, but NYR wont be affected by their presence when dealing with Spezza.
Quote
 
 
0 #45 FO-LEEEEE-NO 2012-04-24 09:51
So,

Who's in, who's out? Stone or Silverberg?
Quote
 
 
+1 #46 C 2012-04-24 09:54
Couple points.

I would love to see Spezza just grab the puck in his own zone and shoot it as soon as he gets it, to shut all this "he needs to shoot more" crap. Guy is making plays, give it a rest.

I'm glad Alfie got mad, shows that this team wants to win, and its not just gravy games for them. He will cool down and the team will play much better at MSG. I can't wait to see crying Ranger fans when they actually lose, let alone their whiney goalie complaining after a win.
Quote
 
 
-1 #47 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 09:54
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
So,

Who's in, who's out? Stone or Silverberg?


both?

If Michalek isn't suspended I would honestly still start both, in favor of Condra

Our biggest offensive showing has been 3 goals, and we will need 3 goals I'm convinced to win game 7. Condra use is great over a series/playoff run etc but in game 7 we can double shift michalek/alfie/ smith/obrien for the PK. we need offense

I would even be inclined to go like this (if michalek plays)

stone-spezza-michalek
silfverberg-turris-alfie
foligno-smith-greening
o'brien-kenopka-neil

we need offense, and we need sustain and generate pressure
Quote
 
 
-1 #48 jakester 2012-04-24 09:54
I love Konopka love his effort but it isn't by playing our little guy 25 minutes a night that we're going to win this series. I'd even give him the night off and replace him with Daug for the last game.

Winning faceoffs and backing in too deep on the penalty kill aren't doing it for us. Faceoffs over rated - hell Rangers tied at 3-3 with barely 35% efficiency.

I'd go with this lineup

Mich-Spez-Alfie
Foligno-Turris-Butler
Greening-Smith-Neil
Daug-O'Brien-Condra

And Pray-Pray-Pray

They r the guys who brought us to the Dance. Experiment next series if we beat the RANGERS and the REFS!

GO SENS GO!
Quote
 
 
-1 #49 Tcharger 2012-04-24 09:55
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting Tcharger:
If he is judging by his recent play it may be a blessing in disguise


If your referring to Michalek don't start drinking zipzapcrap koolaid

Michalek played over 4 min of PK last night. And even though he may have had an off night, without him in the lineup, NY defense first mentality will simply zero in on Spezza and Alfie. Michalek grinds through checks, takes a beating in front of the net, and often gives Spezza room to create in the OZ simply because he parks in rear in front of the net, forcing the NYR to collapse. Butler will not and does not do this. Stone/Silfverberg could, but NYR wont be affected by their presence when dealing with Spezza.


If you say so...I think any of Stone/Silfverbu rg /Foligno(if told t stand there and do nothing else)/can do it
Too. I appreciate his defensive game...but he needs to be more than that ...and I ignore zipzap so not sure what or who he is going on about this week
Quote
 
 
+1 #50 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-04-24 09:57
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
So,

Who's in, who's out? Stone or Silverberg?


If Michalek gets suspended, we might see both Stone and Silverberg!

Would love to see the following based on the above:

Stone - Spezza - Silverberg
Foligno - Turris- Alfredsson
Greening - Smith - Neil
Klinkhammer - O'Brien - Condra

Daugavins possibly, in lieu of Klinkhammer.

GO SENS GO !!!!!!!!!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #51 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 10:00
Quoting SNOOPY SENIOR:
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
So,

Who's in, who's out? Stone or Silverberg?


If Michalek gets suspended, we might see both Stone and Silverberg!

Would love to see the following based on the above:

Stone - Spezza - Silverberg
Foligno - Turris- Alfredsson
Greening - Smith - Neil
Klinkhammer - O'Brien - Condra

GO SENS GO !!!!!!!!!!!


Maybe in 2013 but for a game 7, thats an awful lot to ask of Spezza. His biggest game of the year, Sens biggest game of the year. "Here spezza we need you to carry us offensively with 2 rooks who have each played 1 NHL game ever"

If Michalek gets suspended, Spezza has to play with a vet or someone who won't be overwhelemd by MSG (nto saying S&S would)
Quote
 
 
+1 #52 Sensnation 2012-04-24 10:03
I may be one of the few, but last nights game did not feel as bad for the Sens as a lot of the Toronto media is trying to hype. For the majority of the game the Sens were getting good opportunities. One of the best full games of crashing the opposition net I've seen in a long time.

Yes the refs are blowing it these playoffs in just about every series, but there were plenty of opportunities to close the Rangers out when it was 1-0. As they say, the longer you let a team hang around the bigger chance you'll get bitten in the ass.

I look forward to an amazing game 7. I would strongly advise Maclean to not put Alfie, Michalek and Spezza on 1 line as it makes shutting it down way too easy as they are all relatively small players. Greening works so well with Spezza because he adds a lot of size and grit to the line.

Silfverberg looked good, but I would honestly go back to Stone for game 7 as he has already developed some chemistry with Spezza (they had some in preseason too). I think both will be good offensive players, but Silfverberg looked really small and weak out there physically, not the best recipe against the Rangers.

1 more game for all the marbles, this is what hockey is all about. GO SENS GO!!!
Quote
 
 
+1 #53 Sensnation 2012-04-24 10:05
Quoting SNOOPY SENIOR:
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
So,

Who's in, who's out? Stone or Silverberg?


If Michalek gets suspended, we might see both Stone and Silverberg!

Would love to see the following based on the above:

Stone - Spezza - Silverberg
Foligno - Turris- Alfredsson
Greening - Smith - Neil
Klinkhammer - O'Brien - Condra

Daugavins possibly, in lieu of Klinkhammer.

GO SENS GO !!!!!!!!!!!


I don't mind it, but you have to put Konopka instead of Klink. Not sure if you forgot about him, but he's been one of our better players.
Quote
 
 
0 #54 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-04-24 10:08
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting SNOOPY SENIOR:
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
So,

Who's in, who's out? Stone or Silverberg?


If Michalek gets suspended, we might see both Stone and Silverberg!

Would love to see the following based on the above:

Stone - Spezza - Silverberg
Foligno - Turris- Alfredsson
Greening - Smith - Neil
Klinkhammer - O'Brien - Condra

GO SENS GO !!!!!!!!!!!


Maybe in 2013 but for a game 7, thats an awful lot to ask of Spezza. His biggest game of the year, Sens biggest game of the year. "Here spezza we need you to carry us offensively with 2 rooks who have each played 1 NHL game ever"

If Michalek gets suspended, Spezza has to play with a vet or someone who won't be overwhelemd by MSG (nto saying S&S would)


See your point. Then let's insert Foligno on LW with Spezza and Silverberg

Then move Stone to Line 2 on Lw with Turris and Alfredsson

Hope Michalek plays in Game 7, and Maclean does not have to juggle the lines , in the most important game of the year.

GO SENS GO !!!!!!!!!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #55 Tcharger 2012-04-24 10:08
Does anyone have a clip of what michalek may be suspended for?
Quote
 
 
+1 #56 Tookie 2012-04-24 10:09
Quoting BeastMode:
Am I the only one that noticed Alfie's meltdown happened immediately after he took a hit in the corner? Could it be he noticed concussion symptoms coming back and was pissed off?


This is right, Alfie didnt meltdown after being benched, he had it right after getting hit and had he not looked up at the last second he would be lying on the ice again...very close call. I think thats why he was mad, maybe his symptoms are bothering him, maybe he can push himself to the limit without it bringing on symptoms of some sort.

Anyways I dont think it was good for the team for Alfie to blow up, clearly it wasnt to meant to get the guys going, was more of a sign that his armour is cracking...

BTWI have that exact same stick Sherwood T90 007 Spy all black, he just busted a $250 stick and didnt even think twice about it, LOL, ouch, makes me cry!
Quote
 
 
+2 #57 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 10:13
Alfie nominated for masteron award for perserverence and dedication to hockey! (along with lupul and paccioretty)

Atta boy Alfie

Not showing bias here, but if Pacc wins, then the league has lost all control of this trophy. It will simply be known as the "who came back from the greatest injury/illness" trophy.

Secondly, how is Bryan Murray not nominated for GM of the year

Tallon (Florida) Poille (Nsh) and Armstrong (LA) were nominated
Quote
 
 
0 #58 A11fie 2012-04-24 10:15
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:

From the last post: Foligno should be shot


I hear where your frustration is coming from, however I felt that everyone’s game was pretty good last night (excluding the second period)… but ya, there are a lot of plays that Foligno ‘almost’ makes, and while you can’t fault a guy for trying, it is hard to watch the same result/mistake over and over again. I still think he’s a good player and, if he matures and stops taking so many penalties, he’ll be a lot more valuable to this team in the future.

I want to fault Foligno for the penalty last night, but every time I watch the replay, I just see a soft call. Still, without the rep, I don’t think Foligno gets called. I did think that NYR’s goalie interference penalty was weak, and I’m not surprised by the ‘even-up call’. Maybe you’re right; maybe if Foligno drops to the ice like a sack of bricks when the second D-man makes contact from behind, maybe Foligno doesn’t get called, but c’mon; I wouldn't advocate that anyone play like that.

And true, we have taken 2 of 3 at MSG this postseason… so GO SENS
Quote
 
 
0 #59 FTW 2012-04-24 10:19
So, both Staal and Richards take turns slashing Neil and breaks his stick. NO CALL!
Neil get elbowed in the head by a blind side hit. NO CALL

Guess favouritism comes into play when your the top team in the east? These new school refs are killing hockey and championships.
Quote
 
 
0 #60 miguel 2012-04-24 10:20
are we not getting sick and tired of always having to blame horrendous reffing in critical games?
I am sick and tired of having the Refs play key important roles in most of our games.
Have we not gotten the short end of the stick on the calls almost the entire series. (too many to mention)
Has NY not gotten the benefit of the doubt on most calls (again too many to mention)
Coincedence... I think not!

yes there has been bad reffing, but it is clear that the Sens get it at the worst part of the games. Game two fans in a frenzy to start the game 2PP goals for NY in the first 4 minutes...Refs did their job.

Yesterday 1-0 Sens MO is all in our favour, bad calls against us, leads to 2 goals,
When we finally get a call, it is quickly nullified with a questionable call against us.

I am sorry but this is not a one game assessment, this is an ongoing trend that only concludes me to believe, that bad calls against NY will get scurtinzed more by the Refs supervisors, and Refs will be repremanded. While bad calls against teams the NHL cares less about, ie the Sens, seems to be accepted, leading officials to call one team differently from another team.

I have been to all three home games, and to have all three home game fans constantly chant "Refs you Suck" is not something that should be good for the league, and is not a successful experience for someone shelling out $300 for the stripes to be the stars of the game. NO ONE PAYS TO HAVE THEM DICTATE THE OUTCOME OF A GAME... IMO
Quote
 
 
+1 #61 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 10:22
Quoting FTW:
So, both Staal and Richards take turns slashing Neil and breaks his stick. NO CALL!
Neil get elbowed in the head by a blind side hit. NO CALL

Guess favouritism comes into play when your the top team in the east? These new school refs are killing hockey and championships.


seriously tho, we need to stop complaining about the non calls, or bad calls that were made. Any team, any fan can review tape and find at least 5 missed calls against any team on any given night. If you want to complain about Richards slashing Neil, then NYR can complain about Neil targetting Richards without the puck on that excat same play. If I was the ref I probably would have sent both of and make them still play 5v5

Time to move on and prepare for game 7. The best teams battle through adversity and don't use refs as an excuse.
Quote
 
 
-3 #62 Tookie 2012-04-24 10:22
Inserting 2 raw rookies into a game 7 is recipe for disaster. Silfverberg looked out of place on that top line, call it what you want (jetlag, chemistry, whatever) he shouldnt be on that top line, neither should Stone, although he did get an assist, it was more of a nice finish by Spezza. He dissapeared after.

I argued about this all year and now see that we should put back Greening on the top line, he may not have the top end skill but he busts his ass and does anything for the team. The only reason I want him on the top line is he gives Spezza room and Spezza seems to click with him around the net. (most of Greening's goals have come from Spezza rebounds or passes around the net.)

Michalek Spezza Greening
Silfverberg Turris Alfie
Foligno Smith Neil
O'Brien Konopka Condra

Kuba Karlsson
Phillips Gonchar
Cowen Gilroy
Carks
Quote
 
 
0 #63 Tookie 2012-04-24 10:25
Quoting FTW:
So, both Staal and Richards take turns slashing Neil and breaks his stick. NO CALL!
Neil get elbowed in the head by a blind side hit. NO CALL

Guess favouritism comes into play when your the top team in the east? These new school refs are killing hockey and championships.



LMAO even Neil admitted to watching his pass, that was a great hit by Del Zotto, haha shoulder to chest, Neil gives those almost every game, its not an elbow to the head, LMAO!!
Quote
 
 
-1 #64 Tookie 2012-04-24 10:30
Quoting miguel:

I have been to all three home games, and to have all three home game fans constantly chant "Refs you Suck" is not something that should be good for the league, and is not a successful experience for someone shelling out $300 for the stripes to be the stars of the game. NO ONE PAYS TO HAVE THEM DICTATE THE OUTCOME OF A GAME... IMO


Miguel, you act like the Sens are the only team getting this treatment, have you watched any other series? Every arena chants "Refs you suck" its nothing new and the NHL dont give a shit about it and shouldnt, the refs are doing their job, calling penalties, and all of Ottawa's penalties last night were deserved. We are one of the most penalized teams in the league, its not coincidence, its Foligno, Smith, Konopka, Kuba, Gonchar, same culprits everytime, they get beat and are forced to cheat.
Quote
 
 
0 #65 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 10:31
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Inserting 2 raw rookies into a game 7 is recipe for disaster. Silfverberg looked out of place on that top line, call it what you want (jetlag, chemistry, whatever) he shouldnt be on that top line, neither should Stone, although he did get an assist, it was more of a nice finish by Spezza. He dissapeared after.

I argued about this all year and now see that we should put back Greening on the top line, he may not have the top end skill but he busts his ass and does anything for the team. The only reason I want him on the top line is he gives Spezza room and Spezza seems to click with him around the net. (most of Greening's goals have come from Spezza rebounds or passes around the net.)

Michalek Spezza Greening
Silfverberg Turris Alfie
Foligno Smith Neil
O'Brien Konopka Condra

Kuba Karlsson
Phillips Gonchar
Cowen Gilroy
Carks


Fair enough but on the broadcast last night they mentioned that Maclean stated he inserted Silfverberg over Stone for one reason only. experience. Maclean mentioned that this year has been awesome, but in the grander scheme of things, he wants his young players to get this experience on the big stage. I wouldn't be surprised if 1 or both play thursday simply for this reason
Quote
 
 
0 #66 sens 4 ever 2012-04-24 10:32
A brutal game for sure. The boys were not a focused as a team. Bad reffing for sure but a good team should be able to overcome it. Here's to Thursday and a win...
Quote
 
 
+2 #67 Tookie 2012-04-24 10:39
Quoting Alcatraz:
If you want to complain about Richards slashing Neil, then NYR can complain about Neil targetting Richards without the puck on that excat same play. If I was the ref I probably would have sent both of and make them still play 5v5

Time to move on and prepare for game 7. The best teams battle through adversity and don't use refs as an excuse.


Thank you, finally someone with balls to say it. Refs are part of the game, what did you expect, Sens not get penalties after being one of the most penalized teams in the league. Kuba hook, legit, Smith roughing on Callahan, legit, Michalek slashing/holdin g, legit, Foligno ran the goalie, legit... I mean come on, its not do what you want hockey here. Are there missed calls yes, for everyteam, do they usually change the outcome of a game...NO!

Im happy the Sens keep playing through it though, if they had the fans mentality they would quit and whine...
Quote
 
 
0 #68 Tookie 2012-04-24 10:45
Quoting Alcatraz:

Fair enough but on the broadcast last night they mentioned that Maclean stated he inserted Silfverberg over Stone for one reason only. experience. Maclean mentioned that this year has been awesome, but in the grander scheme of things, he wants his young players to get this experience on the big stage. I wouldn't be surprised if 1 or both play thursday simply for this reason


That is true, most fans forget we are rebuilding mode, including me and if Maclean wants to insert rookies to give them much needed experience than so be it. Maybe winning at all costs is not the mandate here, even Maclean said this year was awesome and that they are basically getting a free ride here, everybit of playoff experience is golden for these kids.

I just want to move onto the 2nd round, 2 rookies in the lineup scares me a bit...
Quote
 
 
0 #69 darthsens911 2012-04-24 10:50
Tookie

If you honestly believe that Foligno ran the goalie for that penalty, you honestly wear blinders for the opposition when you watch a Sens game. There is no way he 'ran' the goalie, he was clearly pushed in as he rushed the net.

Agreed that there are missed calls and the reffing has been poor for the majority of the playoffs but to give a 5 on 3 for that play was and is ridiculous especially considering the refs had the chance to redeem their mistake with the easy delay of game call to give us a 5 on 3 that they blatantly ignored.

It changed the momentum of the game and yes after that, the Sens played like crap but had it not been for the momentum swing the whole game could have gone the other way. Or at very least if the 5 on 3 that the Sens should have had may have turned the table back in our favour.

Game 7 should be ours if the boys can just stay focused on the game and bring the game we all know they can play.

GO SENS GO!
Quote
 
 
+1 #70 NikoTn 2012-04-24 10:53
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting Alcatraz:
If you want to complain about Richards slashing Neil, then NYR can complain about Neil targetting Richards without the puck on that excat same play. If I was the ref I probably would have sent both of and make them still play 5v5

Time to move on and prepare for game 7. The best teams battle through adversity and don't use refs as an excuse.


Thank you, finally someone with balls to say it. Refs are part of the game, what did you expect, Sens not get penalties after being one of the most penalized teams in the league. Kuba hook, legit, Smith roughing on Callahan, legit, Michalek slashing/holding, legit, Foligno ran the goalie, legit... I mean come on, its not do what you want hockey here. Are there missed calls yes, for everyteam, do they usually change the outcome of a game...NO!

Im happy the Sens keep playing through it though, if they had the fans mentality they would quit and whine...


Actually, the lead NHL officiator was in the building last night and gve the refs shit after the game. I agree that we shouldn't whine and stop taking dumb panlties, however this isn't October Tookie, Kuba's penalty was NOT a penalty. If Foligno was a penalty, why didn;t Prust get sent off at least twice for falling on Anderson.

I dont care, just get it done in game 7 boys.
Quote
 
 
0 #71 Tookie 2012-04-24 10:58
Quoting darthsens911:
Tookie

If you honestly believe that Foligno ran the goalie for that penalty, you honestly wear blinders for the opposition when you watch a Sens game. There is no way he 'ran' the goalie, he was clearly pushed in as he rushed the net.


No blinders here bud, even IF Foligno was "clearly" pushed into Lundqvist, he made no attempt whatsoever to change his course or even stop for that matter, he just flops on the goalie like if being pushed in him is ok and not his fault. He has a rep for doing that, its no secret.

Had he made anykind of effort, there would be no call. As for the flip in the crowd, maybe you should pay more attention, it was deflected, Sens bench and Sens players didnt even make anything about it, clearly you were on a beer run or sleeping?
Quote
 
 
+3 #72 Joe Bob 2012-04-24 10:59
Win or lose in game 7, we must all congratulate our Sens on an amazing season. I'd love to see some of our fans line up at the airport to welcome our boys back from NYC (win or lose). Love this team.

I can't help but admire Alfie's freak-out yesterday. His passion and devotion for the Sens organization was very apparent yesterday. Somebody without passion for their team wouldn't display that kind of emotion (Kovalev type of player). My only worry regarding his outburst is that maybe he's concerned that he might have played his last home game as a Senator (contemplating retirement) and wasn't impressed with the way he and his team battled. Knowing Alfie (not personally), I'm sure he'd like to end his last game at home on a high note. Total speculation on my part and I hope this isn't the case because I think he has a lot of great hockey left.

Game 7 guys. Should be a great finish. Lets keep the positive energy flowing and enjoy the rest of the ride. GO SENS GO.
Quote
 
 
0 #73 Sensnation 2012-04-24 10:59
Quoting Alcatraz:


Fair enough but on the broadcast last night they mentioned that Maclean stated he inserted Silfverberg over Stone for one reason only. experience. Maclean mentioned that this year has been awesome, but in the grander scheme of things, he wants his young players to get this experience on the big stage. I wouldn't be surprised if 1 or both play thursday simply for this reason


I have to admit, until that quote circulated yesterday afternoon I was all for Silfverberg in that game, but I think that quote sends the wrong message. If it's really about getting all these young guys experience Lehner should be in the net for a game as well. I think that quote was a big demotivator for the team yesterday and I think it was one of Maclean's few mistakes this year ... the quote, not Silfverberg.
Quote
 
 
0 #74 Hax 2012-04-24 11:03
Have to focus on "real life" a bit so apologies if any of this has been covered (plus I hate reading message boards after a loss):

I'm with Chirp on doubting Paulrus on the benching. Tough love is one thing and the message to the younger guys that "nobody gets a pass" has value - but it was a big risk. Hopefully he and the leadership group he's leaned on and praised all year can truly patch things up.

Silfverberg looked amazing on his first two shifts then sort of meh the rest of the way (not unexpected in his first ever NHL game). Looks great for the future but I wouldn't mind seeing Stone or Butler back in for game 7.

Officiating was brutal, but we also played poorly all game with a few exceptions. I think they took the foot off the gas for the first time this series - we need that underdog desperation mode back for game 7.

Great work again by the crowd at SBP!
Quote
 
 
0 #75 Hax 2012-04-24 11:05
To me Alfie gets a total pass on his "meltdown". A) We all knew he was more passionate than any other player but that he typically keeps it within - so why do people get upset when it finally surfaces? B) He's freaking Alfie - he could run a school bus off the road and deserve a pass (wull) C) Most of us agree it was the wrong call to bench "the big three" anyway.

Extra day off is huge - gives time for the big three and MacLean to kiss and make up, gives time for some practice time for Stone/Silfverbe rg if either is playing in game 7, gives time for the boys to work themselves into an "underdog" state of mind again, gives time for Torts to look past Ottawa like he had been doing at the start of the series.

Michalek might get suspended if there is a camera angle that really shows a kick of any kind - but maybe that's okay too. Helps the underdog mentality and he hasn't exactly been MVP so far (though I do not hate on him like some do).

Let's all remember this is essentially bonus hockey. The elation we've all felt with the three wins so far wasn't expected for another couple of years.
Quote
 
 
0 #76 Ryan 2012-04-24 11:07
Guys remember silfver only had 1 day with the team and only 1 day on north American rinks as they are smaller let him Practice more with the team
Quote
 
 
+1 #77 darthsens911 2012-04-24 11:09
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting darthsens911:
Tookie

If you honestly believe that Foligno ran the goalie for that penalty, you honestly wear blinders for the opposition when you watch a Sens game. There is no way he 'ran' the goalie, he was clearly pushed in as he rushed the net.


No blinders here bud, even IF Foligno was "clearly" pushed into Lundqvist, he made no attempt whatsoever to change his course or even stop for that matter, he just flops on the goalie like if being pushed in him is ok and not his fault. He has a rep for doing that, its no secret.

Had he made anykind of effort, there would be no call. As for the flip in the crowd, maybe you should pay more attention, it was deflected, Sens bench and Sens players didnt even make anything about it, clearly you were on a beer run or sleeping?


Not going to bother getting into a pissing match with you so I guess we agree to disagree. I know Foligno has a rep for running the goalie and that may have played a part in the call but giving him that penalty is like giving Neil a fightin major for a shove in a net scrum simply because he is known as a fighter.

I saw what I saw and you saw what you saw. No beers or sleep affecting what I saw though. Unfortunately :)
Quote
 
 
-2 #78 ZipZapRap 2012-04-24 11:12
Alfie was mad because they... I mean Michalek and Foligno totally blew this game for the whole team

Both of them got Penalties in the other teams zone that resulted in goals

Hands down Michalek changed the entire mood of the game
with his bone head penalty

Fuck him he is as useless as I said he would be


Remember that penalty when we lose game 7 and "9mm" is held off the score sheet
Quote
 
 
0 #79 Hax 2012-04-24 11:15
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting Alcatraz:

Fair enough but on the broadcast last night they mentioned that Maclean stated he inserted Silfverberg over Stone for one reason only. experience. Maclean mentioned that this year has been awesome, but in the grander scheme of things, he wants his young players to get this experience on the big stage. I wouldn't be surprised if 1 or both play thursday simply for this reason


That is true, most fans forget we are rebuilding mode, including me and if Maclean wants to insert rookies to give them much needed experience than so be it. Maybe winning at all costs is not the mandate here, even Maclean said this year was awesome and that they are basically getting a free ride here, everybit of playoff experience is golden for these kids.

I just want to move onto the 2nd round, 2 rookies in the lineup scares me a bit...


Yeah this is a real tough one for me as well. In one sense I get that we're rebuilding still and that this experience for the rookies (and you can include the "message" of benching the big 3) will be valuable down the line .... but at the same time I'd like win this series now that we're so close it. If we were down 3-0 or 3-1 or something then fine to sort of write off the series and get a guy some experience but in a close out game?

I trust Paulrus but this one is tough to get behind.

Win game 7 and all is forgiven though :)
Quote
 
 
0 #80 jasonontheoldsenschirp 2012-04-24 11:16
Quoting ZipZapRap:
Alfie was mad because they... I mean Michalek and Foligno totally blew this game for the whole team

Both of them got Penalties in the other teams zone that resulted in goals

Hand down Michalek changed the entire mood of the game

Fuck him


Again, I have to agree with you here. Foligno's penalty really shouldn't have been a penalty. But Michalek completely devastated the momentum of the second period. And to top that, because our powerplay is so measly and abysmal, we spend time in our own end on the PP and Kuba takes another penalty.

The underlying factor has been an absolute hash of a powerplay. To be honest, it is the worst I have ever seen in hockey-- ever.

That being said, apparently Michalek is facing potential supplemental discipline for some type of kicking act during/after the game? I'll be straight up honest with you, I wouldn't mind seeing him out. He's been an absolute waste of skin. I would rather have Greening, even Mark Stone back on the first line, instead of Milo. He hasn't generated anything, and doesn't deserve to be on the first line anyways.
Quote
 
 
0 #81 darthsens911 2012-04-24 11:16
Regarding the 'benching the top 3', I have to wonder if Alfie was not part of that but more in line with being on the bench because he was shaken up before the fit he had on the bench.
Quote
 
 
+2 #82 Hax 2012-04-24 11:17
Quoting ZipZapRap:
blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblah


Ignore.
Quote
 
 
0 #83 Kielbasa 2012-04-24 11:17
ZipZapRap...ser iously guy, why are you even here. Your comments are so idiotic and full of lunacy that you add nothing to the discussion here.
Quote
 
 
-4 #84 Big_S 2012-04-24 11:29
It's been a great year for the SENS. But let's get down to reality. Unless Spezza, Michalek and Karlsson show up for thursday's game the way Callahan & Richards did last night.

I'M PREDICTING A 4-2 VICTORY fOR THE RANGERS!!!!!! BOOK IT!!
Quote
 
 
-2 #85 Dork 2012-04-24 11:31
People were all over Spezza at the start of this series. He got some points and people seem to be backing off, but to me, the only thing that he's changed is that he's shooting more.

The rest is the same - missed defensive assignments (important ones) and ill-advised passes.

I honestly don't know if he's ever going to fix the cross-ice pass to the other team. I don't think he played much better in the game he got 2 points either.

He needs to start making quicker decisions along with more crisp, simple passes. That and not being afraid to dump the puck once in a while would help his game enormously. I will admit that he's had some nice backchecks though. Other than that he still seems to be playing 'regular season' hockey.
Quote
 
 
0 #86 darthsens911 2012-04-24 11:32
What exactly is the league looking at regarding Michalek anyway? I didn't see anything on the video on twitter.
Quote
 
 
0 #87 Hax 2012-04-24 11:36
Quoting Kielbasa:
Another thought. Foligno needs a restraining order that keeps him a certain distance away from any goaltenders area. Even if the call was completely bogus last night, he is getting the reputation around the league for goaltender interference. The refs are going to call him for just looking at the goalie at this point.


Except that Murray and MacLean have told Foligno the exact opposite. Foligno's best shot at being a top 6 guy is to be a gritty, on the edge and in the paint guy. They know it's going to take him some time to learn how to walk that fine line. Some of the penalties he's taken are his own fault but necessary (to a point) for him to learn what he can and cannot do. The one last night was a brutal call but given the climate that Shanny created when he let Weber get away with the turnbuckle move Foligno should have done a better job demonstrating to the refs that he was trying to avoid contact - even though he couldn't have no matter what he did.
Quote
 
 
-2 #88 jasonontheoldsenschirp 2012-04-24 11:36
Bored at home, watching Hockey Central at Noon, and just wondering: if we were considering a trade, what type of return would Milan Michalek yield us in the off season?
Quote
 
 
+1 #89 SensChirp 2012-04-24 11:38
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
Bored at home, watching Hockey Central at Noon, and just wondering: if we were considering a trade, what type of return would Milan Michalek yield us in the off season?

Hahaha can we hold off on this kind of talk? Yeeeeeeesh
Quote
 
 
0 #90 jasonontheoldsenschirp 2012-04-24 11:38
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
Bored at home, watching Hockey Central at Noon, and just wondering: if we were considering a trade, what type of return would Milan Michalek yield us in the off season?

Hahaha can we hold off on this kind of talk? Yeeeeeeesh


My bad Chirp. I'll read a book or something.
Quote
 
 
0 #91 SensChirp 2012-04-24 11:38
Quoting Big_S:
It's been a great year for the SENS. But let's get down to reality. Unless Spezza, Michalek and Karlsson show up for thursday's game the way Callahan & Richards did last night.

I'M PREDICTING A 4-2 VICTORY fOR THE RANGERS!!!!!! BOOK IT!!

Thanks for shouting that prickish prediction at us :)
Quote
 
 
0 #92 FlickerFlash 2012-04-24 11:39
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
Bored at home, watching Hockey Central at Noon, and just wondering: if we were considering a trade, what type of return would Milan Michalek yield us in the off season?


Jordan Staal???? bahahaha!!!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #93 SensChirp 2012-04-24 11:40
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
Bored at home, watching Hockey Central at Noon, and just wondering: if we were considering a trade, what type of return would Milan Michalek yield us in the off season?

Hahaha can we hold off on this kind of talk? Yeeeeeeesh


My bad Chirp. I'll read a book or something.

Haha obviously I'm a little on edge today. I'm sure you will find others on here that do want to have that discussion.
Quote
 
 
0 #94 miguel 2012-04-24 11:40
Quoting darthsens911:
Tookie

If you honestly believe that Foligno ran the goalie for that penalty, you honestly wear blinders for the opposition when you watch a Sens game. There is no way he 'ran' the goalie, he was clearly pushed in as he rushed the net.

Agreed that there are missed calls and the reffing has been poor for the majority of the playoffs but to give a 5 on 3 for that play was and is ridiculous especially considering the refs had the chance to redeem their mistake with the easy delay of game call to give us a 5 on 3 that they blatantly ignored.

It changed the momentum of the game and yes after that, the Sens played like crap but had it not been for the momentum swing the whole game could have gone the other way. Or at very least if the 5 on 3 that the Sens should have had may have turned the table back in our favour.

Game 7 should be ours if the boys can just stay focused on the game and bring the game we all know they can play.

GO SENS GO!


Thank you... a voice of reason
Quote
 
 
0 #95 Hax 2012-04-24 11:40
I love the 9MM haters who only seem to read the score sheet over and over during the game.

Milo is still a younger guy despite his experience and will get even better - and he ain't bad now.

GO SENS GO
Quote
 
 
0 #96 jasonontheoldsenschirp 2012-04-24 11:41
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
Bored at home, watching Hockey Central at Noon, and just wondering: if we were considering a trade, what type of return would Milan Michalek yield us in the off season?

Hahaha can we hold off on this kind of talk? Yeeeeeeesh


My bad Chirp. I'll read a book or something.

Haha obviously I'm a little on edge today. I'm sure you will find others on here that do want to have that discussion.


As you can probably tell, I am too Chirp.

Really wanted the boys to wrap things up last night.

Sigh.
Quote
 
 
0 #97 Big_S 2012-04-24 11:44
It's called reverse psychology, it worked in game four with my father-in-law. Told him SENS would lose 5-1! Almost got taken down for that comment! :)

But on a serious note this team really needs Spezza to pick his game up! It's been a while since the SENS had a break out offensive game. They are due!!
Quote
 
 
0 #98 SlickRick 2012-04-24 11:45
Anybody else notice that Alfie lost his shit after being crunched by a huge hit? After that his play dropped; bad passes, bad clearings from our zone etc....I'd go as far as guess that may be concussed and the idea of going out like that really made him lose his cool. If he is injured, he won't tell anybody though at this point.
Watch the hit again.
Quote
 
 
+2 #99 CraigL 2012-04-24 11:46
With a 66.6 win% on Broadway, I like our chances.

Year of the Dog! Go Sens Go!
Quote
 
 
0 #100 Hax 2012-04-24 11:46
The beauty of having won game 5 at MSG is that we bought TWO chances to close the rags out.

Put another way, we bought ourselves room to somewhat shit the bed in game 6 and still win the series.

Will be the toughest game to win by far but to paraphrase the Paulrus, the chance to play in a game 7 will be a great building block for our young players.
Quote
 
 
0 #101 Hax 2012-04-24 11:48
Quoting SlickRick:
Anybody else notice that Alfie lost his shit after being crunched by a huge hit? After that his play dropped; bad passes, bad clearings from our zone etc....I'd go as far as guess that may be concussed and the idea of going out like that really made him lose his cool. If he is injured, he won't tell anybody though at this point.
Watch the hit again.


Alfie "lost his shit" when he and the rest of the "big 3" were benched during a key power play.

And yes EVERYONE noticed.
Quote
 
 
0 #102 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 11:54
Quoting Hax:
Quoting SlickRick:
Anybody else notice that Alfie lost his shit after being crunched by a huge hit? After that his play dropped; bad passes, bad clearings from our zone etc....I'd go as far as guess that may be concussed and the idea of going out like that really made him lose his cool. If he is injured, he won't tell anybody though at this point.
Watch the hit again.


Alfie "lost his shit" when he and the rest of the "big 3" were benched during a key power play.

And yes EVERYONE noticed.


false he "lost his shit" after being hit, then skating to the bench swinging and stomping
Quote
 
 
-1 #103 Big_S 2012-04-24 11:56
I still think that PM should go with Milo, Spezza and Alfie on the first line.

Go for GOLD or go HOME!!
Quote
 
 
0 #104 MoeDozer 2012-04-24 11:56
this series (ignore stats) i think butler has to draw in the last game. i know ive been the person that is praising silfver like non other. i honestly think this milan possible suspension is a blessing in disguise. the guy has to sit down even though it is game 7. the rangers have completly shut him out, and hes done nothing decent to make up for that.

if milan is gone, i would go with butler and silfver. or possible go with daugavins? we need that energy guy badly. needs to be a very physical game from our side. finish checks everytime.

side note, we are all lighting up spezza for whatever reason. Can i point out that our stud on D only has 1 point this playoffs, and it came from a somewhat flukey bounce off i think del zotto's skate? konopka has more points than him..

edit: i do give creict for karlsson leading us in shots with 31, next closest is spezz with 19. but these guys have such high skill, no excuses for them to score once every 31 shots.
Quote
 
 
0 #105 Hax 2012-04-24 11:57
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting SlickRick:
Anybody else notice that Alfie lost his shit after being crunched by a huge hit? After that his play dropped; bad passes, bad clearings from our zone etc....I'd go as far as guess that may be concussed and the idea of going out like that really made him lose his cool. If he is injured, he won't tell anybody though at this point.
Watch the hit again.


Alfie "lost his shit" when he and the rest of the "big 3" were benched during a key power play.

And yes EVERYONE noticed.


false he "lost his shit" after being hit, then skating to the bench swinging and stomping


He was definitely mad after the hit but it was the benching that put him over the edge - he even said so himself.

Moot point anyway - let's just win game 7 so we can all relax a bit.

I HATE losing!
Quote
 
 
0 #106 darthsens911 2012-04-24 11:57
Quoting Hax:
Quoting SlickRick:
Anybody else notice that Alfie lost his shit after being crunched by a huge hit? After that his play dropped; bad passes, bad clearings from our zone etc....I'd go as far as guess that may be concussed and the idea of going out like that really made him lose his cool. If he is injured, he won't tell anybody though at this point.
Watch the hit again.


Alfie "lost his shit" when he and the rest of the "big 3" were benched during a key power play.

And yes EVERYONE noticed.


He lost his shit prior to the benching. If he was even part of that benching which I doubt was directed at him.
Quote
 
 
-1 #107 miguel 2012-04-24 11:58
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting darthsens911:
Tookie

If you honestly believe that Foligno ran the goalie for that penalty, you honestly wear blinders for the opposition when you watch a Sens game. There is no way he 'ran' the goalie, he was clearly pushed in as he rushed the net.


No blinders here bud, even IF Foligno was "clearly" pushed into Lundqvist, he made no attempt whatsoever to change his course or even stop for that matter, he just flops on the goalie like if being pushed in him is ok and not his fault. He has a rep for doing that, its no secret.

Had he made anykind of effort, there would be no call. As for the flip in the crowd, maybe you should pay more attention, it was deflected, Sens bench and Sens players didnt even make anything about it, clearly you were on a beer run or sleeping?


Hey Know Nothing, there is a reason I gave you that name...
20,000 at the game disagree with you!
The Sens have been getting the short end this entire series, and it is not just the bad calls, it is the timing of all the bad calls that really changes the momentum.

That call on Foligno was an ebarrassment, that non call on the delay of game was obvious to the 20,000 yet the one ref who was about to call it got called off by the other who saw a phantom tip.

I was at the game with two guys who are not particularily Sens fans, but had to agree, the reffing was not only bad, but it was bad calls against the Sens at bad times,while non calls to NY for the same infractions, which changed the momentum of the game, and in the end the outcome.
In a normal world we could say "all things being equal the law of averages dictates that we will get some of these calls at the right time" we have not had any of this in this series...
again not a coincedence IMO
the fact that all are talking about the refs... proves their ineffectiveness
Quote
 
 
+1 #108 jakester 2012-04-24 11:58
Turris-Spezz-Silfverburg
Greening-Foligno-Stone
Michalek-Smith-Alfie
Condra-Smith-Neil

THat would really screw up FONZIE - we should give it a try.

Lets mix it up - Last game or run to the 2nd round.

GO SENS GO!
Quote
 
 
+1 #109 Hax 2012-04-24 12:00
Quoting jakester:
Turris-Spezz-Silfverburg
Greening-Foligno-Stone
Michalek-Smith-Alfie
Condra-Smith-Neil

THat would really screw up FONZIE - we should give it a try.

Lets mix it up - Last game or run to the 2nd round.

GO SENS GO!


Might also screw up Smith playing on two lines at once. ;)
Quote
 
 
0 #110 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 12:01
Quoting MoeDozer:
this series (ignore stats) i think butler has to draw in the last game. i know ive been the person that is praising silfver like non other. i honestly think this milan possible suspension is a blessing in disguise. the guy has to sit down even though it is game 7. the rangers have completly shut him out, and hes done nothing decent to make up for that.

if milan is gone, i would go with butler and silfver. or possible go with daugavins? we need that energy guy badly. needs to be a very physical game from our side. finish checks everytime.

side note, we are all lighting up spezza for whatever reason. Can i point out that our stud on D only has 1 point this playoffs, and it came from a somewhat flukey bounce off i think del zotto's skate? konopka has more points than him..

edit: i do give creict for karlsson leading us in shots with 31, next closest is spezz with 19. but these guys have such high skill, no excuses for them to score once every 31 shots.


So your saying sit out michalek for being shut out by their top d lines, but keep condra and kenopka in?

ya ok, how about sitting one fo them , demoting michalek slightly and having him play against lesser opponents

Thank god your not our coach.

michalek plays with spezza if he is not suspended
Quote
 
 
0 #111 jakester 2012-04-24 12:02
I knew I should have looked it over again - haha - but you catch my drift. Smith can handle the work
Quote
 
 
0 #112 darthsens911 2012-04-24 12:04
Quoting jakester:
Turris-Spezz-Silfverburg
Greening-Foligno-Stone
Michalek-Smith-Alfie
Condra-Smith-Neil

THat would really screw up FONZIE - we should give it a try.

Lets mix it up - Last game or run to the 2nd round.

GO SENS GO!


That would be very interesting!!! Could work.

Although I think Konopka is supposed to be one of the Smith's?
Quote
 
 
0 #113 Hax 2012-04-24 12:06
The "who to play debate" is pretty interesting. As a passionate fan, I really want a "win at all costs" lineup which (to me) looks like this:

Michalek - Spezza - Butler
Foligno - Turris - Alfredsson
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Daugavins

But I'm thinking MacLean/Murray will go with at "build for the future" lineup more like:

Michalek - Spezza - Stone
Foligno - Turris - Alfredsson
Silfverberg - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Greening

(with Greening moving up and Condra drawing in if MM9 is suspended - for either lineup)

I'm a bit torn as to which is the best option?

Is game 7 experience for Stone and Silfverberg really worth potentially decreasing our chances of winning? How much does having those guys in really decrease our chances - if at all?
Quote
 
 
0 #114 MoeDozer 2012-04-24 12:06
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting MoeDozer:
this series (ignore stats) i think butler has to draw in the last game. i know ive been the person that is praising silfver like non other. i honestly think this milan possible suspension is a blessing in disguise. the guy has to sit down even though it is game 7. the rangers have completly shut him out, and hes done nothing decent to make up for that.

if milan is gone, i would go with butler and silfver. or possible go with daugavins? we need that energy guy badly. needs to be a very physical game from our side. finish checks everytime.

side note, we are all lighting up spezza for whatever reason. Can i point out that our stud on D only has 1 point this playoffs, and it came from a somewhat flukey bounce off i think del zotto's skate? konopka has more points than him..

edit: i do give creict for karlsson leading us in shots with 31, next closest is spezz with 19. but these guys have such high skill, no excuses for them to score once every 31 shots.


So your saying sit out michalek for being shut out by their top d lines, but keep condra and kenopka in?

ya ok, how about sitting one fo them , demoting michalek slightly and having him play against lesser opponents

Thank god your not our coach.

michalek plays with spezza if he is not suspended

and we lose game 7. all series we play those 2 together. and point production from those 2? nothing great.
if the stache decides to break them up and put turris with milo like we did in the islanders game. then i would be stoked, but sadly thats not happening.
and whats the hate on condra? sure he cant finish but he is a very usefull player this series. and for you to even point out konopka as someone to be benched? im not even going to continue about that..
Quote
 
 
0 #115 Tookie 2012-04-24 12:08
Quoting Hax:
Quoting SlickRick:
Anybody else notice that Alfie lost his shit after being crunched by a huge hit? After that his play dropped; bad passes, bad clearings from our zone etc....I'd go as far as guess that may be concussed and the idea of going out like that really made him lose his cool. If he is injured, he won't tell anybody though at this point.
Watch the hit again.


Alfie "lost his shit" when he and the rest of the "big 3" were benched during a key power play.

And yes EVERYONE noticed.


Wrong, he lost his cool right after the hit, he smashed his stick on the boards, jumped the boards, broke his stick even more, threw it, grabbed a bottled, took a sip, threw it, then stepped on it...Greening was like, WTF old man!!

Point is he went nuts right after the hit, not after being benched.
Quote
 
 
0 #116 Hax 2012-04-24 12:10
Quoting MoeDozer:
all series we play those 2 together. and point production from those 2? nothing great.
if the stache decides to break them up and put turris with milo like we did in the islanders game. then i would be stoked, but sadly thats not happening.
and whats the hate on condra? sure he cant finish but he is a very usefull player this series. and for you to even point out konopka as someone to be benched? im not even going to continue about that..


I really do like the idea of getting Turris and Spezza out there together but not sure you can have it be full-time. Foligno did "okay" as 2C earlier this year but not sure we can afford to go that way in a game 7.

Maybe try and double shift those guys a bit to get them some ice together but keep Turris as 2C. I'm fine with Milo playing on another line as long as we don't stick Spezza with a couple of rookies. He needs someone out there that he can feel comfortable with so he doesn't feel he has to wait for a tap-in assist.
Quote
 
 
-1 #117 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 12:11
Quoting Hax:
Quoting jakester:
Turris-Spezz-Silfverburg
Greening-Foligno-Stone
Michalek-Smith-Alfie
Condra-Smith-Neil

THat would really screw up FONZIE - we should give it a try.

Lets mix it up - Last game or run to the 2nd round.

GO SENS GO!


Might also screw up Smith playing on two lines at once. ;)


No the Smith clone on the 4th line is just holding down that spot until Filatov gets here tomorrow.
Quote
 
 
+3 #118 boom 2012-04-24 12:11
You know, it's still amazing to me how much many of you hold Alfie to different standard than anyone else. I like Alfie, and he's been a good captain, but if Spezza acted like Alfie did last night, you would all me far more critical.
This isn't the first time Alfie's acted like a spoiled kid when things aren't going his way - ask Scott Niedermayer...
Passion is one thing, but Alfie was embarassing to watch last night, and I still see far more complaints about Spezza then I do Alfie...
Yes, Spezza needs to be better, but it all starts with the captain.
Quote
 
 
0 #119 MoeDozer 2012-04-24 12:13
Quoting Hax:
Quoting MoeDozer:
all series we play those 2 together. and point production from those 2? nothing great.
if the stache decides to break them up and put turris with milo like we did in the islanders game. then i would be stoked, but sadly thats not happening.
and whats the hate on condra? sure he cant finish but he is a very usefull player this series. and for you to even point out konopka as someone to be benched? im not even going to continue about that..


I really do like the idea of getting Turris and Spezza out there together but not sure you can have it be full-time. Foligno did "okay" as 2C earlier this year but not sure we can afford to go that way in a game 7.

Maybe try and double shift those guys a bit to get them some ice together but keep Turris as 2C. I'm fine with Milo playing on another line as long as we don't stick Spezza with a couple of rookies. He needs someone out there that he can feel comfortable with so he doesn't feel he has to wait for a tap-in assist.

i think you miss read what i wrote. i hoped for milo and turris on the 2nd line. turris and spezz i agree would have to be a desperation line we use late in game or maybe powerplay.
Quote
 
 
0 #120 Hax 2012-04-24 12:14
Maybe go with:

Michalek - Spezza - Turris
Foligno - O'Brien - Alfredsson
Greening - Smith - Neil
Condra - Konopka - Stone

With Turris/Spezza occasionally taking O'Brien's shift when they have the legs for it andd Stone taking the odd Turris shift if he earns it to allow Turris to take more 2C shifts?

I think O'Brien has been a great surprise this year and had a good playoffs. And playing him with two solid guys maybe enables him to be okay as 2C?
Quote
 
 
0 #121 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 12:15
Quoting Hax:
The "who to play debate" is pretty interesting. As a passionate fan, I really want a "win at all costs" lineup which (to me) looks like this:

Michalek - Spezza - Butler
Foligno - Turris - Alfredsson
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Daugavins

But I'm thinking MacLean/Murray will go with at "build for the future" lineup more like:

Michalek - Spezza - Stone
Foligno - Turris - Alfredsson
Silfverberg - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Greening

(with Greening moving up and Condra drawing in if MM9 is suspended - for either lineup)

I'm a bit torn as to which is the best option?

Is game 7 experience for Stone and Silfverberg really worth potentially decreasing our chances of winning? How much does having those guys in really decrease our chances - if at all?


In my opinion choocing between butler/stone/si lfverberg really doesn't increase or decrease our chance

having butler skate with spezza or stone skate with spezza probably wont affect much. If Spezza is on his game, the result will be the same with either of them on his wing
Quote
 
 
+1 #122 Hax 2012-04-24 12:17
Quoting boom:
blahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblah


Ignore.
Quote
 
 
0 #123 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 12:18
Quoting MoeDozer:

and we lose game 7. all series we play those 2 together. and point production from those 2? nothing great.
if the stache decides to break them up and put turris with milo like we did in the islanders game. then i would be stoked, but sadly thats not happening.
and whats the hate on condra? sure he cant finish but he is a very usefull player this series. and for you to even point out konopka as someone to be benched? im not even going to continue about that..


Its game 7, NYR have made it to game 7 winnig 33% of the draws, which really is Kenopka only use so far. He played 15 minutes last night. are you effing serious??? the guy who barely played all year gets 15 minutes!!

we need goals. When only alfie-michalek and spezza play more than kenopka something is utterly wrong

I'm not hating on condra, btu if michalek was sued in the same role as condra he would produce the exact same, and be just as "usefull"

finally still no mention from anyone that Carkner didn't return last night
Quote
 
 
0 #124 Tookie 2012-04-24 12:20
Quoting Hax:
The "who to play debate" is pretty interesting. As a passionate fan, I really want a "win at all costs" lineup which (to me) looks like this:

Michalek - Spezza - Butler
Foligno - Turris - Alfredsson
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Daugavins

But I'm thinking MacLean/Murray will go with at "build for the future" lineup more like:

Michalek - Spezza - Stone
Foligno - Turris - Alfredsson
Silfverberg - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Greening

(with Greening moving up and Condra drawing in if MM9 is suspended - for either lineup)

I'm a bit torn as to which is the best option?

Is game 7 experience for Stone and Silfverberg really worth potentially decreasing our chances of winning? How much does having those guys in really decrease our chances - if at all?


Yeah real tough call for us to make but for Maclean and Murray I'm sure they have a plan and will follow that plan win or lose. Maclean ahs made it pretty clear that experience is valuable in times like these, times where we were not supposed to be in this situation.

Its hard to find words to explain this right but I think Maclean doesnt care? if we win or lose as long as guys play hard and follow his system. Its all great experience.

I think thats what leaves people confused, Maclean is still installing the rebuilding blocks and dressing rookies to get exp only helps us down the road when our chances are higher.
Quote
 
 
+1 #125 thepez 2012-04-24 12:21
Here is my two cents for whatever it's worth. Put Greening back with Spezza and Michalek. Keep the Turris, Foligno and Alfie together. Reunite the Bingo line, Smith, Daug and Condra and the 4th line would be Konoka, O'Brien and Neil.

As for Alfie last night, I would have preferred that he show that emotion in the dressing room (may have happened after the game) however, for a guy who doesn't do that in public, the effect is greater. You can bet that today there was a team meeting held by the leadership group on letting the young guys know that these chances do not come by every year.

As for Spezza, he is trying way to hard to lead. He needs to simplify his game, ie. shoot the puck. The reason guys try to hard is because they care. Spezza cares and I would rather have someone like him on my team than others.

I hate to say it but this series reminds me so much of the 1997 series against Buffalo. However, this team has worked their asses off this year and have earned everything they have. Rest assured they will play their best game of the series. It may not be enough, but we can't ask for more than that.
Quote
 
 
0 #126 Hax 2012-04-24 12:23
Quoting Alcatraz:
Its game 7, NYR have made it to game 7 winnig 33% of the draws, which really is Kenopka only use so far. He played 15 minutes last night. are you effing serious??? the guy who barely played all year gets 15 minutes!!

we need goals. When only alfie-michalek and spezza play more than kenopka something is utterly wrong

I'm not hating on condra, btu if michalek was sued in the same role as condra he would produce the exact same, and be just as "usefull"

finally still no mention from anyone that Carkner didn't return last night


I see what you're saying but who's to say that NYR wouldn't have won the series in 5 if they had won 50% of the draws? Faceoffs are fairly important as is defensive play (Condra, Konopka etc).

Not saying that Konopka is our MVP or even that I'd be against sitting him or Condra to stack the lineup a bit more - but we signed Konopka for the exact reason that he's a playoff style player. Of course the thought was that we'd be able to trade him at the deadline (assuming we'd be out of the race by then) instead of keeping him for our own playoff games.

We do need goals, but we can't afford to give up more goals either.
Quote
 
 
0 #127 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 12:26
Last day of this round to vote EK65 onto the NHL13 cover.

Go vote!

http://covervote.nhl.com/:b=firefox11/#/ballot
Quote
 
 
0 #128 Hax 2012-04-24 12:26
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Its hard to find words to explain this right but I think Maclean doesnt care? if we win or lose as long as guys play hard and follow his system. Its all great experience.


I think I know exactly what you mean. MacLean was brought in to help rebuild a team that can win year in, year out and he's still working on that as "job 1". Once the lineup card is filled out he's focusing on winning that specific game but the bigger picture/plan is still to be in the playoffs for the next 10 years with a legit shot at a cup every season. But those "10 years" were really supposed to start a year or two from now.
Quote
 
 
0 #129 MoeDozer 2012-04-24 12:29
Quoting Alcatraz:

Its game 7, NYR have made it to game 7 winnig 33% of the draws, which really is Kenopka only use so far. He played 15 minutes last night. are you effing serious??? the guy who barely played all year gets 15 minutes!!

we need goals. When only alfie-michalek and spezza play more than kenopka something is utterly wrong

I'm not hating on condra, btu if michalek was sued in the same role as condra he would produce the exact same, and be just as "usefull"

finally still no mention from anyone that Carkner didn't return last night

first of please stop staying kEnopka. its kOnopka.
2nd, playoffs is a different beast, guys like neil carkner konopka have been IMO just as important as having our goal scorers. winning a faceoff is huge, it right away gives you possession of the puck so you dont have to have your skill guys chasing the puck on defense for his entire shift.
i dont think you realise how underrated this aspect of the game is.
the way the rangers play, is collapse defense, they dont need to win the puck. they will stop anything getting through. Our defensive system isnt up to that level yet.
Quote
 
 
+2 #130 boom 2012-04-24 12:29
Quoting Hax:
Quoting boom:
blahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblah


Ignore.

Hax, to be honest, you are one of the posters who I look forward to seeing because I think your posts are fair, regardless of whether I agree with you or not. I had hoped that I, perhaps, had earned some respect from you, because I try to be fair and honest as well, so it's disappointing to see your response to my "suggestion" that there's a double-standard in play when commenting on players. If I sounded like a smart-ass, I apologize, but I see Spezza being crucified on a regular basis and nary a word about Alfie. Just strikes me as strange, that's all...
Quote
 
 
0 #131 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 12:30
@hax while I do agree, and don't read my post as saying we should sit konopka cause I dont think thats good either.

I like to see

michalek-spezza-stone
silfverberg-turris-alfie
foligno-smith-greening
konopka-obrien-neil

Condra is useful and I would probably play him again in game 1 of round 2, but for game 7 all the marbles, condra greatest use is not on a 4th line its on the PK. if we play discipline there is no reason to think michalek/alfie/ obrien/kenopka/ smith/spezza can't handle PK duties (if we keep it to 4 or undeR)

In that case condra will probably only see roughly 5 min of ES time, since as mentioned its game 7 time to shorten the bench to find offense.
Quote
 
 
0 #132 AlfieforMayor11 2012-04-24 12:32
I don't get all these suggested line combinations that you guys are throwing about. It's game 7, we can't afford to play around with the lines.

We have a huge opportunity here to move on to the second round, so go with the guys that brought you here. Go with the experienced players, players that won the championship in Bingo last year, over Stone and Silfverberg.

Maclean has to go with the players that spent the year learning the system and growing with the rest of the team. There's no need to see what Stone and Silfverberg can do at the moment.

Greening-Spezza-MM9 (if he isn't suspended)
Foligno-Turris-Alfie
Condra-Smith-Neil
O'Brien-Konopka-Butler/Daugavins/Klinkhammer
Quote
 
 
+3 #133 Tookie 2012-04-24 12:32
Television cameras caught MacLean and Alfredsson in a discussion afterward, but MacLean brushed off any question regarding what may have been said.

"Frustration is a useless emotion to me," he said. "We didn't talk about it directly. But we will."

Added MacLean: "[I don't think] we're frustrated. We've been here since training camp and these are things you have to learn. It's a hard thing to do. We didn't expect that the Rangers were just going to come in here and say, 'Hey guys, we're ready to go home.' But maybe we thought they were. I don't know for sure. But they sure came out and played and we didn't match their level of desperation."


Hahaha Maclean is awesome!

I think its about time a coach had balls to bench Alfie & Co. Everyone needs a kick in the ass at some point. Alfie is no different than Condra or Greening when on that bench.
Quote
 
 
0 #134 Hax 2012-04-24 12:34
Quoting boom:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting boom:
blahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblah


Ignore.

Hax, to be honest, you are one of the posters who I look forward to seeing because I think your posts are fair, regardless of whether I agree with you or not. I had hoped that I, perhaps, had earned some respect from you, because I try to be fair and honest as well, so it's disappointing to see your response to my "suggestion" that there's a double-standard in play when commenting on players. If I sounded like a smart-ass, I apologize, but I see Spezza being crucified on a regular basis and nary a word about Alfie. Just strikes me as strange, that's all...


Don't take it personally boom and your post was probably justified - I'm just pissed that we lost, pissed that Alfie missed half the series, pissed that people keep bringing up that old news from 2007, pissed that I'm pissed even though this playoffs are pure "bonus" .....

Alfie does get a double standard but I would argue that he (if anyone) deserves one from the fans. Not from the coaches or management of the team or even other players, but as "fanatics" for the Sens we should all let Alfie slide when he's "human" once in a while.
Quote
 
 
0 #135 boom 2012-04-24 12:40
Quoting Hax:
Quoting boom:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting boom:
blahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblahblahblah2007oldhashblah


Ignore.

Hax, to be honest, you are one of the posters who I look forward to seeing because I think your posts are fair, regardless of whether I agree with you or not. I had hoped that I, perhaps, had earned some respect from you, because I try to be fair and honest as well, so it's disappointing to see your response to my "suggestion" that there's a double-standard in play when commenting on players. If I sounded like a smart-ass, I apologize, but I see Spezza being crucified on a regular basis and nary a word about Alfie. Just strikes me as strange, that's all...


Don't take it personally boom and your post was probably justified - I'm just pissed that we lost, pissed that Alfie missed half the series, pissed that people keep bringing up that old news from 2007, pissed that I'm pissed even though this playoffs are pure "bonus" .....

Alfie does get a double standard but I would argue that he (if anyone) deserves one from the fans. Not from the coaches or management of the team or even other players, but as "fanatics" for the Sens we should all let Alfie slide when he's "human" once in a while.

Fair enough. I guess we're all pissed about alot of things...
Quote
 
 
0 #136 Tookie 2012-04-24 12:54
On another note, Kreider's goal is the one that really killed us, what happened on that play? it was 5 on 5 and the box scores have on the ice for the Sens 4, 14, 15, 19, 41, 65.

Who was late to change? Off or Def? who didnt pick up Kreider? Spezza or Smith?

And speaking of the NYR rookie, wish one of ours could step up like he did! we need it from them!
Quote
 
 
0 #137 SlickRick 2012-04-24 12:54
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting SlickRick:
Anybody else notice that Alfie lost his shit after being crunched by a huge hit? After that his play dropped; bad passes, bad clearings from our zone etc....I'd go as far as guess that may be concussed and the idea of going out like that really made him lose his cool. If he is injured, he won't tell anybody though at this point.
Watch the hit again.


Alfie "lost his shit" when he and the rest of the "big 3" were benched during a key power play.

And yes EVERYONE noticed.


Wrong, he lost his cool right after the hit, he smashed his stick on the boards, jumped the boards, broke his stick even more, threw it, grabbed a bottled, took a sip, threw it, then stepped on it...Greening was like, WTF old man!!

Point is he went nuts right after the hit, not after being benched.


Wow, backed up by TOOKIE!(and Alcatraz)
'So this is what it sounds like, when the doves cry'?
Quote
 
 
0 #138 Tookie 2012-04-24 13:06
And just more simple proof that Maclean is playing for the future with loading the kids and benching the vets...Just look at the Rangers players TOI and shifts, especially their FW...that shows to me that they are on the win now at all costs train and we are not. This goes for every game so far.

Richards 21:47 , 26 shifts
Gaborik 20:14, 26 shifts
Callahan 24,28, 30 shifts
Stepan 19:00, 28 shifts

Best players must play big minutes, win or lose, we are going with more of a share the load with the kids option.
Quote
 
 
0 #139 miguel 2012-04-24 13:06
Quoting SlickRick:
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting SlickRick:
Anybody else notice that Alfie lost his shit after being crunched by a huge hit? After that his play dropped; bad passes, bad clearings from our zone etc....I'd go as far as guess that may be concussed and the idea of going out like that really made him lose his cool. If he is injured, he won't tell anybody though at this point.
Watch the hit again.


Alfie "lost his shit" when he and the rest of the "big 3" were benched during a key power play.

And yes EVERYONE noticed.


Wrong, he lost his cool right after the hit, he smashed his stick on the boards, jumped the boards, broke his stick even more, threw it, grabbed a bottled, took a sip, threw it, then stepped on it...Greening was like, WTF old man!!

Point is he went nuts right after the hit, not after being benched.


Wow, backed up by TOOKIE!(and Alcatraz)
'So this is what it's like, when the doves cry'?


It was a build up of frustration for Alfie...
He saw the importance of this game, and wanted to make a difference. We were up 1-0, MO was on our side, Refs fucked up to help the Rangers gain control, he gets benched, then he get hit hard, frustration hits fever pitch and BOOM he explodes.
Of more concern for me is the rift that is forming between PM and Alfie... PM comments that "frustration is useless" further adds insult to injury to Alfie. This must be addressed and resolved today. As much as we can say we won without Alfie, I am sure we can all agree, without him firing in Game 7 it will a monumental task.
Quote
 
 
0 #140 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 13:08
Alfie just stated (via Brent Wallace twitter)

that he simply lost all emotion after the hit. Can't explain it anymore than he lost his control
Quote
 
 
0 #141 AlfieforMayor11 2012-04-24 13:15
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
On another note, Kreider's goal is the one that really killed us, what happened on that play? it was 5 on 5 and the box scores have on the ice for the Sens 4, 14, 15, 19, 41, 65.

Who was late to change? Off or Def? who didnt pick up Kreider? Spezza or Smith?

And speaking of the NYR rookie, wish one of ours could step up like he did! we need it from them!


Kreider was Spezza's man. Spezza mishandled a breakout pass from one of our dmen, the Rangers took over possession just outside our zone, and Spezza just chilled out by the blueline why Kreider scored.

That's why Spezza didn't see any ice time in the first 7 minutes of the 3rd.
Quote
 
 
0 #142 Tookie 2012-04-24 13:15
Quoting Alcatraz:
Alfie just stated (via Brent Wallace twitter)

that he simply lost all emotion after the hit. Can't explain it anymore than he lost his control


Yeah, well can understand, he was going to get crushed again...if not for a last minute heads up. He knows he would have gotten killed and maybe he's just not rdy to return. It wouldnt surprise me if he aint rdy for game 7, might be better that way too. Love Alfie and all but he's no use to us hurt.
Quote
 
 
0 #143 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 13:17
Great interview with P-Mac up:

http://senators.nhl.com/v2/ext/Audio/120424_MacLean.MP3
Quote
 
 
+1 #144 WeAreSensFans! 2012-04-24 13:17
sorry guys we lost last night, i grabbed a sens hat i rarely wear...

i caused the fuss and the loss... now leave everybody alone.

i will stay away from anything thats not routine on thursday.

cheer up everybody, Go Sens!
Quote
 
 
+2 #145 Tookie 2012-04-24 13:19
Quoting WeAreSensFans!:
sorry guys we lost last night, i grabbed a sens hat i rarely wear...

i caused the fuss and the loss... now leave everybody alone.

i will stay away from anything thats not routine on thursday.

cheer up everybody, Go Sens!


Your dead to me...
Quote
 
 
+1 #146 thepez 2012-04-24 13:20
Quoting miguel:
[quote name="SlickRick"][quote name="IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey"][quote name="Hax"][quote name="SlickRick"]
Of more concern for me is the rift that is forming between PM and Alfie... PM comments that "frustration is useless" further adds insult to injury to Alfie. This must be addressed and resolved today. As much as we can say we won without Alfie, I am sure we can all agree, without him firing in Game 7 it will a monumental task.



Not sure there is a rift between coach and Alfie. Probably not the first time that Alfie got pissed off at Mac and/or team. Probably the best thing that could have happened. Let's be honest. The Sens were not very good last night. We can blame the refs or the so called distractions (Alfie coming back, Silfverberg playing, the fans, etc...) but the reality is that the Rangers were the better team last night.

Time for the vets to step up just like they did after the all-star break when they went on a slide. As the saying goes, "Excuses are for losers". No more wouldas, couldas or shouldas.
Quote
 
 
+1 #147 Hax 2012-04-24 13:24
Alfie did change his story it seems. He was quoted (though maybe mis-quoted - I haven't the time to research it) as saying he was upset then got more upset when he realized his unit was not starting the PP. Now he's saying it was just the hit.

Let's just move on and win game 7.
Quote
 
 
+1 #148 Hax 2012-04-24 13:29
Great (positive as always) article from Mendes:

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2012/04/24/ottawa_senators_rangers_nhl_stanley_cup_playoffs_game_7/
Quote
 
 
0 #149 FO-LEEEEE-NO 2012-04-24 13:30
Quoting SlickRick:

'So this is what it sounds like, when the doves cry'?


Uncle Ricky, could you read us a bedtime story please, oh please?
Quote
 
 
+1 #150 ZeddyP 2012-04-24 13:33
Quoting madpajamma:
What really angered me was the non call on the over the glass puck by the Rangers while we were on the PP. The fact that they just made the call and didn't even talk about it possibly going over, or not hitting a stick made me furious. They didn't even show a 2nd or 3rd reply, which they do for EVERY other play that happens.


^ This x10000000 thats the thing that pissed me off the most...even more than the Foligno call.. anytime a puck goes out that even looked FOR SURE deflected...the y discuss all 4 of them... for this one though the 1 ref called it a deflection and practically gave us the middle finger

and the fact that it actually was delay of game...ughh
Quote
 
 
+2 #151 Hax 2012-04-24 13:35
BTW - huge kudos to Chirp. I don't know if I'd be able to muster the will to prepare and post a blog entry after losses like this all season long. Thanks for continuing to provide us all with a place to vent and (occasionally) share intelligent debate.
Quote
 
 
0 #152 Stan Lee Cupchamps 2012-04-24 13:49
Well, as dissapointing as it was to loose I think its important to look at the loss in context. If we had won it would of been our third win in a row during this series, highly unlikely to accomplish considering the competition. The Rangers had been shut out the game before and hadn't scored for 6 periods plus the overtime before potting their first in the 2nd period. They were due for a few goals. We have one 2 in their barn, they have one 2 in ours....a series that favours the road team. Anderson has been lights out at MSG in his career. Just sayin...Go Sens Go....
Quote
 
 
0 #153 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 13:49
Yeah Hax, I frankly don't know how he does it either... Super Dave!
Quote
 
 
+1 #154 Hax 2012-04-24 13:55
Quoting Stan Lee Cupchamps:
Well, as dissapointing as it was to loose I think its important to look at the loss in context. If we had won it would of been our third win in a row during this series, highly unlikely to accomplish considering the competition. The Rangers had been shut out the game before and hadn't scored for 6 periods plus the overtime before potting their first in the 2nd period. They were due for a few goals. We have one 2 in their barn, they have one 2 in ours....a series that favours the road team. Anderson has been lights out at MSG in his career. Just sayin...Go Sens Go....


Game 7 is ours. Excelsior!

'nuff said.
Quote
 
 
+1 #155 A11fie 2012-04-24 13:57
Quoting Hax:
Great (positive as always) article from Mendes:

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2012/04/24/ottawa_senators_rangers_nhl_stanley_cup_playoffs_game_7/


After reading the Mendes article, I have full confidence that the Sens can rack up more than three penalties in Game 7. The fourth penalty will be called in via cell phone by Dan O’Rourke; 2mins unsportsmanlike mustache
Quote
 
 
0 #156 SlickRick 2012-04-24 14:05
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
Quoting SlickRick:

'So this is what it sounds like, when the doves cry'?


Uncle Ricky, could you read us a bedtime story please, oh please?


Bahaha as Norm macDonald would say, "what the H?"
Quote
 
 
+1 #157 SensChirp 2012-04-24 14:05
Quoting Hax:
BTW - huge kudos to Chirp. I don't know if I'd be able to muster the will to prepare and post a blog entry after losses like this all season long. Thanks for continuing to provide us all with a place to vent and (occasionally) share intelligent debate.

Not always easy :)
But honestly, as much as people come here for a daily dose of Sens, so do I. I rely on the comment section to get the pulse of the fan base. I gave up on other sites and talk radio a long time ago.

Comment section on this site is more than enough!
Quote
 
 
0 #158 MethotToMyMadness 2012-04-24 14:06
I've been doing some review of the games this series, not sure how many of you noticed this. Take a look at the majority of the Rangers goals, even strength and PP against us. Someone has been scouting Andy, almost all of them are scored on Andy's blocker side. Either low or high, it doesn't matter, they slip in just past the post or squeeze in somewhere between him and they even scored on him there from the right side going cross corner. If Andy has a weak spot they've exposed it this series. It's actually the first time i've noticed and now I understand why they continually try to stand on that side of the net right near the crease and they've even potted a few rebounds in that position.
Quote
 
 
0 #159 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 14:11
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting Hax:
BTW - huge kudos to Chirp. I don't know if I'd be able to muster the will to prepare and post a blog entry after losses like this all season long. Thanks for continuing to provide us all with a place to vent and (occasionally) share intelligent debate.

Not always easy :)
But honestly, as much as people come here for a daily dose of Sens, so do I. I rely on the comment section to get the pulse of the fan base. I gave up on other sites and talk radio a long time ago.

Comment section on this site is more than enough!


Haha! I hope you didn't scan Pt II of yesterdays post then. Your "pulse" would of had Sens Nation pegged as a bunch of thankless juvenile miscreants.
Quote
 
 
0 #160 SensChirp 2012-04-24 14:16
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting Hax:
BTW - huge kudos to Chirp. I don't know if I'd be able to muster the will to prepare and post a blog entry after losses like this all season long. Thanks for continuing to provide us all with a place to vent and (occasionally) share intelligent debate.

Not always easy :)
But honestly, as much as people come here for a daily dose of Sens, so do I. I rely on the comment section to get the pulse of the fan base. I gave up on other sites and talk radio a long time ago.

Comment section on this site is more than enough!


Haha! I hope you didn't scan Pt II of yesterdays post then. Your "pulse" would of had Sens Nation pegged as a bunch of thankless juvenile miscreants.

Hahah I've also learned when to avoid the comment section altogether.
Quote
 
 
-1 #161 Sandy 2012-04-24 14:18
Quoting BeastMode:
Am I the only one that noticed Alfie's meltdown happened immediately after he took a hit in the corner? Could it be he noticed concussion symptoms coming back and was pissed off?


I was going to say that same thing.. that was a hard hit.. and I would expect something flairs up.. but will he let the team know.

The Rangers know now to hit him hard.. which they will to either get him off his game... or out of the game.

The Rangers play dirtier at home and I fully expect that to continue...

Foligno was told by the ref the reason the goaltender interference was called was because of his reputation.

So now we know it. The refs call penalties based on reputation and not on the play. How the hell can you call a fair game if you don't call the action. That shows complete bias... and is bullshit.

Peel should not be allowed to ref another Sens game, ever.. and that should go for O'Rourke as well.. who I have a bad feeling in my gut gets game 7 in NY.

I would hate to see the Sens lose that game because of referree antics like last night...
Quote
 
 
0 #162 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 14:26
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting BeastMode:
Am I the only one that noticed Alfie's meltdown happened immediately after he took a hit in the corner? Could it be he noticed concussion symptoms coming back and was pissed off?


I was going to say that same thing.. that was a hard hit.. and I would expect something flairs up.. but will he let the team know.

The Rangers know now to hit him hard.. which they will to either get him off his game... or out of the game.

The Rangers play dirtier at home and I fully expect that to continue...

Foligno was told by the ref the reason the goaltender interference was called was because of his reputation.

So now we know it. The refs call penalties based on reputation and not on the play. How the hell can you call a fair game if you don't call the action. That shows complete bias... and is bullshit.

Peel should not be allowed to ref another Sens game, ever.. and that should go for O'Rourke as well.. who I have a bad feeling in my gut gets game 7 in NY.

I would hate to see the Sens lose that game because of referree antics like last night...


mostly yes to all, accept the last point.. we didn't lose because of the refs antics. we lost because we only scored one goal, and were chasing the puck the entire 2nd period

enough is enough with excuses and blaming refs.
Quote
 
 
+1 #163 Sandy 2012-04-24 14:26
Quoting Tcharger:
Does anyone have a clip of what michalek may be suspended for?


Go to TSN the video titled 'Justified'.. It shows another angle of the disallowed goal and it appeared that Michalek was crosschecked or pushed to the ice. As he is falling you see Callahan push his glove into Michalek's face and keep it there...

Michalek is laying on the ice with 2 Rangers on top of him.. one with glove in his face. Was he just squirming to get up and get the guys off him? It's hard to see the kick or even if he did it as opposed to a Ranger player.. but then Tortorella will say it was a Sens player...
Quote
 
 
0 #164 Tookie 2012-04-24 14:30
Quoting Sandy:

I would hate to see the Sens lose that game because of referree antics like last night...


Again...the Sens didnt lose the game because of the refs last night...I know its an easy excuse but you have to drop it already. The Sens had plenty of PP's and couldnt cash in, thats on them, not on the refs.
Quote
 
 
0 #165 Sandy 2012-04-24 14:33
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting darthsens911:
Tookie

If you honestly believe that Foligno ran the goalie for that penalty, you honestly wear blinders for the opposition when you watch a Sens game. There is no way he 'ran' the goalie, he was clearly pushed in as he rushed the net.


No blinders here bud, even IF Foligno was "clearly" pushed into Lundqvist, he made no attempt whatsoever to change his course or even stop for that matter, he just flops on the goalie like if being pushed in him is ok and not his fault. He has a rep for doing that, its no secret.

Had he made anykind of effort, there would be no call. As for the flip in the crowd, maybe you should pay more attention, it was deflected, Sens bench and Sens players didnt even make anything about it, clearly you were on a beer run or sleeping?



Foligno was sandwiched between 2 Ranger players.. where the hell was he supposed to go... he was directed and pushed into Lundquist and the Rangers probably knew there was a chance it would be called as he has a rep.. and they were not wrong.
Quote
 
 
0 #166 Tookie 2012-04-24 14:41
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting Tcharger:
Does anyone have a clip of what michalek may be suspended for?


Go to TSN the video titled 'Justified'.. It shows another angle of the disallowed goal and it appeared that Michalek was crosschecked or pushed to the ice. As he is falling you see Callahan push his glove into Michalek's face and keep it there...

Michalek is laying on the ice with 2 Rangers on top of him.. one with glove in his face. Was he just squirming to get up and get the guys off him? It's hard to see the kick or even if he did it as opposed to a Ranger player.. but then Tortorella will say it was a Sens player...


Looks like MM9 tries to push Girardi with his skate as to say "get off me" but that is a no no, its one thing to facehwash a guy with your glove and push a player with your skate blade. It is a suspendable act.

In Shanahan's suspension video, he described the Skinner play as a violation of Rule 49 specific to kicking and offered the following conclusion, "any intentional or reckless use of a skate blade in this manner is extremely dangerous and unacceptable."
Quote
 
 
0 #167 miguel 2012-04-24 14:43
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting BeastMode:
Am I the only one that noticed Alfie's meltdown happened immediately after he took a hit in the corner? Could it be he noticed concussion symptoms coming back and was pissed off?


I was going to say that same thing.. that was a hard hit.. and I would expect something flairs up.. but will he let the team know.

The Rangers know now to hit him hard.. which they will to either get him off his game... or out of the game.

The Rangers play dirtier at home and I fully expect that to continue...

Foligno was told by the ref the reason the goaltender interference was called was because of his reputation.

So now we know it. The refs call penalties based on reputation and not on the play. How the hell can you call a fair game if you don't call the action. That shows complete bias... and is bullshit.

Peel should not be allowed to ref another Sens game, ever.. and that should go for O'Rourke as well.. who I have a bad feeling in my gut gets game 7 in NY.

I would hate to see the Sens lose that game because of referree antics like last night...

Quoting Hax:
Great (positive as always) article from Mendes:

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2012/04/24/ottawa_senators_rangers_nhl_stanley_cup_playoffs_game_7/

Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Great interview with P-Mac up:

http://senators.nhl.com/v2/ext/Audio/120424_MacLean.MP3


Sandy completely agree, and all I ask is for a fair game where WE DO NOT notice the refs at all, for once.
Whether we like it or not, bad calls do change momentum, and that did happen last night.
Pretending this did not happen, will not make it go away.
Get over it is easier said than done, but agreed the Sens have no choice but to carry on,
all we can do is hope we get a fair game.
Quote
 
 
-1 #168 Boivo 2012-04-24 14:43
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting Sandy:

I would hate to see the Sens lose that game because of referree antics like last night...


Again...the Sens didnt lose the game because of the refs last night...I know its an easy excuse but you have to drop it already. The Sens had plenty of PP's and couldnt cash in, thats on them, not on the refs.



Hey tough guy........we can blame it on whatever we want. And to be honest the refs did play a major role in the game, which is not their job to do so. The changed the mentality of the game, they changed the momentum, they changed the pace of the game. They made calls that were bullshit and didnt make calls when they should have plain and simple. They did not lose the game for us, but they also took the opportunity away from us to play fair. Just fucking leave this site, everyone is embarrassed for you.
Quote
 
 
0 #169 Sandy 2012-04-24 14:44
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
On another note, Kreider's goal is the one that really killed us, what happened on that play? it was 5 on 5 and the box scores have on the ice for the Sens 4, 14, 15, 19, 41, 65.

Who was late to change? Off or Def? who didnt pick up Kreider? Spezza or Smith?

And speaking of the NYR rookie, wish one of ours could step up like he did! we need it from them!



I watched the replay on that goal this morning. The puck is passed to Spezza who kind of missed the pass. The puck was picked off and carried by in.. but Spezza stayed in the neutral zone and did not pick up Kreider... There were in a sense only 4 players defending.. I don't know if Spezza was going to the bench or what he was doing... having a brain cramp... but you can bet Mclean was not happy with that. It's not the rookies costing us... Cowen has been awesome.. it's the vets.. losing focus, lack of attention, etc..
Quote
 
 
0 #170 Hax 2012-04-24 14:44
Any word on the MM9 thing yet? Anyone know when we'd actually hear if there's a call/review scheduled or not?
Quote
 
 
0 #171 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-24 14:48
Quoting Hax:
Any word on the MM9 thing yet? Anyone know when we'd actually hear if there's a call/review scheduled or not?


Haven't heard a peep and usually it would have been leaked that there is a phone call set up for tomorrow. Despite not playing until Thursday they'd want to address this as quickly as possible if they saw it as a disciplinary issue.

A good sign but not in the clear quite yet...
Quote
 
 
0 #172 miguel 2012-04-24 14:49
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting Sandy:

I would hate to see the Sens lose that game because of referree antics like last night...


Again...the Sens didnt lose the game because of the refs last night...I know its an easy excuse but you have to drop it already. The Sens had plenty of PP's and couldnt cash in, thats on them, not on the refs.


yup you are partly right the Rangers won that game because of the refs... they sucked and we got screwed = Rangers Win.
even non Sens fans agree on this one
Quote
 
 
+1 #173 Hax 2012-04-24 14:52
SensChirp ‏ @SensChirp

For the alleged kicking incident in Game 6 RT @RenLavoieRDS No hearing for Milan Michalek.


Sit on it Torts!
Quote
 
 
+1 #174 Tookie 2012-04-24 15:02
Ok so

14-19-9
33-7-11
71-15-25
16-28-22

With 16/14 splitting time on line 1.

97 in for 39 on D.

Game on; we win!
Quote
 
 
0 #175 Hax 2012-04-24 15:04
Not sure I'd want to sit O'Brien - he's been very good. Why Gilroy? Just more offense?
Quote
 
 
0 #176 Tookie 2012-04-24 15:10
Quoting Hax:
Not sure I'd want to sit O'Brien - he's been very good. Why Gilroy? Just more offense?


Thats what I was going for yeah, we are playing good enough D and the toughness is not quite needed anymore. Also it was a tough descision but O'Brien cant play top line, Butler can.
Quote
 
 
+3 #177 Hax 2012-04-24 15:12
I know mixing lines at this point is probably a bad idea, but I'd be tempted to go with:

Silfverberg - Spezza - Alfie
Foligno - Turris - Michalek
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

(And steal Tookie's idea of getting Butler some shifts with the top lines.)

Maybe go with Stone over Silfverberg if he's comfortable on the left side.
Quote
 
 
0 #178 Alcatraz 2012-04-24 15:15
Quoting Hax:
Not sure I'd want to sit O'Brien - he's been very good. Why Gilroy? Just more offense?


Ive posted a few times now, but Carkner only played 6 min last night, and left the game injured after falling awkwardly into the boards. No status has been given on him yet tho
Quote
 
 
0 #179 Sandy 2012-04-24 15:15
Quoting Hax:
SensChirp ‏ @SensChirp

For the alleged kicking incident in Game 6 RT @RenLavoieRDS No hearing for Milan Michalek.


Sit on it Torts!


Well considering two players were on top of him probably sticking punching, whatever the Rangers like to do... I guess they figured it was Michalek just trying to get out of there like any player would. Good to see... especially if Alfie can't go... that was a pretty hard hit.. heaven knows what he is like today.
Quote
 
 
0 #180 ZeddyP 2012-04-24 15:19
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting Sandy:

I would hate to see the Sens lose that game because of referree antics like last night...


Again...the Sens didnt lose the game because of the refs last night...I know its an easy excuse but you have to drop it already. The Sens had plenty of PP's and couldnt cash in, thats on them, not on the refs.



Kinda hard to cash in on them when you only have the PP for 1 minute instead of 2 as the refs would call a weak penalty on us on what...3 out of 5 of our PP's?
Quote
 
 
0 #181 Andrews Theory 2012-04-24 15:20
a little bit late to the party today but i have to say, I liked the intesity Alfie showed coming off the ice...

get mad, get really mad then re-focus and kick the shit out of this over rated Rangers team on Thursday night.
Quote
 
 
0 #182 Tookie 2012-04-24 15:22
Quoting Hax:
I know mixing lines at this point is probably a bad idea, but I'd be tempted to go with:

Silfverberg - Spezza - Alfie
Foligno - Turris - Michalek
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

(And steal Tookie's idea of getting Butler some shifts with the top lines.)

Maybe go with Stone over Silfverberg if he's comfortable on the left side.


Hmmm some good ideas there, just not certain about 33 on the top line, he seemed really out of place last game, he wont be much much better in his 2nd game. Keeping O'Brien and sitting condra might be a better option now that I think about it, O'Brien does everything better and can chip in offensively, where as Condra struggles.

Michalek - Spezza - Alfie
Turris - Foligno - Silfverberg
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

With Turris on the wing, he can use his speed and possibly snipe another game winner on his off wing?
Quote
 
 
+1 #183 FO-LEEEEE-NO 2012-04-24 15:30
Quoting Hax:
I know mixing lines at this point is probably a bad idea, but I'd be tempted to go with:

Silfverberg - Spezza - Alfie
Foligno - Turris - Michalek
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

(And steal Tookie's idea of getting Butler some shifts with the top lines.)

Maybe go with Stone over Silfverberg if he's comfortable on the left side.


Why does everyone keep forgeting about Mark Parrish!

AHAHAH HAHAHA... hahaha.. ha... oh, mercy (wipe tear from eye - a la Principle Skinner)

(Jump to the scene where Burns laughing in the shower)

What was I laughing at again? Oh yes, that crippled Irishman!
Quote
 
 
0 #184 Hax 2012-04-24 15:32
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Hmmm some good ideas there, just not certain about 33 on the top line, he seemed really out of place last game, he wont be much much better in his 2nd game. Keeping O'Brien and sitting condra might be a better option now that I think about it, O'Brien does everything better and can chip in offensively, where as Condra struggles.

Michalek - Spezza - Alfie
Turris - Foligno - Silfverberg
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

With Turris on the wing, he can use his speed and possibly snipe another game winner on his off wing?


How about flipping Turris and 9MM? Give some better back-checking support to Silfverberg (who got caught a few times) as I think Milo is a better back-checker than Turris. And then you have Spezza setting up Turris as well?
Quote
 
 
0 #185 MoeDozer 2012-04-24 15:36
Quoting Hax:
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Hmmm some good ideas there, just not certain about 33 on the top line, he seemed really out of place last game, he wont be much much better in his 2nd game. Keeping O'Brien and sitting condra might be a better option now that I think about it, O'Brien does everything better and can chip in offensively, where as Condra struggles.

Michalek - Spezza - Alfie
Turris - Foligno - Silfverberg
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

With Turris on the wing, he can use his speed and possibly snipe another game winner on his off wing?


How about flipping Turris and 9MM? Give some better back-checking support to Silfverberg (who got caught a few times) as I think Milo is a better back-checker than Turris. And then you have Spezza setting up Turris as well?

that may work but i have a feeling that will be like a filatov spezza situation. both guys want to carry the puck, 2 playmakers together. although funny enough in both situations, both palyers have amazing shots that we dont see enough.
Quote
 
 
0 #186 Hax 2012-04-24 15:37
Quoting MoeDozer:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Hmmm some good ideas there, just not certain about 33 on the top line, he seemed really out of place last game, he wont be much much better in his 2nd game. Keeping O'Brien and sitting condra might be a better option now that I think about it, O'Brien does everything better and can chip in offensively, where as Condra struggles.

Michalek - Spezza - Alfie
Turris - Foligno - Silfverberg
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

With Turris on the wing, he can use his speed and possibly snipe another game winner on his off wing?


How about flipping Turris and 9MM? Give some better back-checking support to Silfverberg (who got caught a few times) as I think Milo is a better back-checker than Turris. And then you have Spezza setting up Turris as well?

that may work but i have a feeling that will be like a filatov spezza situation. both guys want to carry the puck, 2 playmakers together. although funny enough in both situations, both palyers have amazing shots that we dont see enough.


Maybe that solves the problem a bit though - turns at least one of them into a shooter?
Quote
 
 
+1 #187 Hax 2012-04-24 15:40
I've got it!

Turris - Spezza - Alfie
Michalek - Foligno - Stone
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

With Butler and Stone switching up based on play.

Guaranteed win!
Quote
 
 
+2 #188 miguel 2012-04-24 15:45
if you want a guarenteed win I have the answer....
lets get some Swedish Refs!

Really find it hard to predict what PM has in store for tomorrow, in terms of linueps,
one thing very clear, we must improve our PP

Go Sens Go!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #189 Tookie 2012-04-24 15:48
Quoting Hax:
I've got it!

Turris - Spezza - Alfie
Michalek - Foligno - Stone
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

With Butler and Stone switching up based on play.

Guaranteed win!


I'm on board lets go!
Quote
 
 
0 #190 Hax 2012-04-24 15:55
PP line-ups:

Unit one:

Michalek-Spezza-Stone
Alfie-Karlsson

Unit two:

Foligno-Turris-Butler
Kuba-Gonchar
Quote
 
 
+1 #191 Shibal07 2012-04-24 16:04
Like Rundblad, I think Silfverberg will need some time in the AHL maybe. He obviously needs to learn how to get dirty goals, rather than just relying on his wrister to get get goals.

This may give Filatov a chance next year to make the team if he decides to show up for training camp next year, Hoping Bryan Murray keeps his words on not giving up on him yet.
Quote
 
 
0 #192 WeAreSensFans! 2012-04-24 16:08
i'm sorry guys i just don't see foligno as a solid 2nd liner, he's a risk.

i agree with tookie's lines
14-19-9
33-7-11
71-15-25
16-28-22

foligno has often took bad penalties at even worse times of the game. he needs better hockey sense, i'm hoping mclean wears off on him and he becomes a solid 2nd or 3rd liner, but he's got competition with all these prospects coming in the next year or so.
Quote
 
 
0 #193 Merchaholic 2012-04-24 16:19
This next game is going to be a heart twister. Arrg.
Quote
 
 
0 #194 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-04-24 16:31
Quoting IDontKnowAnythi ngAboutHockey:
Quoting Hax:
I've got it!

Turris - Spezza - Alfie
Michalek - Foligno - Stone
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

With Butler and Stone switching up based on play.

Guaranteed win!


I'm on board lets go!


@ Hax and IDontKnowAnythi ngAboutHockey :

I would seriously e-mail the Hax Projected Lineup, and his
2 Power Play lineups to Paul Maclean.

If all the players in those 2 lineups, play 60 minutesof 2 way hockey, and stay out of the penalty box, Senators win
4-0 !

Believe It !!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO SENS GO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quote
 
 
-2 #195 Hax 2012-04-24 16:33
Here's the winning lineup:

Filatov - Da Costa - Noesen
Klinkhammer - Zibanejad - Petersson
Prince - Peumpel - Stone
Silfverberg - Regin - Butler
Quote
 
 
-1 #196 Ty19 2012-04-24 16:37
This site has gone to the crapper. Cya Thursday.
Quote
 
 
+1 #197 Kielbasa 2012-04-24 16:55
It's amazing to read the comments today vs the comments on Saturday/Sunday . How quickly Sens "fans" are able to go from showering Spezza and Michalek with love to talking about how awful these guys are. Get a grip and support the team. This team is where they are today because of these guys. Support them..win or lose. It has been an amazing ride no matter what. The future looks incredible for this team...and that future could be as early as Thursday night.
Quote
 
 
+2 #198 Hax 2012-04-24 17:00
Quoting Kielbasa:
It's amazing to read the comments today vs the comments on Saturday/Sunday. How quickly Sens "fans" are able to go from showering Spezza and Michalek with love to talking about how awful these guys are. Get a grip and support the team. This team is where they are today because of these guys. Support them..win or lose. It has been an amazing ride no matter what. The future looks incredible for this team...and that future could be as early as Thursday night.


Well said.

Spezza is 28 and Michalek is 27. These guys are already great and will only get better.
Quote
 
 
+1 #199 ZeddyP 2012-04-24 17:14
Remind me to never EVER read the facebook sens page comments again....some idiot actually suggested we keep Alfie out of the lineup her exact words were "Keep Alphie on the bench. The Team Played Wicked without him!!!"


the worst part about it is people have LIKED this comment

*facepalm*
Quote
 
 
+1 #200 N8ball85 2012-04-24 17:27
Quoting ZeddyP:
Remind me to never EVER read the facebook sens page comments again....some SENSCHIRP READER actually suggested we keep Alfie out of the lineup her exact words were "Keep Alphie on the bench. The Team Played Wicked without him!!!"


the worst part about it is people have LIKED this comment

*facepalm*
this person should be shot! Praise Alfie!
Quote
 
 
+4 #201 SensChirp 2012-04-24 17:30
Quoting Ty19:
This site has gone to the crapper. Cya Thursday.

Rude. Get outta here would ya :)
Quote
 
 
0 #202 GDN86 2012-04-24 17:46
hey senschrip and fellow readers

2 things:

1. the alfie chant needs to stay forever, even after he hangs them up..no team does what we do..and we should keep it going for years to come..it can be our tradition for him everyhome game.

2. scotiabank place will be open for the game..i say who ever is around we all meet have some brews pre game and finally watch a game 7 on a screen we can all see..
Quote
 
 
0 #203 WeAreSensFans! 2012-04-24 17:57
Atleast us (fans) and our team (sens) get to watch the B's and caps game 7 and get into game mode for game 7! this is going to be a crazy week!

Go Sens Go!
Quote
 
 
0 #204 ChrisT. 2012-04-24 18:53
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
Quoting Hax:
I know mixing lines at this point is probably a bad idea, but I'd be tempted to go with:

Silfverberg - Spezza - Alfie
Foligno - Turris - Michalek
Greening - Smith - Neil
Konopka - O'Brien - Butler

(And steal Tookie's idea of getting Butler some shifts with the top lines.)

Maybe go with Stone over Silfverberg if he's comfortable on the left side.


Why does everyone keep forgeting about Mark Parrish!

AHAHAH HAHAHA... hahaha.. ha... oh, mercy (wipe tear from eye - a la Principle Skinner)

(Jump to the scene where Burns laughing in the shower)

What was I laughing at again? Oh yes, that crippled Irishman!


Because Mark Parrish does not have a contract with the Ottawa Senators - just the Binghampton Senators. I don't know if it is you that continuously brings him up in the conversation. I've addressed it before.

MARK PARISH CANNOT PLAY FOR THE OTTAWA SENATORS.

Hopefully that makes it clear why everyone keeps 'forgetting' about Mark Parrish.
Quote
 
 
0 #205 Hax 2012-04-24 19:06
Quoting ChrisT.:
Because Mark Parrish does not have a contract with the Ottawa Senators - just the Binghampton Senators. I don't know if it is you that continuously brings him up in the conversation. I've addressed it before.

MARK PARISH CANNOT PLAY FOR THE OTTAWA SENATORS.

Hopefully that makes it clear why everyone keeps 'forgetting' about Mark Parrish.


Well, and the fact that Mark Parrish is not even close to being a good option to actually insert in the lineup over several other options.
Quote
 
 
0 #206 charlie2008 2012-04-24 20:22
No suspension for Michalek

http://espn.go.com/nhl/playoffs/2012/story/_/id/7849747/2012-stanley-cup-playoffs-nhl-discipline-milan-michalek-ottawa-senators-apparent-skate-kick-source-says
Quote
 
 
0 #207 sensfan20 2012-04-24 20:34
If both Silfverberg and Stone play they might as well through in the towel. Both guys are going to be extremely important to our future but Silfverberg didn't look at all comfortable out there and Stone (yes it was a nice assist) was very unnoticeable after that. Neither can be blamed given the circumstance of playing deep into a series with no NHL experience.

I hate the idea that guys in that room battled for 82 games and now where using this time to see some prospects? Thats what preseason is for. I am as excited as anyone about our prospects but theres a time a place to play them AND THIS ISN'T IT.

How people forget in this city about the Daugavins K-hammers and Butlers who contributed in many different ways for large chunks of the year and they get the shaft so Murray and company can see what they have drafted.

GO WITH THE GUYS WHO GOT YOU THERE!
Quote
 
 
+1 #208 Tcharger 2012-04-24 20:35
Enjoy game 7 chirp!
Quote
 
 
-2 #209 Sandy 2012-04-24 20:46
Does it seem like every game Tortorella is bellowing out to suspend one Senator or the other. Is it his angle to put the impression to the league/refs that the Sens are the dirty team? I guess he has blinders when it comes to his own team...

Instead of benching the top PP unit.. why not bench the coach that runs the PP... He can't seem to get a system to get around the shot-blocking of the Rangers.. The Sens just seem to stand still... they move the puck slowly... when looking at a team like the Flyers who just throw the puck around and have success..

I will be doing a lot of praying from now until the end of the game.

Karma is a bitch... and I want the Rangers to be repaid in full.
Quote
 
 
0 #210 ZeddyP 2012-04-24 20:51
agreed sandy I dont know why they keep trying the same thing over and over on the PP its back and forth on the blue line then behind the back pass to spezza who rifles it through the middle trying to hit karlsson coming down the boards *gets picked off* and then rinse and repeat....

I dunno why they dont try going down low and try to set something up behind the goal line go for a slot pass or try and hit the far side point man
Quote
 
 
0 #211 jdshady 2012-04-24 21:09
off topic..
Just got banned on hockeybuzz for telling sens fans in a rangers blog to calm down so we dont get banned... turns out i was trolling and not talking hockey...
At least when i come here its mostly sens fans and we can talk and talk and talk but over there with rangers fans...say one thing wrong and they call for mods. make a good point and your banned haha
Quote
 
 
-1 #212 Sandy 2012-04-24 21:21
Read an interesting comment from a facebook friend today.. the quote is from Thomas Paine:

"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead."

I think they can apply to quite a few people.. especially some of those Leaf fans that are all over Alfie on the Yost article.

But it is good to know that it's just not the Sens getting screwed by the refs... the Devils got screwed when a couple of calls could have been made on the Panthers when the Panthers go down the ice.. the player involved in the non-call scored... and the Panthers only had 13 shots on net the whole game....
Quote
 
 
0 #213 Guillaume 2012-04-24 21:22
People on the Rangers' forum on hfboards are talking about doing an "Alfie sucks" chant at 11:11 of each period.

That would be the most disgusting, classless thing ever. Fuck these assholes.
Quote
 
 
+4 #214 SensChirp 2012-04-24 21:34
Quoting Guillaume:
People on the Rangers' forum on hfboards are talking about doing an "Alfie sucks" chant at 11:11 of each period.

That would be the most disgusting, classless thing ever. Fuck these assholes.

No way it actually takes off. Far too scattered in their terrible chant ideas. Plus, they don't have a RangersChirp to coordinate the masses haha
Quote
 
 
0 #215 TyrantWeeeeee 2012-04-24 21:39
You'd think the sky was falling the way people post on here. The rebuilding Sens are a team nobody thought would get to game 7 versus the 1st place Rangers. We're giving them everything they can handle and them some. We didn't lose last night because of officials. The Foligno call was soft and probably didn't warrant a 5-on-3. I'd say it was 50/50 whether that gets called or not in a normal 5-on-5 situation. The ref made a mistake plain and simple. They made a less impactful one when Spezza's goal counted after Neil put his stick into Lundqvist and pushed him out of the crease.

The reality is all 3 penalties Ottawa took 200 feet from their own net in the last 10 minutes of the second could have been avoided with playing a bit smarter. The Sens lost composure after the 5-on-3 goal put them down 2-1 and it cost them another goal before the period was over. They looked like an upset team and they lost focus. If they hadn't we would have seen overtime.

In the end I'd say Ottawa played somewhat unfocused and not nearly intense enough to eliminate a number one team. They'll have a few days to regroup and hopefully get it done. This is a young team and it's a learning process. They will only get better. I'm extremely proud of them whatever happens. This is why they won game 5 - to give themselves two shots at winning the series. Looks like they'll need the second one. So what?

Just be glad we aren't the Canucks, Leafs, or Flames. None of those teams have any hope of winning any time soon. Ottawa is only going to grow. Worst case scenario this year we get another 15th overall pick. Given what Murray does with those I'd say that's not a bad consolation prize when combined with 7 games of hard fought playoff experience for a young team.

Go Sens Go!
Quote
 
 
-1 #216 Sandy 2012-04-24 21:40
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting Guillaume:
People on the Rangers' forum on hfboards are talking about doing an "Alfie sucks" chant at 11:11 of each period.

That would be the most disgusting, classless thing ever. Fuck these assholes.

No way it actually takes off. Far too scattered in their terrible chant ideas. Plus, they don't have a RangersChirp to coordinate the masses haha


Hey that's on the level of Leaf fans... they will probably cheer when one of the Rangers actually succeeds in taking out Alfie again... Mitchell tried last night but all it did is get Alfie mad. What is concerning is anger is a sympton of post-concussion right? How affected is Alfie with this last concussion? How much will this outburst and benching of the stars affect the team going into Thursday. I'm sure that tantrum unravelled a lot of players on the team... I hope it is something the team can get passed..

Dubinsky had a pretty good one with the Gatorade though.
Quote
 
 
0 #217 Sandy 2012-04-24 21:43
The 5 on 3 goal by the Rangers turned the momentum around.

Giving their past history with Peel in the regular season... once he started with the bad calls... and the non-calls.. did the Sens focus more on the ref than on the Rangers?
Quote
 
 
+2 #218 Mark 2012-04-24 21:47
Wholly fuck - relax folks - stay the course - we'll win game 7 in NY - 2nd round here we come.
Quote
 
 
0 #219 Mark 2012-04-24 21:58
Quoting Mark:
Wholly fuck - relax folks - stay the course - we'll win game 7 in NY - 2nd round here we come.


Thats Mark - as in Mark Messier - SUCK IT PHANEUF
Quote
 
 
0 #220 skinner 2012-04-24 22:01
I may be alone in my thinking, but goals are hard to score in the playoffs, so I'd insert Stone AND Silfverberg into the lineup. O'Brien, Smith, Greening, Foligno and Condra have been decent, but haven't really produced points/goals, so any one could be sat out for Stone. However, then there's also the argument of sticking with what got you to this point. Tough call, but good situation to be in.
Quote
 
 
0 #221 Hax 2012-04-24 22:40
Quoting skinner:
I may be alone in my thinking, but goals are hard to score in the playoffs, so I'd insert Stone AND Silfverberg into the lineup. O'Brien, Smith, Greening, Foligno and Condra have been decent, but haven't really produced points/goals, so any one could be sat out for Stone. However, then there's also the argument of sticking with what got you to this point. Tough call, but good situation to be in.


Okay - but the flaw in your logic is that by taking guys like O'Brien, Smith and Condra out you're making it easier for the Rangers to score goals. I think even Foligno and Greening are more responsible defensively than Silfverberg and Stone (when you factor in that the newbies don't know the system yet).

Not saying you don't do it - just saying it's not as simple as adding more goals.
Quote
 
 
0 #222 Hax 2012-04-24 22:46
Calling it now:

Sens win game 7 3-1 with a last-minute EN goal after some gut-wrenching scrambles in our end.

In the post-game presser Torts tries to argue that MacLean should be suspended for having too cool a 'stache.
Quote
 
 
0 #223 sensgod 2012-04-25 06:30
I'm not worried, were a young team, and learning how to close out a series (especially in the playoff pressure cooker) is part of the curve.

Go SENS!! YEAH!!!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #224 Tcharger 2012-04-25 07:12
Talk about a let down...I woke up this morning in a haze...started to wake up and was getting excited for tonight's game....hop in the shower grab my coffee and fully wake up, realize the games tomorrow.

Uggg wierd ass scheduling
Quote
 
 
0 #225 spezzerman 2012-04-25 07:31
Quoting sensfan20:
If both Silfverberg and Stone play they might as well through in the towel. Both guys are going to be extremely important to our future but Silfverberg didn't look at all comfortable out there and Stone (yes it was a nice assist) was very unnoticeable after that. Neither can be blamed given the circumstance of playing deep into a series with no NHL experience.

I hate the idea that guys in that room battled for 82 games and now where using this time to see some prospects? Thats what preseason is for. I am as excited as anyone about our prospects but theres a time a place to play them AND THIS ISN'T IT.

How people forget in this city about the Daugavins K-hammers and Butlers who contributed in many different ways for large chunks of the year and they get the shaft so Murray and company can see what they have drafted.

GO WITH THE GUYS WHO GOT YOU THERE!


Bobby Butler did not "get us here"
Quote
 
 
0 #226 FO-LEEEEE-NO 2012-04-25 07:37
Quoting ChrisT.:


Because Mark Parrish does not have a contract with the Ottawa Senators - just the Binghampton Senators. I don't know if it is you that continuously brings him up in the conversation. I've addressed it before.

MARK PARISH CANNOT PLAY FOR THE OTTAWA SENATORS.

Hopefully that makes it clear why everyone keeps 'forgetting' about Mark Parrish.


I was joking, but I didn't know that he was only on an AHL contract. I find it funny when people suggest putting Parrish in the line up.

Quoting Hax:


Well, and the fact that Mark Parrish is not even close to being a good option to actually insert in the lineup over several other options.


Exactly... I would suggest bringing Daigle back, but I think he's on the no-fly list, and would have to drive to NYC.
Quote
 
 
0 #227 MethotToMyMadness 2012-04-25 08:06
It's been 2 days now and I've had time to cool down a lot. I'm really pumped for the game tomorrow. Yeah, we should of ended it when we had the chance, but just think... we're getting to see our team play in a game 7. We've taken the #1 team in the East all the way to the brink of elimination. Now that's saying something!!

Happy MM isn't getting a suspension, or even being reviewed. It's horse sh!t that it would even go that far. It just seems that Tort's is trying everything in his power to bring the game to an immature level. His constant bickering and whining over the simplest of plays goes against everything we love about this sport.

Now for my real rant. I can understand wanting to take away the plays that hurt people, but to scrutinize every single hit, love tap, gesture... it's too much. Hockey has climbed leaps and bounds over the years in technology and equipment. Players are getting bigger and stronger than they ever were, but we should be able to match that and keep our players protected. If a concussion is so easy to attain by an elbow or shoulder than change the helmets and padding being used, those players have been wearing the same bucket for years. Put something on the players heads that work, it's simple. And why doesn't a fist to the head cause the same concussion? We haven't taken even a glance at fighting being removed, how come players who challenge each other to fistacuffs don't appear phased by it? I find that strange.

Lastly, after that none call on the delay of game that still angers me. If the NHL is changing things, add in a new challenge rule, just like Football. Give the coach or captain an opportunity to overrule a potentially game changing mistake by the refs. It won't slow the game down anymore than it already has with it's constant reviews and debats. That's my two cents on it, give some power back to the players.
Quote
 
 
0 #228 Merchaholic 2012-04-25 08:09
“Someone wants them back in the game, obviously,” said Lundqvist. “There’s no other explanation.”
Quote
 
 
0 #229 Hax 2012-04-25 08:17
Quoting madpajamma:

Now for my real rant. I can understand wanting to take away the plays that hurt people, but to scrutinize every single hit, love tap, gesture... it's too much. Hockey has climbed leaps and bounds over the years in technology and equipment. Players are getting bigger and stronger than they ever were, but we should be able to match that and keep our players protected. If a concussion is so easy to attain by an elbow or shoulder than change the helmets and padding being used, those players have been wearing the same bucket for years. Put something on the players heads that work, it's simple. And why doesn't a fist to the head cause the same concussion? We haven't taken even a glance at fighting being removed, how come players who challenge each other to fistacuffs don't appear phased by it? I find that strange.


Agree with most of that but there are actually A LOT of people trying to get fighting out of the game and fighting has been linked to brain damage (in some studies). Not saying I agree (in fact I'm quite "Cherry" on the subject) but thought I'd point it out.

Blindside hits are the worst of course as the side-to-side motion of the head is much more dangerous and of course a hit like the one by Wolski on Alfie can be much harder than a punch to the face.
Quote
 
 
0 #230 boom 2012-04-25 08:36
Quoting Hax:
Quoting ChrisT.:
Because Mark Parrish does not have a contract with the Ottawa Senators - just the Binghampton Senators. I don't know if it is you that continuously brings him up in the conversation. I've addressed it before.

MARK PARISH CANNOT PLAY FOR THE OTTAWA SENATORS.

Hopefully that makes it clear why everyone keeps 'forgetting' about Mark Parrish.


Well, and the fact that Mark Parrish is not even close to being a good option to actually insert in the lineup over several other options.

Yes, there is that...
Quote
 
 
0 #231 Tookie 2012-04-25 08:45
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting Guillaume:
People on the Rangers' forum on hfboards are talking about doing an "Alfie sucks" chant at 11:11 of each period.

That would be the most disgusting, classless thing ever. Fuck these assholes.

No way it actually takes off. Far too scattered in their terrible chant ideas. Plus, they don't have a RangersChirp to coordinate the masses haha



Actually its pretty ingenious, would def get Alfie off his game in the state he is in emotionally. Anything that makes fun of him or brings back the temper tantrum is all fair game IMO.

But like SC said they dont got a Chirp of their own to make it happen, New Yorkers are so unprepared.
Quote
 
 
0 #232 Hax 2012-04-25 08:50
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting Guillaume:
People on the Rangers' forum on hfboards are talking about doing an "Alfie sucks" chant at 11:11 of each period.

That would be the most disgusting, classless thing ever. Fuck these assholes.

No way it actually takes off. Far too scattered in their terrible chant ideas. Plus, they don't have a RangersChirp to coordinate the masses haha



Actually its pretty ingenious, would def get Alfie off his game in the state he is in emotionally. Anything that makes fun of him or brings back the temper tantrum is all fair game IMO.

But like SC said they dont got a Chirp of their own to make it happen, New Yorkers are so unprepared.


I have to disagree (shocker). A mediocre "Alfie sucks" chant isn't going to get under Alfie's skin. He's used to being booed at home (when the Leafs are in town) and of course at ACC. No big deal.

If anything, it gives him motivation and helps the other guys see how he responds positively etc.

But yeah, they won't get it off the ground anyway.
Quote
 
 
0 #233 miguel 2012-04-25 08:53
Quoting Sandy:
The 5 on 3 goal by the Rangers turned the momentum around.

Giving their past history with Peel in the regular season... once he started with the bad calls... and the non-calls.. did the Sens focus more on the ref than on the Rangers?


Sandy I completely agree with you, and it seems you could only really understand the brutal reffing and the unravelling if you were actually at the game. The calls on Kuba, Michalek, Foligno were either on the PP, or on the PK. While the Rangers, were not called for worse infractions, and then the non call on the Delay of game.
This Peel dick, seems to have chip, when the fans call him out on his shit calls, and he then make the screw you call to top it off,
This jerk is not cut out to be a professional ref... he would be fired in a real league like the NFL
Quote
 
 
0 #234 Tookie 2012-04-25 09:03
Quoting Hax:
[quote name="IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey"]
I have to disagree (shocker). A mediocre "Alfie sucks" chant isn't going to get under Alfie's skin. He's used to being booed at home (when the Leafs are in town) and of course at ACC. No big deal.

If anything, it gives him motivation and helps the other guys see how he responds positively etc.

But yeah, they won't get it off the ground anyway.


Not sure about that, Alfie was embarrased by his tantrum, for NY'ers to bring it back up would probably hit a sensitive spot, its nothing like being boo'ed at home, that does nothing to his image as he is still seen throughout the league as a great player/person. But blowing up like he did and having it relived and mocked about could tarnish his unblemished rep a bit. That and its something personal, its always harder when its personal. Its dirty tactics.....but its also game 7.

Like when Sens nation was preparing to greet Tim Thomas with White House stuff, we're no different, dirty dirty but its the playoffs!!
Quote
 
 
0 #235 Hax 2012-04-25 09:05
Quoting miguel:
Quoting Sandy:
The 5 on 3 goal by the Rangers turned the momentum around.

Giving their past history with Peel in the regular season... once he started with the bad calls... and the non-calls.. did the Sens focus more on the ref than on the Rangers?


Sandy I completely agree with you, and it seems you could only really understand the brutal reffing and the unravelling if you were actually at the game. The calls on Kuba, Michalek, Foligno were either on the PP, or on the PK. While the Rangers, were not called for worse infractions, and then the non call on the Delay of game.
This Peel dick, seems to have chip, when the fans call him out on his shit calls, and he then make the screw you call to top it off,
This jerk is not cut out to be a professional ref... he would be fired in a real league like the NFL


That actually is what bothered me the most. I expect a little league umpire to be bitter like that when the fans get on him, but an NHL (or other major league) official is usually better than that.

I can live with blown calls, these guys are human and the game is super fast, but to try to "prove you're not going to even up" by calling another marginal call AGAINST the team where you blew the call in the first place?

Brutal.

Of course, the NHL will be sure to assign their best crew available for a game 7 so we should see a better result tomorrow (i.e. the players will decide the result of the game).
Quote
 
 
0 #236 miguel 2012-04-25 09:12
Quoting Hax:
Quoting miguel:
Quoting Sandy:
The 5 on 3 goal by the Rangers turned the momentum around.

Giving their past history with Peel in the regular season... once he started with the bad calls... and the non-calls.. did the Sens focus more on the ref than on the Rangers?


Sandy I completely agree with you, and it seems you could only really understand the brutal reffing and the unravelling if you were actually at the game. The calls on Kuba, Michalek, Foligno were either on the PP, or on the PK. While the Rangers, were not called for worse infractions, and then the non call on the Delay of game.
This Peel dick, seems to have chip, when the fans call him out on his shit calls, and he then make the screw you call to top it off,
This jerk is not cut out to be a professional ref... he would be fired in a real league like the NFL


That actually is what bothered me the most. I expect a little league umpire to be bitter like that when the fans get on him, but an NHL (or other major league) official is usually better than that.

I can live with blown calls, these guys are human and the game is super fast, but to try to "prove you're not going to even up" by calling another marginal call AGAINST the team where you blew the call in the first place?

Brutal.

Of course, the NHL will be sure to assign their best crew available for a game 7 so we should see a better result tomorrow (i.e. the players will decide the result of the game).


Well said Hax, and thank you for giving me more hope for tomorrow... lets hope the NHL realizes what a major screw up having Peel call the game, and then to have them completely blow such an important game, I hope that we get two refs, who will not be noticed at all in game 7... and if this is the case we will be on to the next round :)

Go Sens Go!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #237 Hax 2012-04-25 09:12
I'm sure there will be signs about Alfie's meltdown - just like we had signs about Dubinsky's fit.

I don't think it will be a factor. Alfie knows the best way to live down his fit is to win the game - which is what he will lead our boys to do.
Quote
 
 
0 #238 Sens of Peskyville 2012-04-25 09:34
Quoting SomeOtherBlog:
The last time the Stanley Cup playoffs had no Canadian team in the second round was 1996.


Interesting read for those desperate for something else to look at...

http://balanceoffood.typepad.com/canadian_crossing/2012/04/2012-stanley-cup-notebook-last-chance-for-ottawa-and-canada.html
Quote
 
 
0 #239 No65* 2012-04-25 09:40
What pisses me off the most about the refs is that the league is protecting them by not allowing journalists to ask them questions after games. They should be forced to answer the bell once in a while. I am pretty sure this would pressure them enough to get the right job done on the ice. Right now? They don't give a shit and move to the next one. They can get away with crimes.

Playoffs can bring the best and the worst of this sport.

Go SENS Go
Quote
 
 
0 #240 No65* 2012-04-25 09:44
Another issue I have is that coaches can't challenge refs decision. Just imagine if coaches had 1 right to challenge a decision. If they were right, the decision is reversed. Should the refs call was the right one, the team lose is time out right.

PMac would have challenged the Foligno call being pushed on the goaltender and the NYR would have not got the 5 on 3.

Huge implication on the game and the series. And justice would prevail.

My opinion.
Quote
 
 
0 #241 Hax 2012-04-25 09:45
Quoting No65*:
What pisses me off the most about the refs is that the league is protecting them by not allowing journalists to ask them questions after games. They should be forced to answer the bell once in a while. I am pretty sure this would pressure them enough to get the right job done on the ice. Right now? They don't give a shit and move to the next one. They can get away with crimes.

Playoffs can bring the best and the worst of this sport.

Go SENS Go


I think that would get messy really quickly. Maybe have the director of officiating have to answer questions but even then they'd have to have time to have reviewed the tape etc.

I'm as frustrated with the refs as anyone, but really we did not play well in game 6. Could we have still won without a few of the BS calls? Sure. But would we have won DESPITE those calls had we played like we did in games 2-5? Absolutely.

We can't control the refs but (hopefully) the team can simply get back to playing like they did earlier in the series and win game 7 on their own. Which I believe they can.
Quote
 
 
0 #242 Hax 2012-04-25 09:47
Quoting No65*:
Another issue I have is that coaches can't challenge refs decision. Just imagine if coaches had 1 right to challenge a decision. If they were right, the decision is reversed. Should the refs call was the right one, the team lose is time out right.

PMac would have challenged the Foligno call being pushed on the goaltender and the NYR would have not got the 5 on 3.

Huge implication on the game and the series. And justice would prevail.

My opinion.


Agree there should be something they can do here - but it has to be well thought out. The NFL had some bumps along the way and their process still isn't perfect, but it's close.

The Foligno call probably wouldn't have been overturned in the NFL since it's more "judgement" than empirical. The delay of game non-call could have been overturned though.

So maybe they start in with some additional things that can be challenged where a replay could easily be black-and-white and allow the on-ice officials to get the call right.
Quote
 
 
+1 #243 IcySurfas 2012-04-25 09:51
Word on the street is that SBP will open its doors for Thursday's Game 7 for fans to pile in and watch the game on the big screen. With the new screens being there, and the energy for the crowd...this actually sounds tempting.

A deal breaker for me though is (sorry) weather or not they have food and drink available during this open house. By food and drink I really mean Drink, and by Drink I really mean the good stuff....and by the good stuff I really mean the watered down overpriced domestic beer! Meh...does the trick. Anyway....I cant seem to find anything on the Sens website or anywhere else, so I ask you folks, anyone been to one of these things before (open house for playoff road games), and know if they have the concessions open during it? Specifically... ..the "good stuff".
Quote
 
 
-1 #244 IcySurfas 2012-04-25 09:51
BTW....any friggin clue when the game is actually on?? I assume its 7pm like every other game at MSG in this series, but every website you look on, it still says TBD.

I heard a nasty rumour that it might be a afternoon game which seems ridiculous to me for a weekday. But Id like to squash that by seeing an actual game start time for Game 7 posted somewhere!
Quote
 
 
0 #245 FO-LEEEEE-NO 2012-04-25 09:54
Quoting Hax:
Quoting No65*:
Another issue I have is that coaches can't challenge refs decision. Just imagine if coaches had 1 right to challenge a decision. If they were right, the decision is reversed. Should the refs call was the right one, the team lose is time out right.

PMac would have challenged the Foligno call being pushed on the goaltender and the NYR would have not got the 5 on 3.

Huge implication on the game and the series. And justice would prevail.

My opinion.


Agree there should be something they can do here - but it has to be well thought out. The NFL had some bumps along the way and their process still isn't perfect, but it's close.

The Foligno call probably wouldn't have been overturned in the NFL since it's more "judgement" than empirical. The delay of game non-call could have been overturned though.

So maybe they start in with some additional things that can be challenged where a replay could easily be black-and-white and allow the on-ice officials to get the call right.


I'd prefer a booth review challenge system... where 'the war room', or some other league body, watches for missed/blown calls. Refs could be ordered to talk over calls for 30 seconds to allow the 'war room' time to initiate a review. If a review is initiated, a light goes on and the ref picks up the phone.

Assuming that the refs only slip up once and a while, this shouldn't take away from the games.

Or maybe there should be a review system in place for the playoffs only.
Quote
 
 
0 #246 Tookie 2012-04-25 09:56
Quoting Hax:

So maybe they start in with some additional things that can be challenged where a replay could easily be black-and-white and allow the on-ice officials to get the call right.


Well our good friend Burky has propsed a rule change for next year regarding the puck in crowd penalty. That if already on a PP that penalty would only start on expiration of the 1st penalty, so no 5 on 3 but an extended 5-4...

Sounds good to me.
Quote
 
 
0 #247 Hax 2012-04-25 09:56
Further to this, I have to believe that the competition committee is looking at various calls that could be reviewed on replay - either after a challenge or just as a matter of course by the war-room in Toronto.

Delay of game is one for sure. Icing and offsides calls could be included as well. Too many men and playing the puck with a high stick maybe.

But I can't see any sport allowing obstruction or tripping calls to be reviewable. There's just too much judgement involved and it's a VERY slippery slope if you can start comparing reviewed calls to each other.

But anything where you can literally freeze frames on a digital video and determine 100% if a guy was offside or if a forward was first to touch an iced puck etc could fairly easily be reviewed.

The only challenge left is to figure out a way to include those reviews without slowing down the game - the NHL's biggest "win" compared to the other major sports is the speed of the game and efficiency of the broadcasts.

MLB is slow and that's almost part of the culture.
NFL is better than it used to be but reviews can hurt the game.
NBA is almost a joke with the last 60 seconds of the game taking 30 minutes to play.
Soccer just sucks in general (though the 90 minutes plus injury time is actually the most efficient of them all).
Quote
 
 
0 #248 thepez 2012-04-25 09:58
TEAM 1200 just said that BoroCop is on the ice at practice today. Could we see him replace Carkner for game 7?
Quote
 
 
0 #249 Hax 2012-04-25 09:59
Quoting IcySurfas:
Word on the street is that SBP will open its doors for Thursday's Game 7 for fans to pile in and watch the game on the big screen. With the new screens being there, and the energy for the crowd...this actually sounds tempting.

A deal breaker for me though is (sorry) weather or not they have food and drink available during this open house. By food and drink I really mean Drink, and by Drink I really mean the good stuff....and by the good stuff I really mean the watered down overpriced domestic beer! Meh...does the trick. Anyway....I cant seem to find anything on the Sens website or anywhere else, so I ask you folks, anyone been to one of these things before (open house for playoff road games), and know if they have the concessions open during it? Specifically.....the "good stuff".


Confirmation should come out today - they were waiting for an official game time to be confirmed etc.

Expect them to have concessions open (they'll make money) and to ask for donations to the food bank and/or Roger's House.
Quote
 
 
0 #250 Hax 2012-04-25 10:01
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting Hax:

So maybe they start in with some additional things that can be challenged where a replay could easily be black-and-white and allow the on-ice officials to get the call right.


Well our good friend Burky has propsed a rule change for next year regarding the puck in crowd penalty. That if already on a PP that penalty would only start on expiration of the 1st penalty, so no 5 on 3 but an extended 5-4...

Sounds good to me.


I actually don't like this idea. Maybe because it came from Burke though, LOL.

The whole point of the rule in the first place was to prevent PK guys from just dumping over the glass to get a whistle so if you lessen the punishment I think that means you'll see it happen sometimes (though an extra 2 to kill off is still a big punishment).

I'd leave it the way it is and players just need to get better at being careful when clearing the puck (PK or not).
Quote
 
 
0 #251 Hax 2012-04-25 10:05
No Kono at practice (maintenance day I hope).
Quote
 
 
0 #252 MethotToMyMadness 2012-04-25 10:05
Quoting No65*:
Another issue I have is that coaches can't challenge refs decision. Just imagine if coaches had 1 right to challenge a decision. If they were right, the decision is reversed. Should the refs call was the right one, the team lose is time out right.

PMac would have challenged the Foligno call being pushed on the goaltender and the NYR would have not got the 5 on 3.

Huge implication on the game and the series. And justice would prevail.

My opinion.


I actually had this in my comment earlier, wish the NHL would put in place a rule like the NFL with 2 challenges per game. If you use it and it's wrong, you lose the 2nd one and the call on the ice stands. If you're right, you get to keep the 2nd challenge. It won't slow things down, because as it is they still review things, such as goals, etc. This would only allow the Captain or Coach to stop the play after the Refs make the call on the ice, which would then force a challenge upstairs for review. Just gives the chance to have at least 1 say a game on a call they may or may not have got wrong. Like the puck over the glass that they SAY hit a stick and went out in the 3rd, which would have resulted in a 5 on 3 for us, if they actually REVIEWED it. Just saying
Quote
 
 
0 #253 FO-LEEEEE-NO 2012-04-25 10:06
New post in 5mins
Quote
 
 
0 #254 Hax 2012-04-25 10:07
Also, what happens if there's less than 4 minutes to go in the period or in the game for that matter? Then you could definitely see players intentionally shooting the puck over the glass to get a whistle.

I always thought that if a team is trailing and gets a power play with less than 2 minutes to go they should get their full power play. I know that's not really a great idea but I've seen on many occasions where defending players won't mind taking a penalty in desperation with only 30 seconds left since they know they don't have to kill off the whole penalty.
Quote
 
 
0 #255 IcySurfas 2012-04-25 10:08
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting Alcatraz:

Fair enough but on the broadcast last night they mentioned that Maclean stated he inserted Silfverberg over Stone for one reason only. experience. Maclean mentioned that this year has been awesome, but in the grander scheme of things, he wants his young players to get this experience on the big stage. I wouldn't be surprised if 1 or both play thursday simply for this reason


That is true, most fans forget we are rebuilding mode, including me and if Maclean wants to insert rookies to give them much needed experience than so be it. Maybe winning at all costs is not the mandate here, even Maclean said this year was awesome and that they are basically getting a free ride here, everybit of playoff experience is golden for these kids.

I just want to move onto the 2nd round, 2 rookies in the lineup scares me a bit...


Not exactly a true comparison, but we did last longer in these playoffs then Detroit, Vancouver, Chicago, and Pittsburgh! Deep down I think we all know that the Sens could very well steal this last game at MSG and get that 2nd round shot. If we loose, then we shed a tear and move on. If the Rangers loose, expect all hell to break loose with that organization. Who is the preassure on?
Quote
 
 
0 #256 IcySurfas 2012-04-25 10:08
oh yeah....and GSG!!
Quote
 
 
0 #257 FO-LEEEEE-NO 2012-04-25 10:09
Quoting Hax:
Also, what happens if there's less than 4 minutes to go in the period or in the game for that matter? Then you could definitely see players intentionally shooting the puck over the glass to get a whistle.

I always thought that if a team is trailing and gets a power play with less than 2 minutes to go they should get their full power play. I know that's not really a great idea but I've seen on many occasions where defending players won't mind taking a penalty in desperation with only 30 seconds left since they know they don't have to kill off the whole penalty.


That would not help a team like Ottawa, lol
Quote
 
 
0 #258 Hax 2012-04-25 10:09
Lundqvist got a Vezina nom (well deserved) - I wonder if that will in any way put added pressure on him tomorrow?

Doubt it really as he's too much of a pro but one can hope.
Quote
 
 
0 #259 Hax 2012-04-25 10:12
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
New post in 5mins



Awwweee.

Maybe not.

I was thinking the same thing. Okay - game day posts at 11:11 only I guess.
Quote
 
 
0 #260 Tookie 2012-04-25 10:13
Quoting Hax:
Also, what happens if there's less than 4 minutes to go in the period or in the game for that matter? Then you could definitely see players intentionally shooting the puck over the glass to get a whistle.

I always thought that if a team is trailing and gets a power play with less than 2 minutes to go they should get their full power play. I know that's not really a great idea but I've seen on many occasions where defending players won't mind taking a penalty in desperation with only 30 seconds left since they know they don't have to kill off the whole penalty.


Still at the end of regulation the penalty would continue over to OT (4 on 3) and only at the end of OT would that penalized player not participate in the shootout or remove one shooter all together for the penalized team, only 2 shooters to 3.
Quote
 
 
0 #261 No65* 2012-04-25 10:14
[quote name="Hax"]But I can't see any sport allowing obstruction or tripping calls to be reviewable. There's just too much judgement involved and it's a VERY slippery slope if you can start comparing reviewed calls to each other.quote]

The problem I have with obstuction is exactly that refs don't use their judgement anymore as this as become an automatic call. Defensemen know that already and they are taking advantages of it by crosschecking players in their goaltender.
Quote
 
 
0 #262 FO-LEEEEE-NO 2012-04-25 10:15
Quoting Hax:
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
New post in 5mins



Awwweee.

Maybe not.

I was thinking the same thing. Okay - game day posts at 11:11 only I guess.



I'm sure Chirp is just sticking it to me... lol.
Quote
 
 
0 #263 Hax 2012-04-25 10:17
Quoting IDontKnowAnythingAboutHockey:
Quoting Hax:
Also, what happens if there's less than 4 minutes to go in the period or in the game for that matter? Then you could definitely see players intentionally shooting the puck over the glass to get a whistle.

I always thought that if a team is trailing and gets a power play with less than 2 minutes to go they should get their full power play. I know that's not really a great idea but I've seen on many occasions where defending players won't mind taking a penalty in desperation with only 30 seconds left since they know they don't have to kill off the whole penalty.


Still at the end of regulation the penalty would continue over to OT (4 on 3) and only at the end of OT would that penalized player not participate in the shootout or remove one shooter all together for the penalized team, only 2 shooters to 3.


But I'm saying that one team (the one with the power play) is trailing, so no OT.

And yeah I hate how penalized players can come back for the shootout. Would be a ballsy move to only allow two shooters if the team was shorthanded when time expired - I like it.
Quote
 
 
0 #264 Hax 2012-04-25 10:20
According to Don "the douchebag" Brennan, Konopka could miss game 7 because he's "walking around SBP gingerly".

No way Kono misses a game over bumps and bruises - he's as much of a warrior as Neil or Alfie.

Now if MacLean sits him because he feels a healthier guy can help more that's different - but I doubt it. As long as Kono can still win draws he'll play.
Quote
 
 
0 #265 No65* 2012-04-25 10:20
I checked the Madison Square Garden web site and they have the game at 7:00 tomorrow.
Quote
 
 
0 #266 Hax 2012-04-25 10:22
Joy Lindsay ‏ @PSBJoyOnTheSens

Reports from #Sens practice say #BSens Rookie of the Year Mark Borowiecki is skating with the main group, while Matt Carkner is not.


Apparently Gilroy has Snoopy* as an upstairs neighbor.

Sucks to be Gilroy I guess.

* the Peanuts dog, not Pascale Leclaire or Robert Cyr
Quote
 
 
0 #267 Alcatraz 2012-04-25 10:22
I agree with a coaches review or challenge call, but it can only be done on certain situations. For example you can't challenge an off-side call. that would be stupid, what advnatage would that give you? Only things I could see being challenged:

-Icing: centre-ice facoff result and allowed to change lines

-Delay of Game: Either eliminates or calls for a penalty. Gets it right in most likely a crucial situation (a coach wont challenge in 1st period in a 0-0 game you know

-Goal caused by goalie interference (see colton orr and florida) (neil and lundquist), or goal disallowed by wrong goalie interference call (see boaston vs ottawa)

-High Sticking penalty (scrum and own stick/teammate stick clips player or even those times where stick doesn't come in contact at all

Beyond these I don't really see a challenge working or being effective. Bad calls are bad and over a game they regularily balance out. The above mentioned incidents are the ones that can turn a game around or cost a team
Quote
 
 
0 #268 Alcatraz 2012-04-25 10:24
Quoting Hax:
Joy Lindsay ‏ @PSBJoyOnTheSens

Reports from #Sens practice say #BSens Rookie of the Year Mark Borowiecki is skating with the main group, while Matt Carkner is not.


Apparently Gilroy has Snoopy* as an upstairs neighbor.

Sucks to be Gilroy I guess.

* the Peanuts dog, not Pascale Leclaire or Robert Cyr


Makes sense, I kept posting asking for clarification on Carkner yesterday, but to no avail. He fell akwardly into the board in game 6 and only played 6 minutes total. No mention was made on the broadcast of him returning(or for that matter not returning)
Quote
 
 
0 #269 Hax 2012-04-25 10:24
Steve Lloyd ‏ @Steve_Lloyd

More PP work. Greening on unit 1 with Spezza, Michalek, Karlsson, Kuba. #Sens


Hopefully this means Alfie is on the point with unit 2. Am I the only one who remembers how amazing he is on the point of the powerplay?

Unit 2 could be:

Foligno-Turris-Neil
Alfie-Gonchar

(Or you could replace Neil/Foligno with Stone or Silfverberg)

Have Konopka out to take the draw then immediately change.
Quote
 
 
0 #270 Boivo 2012-04-25 10:25
lets get borocop in there, give him some experience and will def help the team. go sens go
Quote
 
 
0 #271 SensChirp 2012-04-25 10:26
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
New post in 5mins



Awwweee.

Maybe not.

I was thinking the same thing. Okay - game day posts at 11:11 only I guess.



I'm sure Chirp is just sticking it to me... lol.

Somewhat frantically preparing for my trip to NYC! Hope to have something up this afternoon before I go.
Quote
 
 
0 #272 Hax 2012-04-25 10:27
Quoting Alcatraz:
I agree with a coaches review or challenge call, but it can only be done on certain situations. For example you can't challenge an off-side call. that would be stupid, what advnatage would that give you? Only things I could see being challenged:

-Icing: centre-ice facoff result and allowed to change lines

-Delay of Game: Either eliminates or calls for a penalty. Gets it right in most likely a crucial situation (a coach wont challenge in 1st period in a 0-0 game you know

-Goal caused by goalie interference (see colton orr and florida) (neil and lundquist), or goal disallowed by wrong goalie interference call (see boaston vs ottawa)

-High Sticking penalty (scrum and own stick/teammate stick clips player or even those times where stick doesn't come in contact at all

Beyond these I don't really see a challenge working or being effective. Bad calls are bad and over a game they regularily balance out. The above mentioned incidents are the ones that can turn a game around or cost a team


Well clearly you might want to challenge an offsides non-call if it lead to a goal. And it's one that's pretty easy to get right on slow-motion replays.
Quote
 
 
0 #273 IcySurfas 2012-04-25 10:28
Quoting Kielbasa:
ZipZapRap...seriously guy, why are you even here. Your comments are so idiotic and full of lunacy that you add nothing to the discussion here.


Because like a true internet troll, he actually gets off on stiring the pot with his lunacy, and like a creepy Mr Burns, reading these rebuttals directed towards him while tapping his fingers together saying "exxxxcellent.."

I know its sucks just to let it fly, but that's the only way to make him go away (aside from Chirp actually banning him). Just ignore my friend, like the drunk leaf fan mumbling at the end of the bar about Alfie getting away with murdering Tucker......jus t shake your head and ignore.

Next.
Quote
 
 
0 #274 FO-LEEEEE-NO 2012-04-25 10:28
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting FO-LEEEEE-NO:
New post in 5mins



Awwweee.

Maybe not.

I was thinking the same thing. Okay - game day posts at 11:11 only I guess.



I'm sure Chirp is just sticking it to me... lol.

Somewhat frantically preparing for my trip to NYC! Hope to have something up this afternoon before I go.


Hahaha, no worries, I'm sure the rest of us are (or should be) trying to catch up on the work we've neglected since the start of the playoffs...
Quote
 
 
0 #275 Alcatraz 2012-04-25 10:29
@hax

your right, that would make sense, in that case simply state "any call or miscall that immediately leads to a goal shall be reviewable by a coaches challenge. "miscall or call can only be applied to off-sides, icing, goalie interference, high stick, hand pass or kicking motions"
Quote
 
 
0 #276 Hax 2012-04-25 10:34
Quoting Alcatraz:
@hax

your right, that would make sense, in that case simply state "any call or miscall that immediately leads to a goal shall be reviewable by a coaches challenge. "miscall or call can only be applied to off-sides, icing, goalie interference, high stick, hand pass or kicking motions"


You wouldn't even really need to restrict when it can be used by rule - no coach is going to challenge an offsides call if a goal didn't result from it. Similar to icing calls etc - they'd only challenge if it was a true TSN turning point in the game.
Quote
 
 
0 #277 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-04-25 10:41
Quoting Hax:
Joy Lindsay ‏ @PSBJoyOnTheSens

Reports from #Sens practice say #BSens Rookie of the Year Mark Borowiecki is skating with the main group, while Matt Carkner is not.


Apparently Gilroy has Snoopy* as an upstairs neighbor.

Sucks to be Gilroy I guess.

* the Peanuts dog, not Pascale Leclaire or Robert Cyr


@ Hax,

That was a real good one Hax!

Games in Ottawa at 7:30 PM, while all the New York games started at 7:00 PM. As was confirmed by NO65 above .

GO SENS GO !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #278 miguel 2012-04-25 10:53
Ok I really think we are getting somewhere on these reviews.
The game is really getting to fast for the refs, but ever worse, b/c there is not accountability they get away with some horroble games that really do affect the outcome and lead to experts saying things like
"They seem to have put the whistle away"
"looks like the've got on the refs bad side"
"thats an even up"
"its late in the third they're letting them go"

This all leads to the refs making calls when they want to, and impartiality, and even worse, subconciously affect what they call and dont call. This then leads to questioning whether there are alterior motives behind some of these games.

Lets allow the coaches two challenges on certain obvious reviewable calls.

then have a "war room" of ex NHL refs call down to the game whenever there was an obvious mistake on a call
ie player dives on a trip, when he was actually never touched, or a player fakes a stick to the head, this will not only correct it but, will give the diver the 2 minutes.

It is long overdue, and this will fix many of the issues that most of us have been complaing about for years now.

thoughts?
Quote
 
 
0 #279 Sens of Peskyville 2012-04-25 11:01
Quoting miguel:
Ok I really think we are getting somewhere on these reviews.
The game is really getting to fast for the refs, but ever worse, b/c there is not accountability they get away with some horroble games that really do affect the outcome and lead to experts saying things like
"They seem to have put the whistle away"
"looks like the've got on the refs bad side"
"thats an even up"
"its late in the third they're letting them go"

This all leads to the refs making calls when they want to, and impartiality, and even worse, subconciously affect what they call and dont call. This then leads to questioning whether there are alterior motives behind some of these games.

Lets allow the coaches two challenges on certain obvious reviewable calls.

then have a "war room" of ex NHL refs call down to the game whenever there was an obvious mistake on a call
ie player dives on a trip, when he was actually never touched, or a player fakes a stick to the head, this will not only correct it but, will give the diver the 2 minutes.

It is long overdue, and this will fix many of the issues that most of us have been complaing about for years now.

thoughts?


It will give them something to do during TV timeouts ;-)

Or, more likely, an opportunity to have ANOTHER TV Timeout (which means more $$$)...
Quote
 
 
0 #280 No65* 2012-04-25 11:02
Quoting miguel:
Ok I really think we are getting somewhere on these reviews.
The game is really getting to fast for the refs, but ever worse, b/c there is not accountability they get away with some horroble games that really do affect the outcome and lead to experts saying things like
"They seem to have put the whistle away"
"looks like the've got on the refs bad side"
"thats an even up"
"its late in the third they're letting them go"

This all leads to the refs making calls when they want to, and impartiality, and even worse, subconciously affect what they call and dont call. This then leads to questioning whether there are alterior motives behind some of these games.

Lets allow the coaches two challenges on certain obvious reviewable calls.

then have a "war room" of ex NHL refs call down to the game whenever there was an obvious mistake on a call
ie player dives on a trip, when he was actually never touched, or a player fakes a stick to the head, this will not only correct it but, will give the diver the 2 minutes.

It is long overdue, and this will fix many of the issues that most of us have been complaing about for years now.

thoughts?



Should the league decide to implement a challenge system in place, I'm pretty sure they will be really carefull and limit to a minimum the possibilities of challenges. As stated before this morning, it would have to imply a goal. Take the Briere goal against the Pens as it was obvious he was offside by 2 feets.
Quote
 
 
0 #281 Canucnik 2012-04-25 11:09
Miguel:

Your heart is in the right place but the League (the BOG)want a certain amount of management, of control over the outcome. Where the stars go free, the head shots are allowed, there right teams win...if Eugene advances it's worth about 7 to 10, if Rangers don't advance it costs MSG and US tv about $60 million...who do you think is going to win game 7? We have been brain washed by those Tranna Non-Experts (that jerk/fool Healy) that Rangers are by far the better team (which is Horse Poo).

Let's hope for a miracle where the ZEBRA get a visitation from the hockey Gods before the game...

SENs in Six!
Quote
 
 
0 #282 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-04-25 11:13
Very excited that Mark Borowiecki, just might play in lieu of Carkner, who is not 100%.

Was very impressed by play of Borowiecki, in the regular season games he played.

Guess he will be paired with Phillips.

GO SENS GO !!!!!!!!!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #283 Hax 2012-04-25 11:25
Quoting Canucnik:
Miguel:

Your heart is in the right place but the League (the BOG)want a certain amount of management, of control over the outcome. Where the stars go free, the head shots are allowed, there right teams win...if Eugene advances it's worth about 7 to 10, if Rangers don't advance it costs MSG and US tv about $60 million...who do you think is going to win game 7? We have been brain washed by those Tranna Non-Experts (that jerk/fool Healy) that Rangers are by far the better team (which is Horse Poo).

Let's hope for a miracle where the ZEBRA get a visitation from the hockey Gods before the game...

SENs in Six!



Riiiiiight
Quote
 
 
0 #284 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-25 11:25
EK65 vs Lundquist in the new round of NHL13 voting. Looks like Erik only came 7th for east voting last time so he is seeded agains the #2. Let's promote this round even more and remember to vote vote vote!

http://covervote.nhl.com/:b=firefox11/#/ballot
Quote
 
 
0 #285 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-04-25 11:25
Quoting No65*:
Quoting miguel:
Ok I really think we are getting somewhere on these reviews.
The game is really getting to fast for the refs, but ever worse, b/c there is not accountability they get away with some horroble games that really do affect the outcome and lead to experts saying things like
"They seem to have put the whistle away"
"looks like the've got on the refs bad side"
"thats an even up"
"its late in the third they're letting them go"

This all leads to the refs making calls when they want to, and impartiality, and even worse, subconciously affect what they call and dont call. This then leads to questioning whether there are alterior motives behind some of these games.

Lets allow the coaches two challenges on certain obvious reviewable calls.

thoughts?



Should the league decide to implement a challenge system in place, I'm pretty sure they will be really carefull and limit to a minimum the possibilities of challenges. As stated before this morning, it would have to imply a goal. Take the Briere goal against the Pens as it was obvious he was offside by 2 feets.


@ No65,

To me Briere was more like 4-5 feet offside as the linesman in that game made the signal that he was onside ????????

There are many times I see puck carrier with puck outside blue line, while left or right side teammate is over the blue line ,puck carrier crosses and no offside called,

Briere goal should have never counted, but whisle never blown, until goal was in back of net. Blatant error by the
linesman nearest Briere !!
Quote
 
 
0 #286 AllStarAlfie 2012-04-25 11:28
I'm nit sure if it's true but apparently there might be a 12:00 noon game for game 7 as cirque du soliel is at msg.
Quote
 
 
0 #287 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-25 11:31
Quoting miguel:

Lets allow the coaches two challenges on certain obvious reviewable calls.


The major problem with this is the second they instituted a rule like this, coaches would immediately use this as a ploy for what is essentially extra timeouts.

They would have to do exactly what the NFL does. let's say you get one coaches challenge but if you lose the challenge you burn your timeout. No timeouts left? No Challenge!
Quote
 
 
0 #288 Hax 2012-04-25 11:32
Quoting AllStarAlfie:
I'm nit sure if it's true but apparently there might be a 12:00 noon game for game 7 as cirque du soliel is at msg.


MSG has many levels - game is at 7pm.
Quote
 
 
0 #289 Hax 2012-04-25 11:34
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Quoting miguel:

Lets allow the coaches two challenges on certain obvious reviewable calls.


The major problem with this is the second they instituted a rule like this, coaches would immediately use this as a ploy for what is essentially extra timeouts.

They would have to do exactly what the NFL does. let's say you get one coaches challenge but if you lose the challenge you burn your timeout. No timeouts left? No Challenge!


Totally agree that would have to be part of it - especially when you're challenging an icing.

Maybe even charge the team a minor penalty if their challenge fails??
Quote
 
 
0 #290 RUSHRLZ 2012-04-25 11:49
New post up! :)
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Senschirp Blog Rangers Force Game 7- (Alfie a Masterton Finalist)

Contact SensChirp

About SensChirp

  • Welcome to the new and I believe, improved SensChirp. It's the same old blog - breaking news, insider info and everything Sens.