Feature Story

  • Game Day- Pittsburgh @ Ottawa Game 3

    After dropping the first two games of the series in Pittsburgh, the Ottawa Senators return to Scotiabank Place for the biggest game of their season.

    In Game 1 they looked overwhelmed, in Game 2 they showed they can play with this Pittsburgh team. Now they hope the lift of playing in front of their home town crowd will be enough to get them back in their Eastern Conference Semifinal match up.

    Written on Sunday, 19 May 2013 09:21
    Comments (155) Read 2607 times
  • Sponsor

  • Sponsor 2

Wednesday, 28 March 2012 09:41

Wednesday News and Notes

Heading into last night’s match up between the Buffalo Sabres and the Washington Capitals, fans of the Ottawa Senators had one simple request- no three point game.  That request was granted.

The red hot Sabres continued their recent surge up the Eastern Conference standings and grabbed the eighth spot with a convincing 5-1 win over the Capitals bumping Washington to ninth place in the process.  All three teams have five games to play.

While it was a neutral result involving the teams behind them, the teams Ottawa is hoping to chase down all picked up important wins.  The Bruins beat the Lightning to extend the division lead to five points with a game in hand.  It would take a special run for the Sens to chase down the division title.

The sixth place New Jersey Devils also picked up a big two points against the Chicago Blackhawks.  Jersey has a four point lead over the Senators with the same number of games played.  The two teams will play each other to close out the season and when you consider the Sens hold the tiebreaker over the Devils, a switch between the six and seven teams is still not out of the question.

Here is how the standings look after last night’s action.

Bruins 93 (6)- WSH, @Nyi, @Nyr, PIT, @Ott, BUF
Panthers 89 (6)-@Min, @Clb, @Det, WPG, @Wsh, CAR
Devils 92 (5)- TBL, @Car, NYI, @Det, OTT
Senators 88 (5)- @Phi, @Nyi, CAR, BOS, @Nj
Sabres 86 (5)- PIT, @Tor, TOR, @Phi, @Bos

Capitals 84 (5)- @Bos, MTL, @Tbl, FLA, @Nyr

Very Western Conference heavy night in the NHL tonight with just the Rangers and Jets in action in the East. The Senators will return to the practice ice at 11:00 AM today at the Bell SensPlex.

  • With some speculation that Ben Bishop could miss more than the two weeks initially reported, there is a chance the Sens may have to entertain the idea of calling up Robin Lehner.  With a light schedule this week, they are in no hurry to use up one of their four post-deadline call ups until they know exactly how long Bishop will be sidelined for.
  • Big night for Sens prospect Stefan Noesen last night in OHL playoff action as he racked up two goals and three assists in a 7-1 Plymouth Whalers win.  The Whalers trail the Guelph Storm two games to one.  Mark Stone had a goal and an assist and now has five points through four games. Brandon leads their series 3-1.
  • Toronto Star writer Damien Cox has weighed in on the Norris Trophy race and says that he puts Dan Girardi ahead of Erik Karlsson.  With all due respect to Dan Girardi, are you freaking kidding me?!  You can let Mr. Cox know what you think on Twitter @DamoSpin.  While we are on the award subject, Jason Spezza was getting some Hart Trophy love from TSN.ca yesterday. Check it out.
  • There is a movement that started on HFBoards to have a tribute to Alfie at the next Sens home game.  The idea suggests a countdown from 10 beginning at 11:11 of each period followed by an "Alfie" chant at the 11:00 minute mark or simply an Alfie chant that starts at 11:11 of each period. Cool concept and one I hope takes off.
Last modified on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 08:42

Comments   Jump to Last Post

 
+6 #1 MacK 2012-03-28 08:44
Love the Alfie Tribute idea! 11:11 has always been my favourite time! Wish I could be at the game!

As for Damien Cox, living in the GTA, I have to listen to him WAY TOO often on the Fan 590 and the guy is absolutely clueless. He's just jealous that his "Make me Laughs" won't be playing hockey in 2 weeks time.

Karlsson is light-years ahead of Girardi in the Norris race..."Grit"? He probably thinks that Phanuef should get a nomination. RIDICULOUS!

Spezza is definitely proving worthy of Hart votes!

Too bad all the teams around us (minus the Washington) won last night.

Can't wait until Saturday afternoon!!! GO SENS GO!!!
Quote
 
 
+2 #2 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 08:48
I honestly think Damien Cox says these things to bump his followers numbers knowing he will be picking the right bone with sens fans.

Because if it wasn't on purpose which newspaper editor/broadcas t director would actually want to hire him? Clearly he is out of touch with hockey and doesn't understand the game, therefore he would bring no value to their publictaion. I must be right on this because there really is no other excusable option
Quote
 
 
+16 #3 Tookie 2012-03-28 08:56
Alfie gets enough attention, I think Spezza is the one that should be cheered!

Maybe at 19:19 of every period!
Quote
 
 
+3 #4 Andrews Theory 2012-03-28 09:01
This isn't the first time Cox has said something stupid.

Stupid is as stupid does.

it's like a good friend of mine once said about Kypreos; "no one cared what you had to say as a player, why would care what you have to say now?"
Quote
 
 
+5 #5 boom 2012-03-28 09:05
Quoting Tookie19:
Alfie gets enough attention, I think Spezza is the one that should be cheered!

Maybe at 19:19 of every period!

I agree, but I think we'll be swimming against the tide on this one....
Quote
 
 
+4 #6 The Apostle 2012-03-28 09:07
Damien Cox is, and has been for a long time, a complete tool.

I'm all for reporters being fans of the teams they write about but he lets his own personal bias colour every article he writes.

The fact of the matter is that the Toronto writers have so little to praise their own team that they delight in taking every opportunity to bash the sens and the habs.
Quote
 
 
+2 #7 sens_fan_mtl1 2012-03-28 09:21
I posted this in the last comment section but seeing as Chirp mentioned Damien Cox has weighed in on the Norris trophy....
I am a huge sens fan here in Montreal, take a lot of heat for it but it is worth it! Keep up the great work...
For what it is worth....I was listening to TSN990 last night and Pierre Macguire was on...they asked him what % of a chance does Karlsson have of winning the Norris...He would not give a % but he seemed to feel that the award would go to Shea Webber. He did say that Karlsson would probably win one but didn't seem to think that it would be this year.
I think he is playing more than well enough to win...so here is hope PM is wrong.
Quote
 
 
0 #8 Hax 2012-03-28 09:26
Quoting boom:
Quoting Tookie19:
Alfie gets enough attention, I think Spezza is the one that should be cheered!

Maybe at 19:19 of every period!

I agree, but I think we'll be swimming against the tide on this one....


Spezza will get his time. Let's focus on Alfie while we still can.

Besides, all the attention Alfie gets sets the right example for guys like Karlsson - don't you think he'd want that sort of treatment? Don't you think he's thinking "wow if I sign here long-term and bust my ass every night I could hear my name chanted like that"?
Quote
 
 
0 #9 Tookie 2012-03-28 09:37
I understand what your saying, just feels like Spezza is taking a back seat to Alfie, when it should be Alfie passing on the torch.

Plus he's said many times that he doesnt even hear it (if its during play) they are so focused on the game at hand.

If they're going to do that, they should consider doing it during a TV time...makes much more sense if you actually want Alfie to hear it.
Quote
 
 
+1 #10 SkipOPot2Mus 2012-03-28 09:37
How can Karlsson not win the Norris this year?!? I know its not all about points but without him the sens would not be where they are today.

If he doesnt win the Norris im gonna be so pissed. To me, its an obvious choice and no, not just because im a Sens fan.
Quote
 
 
+3 #11 SensFanInMTL 2012-03-28 09:39
Damien Cocks is a phuckin tool I can't stand him. Listening to his bias antics and how the leafs are far more superior than the Senators in his eyes makes me wanna beat the shit out of him. Hey Damien the Leafs have once again not made it to the post season. What else is fuckin new, idiot?
Quote
 
 
+4 #12 Spezzafan19 2012-03-28 09:39
I am not insinuating that Alfie has not dont some amazing things for this franchise and is no doubt a very clutch performer. Nor am I suggesting that Spezza hasn't had a heart trophy nominee calibre season. But as a fan base we should be encouraging the entire team with our chants rather than singling out an individual. Quite often, Alfredsson puts the finishing touches on a solid team play and the crowd erupts in "Alfie" chants, yet the overall "Go Sens Go" chants never get the same kind of enthusiasm. As a player other than Alfie on the team, would you not feel that your hard work is undervalued due to the praise the captain gets. Would an overall loud and enthusiastic crowd not serve as better motivation for the whole team. I am all for giving Alfie his moments when the time is right, but in general I think the Ottawa crowd should show appreciation to "the Sens" on a more frequent basis. Just my thoughts…..
Quote
 
 
0 #13 Boivo 2012-03-28 10:00
Quoting Spezzafan19:
I am not insinuating that Alfie has not dont some amazing things for this franchise and is no doubt a very clutch performer. Nor am I suggesting that Spezza hasn't had a heart trophy nominee calibre season. But as a fan base we should be encouraging the entire team with our chants rather than singling out an individual. Quite often, Alfredsson puts the finishing touches on a solid team play and the crowd erupts in "Alfie" chants, yet the overall "Go Sens Go" chants never get the same kind of enthusiasm. As a player other than Alfie on the team, would you not feel that your hard work is undervalued due to the praise the captain gets. Would an overall loud and enthusiastic crowd not serve as better motivation for the whole team. I am all for giving Alfie his moments when the time is right, but in general I think the Ottawa crowd should show appreciation to "the Sens" on a more frequent basis. Just my thoughts…..



I dont think the players feel bad at all. Alfie has done countless things for this city. He has done everything an excellent captain should on and off the ice. he has supported the community amazingly. And for this he is getting praise. He is currently the hart and soul of this team. Im sure the fans are just sensing that the time for him to leave our club is near. This is an amazing way to show their appreciation for years and years of hard work. No doubt that when alfie retires spezza will get his turn with the C.
Quote
 
 
+1 #14 Hax 2012-03-28 10:06
Until Alfie 100% commits to playing next year I'm going to treat the remaining games as my last chance to show my appreciation.

I cheer for all the Sens (even Gilroy) but there's only one Alfie. In 10 years Spezza may be in the same class or even surpass Alfie (if he wins a couple of cups perhaps) but for now Alfie. Is. God.
Quote
 
 
-1 #15 Hax 2012-03-28 10:09
Quoting Boivo:
I dont think the players feel bad at all. Alfie has done countless things for this city. He has done everything an excellent captain should on and off the ice. he has supported the community amazingly. And for this he is getting praise. He is currently the hart and soul of this team. Im sure the fans are just sensing that the time for him to leave our club is near. This is an amazing way to show their appreciation for years and years of hard work. No doubt that when alfie retires spezza will get his turn with the C.


Exactly. The Sens players feel the same way about Alfie we all do. Look at Konopka's comments after the Wolski hit for example. Or any other time players are asked about Alfie in general or the Alfie chants etc. Even if Alfie doesn't hear it during the game, he'll know it happened and he'll appreciate it.

If he's 49.9% thinking of coming back next year and something like this helps get him to 50.1% then let's do it. He very clearly appreciated the love we all showed him during the AS weekend.
Quote
 
 
-6 #16 Tookie 2012-03-28 10:16
Quoting SkipOPot2Mus:
How can Karlsson not win the Norris this year?!? I know its not all about points but without him the sens would not be where they are today.

If he doesnt win the Norris im gonna be so pissed. To me, its an obvious choice and no, not just because im a Sens fan.


Its not that simple and yes, your being biased. Lets gauge the value of the players possibly nominated:

Chara, brought home the Cup with out of this world overall play, physical, monster of a person, bleeds leadership...

Weber, has the Preds in the playoffs once again, despite having a NHL low cap. He brings physicality and leadership and consistency to the back end and to the forwards group.

Karlsson, no doubt the best offensive D-man in the league, defensively, not bad but has lots of room to improve. Brings much needed help to the offense. Consistent on offense but defensively not so much.

To me you have to take into account what the team has done under their leadership, sure Karlsson is putting up pts but his team is on the bubble and until he proves he is a consistent winner, its gonna go to Weber or Chara or Lidstrom. hey are proven winners and the positioning of they're team shows it.

Karlsson will win it, just not now, he's still very young and if he puts a couple of consistent years together, nobody can deny him the Norris.
Quote
 
 
0 #17 Tookie 2012-03-28 10:24
OTT 77games 88pts
BUF 77games 86pts
WSH 77games 84pts

So freaking close, 2 wins for OTT and 2 losses for either BUF or WSH and were in...but 2 losses for OTT could spell 9th...
Quote
 
 
0 #18 Hax 2012-03-28 10:24
Quoting Tookie19:
Its not that simple and yes, your being biased. Lets gauge the value of the players possibly nominated:

Chara, brought home the Cup with out of this world overall play, physical, monster of a person, bleeds leadership...

Weber, has the Preds in the playoffs once again, despite having a NHL low cap. He brings physicality and leadership and consistency to the back end and to the forwards group.

Karlsson, no doubt the best offensive D-man in the league, defensively, not bad but has lots of room to improve. Brings much needed help to the offense. Consistent on offense but defensively not so much.

To me you have to take into account what the team has done under their leadership, sure Karlsson is putting up pts but his team is on the bubble and until he proves he is a consistent winner, its gonna go to Weber or Chara or Lidstrom. hey are proven winners and the positioning of they're team shows it.

Karlsson will win it, just not now, he's still very young and if he puts a couple of consistent years together, nobody can deny him the Norris.


I think Karlsson is the most deserving but Tookie's points are mostly valid. Though I don't like it, previous accomplishments (like Chara winning a cup) play into the voting - even though they shouldn't.

Reputation does as well and Karlsson still has a stigma of being poor in his own end that some of the voters won't have realized isn't true any more.

My prediction is that he'll be a finalist but won't win but that will be enough to wash away his poor rep in his own end and he'll win the Norris soon enough. If he has the same (or similar) season next year he'll win in a landslide.
Quote
 
 
0 #19 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-28 10:30
Quoting Tookie19:

Chara, brought home the Cup with out of this world overall play, physical, monster of a person, bleeds leadership...


See? You're living in the past, the award is about this year, not Chara's legacy or the fact that Weber has been so close in THE PAST that he deserves special consideration.

Screw that. It seems many of the people voting will already be biased and misinformed about Karlsson... someone should at least smack them upside the head and remind them that this is about this season, not past accomplishments ...
Quote
 
 
-1 #20 Hax 2012-03-28 10:31
Quoting Tookie19:
Its not that simple and yes, your being biased. Lets gauge the value of the players possibly nominated:

Chara, brought home the Cup with out of this world overall play, physical, monster of a person, bleeds leadership...

Weber, has the Preds in the playoffs once again, despite having a NHL low cap. He brings physicality and leadership and consistency to the back end and to the forwards group.

Karlsson, no doubt the best offensive D-man in the league, defensively, not bad but has lots of room to improve. Brings much needed help to the offense. Consistent on offense but defensively not so much.

To me you have to take into account what the team has done under their leadership, sure Karlsson is putting up pts but his team is on the bubble and until he proves he is a consistent winner, its gonna go to Weber or Chara or Lidstrom. hey are proven winners and the positioning of they're team shows it.

Karlsson will win it, just not now, he's still very young and if he puts a couple of consistent years together, nobody can deny him the Norris.


I will submit however that Karlsson is as much a reason why the Sens are in 7th despite being pegged for last as Weber is a reason for getting his team into the playoffs despite their low payroll (which is almost exactly the same as Ottawa's BTW).
Quote
 
 
+3 #21 Boivo 2012-03-28 10:33
I dont even understand why Karlsson for Norris is up for debate. When is the last time the NHL has seen such a huge differential in pts. between defence. When is the last time a Dman was in the top ten for scoring in the league. If they dont give Karlsson the Norris then there is something terribly wrong with the league. Its a fucking no brainer.
Quote
 
 
-1 #22 Hax 2012-03-28 10:33
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Quoting Tookie19:

Chara, brought home the Cup with out of this world overall play, physical, monster of a person, bleeds leadership...


See? You're living in the past, the award is about this year, not Chara's legacy or the fact that Weber has been so close in THE PAST that he deserves special consideration.

Screw that. It seems many of the people voting will already be biased and misinformed about Karlsson... someone should at least smack them upside the head and remind them that this is about this season, not past accomplishments...


The voters live in the past too though. It ain't right, but it's true. I think there are plenty of people campaigning for Karlsson and trying to get the voters to realize that THIS YEAR he's the best blue-liner, but the past always plays into the voting. Every sport, every award. Weber should have won it last year but lost due to not having as full a resume as Chara or Lidstrom.
Quote
 
 
0 #23 Hax 2012-03-28 10:37
Steve Lloyd ‏ @Steve_Lloyd

Alfredsson and Bishop only absentees from practice. Konopka skating as D-man with Gilroy. Butler filling in for Alfie with Turris & Foligno.


Sounds like a "maintenance" day for Alfie.
Quote
 
 
0 #24 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-28 10:43
I hope the Alfie chant catches on, I wish I was either of the remaining home games, unlikely but still TBD at this point...

We should do this not just the next home game but every home game until Alfie calls it quits. Whether they hear it on ice or not is a little irrelevant, surely the broadcasters and media would catch on that our fans are doing something cool for a change. and Alfie would learn about it for sure.

Might be a bit awkward if there is a whistle blown at 11:04 though. :)
Quote
 
 
0 #25 Hax 2012-03-28 10:45
Updated projected standings based on "last 10" pace:

NYR 110
BOS 99
FLO 98
PIT 109
PHI 104
NJD 98
OTT 94
BUF 94

(Washington with 90)
Quote
 
 
0 #26 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-03-28 10:47
Quoting Tookie19:
OTT 77games 88pts
BUF 77games 86pts
WSH 77games 84pts

So freaking close, 2 wins for OTT and 2 losses for either BUF or WSH and were in...but 2 losses for OTT could spell 9th...


Hey Tookie,

I truly believe that should the Sens win in Philly, they will be pumped, and the last 4 games are all winnable, so
maybe we end up with 98 points, and higher in final standings!

That would be the icing on the cake !!
Quote
 
 
-2 #27 Tookie 2012-03-28 10:48
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Quoting Tookie19:

Chara, brought home the Cup with out of this world overall play, physical, monster of a person, bleeds leadership...


See? You're living in the past, the award is about this year, not Chara's legacy or the fact that Weber has been so close in THE PAST that he deserves special consideration.

Screw that. It seems many of the people voting will already be biased and misinformed about Karlsson... someone should at least smack them upside the head and remind them that this is about this season, not past accomplishments...


This year, Weber has Preds looking like serious contenders, and Boston is again top in the East cuz of Chara.

The Sens and Karlsson are on the bubble, struggling to stay within 8th. Karlsson does not show leadership, taking those dumb penalties and showing immaturity (he is only 21). Its not the end of the world if he doesnt win it this year, despite having Mike Green numbers, remember, Mike Green was snubbed twice in a row.
Quote
 
 
0 #28 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 10:48
@tookie19

Why are you bringing Chara's cup into the Norris debate? That was last year doesn't count.

As for Weber: Ottawa spent $80,000 more on the cap than them, so that argument about leading them to playoffs on a low cap team should hold true for Karlsson (who doesn't have suter as well)

Advanced Stats (all 5 on 5) (bold is best, italics is worst)

Quality of Competition related to Corsi:
Lidstrom: 1.581
Karlsson: 0.789 still a good number
Weber: 1.384
Chara: 1.075

+/- off ice/60:
Lidstrom: 0.87 shows detroit score with or without
Karlsson: -0.31 basically same impact to team as weber
Weber: -0.33
Chara: 0.41

+/- on ice/60:
Lidstrom: 1.51 very high
Karlsson: 0.95
Weber: 0.62
Chara: 0.99

TOI/60:
Lidstrom: 17.43
Karlsson: 19.88 very high number Weber: 19.79
Chara: 18:86

TOi/60 Shorthanded:
Lidstrom: 1.82
Karlsson: 0.53 obviously low
Weber: 2.15
Chara: 2.54 insanely high

TOI/60 Powerplay:
Lidstrom: 3.56
Karlsson: 3.64 just a lsight advantage
Weber: 3.51
Chara: 2.54 Surprisingly low
Quote
 
 
0 #29 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 10:50
Continuing:

Basically this shows you that looking at situated times, and impact on the team (leadership debate) Karlsson impacts his team when he is on the ice basically equal in most cases to any other dman.

If you want to bring up the SH TOI debate well put it this way, Ottawa has let up the 3rd most PPG (54), Det 7th (50), Bos 19th (41) and Nsh 23rd(38). Ottawa has let up 4 more goals than det, 13 more than bos and 16 more than nsh.

Bringing pts into equation, Karlsson has scored 22 more pts than his team let up on PK compared to chara (+7) Lidstrom (-17) and Weber (-8)

This shows that in a perfect world, if you could trade every Power play goal against for a dman goal generated that Karlsson impacts his team more in helping them win

sorry for the long post
Quote
 
 
+3 #30 Hax 2012-03-28 10:57
Chirp - how's that "ignore" button coming along?
Quote
 
 
+2 #31 boom 2012-03-28 10:59
Quoting Hax:
Chirp - how's that "ignore" button coming along?

Please.
Quote
 
 
0 #32 SensChirp 2012-03-28 11:06
Quoting boom:
Quoting Hax:
Chirp - how's that "ignore" button coming along?

Please.

Current comment platform does not have it. Would mean changing comment systems I believe.
Quote
 
 
0 #33 Tcharger 2012-03-28 11:07
Does the old format offer it

Nudge nudge

Wink wink
Quote
 
 
0 #34 SensChirp 2012-03-28 11:19
Quoting Tcharger:
Does the old format offer it

Nudge nudge

Wink wink

What is this old format you speak of? Never heard of it! I'm holding off on another redesign because theScore has shown some interest in creating a network of similar looking blogs that they would design.
Quote
 
 
0 #35 jakester 2012-03-28 11:25
Tookie you're proving to be as idiotic as COX - Karlsson is far and away the leader in the NORRIS RACE. The 3 nominees should go to Karlsson. Those other nominees bore the hell out of me. Karlsson offensively and defensely is a thrill to watch. Love seeing him rush back down the ice after a pinch. The kid is like Coffey and ORR(comparative ly I mean).
Quote
 
 
+1 #36 sens_fan_mtl1 2012-03-28 11:25
I guess since it appears that past performances play a roll in Norris trophy winner I guess that means Jose Theodore has a better chance of winning the Vezina over Brian Elliott because he has won it in the past and he has helped FLA into a top spot in the east, whereas Brian Elliott was not very good in Ottawa and Colorado...so even though he leads most major categories he doesn't deserve it.
Quote
 
 
+1 #37 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 11:30
Quoting sens_fan_mtl1:
I guess since it appears that past performances play a roll in Norris trophy winner I guess that means Jose Theodore has a better chance of winning the Vezina over Brian Elliott because he has won it in the past and he has helped FLA into a top spot in the east, whereas Brian Elliott was not very good in Ottawa and Colorado...so even though he leads most major categories he doesn't deserve it.


As much as I agree with what your saying, I hope your not trying to say that Elliott deserves the Vezina? lol

I think that race will and should come down to Lundquist(winne r), Quick and Fleury, honorable mention to Rinne

Halak/Elliott will split the Jennings for fewest goals allowed
Quote
 
 
0 #38 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-28 11:31
Who needs an ignore button? Days like today we get 10 posts per hour, is it really so hard to skip over someone's comment if you think they're a bumbling annoying jackass?
Quote
 
 
0 #39 gosensgo101 2012-03-28 11:36
Don't go questioning Damien Cox's ironclad opinion on twitter unless you're comfortable with being blocked by him.
Quote
 
 
0 #40 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 11:36
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Who needs an ignore button? Days like today we get 10 posts per hour, is it really so hard to skip over someone's comment if you think they're a bumbling annoying jackass?


Good to see Tookie leave after I prove him wrong with the advanced stats...
Quote
 
 
+1 #41 MethotToMyMadness 2012-03-28 11:42
I'm reading a lot of comments about the Norris and why EK isn't getting the love. Trust me, everyone is loving what he's doing this year, but remember.... this is the first year he's put up these numbers. He had an ok season last year and did finish with 45 points, but this is his first solid year, including a positive +/-

If you look at the way the voting goes, it's been said time and time again, it's an old mans system. Very seldom would an up and coming D get votes over someone who's been proven and put his time in. I'm not saying I like it that way, and many people have complained about it, just listen to the guys on the Team 1200. But this seems to be how it is, guys like Weber have paid the dues and it just tends to go that way. If PM is saying he thinks that's who's in the running for it, good guess as any he's more than likely right. I mean, look at Green a few years back. He put up 2 solid point producing seasons and the Caps did well those years, but he didn't win.

EK will likely get some nominations, enough to say people see what he did, but I don't expect he'll win it. It's a pisser for sure, but look at the history of the previous winners.
Quote
 
 
0 #42 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 11:44
Quoting madpajamma:
I'm reading a lot of comments about the Norris and why EK isn't getting the love. Trust me, everyone is loving what he's doing this year, but remember.... this is the first year he's put up these numbers. He had an ok season last year and did finish with 45 points, but this is his first solid year, including a positive +/-

If you look at the way the voting goes, it's been said time and time again, it's an old mans system. Very seldom would an up and coming D get votes over someone who's been proven and put his time in. I'm not saying I like it that way, and many people have complained about it, just listen to the guys on the Team 1200. But this seems to be how it is, guys like Weber have paid the dues and it just tends to go that way. If PM is saying he thinks that's who's in the running for it, good guess as any he's more than likely right. I mean, look at Green a few years back. He put up 2 solid point producing seasons and the Caps did well those years, but he didn't win.

EK will likely get some nominations, enough to say people see what he did, but I don't expect he'll win it. It's a pisser for sure, but look at the history of the previous winners.


True 100% but why does Perry win MVP last year then?
Quote
 
 
0 #43 Hax 2012-03-28 11:47
We can manually ignore - it's not that tough.

Though perhaps you can tell your platform provider that they should work on an ignore button? The current platform is pretty solid in other respects.

Not a huge deal of course, just saves some of the flame wars we get from time to time.

From twitter:

Daniel Slater ‏ @ScoreOttawa

Coach MacLean working the boys hard today. Zamboni is currently clearing the ice after first 45 minutes. Probably another 45 to go.
Quote
 
 
0 #44 sens_fan_mtl1 2012-03-28 11:48
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting sens_fan_mtl1:
I guess since it appears that past performances play a roll in Norris trophy winner I guess that means Jose Theodore has a better chance of winning the Vezina over Brian Elliott because he has won it in the past and he has helped FLA into a top spot in the east, whereas Brian Elliott was not very good in Ottawa and Colorado...so even though he leads most major categories he doesn't deserve it.


As much as I agree with what your saying, I hope your not trying to say that Elliott deserves the Vezina? lol

I think that race will and should come down to Lundquist(winner), Quick and Fleury, honorable mention to Rinne

Halak/Elliott will split the Jennings for fewest goals allowed


Nah don't worry...I do not think he should get the Vezina, I just think that it should be about the present year...otherwis e what is the point of giving out a yearly award when you are not rewarding the player for the current year. If the MVP hands down is Malkin, then it should be a no-brainer that Karlsson wins the Norris.
Quote
 
 
0 #45 Hax 2012-03-28 11:49
Quoting Alcatraz:
True 100% but why does Perry win MVP last year then?


There's always exceptions of course and Karlsson still could win the Norris this season, it's just not likely.

Though I will say if a 21 year old was ever going to "come out of nowhere" to win the Norris, it would be Karlsson with the season he's put together.

Mendes has tweeted a billion stats/facts that make a solid case for Karlsson to win - but it will take a lot to overcome the fact that most voters simply pick a name they recognize and move on.
Quote
 
 
+1 #46 Tookie 2012-03-28 11:50
Quoting Alcatraz:
Continuing:

Basically this shows you that looking at situated times, and impact on the team (leadership debate) Karlsson impacts his team when he is on the ice basically equal in most cases to any other dman.

If you want to bring up the SH TOI debate well put it this way, Ottawa has let up the 3rd most PPG (54), Det 7th (50), Bos 19th (41) and Nsh 23rd(38). Ottawa has let up 4 more goals than det, 13 more than bos and 16 more than nsh.

Bringing pts into equation, Karlsson has scored 22 more pts than his team let up on PK compared to chara (+7) Lidstrom (-17) and Weber (-8)

This shows that in a perfect world, if you could trade every Power play goal against for a dman goal generated that Karlsson impacts his team more in helping them win

sorry for the long post


Hehe no worries that pretty cool for those numbers to come up like that but the only stat that matters is:

Quality of Competition related to Corsi:
Lidstrom: 1.581
Karlsson: 0.789
Weber: 1.384
Chara: 1.075

Karlsson is the lowest. Meaning he doesnt play vs the best night in & night out..

+/- off ice/60:
Lidstrom: 0.87 shows detroit score with or without
Karlsson: -0.31 basically same impact to team as weber
Weber: -0.33
Chara: 0.41

Good stat, shows that when he is not on the ice, his team struggles to score.

+/- on ice/60:
Lidstrom: 1.51 very high
Karlsson: 0.95
Weber: 0.62
Chara: 0.99

3rd best when on the ice vs weaker opponents than the other 3.

I'm not saying he aint good, he's the best offensive D-man in the game today. He just aint got the reputation these other guys have built up. Give him time to build his case.
Quote
 
 
+1 #47 my2sens 2012-03-28 11:51
The James Norris Memorial Trophy is an annual award given to the defense player who demonstrates throughout the season the greatest all-round ability in the position. The winner is selected in a poll of the Professional Hockey Writers' Association at the end of the regular season. The James Norris Memorial Trophy was presented in 1953 by the four children of the late James Norris in memory of the former owner-president of the Detroit Red Wings. The trophy is named in honour of James E. Norris, owner of the National Hockey League's Detroit Red Wings from 1932 to 1952. The trophy was first awarded at the conclusion of the 1953–54 NHL season. Bobby Orr of the Boston Bruins won the award for a record eight consecutive seasons (1968–75). Doug Harvey won the award seven times, while Nicklas Lidstrom has won it six times in his career and Ray Bourque won it five times during his career; between them, those four players have won half the Norris Trophies awarded to date. The Boston Bruins have won the most Norris Trophies with 13. The Montreal Canadiens are second with 11. The voting is conducted at the end of the regular season, and each individual voter ranks their top five candidates on a 10–7–5–3–1 points system. Three finalists are named and the trophy is awarded at the NHL awards ceremony after the conclusion of the playoffs.

Unfortunately I don't think he will get it this year due to his 'defensive' aspect of the game.
Quote
 
 
+1 #48 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 11:56
The thing tho Tookie is that yes he plays against "weaker" opponents, his quality of competition number is not low, just lower but that should define him as a dman

As a dman his offense more than makes up for any deficency he has.

If he was +2 and scored 78 pts than yes, I agree with you 100% but his stats show that he is still be reliable in his own end, while playing top lines as well. His quality of competition stat is the 2nd highest on the team (next to Kuba) so ya he may be lower than the others, but it shows that Maclean is not line matching every game, and is using a combo of pairings against the opposing top lines.

Summary, Karlsson/Kuba pairing plays the top line more than any other defensive pairing on the Senators.

Compare Apples and Apples not Apples and Oranges. Karlsson vs Lidstrom sure different numbers but a variety of reasons why there is such a discrepancy.
Quote
 
 
0 #49 Tookie 2012-03-28 11:56
Quoting madpajamma:
I'm reading a lot of comments about the Norris and why EK isn't getting the love. Trust me, everyone is loving what he's doing this year, but remember.... this is the first year he's put up these numbers. He had an ok season last year and did finish with 45 points, but this is his first solid year, including a positive +/-

If you look at the way the voting goes, it's been said time and time again, it's an old mans system. Very seldom would an up and coming D get votes over someone who's been proven and put his time in. I'm not saying I like it that way, and many people have complained about it, just listen to the guys on the Team 1200. But this seems to be how it is, guys like Weber have paid the dues and it just tends to go that way. If PM is saying he thinks that's who's in the running for it, good guess as any he's more than likely right. I mean, look at Green a few years back. He put up 2 solid point producing seasons and the Caps did well those years, but he didn't win.

EK will likely get some nominations, enough to say people see what he did, but I don't expect he'll win it. It's a pisser for sure, but look at the history of the previous winners.


Well said, exactly what I'm trying to say. Give Karlsson some time, he will win it eventually, just has to build some rep and stay consistant.
Quote
 
 
0 #50 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-28 11:57
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Who needs an ignore button? Days like today we get 10 posts per hour, is it really so hard to skip over someone's comment if you think they're a bumbling annoying jackass?


Good to see Tookie leave after I prove him wrong with the advanced stats...


Yeah.

At the end of the day any such voting is open to subjectivity and strong arguments can be made for many candidates.

I just get sick of the same recurring knocks on EK65 Norris such as:
- he's not strong enough defensively
- it's only his first really strong year
- he isn't good enough to see the first PK unit
- he lacks leadership / discipline
- former candidates had to be spurned by the Norris for years before they were awarded it

This kid is, undoubtedly, one of the most amazing players in the entire hockey world this year, an absolute phenom that is just starting to hit his stride. You can easily make an argument for him for the Norris and Hart, his name is being bandied about with and by the greatest defensemen in NHL history, and he is one of the biggest reasons that the Senators sit in 7th with a small handful of games left, instead of 15th like all the morons err.. experts had suggested.

The least that the media pundits that are eligible to vote should do, is do their f**king jobs and educate themselves on all of the candidates before throwing out misinformed judgement on players they've barely cared enough to read up on...
Quote
 
 
+1 #51 Hax 2012-03-28 11:57
Quoting my2sens:

Unfortunately I don't think he will get it this year due to his 'defensive' aspect of the game.


Um, what's wrong with his defensive play? He's not going to blow anyone away with his size but he's near the top of the league lead in takeaways - that's gotta mean something. Having watched him work on his defensive game I'm confident that he'll be considered a shut-down guy in tight games in the near future.

He's not going to get heavy minutes in that role because he's far too valuable in the other end, but if we're up a goal late in a game I expect to see more and more of EK65 in those key minutes.

Similar to Spezza who never got a whiff of PK time but now sees a regular shift there.
Quote
 
 
0 #52 my2sens 2012-03-28 11:59
Hax - I agree, he's great at takeways... his stick work is phenomenal! But the fact that he isn't against the best every night reflects something, no?
Quote
 
 
+2 #53 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 11:59
Gotta love NHL awards then!

I guess Octavia Spencer didn't deserve the best supporting actress award because she is relatively new, it should have gone to someone with more reputation.

How on earth did George Clooney not win then for best male!

Even in Baseball they gave the Cy Young to a relatively young Tim Lincecum 2 years in a row!! now look at him.

Stupid that the NHL is so busy staring at each others dicks to actually make decisions based on merit
Quote
 
 
+1 #54 AlfieforMayor11 2012-03-28 12:01
The Norris race is going to be pretty close. It could go to any one of Chara, Weber, Karlsson, and Lidstrom, and I would even throw Alex Pietrangelo in the mix after those top 4. I don't think Karlsson wins it this year, just because of the reputation that Chara, Lidstrom and Weber carry, and the fact that he simply isn't the best all-round defender in the game.

With saying that, there's no doubt in my mind that he will eventually win a Norris, most likely multiple Norris', and possible even a Hart trophy some day as well.
Quote
 
 
-6 #55 ShaunK 2012-03-28 12:01
Would be great if Florida caught Boston. Hate to say it but we'll get bounced quickly (likely a sweep) if we play the Bruins
Quote
 
 
+2 #56 my2sens 2012-03-28 12:03
We can take the Bruins in 7...
Quote
 
 
0 #57 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 12:04
Quoting my2sens:
Hax - I agree, he's great at takeways... his stick work is phenomenal! But the fact that he isn't against the best every night reflects something, no?


Quality of Competition (5 on 5) All Sens Dmen

Kuba: 0.059
Karlsson: 0.048
Gonchar: 0.012
Phillips: -0.009
Cowen: -0.022
Carkner: -0.035
Gilroy: -0.046

So on Ottawa's team (the only team you can actually compare) The Karlsson/Kuba pairing faces the hardest quality of competition

Quality of Competition as defined: Average Relative Plus-Minus of opposing players, weighted by head-to-head ice time
Quote
 
 
-1 #58 Tookie 2012-03-28 12:05
Quoting Alcatraz:
The thing tho Tookie is that yes he plays against "weaker" opponents, his quality of competition number is not low, just lower but that should define him as a dman

As a dman his offense more than makes up for any deficency he has.

If he was +2 and scored 78 pts than yes, I agree with you 100% but his stats show that he is still be reliable in his own end, while playing top lines as well. His quality of competition stat is the 2nd highest on the team (next to Kuba) so ya he may be lower than the others, but it shows that Maclean is not line matching every game, and is using a combo of pairings against the opposing top lines.

Summary, Karlsson/Kuba pairing plays the top line more than any other defensive pairing on the Senators.

Compare Apples and Apples not Apples and Oranges. Karlsson vs Lidstrom sure different numbers but a variety of reasons why there is such a discrepancy.


You have to understand that this award is given to D-man, not forwards, scoring is not the pre-req to winning the award, it helps but voters dont drool over who had the most points as a D-man. They look at many factors and in this case, Karlsson just doesnt have the factors the other 3 have.

Produce, Defend, Lead.

Karlsson only does 1 well.
Quote
 
 
0 #59 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 12:07
@tookie

I would love to know your definition of lead?? What does Chara do so differently or Weber for that matter in terms of "lead" than Karlsson

Karlsson controls the pace of the game, when he is on the ice he "leads" his team. He settles everyone down. Everytime Maclean throws him over the board he expects Karlsson to take control of the puck and the game and have a calming impact

so because he doesn't jump into a scrum to fight someone he is worse than Weber and Chara at "leading"
Quote
 
 
0 #60 Tookie 2012-03-28 12:09
Quoting Hax:

He's not going to get heavy minutes in that role because he's far too valuable in the other end, but if we're up a goal late in a game I expect to see more and more of EK65 in those key minutes.

Similar to Spezza who never got a whiff of PK time but now sees a regular shift there.


Exactly, time, as of right now he doesnt see that time, which is a clear indicator that he isnt in that Norris class just yet, soon tho.
Quote
 
 
+1 #61 Hax 2012-03-28 12:09
Quoting my2sens:
Hax - I agree, he's great at takeways... his stick work is phenomenal! But the fact that he isn't against the best every night reflects something, no?


Simple - because he's more valuable playing in the offensive end. He can't play 40 minutes.

Let Phillips and Carkner play the "shut down" role and let Kuba/Karlsson get their ice time in the other team's end.

It's got very little to do with any problem he has playing in his own end - it's all about getting the most out of his ice time.
Quote
 
 
0 #62 Tookie 2012-03-28 12:14
Quoting Alcatraz:
@tookie

I would love to know your definition of lead?? What does Chara do so differently or Weber for that matter in terms of "lead" than Karlsson

Karlsson controls the pace of the game, when he is on the ice he "leads" his team. He settles everyone down. Everytime Maclean throws him over the board he expects Karlsson to take control of the puck and the game and have a calming impact

so because he doesn't jump into a scrum to fight someone he is worse than Weber and Chara at "leading"


Weber, Chara, Lidstrom all have different effects aswell, its not like Karlsson is the only who has an effect on a game. They all do plus they do all the other things, OVERALL, they are better. One major fact you leave out is hits, block shots, toughness. All major factors. You cant just throw them out the window cuz Karlsson doesnt do any of em, the others do plus they do all the other major categories.
Quote
 
 
0 #63 Hax 2012-03-28 12:15
Quoting Tookie19:
Quoting Hax:

He's not going to get heavy minutes in that role because he's far too valuable in the other end, but if we're up a goal late in a game I expect to see more and more of EK65 in those key minutes.

Similar to Spezza who never got a whiff of PK time but now sees a regular shift there.


Exactly, time, as of right now he doesnt see that time, which is a clear indicator that he isnt in that Norris class just yet, soon tho.


No that's not what I meant. First off it's been shown here that he and Kuba actually do play against the best players (see Alcatraz' post), but my point is that MacLean is going to make sure as much of Karlsson's ice time as possible is played when we're on the offensive.

He'd much rather Karlsson on the ice for shifts in the opponent's end than our own end - NOT because he doesn't trust EK to play good defense, but because our chance to score is incredibly higher when EK is on the ice.

If the kid could play 60 minutes he'd be on the ice all game long. Same goes for nearly all elite offensive players - they get shifts based on a chance to score, not a need to defend. Depends too on the relative strength of the rest of your team of course (Lidstrom isn't REQUIRED for Detroit to score for example).
Quote
 
 
0 #64 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 12:16
Also looking at our quality of competion stats I would say that Maclean doesn't match lines according to opposing team, rather he sends out Dmen according to where the faceoff is taking place. (Karlsson 57% of time to Phillips 48% of time)

This maximizes his use of dmen skill sets

Also I would hazard a guess that the other team is matching lines against Karlsson as a reason he doesn't face the top end forwards. For example, if you Rangers, do you place Stepan and Gaborik on the ice vs Karlsson, or Boyle/Callahan? I know who I would be telling to dump and pound. Similar to Boston with Bergeron/Seguin or Lucic/Peverly?

That factors in also, Maclean can only do so much with trying to get Karlsson out against who he likes.

On the other end, I don't think NYR would be putting Boyle out against Chara for same strategy, rtaher they would put Gaborik to use his outside speed on him.
Quote
 
 
0 #65 Tookie 2012-03-28 12:16
Quoting Hax:
Quoting my2sens:
Hax - I agree, he's great at takeways... his stick work is phenomenal! But the fact that he isn't against the best every night reflects something, no?


Simple - because he's more valuable playing in the offensive end. He can't play 40 minutes.

Let Phillips and Carkner play the "shut down" role and let Kuba/Karlsson get their ice time in the other team's end.

It's got very little to do with any problem he has playing in his own end - it's all about getting the most out of his ice time.


Hax, you just keep proving my point, he aint "the man" yet, he isnt out there on every situation, Chara, Lidstrom, Weber are...debate over.
Quote
 
 
0 #66 Shibal07 2012-03-28 12:19
Karlsson and Green don't even compare. During Green's mighty reign, he had Semin, Backstrom, and Ovechkin playing at their best. Washington was an offensive machine. Karlsson's 45 points last year I thought was amazing for the fact that the sens were the second lowest scoring team in the league. Last year I was thinking that if only the sens scored more, Karlsson would be getting even more points last year. This year the sens are scoring a crap load, and Karlsson is getting the points.

Karlsson is also putting up points in a team where half of them are freshly graduated AHL players. Greens stats for those 2 amazing seasons he had is totally blown up, Capitals were like scoring over 300 goals those seasons. The so called experts should take into account that what Karlsson is doing this year has only been done by the greats in the past. If people do care about +-, as of right now Karlsson is +19, Shea Weber is +18, Karlsson is 76 points in 76 game, Weber is 46 points in 73 games. The only difference is that Karlsson does not kill penalties, well his body is not made for that, and most of his ice time is used on even strenght and power plays. His body is not made to be physical aswell when playing defensively it's not his fault he can't grow. If Weber wins it's pure robbery.
Quote
 
 
0 #67 Hax 2012-03-28 12:19
Quoting Tookie19:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting my2sens:
Hax - I agree, he's great at takeways... his stick work is phenomenal! But the fact that he isn't against the best every night reflects something, no?


Simple - because he's more valuable playing in the offensive end. He can't play 40 minutes.

Let Phillips and Carkner play the "shut down" role and let Kuba/Karlsson get their ice time in the other team's end.

It's got very little to do with any problem he has playing in his own end - it's all about getting the most out of his ice time.


Hax, you just keep proving my point, he aint "the man" yet, he isnt out there on every situation, Chara, Lidstrom, Weber are...debate over.


No dude you keep missing my point. Alcatraz keeps proving his point over and over again. If you can't follow my logic then try reading his posts.

Bottom line - EK65 is the best d-man we have, hands down. Best in the NHL? I think so.
Quote
 
 
-1 #68 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-28 12:21
Quoting Hax:
Quoting my2sens:
Hax - I agree, he's great at takeways... his stick work is phenomenal! But the fact that he isn't against the best every night reflects something, no?


Simple - because he's more valuable playing in the offensive end. He can't play 40 minutes.

Let Phillips and Carkner play the "shut down" role and let Kuba/Karlsson get their ice time in the other team's end.

It's got very little to do with any problem he has playing in his own end - it's all about getting the most out of his ice time.


EXACTLY

Goes to my top annoyance list:
- he isn't good enough to see the first PK unit

Is complete and totally bullshit. He could easily man the PK unit and do an outstanding job at it but he is MORE valuable on the PP and as Hax has said, the guy can play 60 minutes per game FFS.
Quote
 
 
0 #69 Muckalt 2012-03-28 12:22
Karlsson probably won't get the nod because he is young and will have to pay his dues. From a purely selfish standpoint, I would like to see him get nominated, but not win it. Trying to negotiate with Karlsson for a new contract, with the season he has had, will be that much more expensive if he is the Norris winner.
Quote
 
 
+1 #70 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 12:23
Block Shots:

Karlsson: 61
Lidstrom: 75
Weber: 130
Chara: 81

Hits:
Karlsson: 55
Lidstrom: 39
Weber: 171
Chara: 159

My God look at how many Blocked shots thhey have over Karlsson!! and Lidtsrom clearly outhits Karlsson this year. He must be a better leader!!

Another spin: the puck is always on Karlsson stick..how is he supposed to get hits and blocked shots as a result?
Quote
 
 
0 #71 Hax 2012-03-28 12:27
Quoting Alcatraz:
Block Shots:

Karlsson: 61
Lidstrom: 75
Weber: 130
Chara: 81

Hits:
Karlsson: 55
Lidstrom: 39
Weber: 171
Chara: 159

My God look at how many Blocked shots thhey have over Karlsson!! and Lidtsrom clearly outhits Karlsson this year. He must be a better leader!!

Another spin: the puck is always on Karlsson stick..how is he supposed to get hits and blocked shots as a result?


LOL

But you have to factor in body size to blocked shots. Blocked shots per square inch or per pound I bet Karlsson is closer to the top.

As for hits - yeah who needs to hit a guy when you can just pick his pocket instead?
Quote
 
 
0 #72 Tookie 2012-03-28 12:27
Quoting Hax:

No dude you keep missing my point. Alcatraz keeps proving his point over and over again. If you can't follow my logic then try reading his posts.

Bottom line - EK65 is the best d-man we have, hands down. Best in the NHL? I think so.


Never said he wasnt our best D, he just aint the best in the League, yet.
Quote
 
 
0 #73 MethotToMyMadness 2012-03-28 12:29
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting madpajamma:
I'm reading a lot of comments about the Norris and why EK isn't getting the love. Trust me, everyone is loving what he's doing this year, but remember.... this is the first year he's put up these numbers. He had an ok season last year and did finish with 45 points, but this is his first solid year, including a positive +/-

If you look at the way the voting goes, it's been said time and time again, it's an old mans system. Very seldom would an up and coming D get votes over someone who's been proven and put his time in. I'm not saying I like it that way, and many people have complained about it, just listen to the guys on the Team 1200. But this seems to be how it is, guys like Weber have paid the dues and it just tends to go that way. If PM is saying he thinks that's who's in the running for it, good guess as any he's more than likely right. I mean, look at Green a few years back. He put up 2 solid point producing seasons and the Caps did well those years, but he didn't win.

EK will likely get some nominations, enough to say people see what he did, but I don't expect he'll win it. It's a pisser for sure, but look at the history of the previous winners.


True 100% but why does Perry win MVP last year then?


Now you're comparing a different award, MVP holds true for a player that does an outstanding job in that current season and what Perry did from mid to end of season last year was amazing.

What we've been trying to say, is the Norris has a long and outstanding history of awarding a player not always based on current season stats, more of a general history so to speak, of the last few seasons. It sucks, but that is often how it goes. I can't argue anything about it, cause I don't like it either, so there isn't much to say other than that.
Quote
 
 
0 #74 Hax 2012-03-28 12:35
Quoting Tookie19:
Quoting Hax:

No dude you keep missing my point. Alcatraz keeps proving his point over and over again. If you can't follow my logic then try reading his posts.

Bottom line - EK65 is the best d-man we have, hands down. Best in the NHL? I think so.


Never said he wasnt our best D, he just aint the best in the League, yet.


Your assertion that Chara, Weber and Lidstrom are somehow better because they kill penalties more than Karlsson is flawed. It's not due to Karlsson's inability to help the PK, it's due to the fact that (especially compared to the other guys you mention) he makes more of an impact if his ice time is spent on offense.

Lidstrom is the only guy you mention who's even in the same league as EK when it comes to offense and he plays on a team with more options offensively so they don't *need* Lidstrom to play all his minutes in the other team's zone. Ottawa does since without Karlsson on the ice our offense (as Alcatraz has illustrated) is fairly anemic.

You can feel that EK isn't the best in the league yet and many would agree - but don't try and tell me that he's not on the PK because he's not good enough - that's just not true.
Quote
 
 
0 #75 Tookie 2012-03-28 12:38
Quoting Alcatraz:
Block Shots:

Karlsson: 61
Lidstrom: 75
Weber: 130
Chara: 81

Hits:
Karlsson: 55
Lidstrom: 39
Weber: 171
Chara: 159

My God look at how many Blocked shots thhey have over Karlsson!! and Lidtsrom clearly outhits Karlsson this year. He must be a better leader!!

Another spin: the puck is always on Karlsson stick..how is he supposed to get hits and blocked shots as a result?


Really guys, do I really have to explain myself when talking about Weber, Lidstrom (who only played 64 games this year) and Chara.....compa red to Karlsson....really.

Your looking at this with Sens goggles, obvioulsy, Karlsson is a great offensive D-man but he aint Norris worthy, until he gets better OVERALL (which is the actual description), he wont win it.

The 3 others have been doing this year in and year out, Karlsson has 1 great year.

Your point about only maximizing Karlsson's play to be in the offensive zone is total bullshit. Chara, Lidstrom, Weber all play as much in the off zone AND def zones, they do EVERYTHING. And they do it YEARLY. Not only this or only that.
Quote
 
 
+1 #76 SensChirp 2012-03-28 12:43
Ben Bishop hopeful that he'll be skating again this weekend and could return to game action next week.
Quote
 
 
0 #77 Tookie 2012-03-28 12:44
Norris trophy winners dont "maximize" their ice time, they are on wether they like it or not and excel at it.

I dont buy into the "more of an impact on offense" Norris winners do it from everywhere, they shouldnt need to be place in "offensive situation" to excel.
Quote
 
 
0 #78 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 12:44
If they play as much in the off zone then why do they have up to 30-40 points less? Surely dmen of their caliber would be able to keep up, like they have every other year right?
Quote
 
 
0 #79 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 12:47
Your right Tookie I mean Rod Langway was able to carry his own weight offensively as well right?

Same with Paul Coffey Defensively?
Quote
 
 
0 #80 Floridasensfan 2012-03-28 12:48
Quoting Tookie19:
Quoting Hax:

No dude you keep missing my point. Alcatraz keeps proving his point over and over again. If you can't follow my logic then try reading his posts.

Bottom line - EK65 is the best d-man we have, hands down. Best in the NHL? I think so.


Never said he wasnt our best D, he just aint the best in the League, yet.


Crazy talk again from you.

Karlsson is leading the league, is that not leading, you lead by example.
Karlsson is also second only to Spezza on the team (and not by much) in points and Spezza is a friggin forward.
Karlsson is also a leader in take aways, is that offensive or defensive play.

Karlsson is also a + player, was it not Lindstrom that won it being a negative player.

If Karlsson does not take it hands down the Norris trophy is a joke and should be compared to prizes you get out of cracker jack boxes yeas ago.

worthless and not even worthy of conversation.

Should be called the joke award.

Karlsson is the best all around defenceman in the NHL, you can't discount performance for age or been around, if you do. JOKE.
Quote
 
 
0 #81 Tookie 2012-03-28 12:48
Quoting Alcatraz:
If they play as much in the off zone then why do they have up to 30-40 points less? Surely dmen of their caliber would be able to keep up, like they have every other year right?


Because they also excel on the defensive side.

No point in explaining to you if you dont understand how the Norris is won.

Its been like that for ages, it aint gonna change, accept and move on.
Quote
 
 
+1 #82 SensChirp 2012-03-28 12:48
With all of the candidates, there are strengths to their games and areas where they are not as strong. Karlsson is no different. But in my opinion, he is SO MUCH better offensively than any other contender, that he more than makes up for what he lacks in his own end.
Quote
 
 
+2 #83 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-03-28 12:51
Lots of back and forth on Karlsson and Norris Trophy.
Strong arguments from all the posters for and against.

Because he is only 21, and in his 2nd year, he is still
a work in progress. He has improved by 75% over last year in his offensive ability, and has improved his defensive abilities in leaps and bounds this season.

To me, he will be nominated, but will not win this year,
and should next year. Karlsson is much more talented than Coffey, Potvin, Lidstrom, Chara and a few more top defencemen.

I would compare him to Bobby Orr, in style of play, more offense, not comfortable on defense like Orr, but working on it !

Only player to have a chance to surpass Orr 's 8 Norris Trophies, if he remains healthy in years ahead !
Quote
 
 
0 #84 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 12:51
Regardless of your opinion Tookie, Karlsson has been just as good 5 on 5 and 5 on 4 as any other candidate. So using your "produce, defend. lead" argument from before Karlsson plays the most PP, 2nd most ES and little PK so 2 out of 3 is good enough right, considering he does PP and ES better than any other dman

Question:

Would you rather have a dman do 3/3 reasonably well, or a dman do 2/3 as best in show, and make up for the 1/3 elsewhere (similar argument to using langway in a strictly shutdown role)
Quote
 
 
0 #85 PaulMacLeansMustache 2012-03-28 12:53
Personally I am happier if Karlsson doesn't get nominated this year, signs for 1M-2M cheaper long term and then wins the next 8 in a row. Be careful what you wish for. How much is a 21 year old Nirris Trophy winner worth? 9M per season? You'd better start living Gilroy and Condra since that's all the Sens will be able to afford with that cap hit. (I'm over exaggerating but you get my point). No hardware = Less Cap Hit.
Quote
 
 
+1 #86 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 12:55
Quoting SensChirp:
With all of the candidates, there are strengths to their games and areas where they are not as strong. Karlsson is no different. But in my opinion, he is SO MUCH better offensively than any other contender, that he more than makes up for what he lacks in his own end.


I wouldn't so much as say so much better offensively as say he is so much better at controlling and dictating the play than the others. Weber and Chara rarely are able to control the play of the game with the puck on their sticks, sure they alter the game when players are attacking, but they can not immobilize and counter the way karlsson does. Lidstrom is the only one in Karlsson's league, and using him as a reference, karlsson is having a better year
Quote
 
 
0 #87 SensChirp 2012-03-28 13:02
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting SensChirp:
With all of the candidates, there are strengths to their games and areas where they are not as strong. Karlsson is no different. But in my opinion, he is SO MUCH better offensively than any other contender, that he more than makes up for what he lacks in his own end.


I wouldn't so much as say so much better offensively as say he is so much better at controlling and dictating the play than the others.

True. I have watched a lot of hockey this year and I can't think of a player, defenceman or forward, who is better at controlling the pace of the game.
Quote
 
 
0 #88 Tookie 2012-03-28 13:04
Quoting Alcatraz:
Would you rather have a dman do 3/3 reasonably well, or a dman do 2/3 as best in show, and make up for the 1/3 elsewhere (similar argument to using langway in a strictly shutdown role)



"3/3 reasonably well" no question. The other option leaves you with holes in your strategy.
Quote
 
 
0 #89 Tookie 2012-03-28 13:08
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting SensChirp:
With all of the candidates, there are strengths to their games and areas where they are not as strong. Karlsson is no different. But in my opinion, he is SO MUCH better offensively than any other contender, that he more than makes up for what he lacks in his own end.


I wouldn't so much as say so much better offensively as say he is so much better at controlling and dictating the play than the others.

True. I have watched a lot of hockey this year and I can't think of a player, defenceman or forward, who is better at controlling the pace of the game.


Guess what, again I have to disagree :)

You dont think that team that plays a certain style of game (dump and chase) dont change they're gameplan when facing Chara or Weber, your insane! Nobody wants to dump and chase on them, thats controlling and dictating the play aswell as Karlsson, EK just doesnt it another way.
Quote
 
 
-1 #90 Tookie 2012-03-28 13:11
I guess the debate is over, many think he will be nominated but wont win and are ok with that for various reasons.
Quote
 
 
+1 #91 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 13:15
@Tookie thats not what I was saying

When karlsson is on the ice he dictates the play on his own, regardless of opposing strategies. You don't think teams don't try and dump and chase on him? He still manages a way to control the game

Sure teams might play differently vs chara but you don't notice him taking over a game. he may alter (closer to what your thinking) but give me a must needed shift to generate something, and you know Karlsson will take over, where as Chara will rely on Seguin, Weber on Radulov/Erat etc

as for your 3/3 reasonably well thats just moronic. Thats like saying you would prefer Spezza over Stamkos/Malkin lol. Spezza wins faceoffs (55% 9th in league), scores and dishes out assists all reasonable well, where Malkin/Stamkos scores and dishes out assist as the best they come yet are awful at Faceoffs (Malkin 47% and Stamkos 46%)

Hey as a Centreman those are their 3 most important jobs right?

So Spezza 3/3 reasonably well and Stamkos/Malkin 2/3 best in show so right now your saying you would take Spezza

Gotcha
Quote
 
 
+2 #92 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-28 13:17
Hey Tookie, this one is for you. This is from Yost's Twitter (he's also taken up the gauntlet to get some recognition for EK65).

By your own logic Tookie, this is who you should be vying to win the Norris:

Ladislav Smid. 182 BS, 182 Hits, PK TOI 3:21. 5G/10A solid offensive output. Elite; well-rounded defenseman.

You put on your narrow lenses and bury yourself in iffy statistics to support your inexplicable loathing for Senators success and recognition.

I agree that Karlsson is likely to be nominated this year but NOT win it but that doesn't mean i think he doesn't deserve to win it. Without a doubt, he deserves to be considered a top-2 candidate.

How long until your name change? Can't wait!
Quote
 
 
0 #93 IcySurfas 2012-03-28 13:23
Quoting Tookie19:
Quoting SkipOPot2Mus:
How can Karlsson not win the Norris this year?!? I know its not all about points but without him the sens would not be where they are today.

If he doesnt win the Norris im gonna be so pissed. To me, its an obvious choice and no, not just because im a Sens fan.


Its not that simple and yes, your being biased. Lets gauge the value of the players possibly nominated:

Chara, brought home the Cup with out of this world overall play, physical, monster of a person, bleeds leadership...

Weber, has the Preds in the playoffs once again, despite having a NHL low cap. He brings physicality and leadership and consistency to the back end and to the forwards group.

Karlsson, no doubt the best offensive D-man in the league, defensively, not bad but has lots of room to improve. Brings much needed help to the offense. Consistent on offense but defensively not so much.

To me you have to take into account what the team has done under their leadership, sure Karlsson is putting up pts but his team is on the bubble and until he proves he is a consistent winner, its gonna go to Weber or Chara or Lidstrom. hey are proven winners and the positioning of they're team shows it.

Karlsson will win it, just not now, he's still very young and if he puts a couple of consistent years together, nobody can deny him the Norris.


I swear I overhead a guy at Locals on Monday night (Jets game) talking to his buddies about every single thing you just said, all supporting his arguement that Karlsson will get nominated, but won't win.

Was that you? Will the real Tookie19 please stand up!
Quote
 
 
0 #94 SNOOPY SENIOR 2012-03-28 13:33
Excitement galore on Senschirp !

Yesterday, we had a long debate with a narrow minded yoyo
named ZipZapRap, who is gone !

Today, we had a more sane debate with Tookie 19, on Karlsson and his Norris nomination, which he should achieve,but will not win this year .
Quote
 
 
+2 #95 Sandy 2012-03-28 13:41
I just want Karlsson to get a nomination.

For years... it basically seems to be Chara, Weber, Lidstrom.

What Karlsson is doing in the league this year at 21 yrs of age is amazing. Sure he still needs to develop his defensive game more..

He may not win it this year... but he will in time. He has a great future ahead of him.... all hopefully with the Sens.

Oh, and happy L.E.D. to all Sens fans... (that's Leafs Elimination Day).
Quote
 
 
+1 #96 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-28 13:41
Quoting SNOOPY SENIOR:
Excitement galore on Senschirp !

Yesterday, we had a long debate with a narrow minded yoyo
named ZipZapRap, who is gone !

Today, we had a more sane debate with Tookie 19, on Karlsson and his Norris nomination, which he should achieve,but will not win this year .


Hahaha. Urgh. Is it Saturday yet?
Quote
 
 
+1 #97 SensChirp 2012-03-28 13:43
Senators have signed defenceman Chris Wideman to a two year, entry level deal. Fourth round pick in 2009 will report to the Binghamton Senators.
Quote
 
 
0 #98 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 13:46
Quoting SensChirp:
Senators have signed defenceman Chris Wideman to a two year, entry level deal. Fourth round pick in 2009 will report to the Binghamton Senators.


Can he play a better defensive game than Karlsson? if so we def need him here this year
Quote
 
 
0 #99 IcySurfas 2012-03-28 13:47
Quoting my2sens:
We can take the Bruins in 7...


It really is starting to smell like a match-up with the Champs isn't it. Not just the standings right now as yes, alot of things could still happen. Call it a gut feeling but I think more and more that this is a real possibility for us. But anyway...my point, what was it. Oh yeah.

You look at some of the games Boston has lost this year and moreso some of the games they lost last year in the playoffs especially in those 7 game tilts with Montreal and Tampa, and you gotta think that anything is possible. I give advantage to Boston over us, but I really think that with the right momentum swing early in any game, and some lights out from Spezza, Karlsson, and Andy, that we could push the Bruins back in a long battle. Anything can happen.

I won't worry to much more about it though till the final standings are set.

Long story short "My2Sens", I agree with you.
Quote
 
 
0 #100 Tookie 2012-03-28 13:50
Quoting Sandy:
I just want Karlsson to get a nomination.

For years... it basically seems to be Chara, Weber, Lidstrom.

What Karlsson is doing in the league this year at 21 yrs of age is amazing. Sure he still needs to develop his defensive game more..

He may not win it this year... but he will in time. He has a great future ahead of him.... all hopefully with the Sens.

Oh, and happy L.E.D. to all Sens fans... (that's Leafs Elimination Day).


I agree with you Sandy, he will one day win it.

And good one with the L.E.D. :)
Quote
 
 
0 #101 Tookie 2012-03-28 13:52
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting SensChirp:
Senators have signed defenceman Chris Wideman to a two year, entry level deal. Fourth round pick in 2009 will report to the Binghamton Senators.


Can he play a better defensive game than Karlsson? if so we def need him here this year



Or maybe if he's offensive minded, we can "maximize" his ice time to have a greater impact on offense...
Quote
 
 
-1 #102 Tcharger 2012-03-28 13:54
Can we trade him for Lee?
Quote
 
 
0 #103 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-28 13:59
Yeah looking more and more likely we get the Bs in Round #1.

Sure they may be leading the season series 4-1 to this point, but at the end of the days, after ~77 games against the same opponents they are only FIVE points up on us.

Although we've been inconsistent most of the year including the past two weeks, we've also shown the ability to be Giant Slayers a couple of times very recently, while the Bruins have been struggling of late...

Every pundit on god's green Earth will pick Boston to win the series, but I got a feeling, much like this entire 2011/12 campaign, that we have the potential to shock the f**k out of a lot of people.

I just hope I don't die of a heart attack watching it unfold, hahaha.
Quote
 
 
+5 #104 Alcatraz 2012-03-28 14:00
Off Topic but great article/message

http://blog.country.inmusic.ca/2012/03/carrie-underwood-mike-fisher-do-it-for-daron-video-message-watch.html

direct video link:
http://www.doitfordaron.com/videos/d-i-f-d-mike-fisher-carrie-underwood-psa/

Amazing to see Fisher/Uuderwoo d still supporting Luke and his family. class acts
Quote
 
 
+1 #105 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-28 14:02
Quoting Tcharger:
Can we trade him for Lee?


Now that Gilroy is having some trouble adjusting / turning out to be a bit of a bust, whatever you want to call it... I sure wish we had kept Lee for a little stay at home meat and potatoes defense and playoff depth.

One of the things I am most curious about for Saturday's game is whether we put Gilroy back in the lineup. IMO Carkner had a hell of a game last time out and played as much of a physical game and blueline attack presence that Gilroy could bring to the table on the best of days. We'll need a LOT of heart in the playoffs, if Carker somehow really gets his game going at this point, there couldn't be better news for us.
Quote
 
 
-1 #106 Tcharger 2012-03-28 14:07
No we do not put Gilroy in...it was 100% a failed trade based off of Murray's inability to give. Someone a shot that he didn't draft
Quote
 
 
0 #107 Hax 2012-03-28 14:08
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Quoting Tcharger:
Can we trade him for Lee?


Now that Gilroy is having some trouble adjusting / turning out to be a bit of a bust, whatever you want to call it... I sure wish we had kept Lee for a little stay at home meat and potatoes defense and playoff depth.

One of the things I am most curious about for Saturday's game is whether we put Gilroy back in the lineup. IMO Carkner had a hell of a game last time out and played as much of a physical game and blueline attack presence that Gilroy could bring to the table on the best of days. We'll need a LOT of heart in the playoffs, if Carker somehow really gets his game going at this point, there couldn't be better news for us.


Carkner is the right guy against the more physical teams (Bruins in round 1 for example). Gilroy might draw in if PMac feels we need more puck movement and less physicality against other opponents.
Quote
 
 
+2 #108 spezzerman 2012-03-28 14:09
Quoting Tcharger:
No we do not put Gilroy in...it was 100% a failed trade based off of Murray's inability to give. Someone a shot that he didn't draft


I find it hilarious that you feel 11 games is enough of a chance for Gilroy but 6 years wasn't enough for Lee.
Quote
 
 
+1 #109 Tcharger 2012-03-28 14:10
Find it funny...if you think drawing in on e every 25 games is a shot then you are hillarious.

How bout I hire you but you can only work once a month
Quote
 
 
+1 #110 Hax 2012-03-28 14:10
Quoting Tcharger:
No we do not put Gilroy in...it was 100% a failed trade based off of Murray's inability to give. Someone a shot that he didn't draft


Not going to try and say the trade was a success, but do you really think Murray's been holding Lee down with every single coach we've had? Isn't it possible that none of the coaches we've had really liked Lee's play?

I like Lee as much as the next guy if not more and really hoped he'd end up in our top 4 in a few years - but clearly ALL our coaches have agreed that he's missing something.
Quote
 
 
+3 #111 WeAreSensFans! 2012-03-28 14:11
we need carkner in the room right now, keep him playing!

continue to sit gilroy, butler, konopka
Quote
 
 
+7 #112 boom 2012-03-28 14:13
Not to take sides on the Karlsson debate but...

Yesterday on TSN's site:
YOUR CALL: DOES SPEZZA DESERVE HART TROPHY CONSIDERATION?

Today, on this site, and everywhere for the last couple months:
Should Karlsson win the Norris?

Lastly, it's March 28th, and the Senators are in a playoff spot, and the Leafs are already eliminated.

All of this news around a team that was supposed to be a basement dweller...Life is good being a Sens fan eh?
Quote
 
 
0 #113 Tcharger 2012-03-28 14:13
he didn't draft

Not going to try and say the trade was a success, but do you really think Murray's been holding Lee down with every single coach we've had? Isn't it possible that none of the coaches we've had really liked Lee's play?
like Lee as much as the next guy if not more and really hoped he'd end up in our top 4 in a few years - but clearly ALL our coaches have agreed that he's missing something.


I do somewhat agree with what you are saying...but stuff doesn't usually stay hidden in this city
Quote
 
 
+1 #114 Hax 2012-03-28 14:13
Quoting Tcharger:
Find it funny...if you think drawing in on e every 25 games is a shot then you are hillarious.

How bout I hire you but you can only work once a month


DONE!

When can I start? (Keep in mind Lee got paid regardless)
Quote
 
 
0 #115 spezzerman 2012-03-28 14:13
Quoting Tcharger:
Find it funny...if you think drawing in on e every 25 games is a shot then you are hillarious.

How bout I hire you but you can only work once a month


ok fine. I find it hilarious you feel 11 games for Gilroy was enough but 167 wasnt enough for Lee.

boo-hoo. He's gone man. He sucks in Tampa too.
Quote
 
 
0 #116 PaulMacLeansMustache 2012-03-28 14:17
We will already be paying a few million more for Eugene's "Greatest of All Time" comment. On that note, although I love EM for keeping the Sens in Ottawa, I wish he wouldnt talk to the media. Quoting Tcharger:
he didn't draft


Not going to try and say the trade was a success, but do you really think Murray's been holding Lee down with every single coach we've had? Isn't it possible that none of the coaches we've had really liked Lee's play?
like Lee as much as the next guy if not more and really hoped he'd end up in our top 4 in a few years - but clearly ALL our coaches have agreed that he's missing something.


I do somewhat agree with what you are saying...but stuff doesn't usually stay hidden in this city

Sounds like something Garrioch and Brennan uncovered/made up.
Quote
 
 
+1 #117 Tookie 2012-03-28 14:19
Quoting Tcharger:
Find it funny...if you think drawing in on e every 25 games is a shot then you are hillarious.

How bout I hire you but you can only work once a month


And get paid the whole year, SIGN ME UP PLEASE!
Quote
 
 
+1 #118 ZipZapRap 2012-03-28 14:19
Quoting Tookie19:
I understand what your saying, just feels like Spezza is taking a back seat to Alfie, when it should be Alfie passing on the torch.

Plus he's said many times that he doesnt even hear it (if its during play) they are so focused on the game at hand.

If they're going to do that, they should consider doing it during a TV time...makes much more sense if you actually want Alfie to hear it.



Nothing new here
Spezza has taken the back seat his whole career

Fisher, Phillips and Heatley all had "A"'s on their jersey before our best talent did.

Alfie is Alfie, but you cant deny the teams success is resting on Jason's shoulders
Quote
 
 
+3 #119 Hax 2012-03-28 14:23
Quoting ZipZapRap:

Nothing new here
Spezza has taken the back seat his whole career

Fisher, Phillips and Heatley all had "A"'s on their jersey before our best talent did.

Alfie is Alfie, but you cant deny the teams success is resting on Jason's shoulders


Cue the mindless thumbs down for voicing a valid opinion


Heatley was given the A because his daddy wanted him to be a leader and it was purely part of contract negotiations. So totally agree that was BS.

However, Phillips and Fisher were here first and while Spezza has evolved into a really good leader he wasn't when those two were given A's.
Quote
 
 
0 #120 Tcharger 2012-03-28 14:28
I suppose its slightly different in the real world...you wouldn't be getting paid. Guessbit makes it a bit easier
Quote
 
 
0 #121 spezzerman 2012-03-28 14:29
ýou know, until this season, Carkner has been a really solid player for Ottawa, although I know folks around here disagree. He probably gets more ice time because he is one of the most intimidating guys in the NHL but for the most part, he deserves it. I actually think he is a much better puck mover than he gets credit for. In my opinion, he is the perfect #7 d-man who can play #6 every night if he needs to.

As bad as Lee was, Gilroy has contributed even less than Lee did with their different strengths (use the term loosely). But I do think Gilroy will draw back in at some point. He has been downright awful but I definitely think he can be better than he has shown. After a good month of practicing and watching, he should settle in and be better than he was. I don't think he could be any worse. He'll probably draw back in when or if we stop scoring on the Power Play or can't move the puck up ice.
Quote
 
 
0 #122 Hax 2012-03-28 14:46
Quoting ZipZapRap:

Cue the mindless thumbs down for voicing a valid opinion


This reminds me so much of Boo-boo (never missed a free meal) Garrioch and his comments about "the naive".
Quote
 
 
0 #123 ZipZapRap 2012-03-28 14:50
Quoting Hax:
Quoting ZipZapRap:

Cue the mindless thumbs down for voicing a valid opinion


This reminds me so much of Boo-boo (never missed a free meal) Garrioch and his comments about "the naive".


It's the truth, this place is like a school yard, you pick the names you like and you pick the names you hate
Then you thumbs up or down accordingly

Not once have I looked at a name on a comment, they are all read equally

If all of a sudden Chirp started to question Michalek down the stretch you would all be jumping on it


There is nothing wrong with conflict of opinion, but you all try to isolate people that arent constantly a part of the mindless love fest

I'm not coming here to shit on Michalek for no reason. I have valid concerns and would love for him to shut me up by contributing when it really matters.
Quote
 
 
+1 #124 Tcharger 2012-03-28 14:52
I gotta agree with what zipzaprap is saying thefe
Quote
 
 
+1 #125 Hax 2012-03-28 14:54
Quoting spezzerman:
ýou know, until this season, Carkner has been a really solid player for Ottawa, although I know folks around here disagree. He probably gets more ice time because he is one of the most intimidating guys in the NHL but for the most part, he deserves it. I actually think he is a much better puck mover than he gets credit for. In my opinion, he is the perfect #7 d-man who can play #6 every night if he needs to.

As bad as Lee was, Gilroy has contributed even less than Lee did with their different strengths (use the term loosely). But I do think Gilroy will draw back in at some point. He has been downright awful but I definitely think he can be better than he has shown. After a good month of practicing and watching, he should settle in and be better than he was. I don't think he could be any worse. He'll probably draw back in when or if we stop scoring on the Power Play or can't move the puck up ice.


Carkner is a great #7 guy but the trouble starts when he has to play heavy minutes for several games. If his playing time is limited to just "hold the fort" in his own end and break up scrums he's fine, but when we need him to literally shut down another team's top line even for a shift of two he gets exposed.

Most teams have more than one guy like that so it's not a bad thing really, but when another D gets hurt or has an off night Carkner stands out more (usually not in a good way).

I do agree that Gilroy wasn't likely to impress in such a short time and that it does take time for D-men to fit in with a new team/system - but I don't think Gilroy's going to get that chance. There are (hopefully) better options for us for next year. Guys we can sign either for multiple years (i.e. under 30 guys who can legitimately crack our top 4) or one-year guys who can fill a spot until some of our prospects develop.
Quote
 
 
0 #126 Hax 2012-03-28 14:57
Quoting ZipZapRap:
Quoting Hax:
Quoting ZipZapRap:

Cue the mindless thumbs down for voicing a valid opinion


This reminds me so much of Boo-boo (never missed a free meal) Garrioch and his comments about "the naive".


It's the truth, this place is like a school yard, you pick the names you like and you pick the names you hate
Then you thumbs up or down accordingly

Not once have I looked at a name on a comment, they are all read equally

If all of a sudden Chirp started to question Michalek down the stretch you would all be jumping on it


There is nothing wrong with conflict of opinion, but you all try to isolate people that arent constantly a part of the mindless love fest


I don't even use the thumbs up or down dude and I don't pick on specific people. But I will make jokes about comments I deem joke-worthy and I will disagree with comments I disagree with. If that reminds you of a school yard I don't know what to tell you.

You might want to note that I agreed with you that Heatley getting an A was BS. Though if you think Fisher and Phillips were undeserving when they got A's I'm not sure many will agree.
Quote
 
 
-1 #127 ZipZapRap 2012-03-28 14:59
I wasn't referring to you specifically, but it proves the point that any nay sayers here are isolated and shat upon
Quote
 
 
0 #128 my2sens 2012-03-28 15:03
We should have traded Lee for a 2nd line player they were seeking... our D are just fine right now...

GO SENS GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fuc---g 4 days off is bull!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #129 Kratos83 2012-03-28 15:04
more karlsson hate over at hockey buzz from the blues blogger, which is probably an extension of pangers comments, wanting Pietrangelo to win the norris over EK65...I am on board with most people in saying Karlsson's performance is so dominant this year that here is no way the writers could not give him the trophy, but that is just my opinion, and we know what they are like.
Quote
 
 
+3 #130 Johnny T 2012-03-28 15:07
mathematical elimination!! SUCK IT PHANEUF!!
Quote
 
 
+2 #131 Hax 2012-03-28 15:14
Quoting ZipZapRap:
I wasn't referring to you specifically, but it proves the point that any nay sayers here are isolated and shat upon


Wow imagine that. On a blog dedicated to Sens fans people who want to bring negativity are met with resistance.

What a crazy world we live in.

Honestly, most of the people here are HUGE Sens fans so of course they're going to knee-jerk respond with the "homer" side of things. Many will keep an open mind and discuss but most are true "fanatics" for the Sens and aren't interested.

If you truly want intelligent debate or feedback on an opinion/idea that's not "fan friendly" then you're just going to have to filter through the "not so nice" responses to find someone willing to debate intelligently.
Quote
 
 
+5 #132 Ctea 2012-03-28 15:20
Brynas tied up the series at one a piece against Farjestad earlier today. Silfverberg with a goal in the last minute. Wow.

http://www.scoresway.com/?sport=hockey&page=match&id=101139
Quote
 
 
0 #133 Sandy 2012-03-28 15:23
Quoting SensChirp:
Senators have signed defenceman Chris Wideman to a two year, entry level deal. Fourth round pick in 2009 will report to the Binghamton Senators.


Anything on when Ben Blood with join the B-Sens?
Quote
 
 
0 #134 Bradweiser 2012-03-28 15:28
To celebrate the Leafs being officially eliminated: "Shit Leaf fans say"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k53MxoVsfgg&context=C49d043aADvjVQa1PpcFM3LNflsV6o-fDI0URt24yT-Cmz0xrvu58=
Quote
 
 
0 #135 miguel 2012-03-28 15:48
Great debate on Karlsson, put me on the... he will get nominated but probably wont win side... not necessarily b/c he does not deserve it, but usually the D-men that produce the points, need a couple of years of proof before they can earn that honour.
And lets be careful what we wish for, if he wins that contract will be huge... and for a young guy with all that money, if he were to gain a few pounds, and slow down... that can be a scary combination!
Quote
 
 
0 #136 Hax 2012-03-28 15:51
Quoting miguel:
Great debate on Karlsson, put me on the... he will get nominated but probably wont win side... not necessarily b/c he does not deserve it, but usually the D-men that produce the points, need a couple of years of proof before they can earn that honour.
And lets be careful what we wish for, if he wins that contract will be huge... and for a young guy with all that money, if he were to gain a few pounds, and slow down... that can be a scary combination!


I do worry about the contract as well. But I'm hopeful that he's taken a cue from Alfie and realized that the bigger his payday the worse his future teammates will be. i.e. if he gets $9M per year he's going to be stuck playing with slugs but if he "settles" for $6M per year he should be surrounded with quality players.

He needs to decide if he's taking the Alfie approach or the Volchenkov approach.
Quote
 
 
0 #137 Mr Hockey 2012-03-28 15:54
It's NHL 12's online playoffs now. Any chirpers up for a game tonight?
Quote
 
 
0 #138 miguel 2012-03-28 15:56
Also that trade for Gilroy was brutal...
we all love what Murray is doing and he is making some excellent moves, however no one is perfect, and sometimes his stubboness on certain players gets in the way of his better judgement.
He had it out for Lee, why? we will never know, but he should have been top 6 on this team starting last year, and his play clearly indicated that. But Murray wanted his players in there, and Lee was not one of them.

And he is playing quite well in TB, and Tampa could not be happier to have moved Gilroy. IMO of course
Quote
 
 
0 #139 miguel 2012-03-28 15:59
Quoting Hax:
Quoting miguel:
Great debate on Karlsson, put me on the... he will get nominated but probably wont win side... not necessarily b/c he does not deserve it, but usually the D-men that produce the points, need a couple of years of proof before they can earn that honour.
And lets be careful what we wish for, if he wins that contract will be huge... and for a young guy with all that money, if he were to gain a few pounds, and slow down... that can be a scary combination!


I do worry about the contract as well. But I'm hopeful that he's taken a cue from Alfie and realized that the bigger his payday the worse his future teammates will be. i.e. if he gets $9M per year he's going to be stuck playing with slugs but if he "settles" for $6M per year he should be surrounded with quality players.

He needs to decide if he's taking the Alfie approach or the Volchenkov approach.

Great point Hax, lets hope he does not let his agent make that decision for him
Quote
 
 
+3 #140 Hax 2012-03-28 15:59
While we're talking about our D - can you guys imagine if we actually had moved Kuba at the deadline?

Safe to say we'd be a few points shy of where we are now and probably missing the playoffs.

I was certainly in the camp of "move him if there's a good offer" but looking back I'm glad we didn't.

Of course, if we lose in round 1 I may feel differently again, but for the moment I'm glad we basically kept Kuba as our "free rental".
Quote
 
 
0 #141 jasonontheoldsenschirp 2012-03-28 16:01
5 games left on his contract.

The question remains: What do we do with Filip Kuba?
Quote
 
 
+1 #142 Canucnik 2012-03-28 16:03
Was in Tranna yesterday for a course...up town looking for Cox...Roger's Center...the ACC...HHoF...ev en observed the Fan 590 from the CN Tower...no sign of Cox, MacLean, Kipreos...nobod ies around.

The Leaf stuff is off the shelves...a SENs key chain...a SENs hat on sale in the gift shop @CNTower. One soft crack about my Senator's Cap and she was Pittsburgh Fan.

The Leaf fans in Tranna are so done...now we gotta do something about these "Ottawa Jerks", who not only cheer for Tranna but show up, bring their kids and cheer for Tranna!

Gentlemen, do we have some non-believers among us?
Quote
 
 
+2 #143 Hax 2012-03-28 16:05
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
5 games left on his contract.

The question remains: What do we do with Filip Kuba?


Our options (IMO):

1) Let him walk. This assumes we have someone to fill that hole on the blueline or can get someone this summer. Remember that Gilroy and Carkner are likely walking too.

2) Sign him for 1 year to keep a spot on the blueline warm for Borowiecki, Wiercioch, Grbya or whomever.

3) Sign him for a few years on the hope that this season is the "real" Filip Kuba. And that he can keep it up now that he's 35+.

I'm actually leaning a bit towards #2 (and do not like #3 at all) but if Murray can sign one of the UFA stud D-men out there this summer then that's (obviously) a better option.

Karlsson and Cowen are "the future" and we're somewhat stuck with Phillips and Gonchar at least until the deadline next year (when Gonchar might go).

So really talking about two spots to fill and we can't have both be rookies even if we had two rookies ready - which I don't think we do.

So it boils down to this: Is there one rookie ready for next year? If so then who fills the other spot? Kuba or another UFA? Then you decide if you want Carkner back as your #7 guy or if that role will fall to various Bingo guys as needed.
Quote
 
 
+1 #144 MoeDozer 2012-03-28 16:15
in the other semi final game. claesson has 2nd most ice time on his team. the game is in triple OT tied at 4-4 he has just under 34minutes. usually a number 1 dman gets just arround 22minutes.

this is actaully really impressive for a sophmore like claesson to already be playing top line minutes for a good team (AIK) who are one of the favourites to win the cup this year.
Quote
 
 
0 #145 PaulMacLeansMustache 2012-03-28 16:18
Quoting Hax:
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
5 games left on his contract.

The question remains: What do we do with Filip Kuba?


Our options (IMO):

1) Let him walk. This assumes we have someone to fill that hole on the blueline or can get someone this summer. Remember that Gilroy and Carkner are likely walking too.

2) Sign him for 1 year to keep a spot on the blueline warm for Borowiecki, Wiercioch, Grbya or whomever.

3) Sign him for a few years on the hope that this season is the "real" Filip Kuba. And that he can keep it up now that he's 35+.

I'm actually leaning a bit towards #2 (and do not like #3 at all) but if Murray can sign one of the UFA stud D-men out there this summer then that's (obviously) a better option.

Karlsson and Cowen are "the future" and we're somewhat stuck with Phillips and Gonchar at least until the deadline next year (when Gonchar might go).

So really talking about two spots to fill and we can't have both be rookies even if we had two rookies ready - which I don't think we do.

So it boils down to this: Is there one rookie ready for next year? If so then who fills the other spot? Kuba or another UFA? Then you decide if you want Carkner back as your #7 guy or if that role will fall to various Bingo guys as needed.


Your assuming that he would accept a one year offer from Ottawa rather then a multi year offer from some other team. My prediction is that he walks when some team desperate for D offers him a 4 year 16M deal.
Quote
 
 
+1 #146 Hax 2012-03-28 16:23
Quoting PaulMacLeansMustache:

Your assuming that he would accept a one year offer from Ottawa rather then a multi year offer from some other team. My prediction is that he walks when some team desperate for D offers him a 4 year 16M deal.


Not assuming but you're right of course. There's no guarantee so maybe I should have said "try" to sign him for 1 year.

He is 35 though so not sure he'll get a 4 year deal, but he can likely get more than one year elsewhere.
Quote
 
 
0 #147 Johnny T 2012-03-28 16:59
Quoting Canucnik:
Was in Tranna yesterday for a course...up town looking for Cox...Roger's Center...the ACC...HHoF...even observed the Fan 590 from the CN Tower...no sign of Cox, MacLean, Kipreos...nobodies around.

The Leaf stuff is off the shelves...a SENs key chain...a SENs hat on sale in the gift shop @CNTower. One soft crack about my Senator's Cap and she was Pittsburgh Fan.

The Leaf fans in Tranna are so done...now we gotta do something about these "Ottawa Jerks", who not only cheer for Tranna but show up, bring their kids and cheer for Tranna!

Gentlemen, do we have some non-believers among us?


no chance any of those zipperheads show their faces here apart from those painful three days a year.
Quote
 
 
0 #148 MoeDozer 2012-03-28 17:04
chirp, you hearing anything about sens looking at signing a college player?

bob mackenzie keeps tweeting about other NHL teams that are trying to/expected to sign certain players at the moment.
Quote
 
 
+2 #149 Colin 2012-03-28 17:05
Quoting Johnny T:
Quoting Canucnik:
Was in Tranna yesterday for a course...up town looking for Cox...Roger's Center...the ACC...HHoF...even observed the Fan 590 from the CN Tower...no sign of Cox, MacLean, Kipreos...nobodies around.

The Leaf stuff is off the shelves...a SENs key chain...a SENs hat on sale in the gift shop @CNTower. One soft crack about my Senator's Cap and she was Pittsburgh Fan.

The Leaf fans in Tranna are so done...now we gotta do something about these "Ottawa Jerks", who not only cheer for Tranna but show up, bring their kids and cheer for Tranna!

Gentlemen, do we have some non-believers among us?


no chance any of those zipperheads show their faces here apart from those painful three days a year.


A couple of co-workers were saying that they actually felt sorry for Leaf fans. Sorry! Fuck 'em! After having their fun at SBP, they can bag their heads until next year.
Quote
 
 
0 #150 SensChirp 2012-03-28 17:38
Quoting MoeDozer:
chirp, you hearing anything about sens looking at signing a college player?

bob mackenzie keeps tweeting about other NHL teams that are trying to/expected to sign certain players at the moment.

Cameron Schilling and JT Brown were two of the guys the Senators were apparently interested in. Tough competition though.
Quote
 
 
0 #151 MoeDozer 2012-03-28 17:40
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting MoeDozer:
chirp, you hearing anything about sens looking at signing a college player?

bob mackenzie keeps tweeting about other NHL teams that are trying to/expected to sign certain players at the moment.

Cameron Schilling and JT Brown were two of the guys the Senators were apparently interested in. Tough competition though.

interesting, and now i see bob mack just tweeted that tampa signed JT brown and he will be starting this year. got a 2 year deal but since he is playing this year, it burns off a year.

as for cameron schilling, he might be interested in joining us, his Miami team mate Chris Wideman has joined bingo a couple days ago, and i think his pro debut might be tonight
Quote
 
 
+2 #152 Dude Duderson 2012-03-28 17:50
I just don't get it.. what does EK need to do...? Lead the entire league in scoring to be considered for the Norris?
Quote
 
 
+2 #153 MoeDozer 2012-03-28 17:55
Quoting Dude Duderson:
I just don't get it.. what does EK need to do...? Lead the entire league in scoring to be considered for the Norris?

the problem is, all people that arent convinced that he should be a Norris basically just look at him as a stereotypical tiny feather weight puck mover softy from europe. and that may have been true.. in his rookie year. its amazing how many people i tell (sens fans included) that karlsson leads all Dmen in takeaways. isnt that kinda what the main objective of a Dmen is? take the puck away from the opposition.
his offence obviously speaks for itself though.

non-sens fans need to watch this guy play a full 60minutes, not just the highlights post game... the kid can play D.
Quote
 
 
-2 #154 Dirk Diggler 2012-03-28 18:46
So I may get crucified by this but would any Sens fan consider trading for Schenn from TO? His value will never be lower and I think he will bounce back in a big way next year.
Quote
 
 
+1 #155 MoeDozer 2012-03-28 18:50
Quoting riceroni:
So I may get crucified by this but would any Sens fan consider trading for Schenn from TO? His value will never be lower and I think he will bounce back in a big way next year.

i would love to have him in a sens jersey but the price is obviously going to be way too high no matter how low his value may seem to be. and we would have to obviously give up one of our top prospects for him, and honestly i am way too big a fan of all our prospects to risk trading them away at this point
Quote
 
 
+3 #156 Johnny T 2012-03-28 19:08
Chirp - your clock hasn't moved into daylight savings mode...
Quote
 
 
0 #157 Hax 2012-03-28 19:12
Quoting riceroni:
So I may get crucified by this but would any Sens fan consider trading for Schenn from TO? His value will never be lower and I think he will bounce back in a big way next year.


I'm not really interested and think the price would still be too high (since Burkie would have to be able to justify it as not giving up on him etc).

Would love it if we had some sort of guarantee that he'd excel here of course - nothing better than rubbing TO fans faces in that. But far from guaranteed to win that trade.
Quote
 
 
0 #158 SensChirp 2012-03-28 19:15
Quoting MoeDozer:
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting MoeDozer:
chirp, you hearing anything about sens looking at signing a college player?

bob mackenzie keeps tweeting about other NHL teams that are trying to/expected to sign certain players at the moment.

Cameron Schilling and JT Brown were two of the guys the Senators were apparently interested in. Tough competition though.

interesting, and now i see bob mack just tweeted that tampa signed JT brown and he will be starting this year. got a 2 year deal but since he is playing this year, it burns off a year.

as for cameron schilling, he might be interested in joining us, his Miami team mate Chris Wideman has joined bingo a couple days ago, and i think his pro debut might be tonight

Schilling signed on with Washington two days ago.
Quote
 
 
0 #159 SensChirp 2012-03-28 19:16
Quoting Johnny T:
Chirp - your clock hasn't moved into daylight savings mode...

Haha well aware. Trying to figure out how to change it but I'm a bit of a rook still with some of the features on this site. Workin on it!
Quote
 
 
+2 #160 GreeningTheMonster 2012-03-28 19:23
the beautiful mark stone goal from yesterday

u have to press on the brandon vs calgary one

his goal is at 33 seconds in

http://www.whl.ca/video/index/id/991188d8c74e314f8c995f22704e3497
Quote
 
 
+5 #161 Mat 2012-03-28 20:13
Quoting Hax:
Quoting riceroni:
So I may get crucified by this but would any Sens fan consider trading for Schenn from TO? His value will never be lower and I think he will bounce back in a big way next year.


I'm not really interested and think the price would still be too high (since Burkie would have to be able to justify it as not giving up on him etc).

Would love it if we had some sort of guarantee that he'd excel here of course - nothing better than rubbing TO fans faces in that. But far from guaranteed to win that trade.


That didn't work too well when Toronto stole Komisarek from Montreal...

Don't want any Leafs on my team. Sworn enemies. For life.
Quote
 
 
-2 #162 MoeDozer 2012-03-28 20:21
Joy Lindsay ‏ @PSBJoyOnTheSen s
Matt Puempel awarded a penalty shot at 8:58 after being taken down by Tomas Kundratek, but Dany Sabourin makes the save. #BSens

good to hear he is creating scoring chances while playing on the 4th line. his offence will start rolling soon, im sure he is still really rusty for not playing in many long months, plus he is playing with men now.
Quote
 
 
+5 #163 KT7 2012-03-28 20:39
It's Damien Cox's opinion. The fact that we feel insulted/ or put down by his comments is only making the point that Damien Cox is a smart man. I'm not saying we shouldn't stand up for what karlsson deserves. All i'm saying is we shouldn't give Cox the respect he doesn't deserve.

I don't consider the members who vote for the Norris trophy to have all-world hockey wisdom, neither do i care. Karlsson, is a gem. NO one else has anyone with a similar skillset. Karlsson not getting the Norris won't take away the fact that the opposition coach cringe whenever they see's No.65 on the ice. Fans and Writers can say all they want. However, when they see him skating (at the speed of light) down the ice,they're the one's closing their eyes to not spectate the horror their team is about to face. In fact, I say just give the Norris to someone like to pietrangelo or even Girardi. They'll Be solid Defencemen though! Just don't expect them to create terror and frustrate the opposition.
Quote
 
 
+4 #164 Boivo 2012-03-28 21:17
There are a lot of people on here that are going to be eating their words come that trophy time in LV, when they announce Karlsson's name as the winner of the norris trophy. Its a lock, no question.
Quote
 
 
+2 #165 FSJGuy 2012-03-28 21:36
Happy Leafs Elimination Day

http://youtu.be/fZ2-U5kyC2M
Quote
 
 
+1 #166 captainohmycaptain11 2012-03-28 22:01
Quoting Boivo:
There are a lot of people on here that are going to be eating their words come that trophy time in LV, when they announce Karlsson's name as the winner of the norris trophy. Its a lock, no question.
I hope so...
Quote
 
 
-2 #167 FSJGuy 2012-03-28 22:28
Phaneuf has a better shot at the Norris, come on, where are the majority of NHL writers? it's simple numbers, not Ottawa.
Quote
 
 
0 #168 DenisVial 2012-03-28 23:46
Quoting Spezzafan19:
I am not insinuating that Alfie has not dont some amazing things for this franchise and is no doubt a very clutch performer. Nor am I suggesting that Spezza hasn't had a heart trophy nominee calibre season. But as a fan base we should be encouraging the entire team with our chants rather than singling out an individual. Quite often, Alfredsson puts the finishing touches on a solid team play and the crowd erupts in "Alfie" chants, yet the overall "Go Sens Go" chants never get the same kind of enthusiasm. As a player other than Alfie on the team, would you not feel that your hard work is undervalued due to the praise the captain gets. Would an overall loud and enthusiastic crowd not serve as better motivation for the whole team. I am all for giving Alfie his moments when the time is right, but in general I think the Ottawa crowd should show appreciation to "the Sens" on a more frequent basis. Just my thoughts…..


For those of you who are regulars, you know by reading the post above that this is not the real SpezzaFan19, it's a fraud who has ripped his name off minus the capital F. This sounds nothing like the real SF19, nor has he ever posted anything 1/4 as long as the above post.
Quote
 
 
0 #169 no one you know 2012-03-29 00:36
Quoting DenisVial:
Quoting Spezzafan19:
I am not insinuating that Alfie has not dont some amazing things for this franchise and is no doubt a very clutch performer. Nor am I suggesting that Spezza hasn't had a heart trophy nominee calibre season. But as a fan base we should be encouraging the entire team with our chants rather than singling out an individual. Quite often, Alfredsson puts the finishing touches on a solid team play and the crowd erupts in "Alfie" chants, yet the overall "Go Sens Go" chants never get the same kind of enthusiasm. As a player other than Alfie on the team, would you not feel that your hard work is undervalued due to the praise the captain gets. Would an overall loud and enthusiastic crowd not serve as better motivation for the whole team. I am all for giving Alfie his moments when the time is right, but in general I think the Ottawa crowd should show appreciation to "the Sens" on a more frequent basis. Just my thoughts…..


For those of you who are regulars, you know by reading the post above that this is not the real SpezzaFan19, it's a fraud who has ripped his name off minus the capital F. This sounds nothing like the real SF19, nor has he ever posted anything 1/4 as long as the above post.


HMMMMMM - I think you're correct.

This SF19 didn't threaten to kill "Don Cherry" or anyone else who disagrees with him.
Quote
 
 
+1 #170 timwrx 2012-03-29 05:15
Resign Carkner to a 2 way deal. There is the next Capt of the B-Sens. And can be called up in a pinch already knowing what you can get out of him.
Quote
 
 
0 #171 Smash_88 2012-03-29 07:00
Quoting Boivo:
There are a lot of people on here that are going to be eating their words come that trophy time in LV, when they announce Karlsson's name as the winner of the norris trophy. Its a lock, no question.


Judging by the what I've seen people writing, who don't cover the Sens... It's nowhere near a lock..
Quote
 
 
-1 #172 mooyootoo 2012-03-29 08:08
I don't know about this Karlsson for Norris campaign. I have to think Scott Niedermayer is the best model for Karlsson (in recent history), and it took him 10 years and 3 Stanley Cups to get his first Norris.

Seriously, I don't see Karlsson winning the Norris yet. That award, you can argue whether it should or shouldn't, seems to consider way more than the single year's performance.
Quote
 
 
0 #173 SensPuckLuck 2012-03-29 08:54
As for Karlsson getting the Norris, if he doesn't get it don't be upset. He won't be as big a target if he doesn't get it. I am sure his production will go down if he wins as teams are going to target him and make his life miserable checking him every chance with forth liners. So, don't be upset if he doesn't win. He'll get more space to wreck havoc.

SPL
Quote
 
 
+1 #174 CarloswSPECR1 2012-03-29 09:03
Quoting mooyootoo:
I don't know about this Karlsson for Norris campaign. I have to think Scott Niedermayer is the best model for Karlsson (in recent history), and it took him 10 years and 3 Stanley Cups to get his first Norris.

Seriously, I don't see Karlsson winning the Norris yet. That award, you can argue whether it should or shouldn't, seems to consider way more than the single year's performance.


I disagree. I think Karlsson should win the Norris this year. There's a reason why they give a Norris Trophy every year, because it's awarded to THE BEST DEFENCEMAN OF THE YEAR — which is exactly what Karlsson is THIS YEAR.
Quote
 
 
+1 #175 Tcharger 2012-03-29 09:08
Pierre Gauthier fired!

Lets see Burke next!
Quote
 
 
0 #176 MethotToMyMadness 2012-03-29 09:10
Was just thinking, can't wait to read the game day post, Dohh!! Guess I'll have to wait for that one. Man, the weekend cannot get here quick enough.

Sucks that I'll be out of town on business this weekend though, I won't get a chance to watch the games. Happy I can always rely on Chirps comment section to get the low down, if the wifi isn't good enough for a stream.

Do any of you have the Sens app for the iPhone. I was looking at it yesterday and caught a News story about the playoff drive and our successful year being one of the most successful viewer wise with Sportsnet. If you haven't seen it, check it out, interesting. I find it hard to believe we have more viewers now than the years we were finishing top of the heap, but I guess you have to calculate the fan base getting larger over time and such an unbelievable year in general. The best part, the broadcasts will start to spread further for Sens fans, east of Peterborough, parts of northern Ontario, Quebec and even into the Atlantic provinces. I know some people that will be VERY happy about that!

Cheers and Go Sens Go!!!!
Quote
 
 
+3 #177 CarloswSPECR1 2012-03-29 09:11
Quoting Tcharger:
Pierre Gauthier fired!

Lets see Burke next!


BOO-URNS!!!! I like him up there for Montreal. It increases our chances of winning, and reaching the Play-Offs.

The same goes for Burke. I want Toronto to keep Burke, because It's just freakin' Hillarious when he feeds L'aff Fans BS, and they eat it and ask for a 2nd serving of more BS when they eat the first batch.
Quote
 
 
0 #178 Dirk Diggler 2012-03-29 09:17
Quoting CarloswSPECR1:
Quoting Tcharger:
Pierre Gauthier fired!

Lets see Burke next!


BOO-URNS!!!! I like him up there for Montreal. It increases our chances of winning, and reaching the Play-Offs.

Don't worry, he has screwed them up for years to come... They have way too many bad contract on their books to really improve in the short term... The only thing they can rely on is Price, Pleks, Cole, Subban and Patches... still too many holes on that team
Quote
 
 
-1 #179 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-29 09:17
Quoting Spezzafan19:
I am not insinuating that Alfie has not dont some amazing things for this franchise and is no doubt a very clutch performer. Nor am I suggesting that Spezza hasn't had a heart trophy nominee calibre season. But as a fan base we should be encouraging the entire team with our chants rather than singling out an individual. Quite often, Alfredsson puts the finishing touches on a solid team play and the crowd erupts in "Alfie" chants, yet the overall "Go Sens Go" chants never get the same kind of enthusiasm. As a player other than Alfie on the team, would you not feel that your hard work is undervalued due to the praise the captain gets. Would an overall loud and enthusiastic crowd not serve as better motivation for the whole team. I am all for giving Alfie his moments when the time is right, but in general I think the Ottawa crowd should show appreciation to "the Sens" on a more frequent basis. Just my thoughts…..


This is Ottawa for you. Aside from big rivalry games and weekend tilts, many of the people who attend Sens games are quiet, stodgy and boring, a microcosmic comparisons to Ottawa as a whole. Half the time I go, my crew gets weird looks for being loud, cheering and yelling, as if we were aliens.

So a group of people decide to try and do something cool, something raucous and loud that our Captain would appreciate and that the sports world would hear about watching playoff games and sports highlights...

People come out of the woodwork to poop on it. Typical Ottawa.

If you don't like this idea, go the f**k ahead and do something else, for the love of god ANYTHING I'd love for SBP to be a noisier place and daunting arena for our opponents.

In the meantime this Alfie countdown is a) an awesome idea and b) great to see fans bonding together to do something neat.

I hope this catches on like wild fire. Hopefully I can be at least one of the remaining games to help out...
Quote
 
 
-1 #180 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-29 09:20
Quoting CarloswSPECR1:
Quoting Tcharger:
Pierre Gauthier fired!

Lets see Burke next!


BOO-URNS!!!! I like him up there for Montreal. It increases our chances of winning, and reaching the Play-Offs.


Gauthier is a clown, and the day they announced they were bringing him in I actually felt sorry for the Habs fans in my family... I couldn't stand him in Ottawa either.
Quote
 
 
0 #181 Tcharger 2012-03-29 09:21
Quoting RUSHRLZ:

This is Ottawa for you. Aside from big rivalry games and weekend tilts, many of the people who attend Sens games are quiet, stodgy and boring, a microcosmic comparisons to Ottawa as a whole. Half the time I go, my crew gets weird looks for being loud, cheering and yelling, as if we were aliens.

So a group of people decide to try and do something cool, something raucous and loud that our Captain would appreciate and that the sports world would hear about watching playoff games and sports highlights...

People come out of the woodwork to poop on it. Typical Ottawa.

If you don't like this idea, go the f**k ahead and do something else, for the love of god ANYTHING I'd love for SBP to be a noisier place and daunting arena for our opponents.

In the meantime this Alfie countdown is a) an awesome idea and b) great to see fans bonding together to do something neat.

I hope this catches on like wild fire. Hopefully I can be at least one of the remaining games to help out...


Sad but SO true...my brother in law and I were at the game(100 level) and were yelled at anytime that we stood up to cheer while the play was still going.
Quote
 
 
-1 #182 Mat 2012-03-29 09:39
Hey Chirp or anyone else,

TSN has started displaying in the standings the points accumulated as ROW (regulation + overtime wins). I can see that this is there because it will make a difference on the final standings (if say, we were tied with NJ).

I'm trying to get a sense of the calculations for this. Doesn't seem to add up and perhaps someone here can give that explanation?

Cheers,
Quote
 
 
0 #183 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-29 09:50
Quoting Mat:
Hey Chirp or anyone else,

TSN has started displaying in the standings the points accumulated as ROW (regulation + overtime wins). I can see that this is there because it will make a difference on the final standings (if say, we were tied with NJ).

I'm trying to get a sense of the calculations for this. Doesn't seem to add up and perhaps someone here can give that explanation?

Cheers,


ROW does not include shootout wins. So our 39 wins minus 34 ROW means we won 5 in shootout.

Does that make sense?

edit: So our record is 34 ROW wins (x2 pts) + 5 shootout wins (x2 pts) + 10 OT losses (x1 pt) + 28 losses (0 pts) = 88 pts in 77 games.
Quote
 
 
0 #184 Mat 2012-03-29 09:58
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Quoting Mat:
Hey Chirp or anyone else,

TSN has started displaying in the standings the points accumulated as ROW (regulation + overtime wins). I can see that this is there because it will make a difference on the final standings (if say, we were tied with NJ).

I'm trying to get a sense of the calculations for this. Doesn't seem to add up and perhaps someone here can give that explanation?

Cheers,


ROW does not include shootout wins. So our 39 wins minus 34 ROW means we won 5 in shootout.

Does that make sense?

edit: So our record is 34 ROW wins (x2 pts) + 5 shootout wins (x2 pts) + 10 OT losses (x1 pt) + 28 losses (0 pts) = 88 pts in 77 games.


That's what I imagined. That gives NJ an impressive 12 shootout wins this year.. It also means that if we are tied with them in points, we should get that wonderful 6th place finish and a date with Florida.

Thanks man!
Quote
 
 
-3 #185 C 2012-03-29 10:12
You can vote for your favourite player to be on NHL13 at NHL.com. If Karlsson won't win the Norris, let's get him on the cover of NHL13! We all know how good Sens fans are at ballot stuffing now, lets keep stupid Phil Kessel off the cover!
Quote
 
 
+1 #186 SensChirp 2012-03-29 10:14
Quoting C:
You can vote for your favourite player to be on NHL13 at NHL.com. If Karlsson won't win the Norris, let's get him on the cover of NHL13! We all know how good Sens fans are at ballot stuffing now, lets keep stupid Phil Kessel off the cover!

It's kind of tough though because don't you have to vote for every match up? I'll be honest. I voted for Spezza haha
Quote
 
 
0 #187 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-29 10:18
We should get organized and figure out which of our two players we want to plow forward with. Both are equally deserving IMO (queue the Hart arguments again...).

Spezza is more of our legacy superstar.
EK65 obviously our superstar whiz kid.

I'd be happy to support either, but in voting past round 1, who has the best shot at going all the way, or who do you feel is more deserving?
Quote
 
 
0 #188 MacK 2012-03-29 10:20
What a beautiful day to be a fan of the Ottawa Senators!

Not so much to be a leafs fan...

http://thepuckdoctors.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/leafs-elimination-day.jpg
Quote
 
 
0 #189 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-29 10:20
On another note... poor Calgary and this indictment on the state of the franchise. Their "contenders" are Stajan versus Backlund. Sorry Iginla, Kipper, Camaleri, Jokinen..
Quote
 
 
0 #190 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-29 10:22
We could also hurt the Leafs a little by voting Bozak over Kessel in their bracket. LOL.
Quote
 
 
0 #191 Hax 2012-03-29 10:24
Quoting Tcharger:
Sad but SO true...my brother in law and I were at the game(100 level) and were yelled at anytime that we stood up to cheer while the play was still going.


I'm sorry - you say you were standing during play? Not to sound like a typical govt town boring guy, but I don't want someone standing in front of me while play is on.

It's one thing of course to jump up on a near goal but to just stand there?
Quote
 
 
0 #192 Tcharger 2012-03-29 10:29
Well no we weren't just standing for the sake of standing...if I am not mistaken it was a massive hit from Neil

They didn't seem to understand why that warranted cheering
Quote
 
 
0 #193 Hax 2012-03-29 10:30
Don't get me wrong - I can't stand the silent fans and am happy to see anyone making any noise what-so-ever. But don't confuse someone telling you to sit down during play with someone telling you to not cheer on the team.

People that are dropping four-letter words or being obnoxious shouldn't try to hide behind "I'm just cheering for my team".

Not saying that applies to you and your brother-in-law at all - just talking in general.

I'm usually the loudest person in my section and while I get some odd looks from people who are used to silent fans, I have yet to have anyone ask me to keep quiet.
Quote
 
 
0 #194 Hax 2012-03-29 10:33
Quoting Tcharger:
Well no we weren't just standing for the sake of standing...if I am not mistaken it was a massive hit from Neil

They didn't seem to understand why that warranted cheering


Totally understandable and warranted.
Quote
 
 
+1 #195 Hax 2012-03-29 10:46
TEAM 1200 ‏ @TEAM1200Ottawa

@SSimpsonHockey on @TEAM1200Ottawa "From what I'm understanding,w hen season is over, it will be announced that PHX will move to QCity" #NHL


Wow - pretty cool if this is true.
Quote
 
 
0 #196 Tcharger 2012-03-29 10:50
Too bad Toronto couldn't get a team first
Quote
 
 
0 #197 Hax 2012-03-29 10:54
LOL - Imagine in a few years when Hamilton has a team too. Toronto might be the third best NHL team in Ontario.
Quote
 
 
0 #198 Alcatraz 2012-03-29 10:57
Wasn't Spezza already on the lesser played 2K series? I think after our cup run maybe 2008 he was cover boy

Kind of sucks they do this voting thing this year, because all signs pretty much point to Karlsson being the cover boy haha. If not him I could have seen them giving it to quick/rinne or giroux.
Quote
 
 
0 #199 Merchaholic 2012-03-29 10:57
EA Sports is having a contest for the cover athlete of NHL 13. Let's get Karlsson or Spezza on it. haha!

http://covervote.nhl.com/
Quote
 
 
0 #200 SensChirp 2012-03-29 11:01
@Team1200Ottawa According to @SSimpsonHockey The reason #Habs replaced Gauthier when they did, was to beat #Nordiques in the race for Patrick Roy #NHL
Quote
 
 
0 #201 Cactus Face Elmer 2012-03-29 11:01
Quoting Tcharger:
Pierre Gauthier fired!


"The Ghost" has left the building.

Tampa Bay AGM (can't recall his name) favoured to replace him ?
Quote
 
 
0 #202 andreasdackell 2012-03-29 11:01
ya i voted for spezza too chirp. But I just like him better than Karlsson, not too sure how the majority of sens fans will vote, but i think with all that hype on tsn the majority of outsider fans will go for spezza after that beauty assist, while i think the majority of sens fans will vote for Karlsson because of all the norris push. It will be interesting to see who wins!!! Dont get me wrong if Spezza doesnt make it out of first round i will be going for Karlsson to take it all. But Spez is ma boy!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #203 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-29 11:04
Looking at the "rules" for this NHL 13 stunt, it seems like there are only three voting periods, during which I would imagine they will reduce the number of players.

They make it somewhat misleading by presenting the voting like a "bracket". I think they will actually go from this entire list of 60 down to only 16 or something for the next round.

If we want to make our votes count as Sens fans, it would be better if most of us either got behind Karlsson or Spezza, not split votes between both.
Quote
 
 
0 #204 andreasdackell 2012-03-29 11:08
The Vote Spezza!!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #205 Merchaholic 2012-03-29 11:17
I will shit if Stamkos is on the fuckin' cover again.
Quote
 
 
+1 #206 Merchaholic 2012-03-29 11:25
We need a Senator on the cover for once... Only the NHL 09 game in Sweden released a cover with Daniel Alfredsson.

http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m242/bceaglesfan/NHL09_PS3.png
Quote
 
 
0 #207 MethotToMyMadness 2012-03-29 11:40
Quoting Merchaholic:
I will shit if Stamkos is on the fuckin' cover again.


I may be wrong here, but don't they put a different player on the cover for the American's and Canadian's? And didn't they do it in Sweden with Alfredsson?
Quote
 
 
0 #208 Tookie 2012-03-29 11:51
I vote Karlsson!
Since he wont be winning the Norris he should win this :P
Quote
 
 
-1 #209 WeAreSensFans! 2012-03-29 12:03
Whats with the blue jays, doing hockey tours and trying to get more fans from hockey? team 1200 carrying games too?
we don't care about toronto or baseball. bell media trying to lure ottawa fans away again.

let hockey fans enjoy the summer, hockey guys find baseball way to boring, go away toronto blue jays.
Quote
 
 
0 #210 MethotToMyMadness 2012-03-29 12:04
Time for Chirp to start a new post for the day. Let's see if we can figure out what it'll be about in advance, as he's no doubt in the middle of writing/editing it for posting.

My guesses
1. Karlsson for Norris
2. Eliminated teams (blue team done)
3. Ottawa practices, Prospects.

Any takers?
Quote
 
 
0 #211 Alcatraz 2012-03-29 12:04
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Looking at the "rules" for this NHL 13 stunt, it seems like there are only three voting periods, during which I would imagine they will reduce the number of players.

They make it somewhat misleading by presenting the voting like a "bracket". I think they will actually go from this entire list of 60 down to only 16 or something for the next round.

If we want to make our votes count as Sens fans, it would be better if most of us either got behind Karlsson or Spezza, not split votes between both.


I'm pretty sure I read it as all teams get 2 nominees, the first voting round eliminates 1 team member each, leaving 30 players. EA adds back 2 wild cards setting up our 32 player bracket

then 32 go leaderboard, and top 16 advance to bracket style

So for now it doesn't matter if you vote karlsson or spezza, one will move on
Quote
 
 
0 #212 IcySurfas 2012-03-29 12:05
Quoting ZipZapRap:
Quoting Tookie19:
I understand what your saying, just feels like Spezza is taking a back seat to Alfie, when it should be Alfie passing on the torch.

Plus he's said many times that he doesnt even hear it (if its during play) they are so focused on the game at hand.

If they're going to do that, they should consider doing it during a TV time...makes much more sense if you actually want Alfie to hear it.



Nothing new here
Spezza has taken the back seat his whole career

Fisher, Phillips and Heatley all had "A"'s on their jersey before our best talent did.

Alfie is Alfie, but you cant deny the teams success is resting on Jason's shoulders


Your best talent isn't always your teams leaders. Sometimes it works out that way, but there are still alot of captains and "A"s around the league that are rocks for their team and leaders in the dressing room but are not the top talent on the team. Spezza hasn't taken a back seat at all. He has always been high end talent, but his maturity and leadership skills have only sprouted in recent years. Wears the "A" now, and who knows, someday may wear the "C" for this team. But don't make it sound like hes currently being robbed of the title. Your definately worrying way more about it than Spezza is.
Quote
 
 
+1 #213 Hax 2012-03-29 12:10
Quoting IcySurfas:
Your best talent is always your teams leaders. Sometimes it works out that way, but there are still alot of captains and "A"s around the league that are rock for their teams and leaders in the dressing room and they aren't the top talent on the team. Spezza hasn't taken a back seat at all. He has always been high end talent, but his maturity and leadership skills have only sprouted in recent years. Wears the "A" now, and who knows, someday may wear the "C" for this team. But don't make it sound like hes currently being robbed of the title. Your definately worrying way more about it than Spezza is.


Spezza is pretty much a lock to be the captain when Alfie retires (or moves behind the bench as special teams coach??)

Karlsson likely gets an A at the same time.
Quote
 
 
0 #214 SwedishSens 2012-03-29 12:16
@aaronward_nhl: Appears Eric lindros on ice with Flyers for pregame skate..puzzling #TSN


Thought that was cool what if Giroux Lindros Jagr line .. Lol
Quote
 
 
0 #215 MethotToMyMadness 2012-03-29 12:16
Quoting madpajamma:
Time for Chirp to start a new post for the day. Let's see if we can figure out what it'll be about in advance, as he's no doubt in the middle of writing/editing it for posting.

My guesses
1. Karlsson for Norris
2. Eliminated teams (blue team done)
3. Ottawa practices, Prospects.

Any takers?


Or it could be about the return of Jesse Winchester. Anyone hear anything more about this? Will he be given a shot this weekend?
Quote
 
 
+3 #216 ZipZapRap 2012-03-29 12:19
The NHL 13 (video game) Cover athlete voting is open

http://covervote.nhl.com/:b=chrome/#/ballot


Since spezza already got the cover of nhl 2k years back , We should rally behind karlsson (they are the only sens on the ballot)
Quote
 
 
0 #217 boom 2012-03-29 12:26
Quoting madpajamma:
Quoting madpajamma:
Time for Chirp to start a new post for the day. Let's see if we can figure out what it'll be about in advance, as he's no doubt in the middle of writing/editing it for posting.

My guesses
1. Karlsson for Norris
2. Eliminated teams (blue team done)
3. Ottawa practices, Prospects.

Any takers?


Or it could be about the return of Jesse Winchester. Anyone hear anything more about this? Will he be given a shot this weekend?

I've always liked Winchester, so I'm looking forward to seeing him. Who do they take out? O'Brien?
Personally, I'd like to see them sit Condra, but the coaches seem to like him...more than I do, certainly.
Quote
 
 
+1 #218 57gord 2012-03-29 12:26
You kniow I always thought B Murray pretended like he wanted Kadri So Burke would take him. Burke is such a dummy. Why in the world would Murray ask Burke if he's going to leave Kadri on the table for him, it made no sense.
Quote
 
 
0 #219 Hax 2012-03-29 12:31
Quoting boom:
I've always liked Winchester, so I'm looking forward to seeing him. Who do they take out? O'Brien?
Personally, I'd like to see them sit Condra, but the coaches seem to like him...more than I do, certainly.


Condra is great on the PK though I get why people get frustrated with him on the offensive side.

With Daugavins scoring last game I wonder if that means he's "safe".

My money would be on O'Brien coming out since Winchester fits nicely right on that same line/role. Though O'Brien seems to be very valuable on the PK as well.

Might it depend on who we're playing with Winnie draws in? If we want the PK to be as solid as possible maybe it is Klinkhammer that comes out?
Quote
 
 
0 #220 Alcatraz 2012-03-29 12:33
Quoting Hax:
Quoting boom:
I've always liked Winchester, so I'm looking forward to seeing him. Who do they take out? O'Brien?
Personally, I'd like to see them sit Condra, but the coaches seem to like him...more than I do, certainly.


Condra is great on the PK though I get why people get frustrated with him on the offensive side.

With Daugavins scoring last game I wonder if that means he's "safe".

My money would be on O'Brien coming out since Winchester fits nicely right on that same line/role. Though O'Brien seems to be very valuable on the PK as well.

Might it depend on who we're playing with Winnie draws in? If we want the PK to be as solid as possible maybe it is Klinkhammer that comes out?


Winnie is just as good as condra on the PK

But I agree Klinky should come out
Quote
 
 
0 #221 jasonontheoldsenschirp 2012-03-29 12:33
Can't take Condra out of lineup he's been good.

I would say JOB, and have him as the guy who fills in for who ever slides in their play.

Good to have Winnie back, but this almost certainly his last season with the Sens
Quote
 
 
0 #222 IcySurfas 2012-03-29 12:35
Quoting timwrx:
Resign Carkner to a 2 way deal. There is the next Capt of the B-Sens. And can be called up in a pinch already knowing what you can get out of him.


Carkner does not sign a deal like that. Forget it. We either offer him a 1-way, or he takes an offer from another team that will, and yes, someone else (albeit cheap) would offer him a 1-way if we didn't.
Quote
 
 
0 #223 Hax 2012-03-29 12:37
Speaking of special teams....

I'm still wondering why Alfie's not on the point on the PP. With Karlsson, Kuba and Gonchar our only legit PP d-men it would seem to make sense to put Alfie on the point on the second unit with one of them.

Cowen can probably be a second unit point guy (heavy shot) down the line but for now he doesn't quite fit out there. And despite Phillips' recent goal surge (eep) he's not exactly a PP guy either.

Karlsson-Kuba
Greening-Spezza-Michalek

Gonchar-Alfredsson
Foligno-Turris-Neil

Maybe I answered my own question with unit 2. Don't really need both Neil and Foligno out there since they're both "in the paint" guys.
Quote
 
 
0 #224 boom 2012-03-29 12:38
Quoting Hax:
Quoting boom:
I've always liked Winchester, so I'm looking forward to seeing him. Who do they take out? O'Brien?
Personally, I'd like to see them sit Condra, but the coaches seem to like him...more than I do, certainly.


Condra is great on the PK though I get why people get frustrated with him on the offensive side.

With Daugavins scoring last game I wonder if that means he's "safe".

My money would be on O'Brien coming out since Winchester fits nicely right on that same line/role. Though O'Brien seems to be very valuable on the PK as well.

Might it depend on who we're playing with Winnie draws in? If we want the PK to be as solid as possible maybe it is Klinkhammer that comes out?

I still hope it's Condra. Everyone points to his being good on the PK, but how good can he, or anyone ot Ottawa, be when they are never ranked in the top half of the league?
I think we, as fans, overvalue the PK ability of some of these guys just because we always see them do it. Doesn't mean they're any good at it.
You mentioned some other possible choices though, it will be interesting...
Quote
 
 
0 #225 Hax 2012-03-29 12:41
Quoting Alcatraz:
Winnie is just as good as condra on the PK

But I agree Klinky should come out


Agreed but you can't have too many good PK guys. The deeper we are on PK guys the less time Spezza and Alfie have to spend killing.

Quoting IcySurfas:
Carkner does not sign a deal like that. Forget it. We either offer him a 1-way, or he takes an offer from another team that will, and yes, someone else (albeit cheap) would offer him a 1-way if we didn't.


Agreed - plenty of teams will offer him a one-way deal.

Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
Good to have Winnie back, but this almost certainly his last season with the Sens


Might be true but he'd make an excellent 13th forward once the rebuild is over (i.e. Silfverberg et al are in the lineup). He's still young and a versatile player.
Quote
 
 
0 #226 ZipZapRap 2012-03-29 12:49
Quoting ZipZapRap:
The NHL 13 (video game) Cover athlete voting is open

http://covervote.nhl.com/:b=chrome/#/ballot


Since spezza already got the cover of nhl 2k years back , We should rally behind karlsson (they are the only sens on the ballot)



I know you guys pretty much ignore what guys like me or tookie type, but this is important, you don;t want to see Tyler Bozak or Phil Kessel voted onto the cover of NHL13
Quote
 
 
+1 #227 boom 2012-03-29 12:52
Quoting ZipZapRap:
Quoting ZipZapRap:
The NHL 13 (video game) Cover athlete voting is open

http://covervote.nhl.com/:b=chrome/#/ballot


Since spezza already got the cover of nhl 2k years back , We should rally behind karlsson (they are the only sens on the ballot)



I know you guys pretty much ignore what me guys like me or tookie type, but this is important, you don;t want to see Tyler Bozak or Phil Kessel voted onto the cover of NHL13

I imagine I'll be the first of many to tell you - you are not like Tookie.
Quote
 
 
0 #228 Hax 2012-03-29 13:16
Quoting ZipZapRap:
Quoting ZipZapRap:
The NHL 13 (video game) Cover athlete voting is open

http://covervote.nhl.com/:b=chrome/#/ballot


Since spezza already got the cover of nhl 2k years back , We should rally behind karlsson (they are the only sens on the ballot)



I know you guys pretty much ignore what guys like me or tookie type, but this is important, you don;t want to see Tyler Bozak or Phil Kessel voted onto the cover of NHL13


We just ignore what we don't like ;)

I'll vote anti-leaf, pro-sen any chance I get!
Quote
 
 
0 #229 spezzerman 2012-03-29 13:28
don't vote any SEns on the cover of NHL 13, it's cursed!

until Stamkos got the cover, it was rather eerie over a stretch of time how the player on the cover either sucked the next season(s) or beat up taxi drivers shortly after.

This is such an oft-discussed topic EA sports addressed it for this promo;

http://www.ea.com/nhl/videos/there-is-no-nhl-cover-curse
Quote
 
 
0 #230 jasonontheoldsenschirp 2012-03-29 13:29
For anyone interested in watching Mika. Djurgarden is currently playing Orebro

http://www.sportlemon.tv/wv-2/18/80/v-388043.html

He has two goals
Quote
 
 
0 #231 Tookie 2012-03-29 13:43
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
For anyone interested in watching Mika. Djurgarden is currently playing Orebro

http://www.sportlemon.tv/wv-2/18/80/v-388043.html

He has two goals


Says server not found :(
Quote
 
 
+1 #232 11Alfie11 2012-03-29 13:47
Karlsson it is for the cover voting!

Also... just found out that there's only 5 former Maple Leafs still playing in the NHL to have every played a playoff game with them.

Pretty easy, but do you know them?

http://www.sporcle.com/games/NHL_LHN/nhl---playoff-maple-leafs
Quote
 
 
0 #233 Alcatraz 2012-03-29 13:49
So do we cheer for Minny(florida) and Boston(washingt on) tonight?

or do we cheer for Florida and Washington?

If Minny win then Ottawa will only be 1 pt back of Florida in case thye fall out of 1st in division.

If Washington beat Boston they will be 2 back of us (we wouls have game in hand) but at same time if coupled with a florida win, florida would only be 2 pts back of boston(with an ott-bos match coming up)

So what say you sens fans who do we want winning tonight?

Florida, Minny, boston or Washington?
Quote
 
 
0 #234 Floridasensfan 2012-03-29 13:51
Voted Karlsson
Quote
 
 
0 #235 Alcatraz 2012-03-29 13:52
If Jersey wins tonight, its all but assured we will finish 7th/8th/9th, as they will be 6 pts up with us only able to get 10 more pts total (jersey still would have 8 pts remaining)

So lets go T-Bay!!

Also, just our luck, we will catch jersey, and florida will catch Boston..FML
Quote
 
 
+1 #236 TheBoss 2012-03-29 13:56
Sorry to bring up Leafs Eliminated Day but saw this fun fact on Twitter..

"Only 4 players are still playing in #NHL who were regulars with #Leafs last playoff team in '04; Ponikarovsky, Antropov, Stajan and Kaberle."

Not only does that team suck, the fans are so harsh that the players never play in the NHL again? LOL

From the Sens 03/04 team:
Hossa, Alfie, Spezza, Havlat, Emery (on roster briefly), Chara, Phillips, Neil, Vermette, Fisher, Kelly (on roster briefly), Laich (on roste brieflyr), A-Train..

Damn, good ol days.
Quote
 
 
+2 #237 Studebaker Dunlop 2012-03-29 14:05
I hope that Pierre McGuire gets the job as the next GM
of Montreal and then he appoints himself as the coach
and first string goalie as well.

Montreal would then become the best team ever........... EVER!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!
Quote
 
 
0 #238 Patty Lalime 2012-03-29 14:15
Quoting TheBoss:
Sorry to bring up Leafs Eliminated Day but saw this fun fact on Twitter..

"Only 4 players are still playing in #NHL who were regulars with #Leafs last playoff team in '04; Ponikarovsky, Antropov, Stajan and Kaberle."

Not only does that team suck, the fans are so harsh that the players never play in the NHL again? LOL

From the Sens 03/04 team:
Hossa, Alfie, Spezza, Havlat, Emery (on roster briefly), Chara, Phillips, Neil, Vermette, Fisher, Kelly (on roster briefly), Laich (on roste brieflyr), A-Train..

Damn, good ol days.



Thing is, Leafs teams back then were all veterans anyways... Roberts, Francis, Mogilny, etc.

And despite us having all those players you listed, we still lost to the leafs in '04 in the first round.

Sullivan and Mair are the only other two Leafs to play a playoff game as one that are still playing NHL or AHL hockey.
Quote
 
 
0 #239 Hax 2012-03-29 14:20
Quoting Alcatraz:
So do we cheer for Minny(florida) and Boston(washington) tonight?

or do we cheer for Florida and Washington?

If Minny win then Ottawa will only be 1 pt back of Florida in case thye fall out of 1st in division.

If Washington beat Boston they will be 2 back of us (we wouls have game in hand) but at same time if coupled with a florida win, florida would only be 2 pts back of boston(with an ott-bos match coming up)

So what say you sens fans who do we want winning tonight?

Florida, Minny, boston or Washington?


Let the chips fall where they may. I'm not really worried about facing any team (especially since we beat Pitt recently).

A Washington loss at least takes a bit of pressure off potentially falling to 9th but I kind of like having the last few games with a bit of pressure - keeps the boys sharp.
Quote
 
 
+1 #240 miguel 2012-03-29 14:27
Quoting Hax:
Quoting PaulMacLeansMustache:

Your assuming that he would accept a one year offer from Ottawa rather then a multi year offer from some other team. My prediction is that he walks when some team desperate for D offers him a 4 year 16M deal.


Not assuming but you're right of course. There's no guarantee so maybe I should have said "try" to sign him for 1 year.

He is 35 though so not sure he'll get a 4 year deal, but he can likely get more than one year elsewhere.


haven't read all the comments, but
I have to admit I was wrong about Kuba THIS YEAR.
I thought he was beyond done, but he has had a huge comeback year.
however I cannot forget those first two years of brutal play and evern worse effort, and even worse than that was conditioning,

Never thought I would say this but if we can sign him to a fair one - maybe 2 year deal at less money then yes sign him,

But I can assure you there will be a stupid team ( see maple laffs ) who will sign him to a large 3 year deal that we SHOULD NOT match... IMO of course
Quote
 
 
0 #241 hello_gary 2012-03-29 14:28
Totally change the topic here kids-

What do you think the chances are that Daniel Alfredsson is a presenter again at this year's Junos? He presented last time the were in Ottawa back in 2003...Anyone else remember those flowing long blonde locks and rock star puffy shirt? Kinda looked like a Scandinavian pirate...

Our boys play on the Island at 3, realistically he could be back at SBP for 8pm, ish...

I think that would be another great tribute for him this year, showcase our leader to music fans and media. :)

tl;dr: Praise Alfie.
Quote
 
 
+1 #242 Alcatraz 2012-03-29 14:35
Quoting hello_gary:
Totally change the topic here kids-

What do you think the chances are that Daniel Alfredsson is a presenter again at this year's Junos? He presented last time the were in Ottawa back in 2003...Anyone else remember those flowing long blonde locks and rock star puffy shirt? Kinda looked like a Scandinavian pirate...

Our boys play on the Island at 3, realistically he could be back at SBP for 8pm, ish...

I think that would be another great tribute for him this year, showcase our leader to music fans and media. :)

tl;dr: Praise Alfie.


So game ends at lets say 5:30-6. Shower up and take a plan at 7? be in Ottawa at? leave airport and get to SBP by 8:30? possible...like ly? probably not
Quote
 
 
0 #243 Sandy 2012-03-29 14:40
Quoting SensChirp:
@Team1200Ottawa According to @SSimpsonHockey The reason #Habs replaced Gauthier when they did, was to beat #Nordiques in the race for Patrick Roy #NHL


Patrick Roy as coach? or GM? If it's GM -- I think that's a big mistake. He has no experience in NHL administration during what will be very key seasons in the re-growth of the Habs team. He may be okay as coach...

It would be great to see the Nordiques back in Canada... make it happen Bettman.
Quote
 
 
0 #244 Sensnation 2012-03-29 14:41
Quoting Studebaker Dunlop:
I hope that Pierre McGuire gets the job as the next GM
of Montreal and then he appoints himself as the coach
and first string goalie as well.

Montreal would then become the best team ever...........EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Pierre McGuire is a MONSTER! haha

It's awesome to see Montreal and Toronto so far from ever being relevant! GO SENS GO!!!
Quote
 
 
+2 #245 Sandy 2012-03-29 14:43
Quoting 57gord:
You kniow I always thought B Murray pretended like he wanted Kadri So Burke would take him. Burke is such a dummy. Why in the world would Murray ask Burke if he's going to leave Kadri on the table for him, it made no sense.



I really think Murray was after Cowen all along.. he was building the defense. I think he said that to make sure Burke did not take Cowen...IMO
Quote
 
 
0 #246 Tookie 2012-03-29 14:46
Quoting Hax:
Let the chips fall where they may. I'm not really worried about facing any team (especially since we beat Pitt recently).

A Washington loss at least takes a bit of pressure off potentially falling to 9th but I kind of like having the last few games with a bit of pressure - keeps the boys sharp.


Come on Hax, you cant say that with a straight face, Pitts had they're 3rd string goalie in nets...You think with Fleury in nets we get 8 passed him? Dont think so.

But your right when it comes to the Blueshirts (NYR) we hold a 3-1 edge during the season.

Boston will pound us into submission.
Florida would be the best option but its a stretch.
Quote
 
 
-2 #247 Tookie 2012-03-29 14:52
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting 57gord:
You kniow I always thought B Murray pretended like he wanted Kadri So Burke would take him. Burke is such a dummy. Why in the world would Murray ask Burke if he's going to leave Kadri on the table for him, it made no sense.



I really think Murray was after Cowen all along.. he was building the defense. I think he said that to make sure Burke did not take Cowen...IMO


I doubt it, Murray wouldnt lie to another GM or try and trick them, u might not like Burke but Murray has no problem with him, no problem with any other GM. They are his peers, you dont double cross your peer in case you need a favor down the road.

Murray was going for Kadri and we can thank Burke for landing Cowen!
Quote
 
 
-3 #248 Tookie 2012-03-29 14:56
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting hello_gary:
Totally change the topic here kids-

What do you think the chances are that Daniel Alfredsson is a presenter again at this year's Junos? He presented last time the were in Ottawa back in 2003...Anyone else remember those flowing long blonde locks and rock star puffy shirt? Kinda looked like a Scandinavian pirate...

Our boys play on the Island at 3, realistically he could be back at SBP for 8pm, ish...

I think that would be another great tribute for him this year, showcase our leader to music fans and media. :)

tl;dr: Praise Alfie.


So game ends at lets say 5:30-6. Shower up and take a plan at 7? be in Ottawa at? leave airport and get to SBP by 8:30? possible...likely? probably not


The Juno's? isnt that a chick movie? really? I think Alfie has much better things to do...like ride the bicycle...
Quote
 
 
+1 #249 Hax 2012-03-29 14:58
Quoting Tookie19:
Quoting Hax:
Let the chips fall where they may. I'm not really worried about facing any team (especially since we beat Pitt recently).

A Washington loss at least takes a bit of pressure off potentially falling to 9th but I kind of like having the last few games with a bit of pressure - keeps the boys sharp.


Come on Hax, you cant say that with a straight face, Pitts had they're 3rd string goalie in nets...You think with Fleury in nets we get 8 passed him? Dont think so.

But your right when it comes to the Blueshirts (NYR) we hold a 3-1 edge during the season.

Boston will pound us into submission.
Florida would be the best option but its a stretch.


Sure I can. I'm not saying for one minute that we'd score 8 on MAF nor am I saying that we'd be the favorite. We'd be huge underdogs but I AM saying that regardless of how much you want to piss on it, we beat them and that helps when you're going into a series against them.

I'm also not so sure Boston would "pound us into submission". Better team on paper sure, but I'll take my chances with them after they were inconsistent down the stretch.

Agree that Florida is our best match-up in round 1, I'm just not "afraid" of any team right now. Let us play the underdog role and see what happens.
Quote
 
 
+2 #250 Hax 2012-03-29 15:00
Quoting Tookie19:
I doubt it, Murray wouldnt lie to another GM or try and trick them, u might not like Burke but Murray has no problem with him, no problem with any other GM. They are his peers, you dont double cross your peer in case you need a favor down the road.

Murray was going for Kadri and we can thank Burke for landing Cowen!


Lie? No, but it's a cut-throat business and I wouldn't put it past any GM to bluff another GM. Just like in a trade discussion they're not going to admit which guys they really want to unload etc.
Quote
 
 
0 #251 hello_gary 2012-03-29 15:00
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting hello_gary:
Totally change the topic here kids-

What do you think the chances are that Daniel Alfredsson is a presenter again at this year's Junos? He presented last time the were in Ottawa back in 2003...Anyone else remember those flowing long blonde locks and rock star puffy shirt? Kinda looked like a Scandinavian pirate...

Our boys play on the Island at 3, realistically he could be back at SBP for 8pm, ish...

I think that would be another great tribute for him this year, showcase our leader to music fans and media. :)

tl;dr: Praise Alfie.


So game ends at lets say 5:30-6. Shower up and take a plan at 7? be in Ottawa at? leave airport and get to SBP by 8:30? possible...likely? probably not



Just checked the Juno schedule - the ceremony starts at 8pm and ends at 10...I think it's very possible that he could present an award... Would be nice to light up SBP with "Alfie, Alfie" chants again! :)

@Chirp - Could you do some digging in regards to this question? Have you heard anything about this perchance?
Thanks!!!
Quote
 
 
+1 #252 Sensnation 2012-03-29 15:02
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting 57gord:
You kniow I always thought B Murray pretended like he wanted Kadri So Burke would take him. Burke is such a dummy. Why in the world would Murray ask Burke if he's going to leave Kadri on the table for him, it made no sense.



I really think Murray was after Cowen all along.. he was building the defense. I think he said that to make sure Burke did not take Cowen...IMO


Sandy I completely agree, that is exactly what Murray did. Kadri isn't even close to being a BM type of player, but definitely fits the Burke mold of being overrated.

Murray said from the start he was building from the back out and has said several times he can't believe Cowen fell all the way to our pick. Murray was definitely making sure that he didn't need to trade up to get him as Burke at the time had stated he was building from the back end as well.
Quote
 
 
+1 #253 miguel 2012-03-29 15:06
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting 57gord:
You kniow I always thought B Murray pretended like he wanted Kadri So Burke would take him. Burke is such a dummy. Why in the world would Murray ask Burke if he's going to leave Kadri on the table for him, it made no sense.



I really think Murray was after Cowen all along.. he was building the defense. I think he said that to make sure Burke did not take Cowen...IMO

If I recall correctly, it was the "spotlight lover" Burke who wanted to steal the show, by walking over to BM, to tell him "I know you want Kadri b/c you need forwards, so here is your chance to move up and make me an offer"
He thought he would show up Murray, only to have it backfire in his face, almost as bad as the Kessel trade for Seguin, Hamilton, and a second rounder.

Tookie how is that one working out for you :)
Quote
 
 
+1 #254 Alcatraz 2012-03-29 15:12
Also to note about Burke his "steal" of a deal for phanuef...neith er team has made playoffs since the deal and in fcat Bouwmeester still has never played a single playoff game in his career beyond minor hockey.....

let that sink for a bit

Never tasted playoffs in Junior hockey or pro hockey...since he was 16 years old..
Quote
 
 
-3 #255 Tookie 2012-03-29 15:17
Quoting miguel:
almost as bad as the Kessel trade for Seguin, Hamilton, and a second rounder.

Tookie how is that one working out for you :)


Not to burst your bubble but I would much rather have Kessel than Seguin.

Hamilton has yet to play a game in the NHL and the 2nd rounder I could care less.

Yes it looks bad, 3 guys for 1 but Kessel is a sniper! and who knows, Seguin and Hamilton on Leafs jerseys, you should be thanking Burke or the Leafs would probably be ahead of us in the rebuild phase.
Quote
 
 
+1 #256 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-29 15:18
Quoting hello_gary:


Just checked the Juno schedule - the ceremony starts at 8pm and ends at 10...I think it's very possible that he could present an award... Would be nice to light up SBP with "Alfie, Alfie" chants again! :)

@Chirp - Could you do some digging in regards to this question? Have you heard anything about this perchance?
Thanks!!!


I would MUCH rather he just keep his head focused on hockey for the foreseeable short-term future. F**k a Junos distraction.
Quote
 
 
0 #257 Tookie 2012-03-29 15:19
Quoting Alcatraz:
Also to note about Burke his "steal" of a deal for phanuef...neither team has made playoffs since the deal and in fcat Bouwmeester still has never played a single playoff game in his career beyond minor hockey.....

let that sink for a bit

Never tasted playoffs in Junior hockey or pro hockey...since he was 16 years old..



Poor guy, great person, just played for the wrong teams...
I cant be too sad for him tho, he is making 4Mil per!!!???
Quote
 
 
0 #258 spezzerman 2012-03-29 15:19
Quoting miguel:
[quote name="Sandy"][quote name="57gord"]You kniow I always thought B Murray pretended like he wanted Kadri So Burke would take him. Burke is such a dummy. Why in the world would Murray ask Burke if he's going to leave Kadri on the table for him, it made no sense.


what the hell did we do before youtube?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kzgalcl3tD8

Since Burke stands up, it looks like Murray approached him but Burke certainly seemed high and mighty thinking he got the upper hand. What a cocky bastard, he deserves his humbling he is going through. (an aside, if he has been humbled at all I think he'll be a better GM without his giant ego getting in the way)

My hunch, based on Murray's quick response to the Question from Burke, "are you taking KAdri?" indicates Murray was surprised Burke brought up Kadri and probably didn't want him at all. He had absolutely no upset reaction or strong emotion to knowing he was picking Kadri. That is my completely baseless, unprofessional, homer-hunch. Or, this was scripted for good TV and they were "acting"
Quote
 
 
+1 #259 RUSHRLZ 2012-03-29 15:27
Quoting spezzerman:
Quoting miguel:
[quote name="Sandy"][quote name="57gord"]You kniow I always thought B Murray pretended like he wanted Kadri So Burke would take him. Burke is such a dummy. Why in the world would Murray ask Burke if he's going to leave Kadri on the table for him, it made no sense.


what the hell did we do before youtube?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kzgalcl3tD8


This is one of the greatest Sens vs Leafs moments since Burke came into the picture... I remember how ignorant I thought that was of Burke back on the day it actually happened, boy did it ever backfire.... karma's a bitch. Murray probably didn't even want Kadri but was willing to flip for Cowen. Good listening skills Burkie. LOL.
Quote
 
 
0 #260 boom 2012-03-29 15:36
Quoting Tookie19:
Quoting miguel:
almost as bad as the Kessel trade for Seguin, Hamilton, and a second rounder.

Tookie how is that one working out for you :)


Not to burst your bubble but I would much rather have Kessel than Seguin.

Hamilton has yet to play a game in the NHL and the 2nd rounder I could care less.

Yes it looks bad, 3 guys for 1 but Kessel is a sniper! and who knows, Seguin and Hamilton on Leafs jerseys, you should be thanking Burke or the Leafs would probably be ahead of us in the rebuild phase.

So you'd much rather have Kessel then Seguin, but you admit that Toronto would be better off if they had Seguin and Hamilton? You can't have it both ways...
Quote
 
 
+1 #261 Hax 2012-03-29 15:39
Quoting RUSHRLZ:
Quoting spezzerman:
Quoting miguel:
Quoting Sandy:
Quoting 57gord:
You kniow I always thought B Murray pretended like he wanted Kadri So Burke would take him. Burke is such a dummy. Why in the world would Murray ask Burke if he's going to leave Kadri on the table for him, it made no sense.


what the hell did we do before youtube?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kzgalcl3tD8


This is one of the greatest Sens vs Leafs moments since Burke came into the picture... I remember how ignorant I thought that was of Burke back on the day it actually happened, boy did it ever backfire.... karma's a bitch. Murray probably didn't even want Kadri but was willing to flip for Cowen. Good listening skills Burkie. LOL.


Definitely loved this at the time and still do. Murray almost basically says "I'll make you an offer for your pick" and Burkie just misses it completely and ends up helping us out by taking a guy we didn't want anyway. If Burke had been paying attention he could have gotten Murray to trade up to take Cowen and still had Kadri.

HA! HA!
Quote
 
 
+2 #262 Hax 2012-03-29 15:41
Quoting boom:

So you'd much rather have Kessel then Seguin, but you admit that Toronto would be better off if they had Seguin and Hamilton? You can't have it both ways...



Tookie's rule #5 - he gets to have it both ways or else he'll just ignore you.
Quote
 
 
0 #263 NickG 2012-03-29 15:46
Quoting SensChirp:
Quoting C:
You can vote for your favourite player to be on NHL13 at NHL.com. If Karlsson won't win the Norris, let's get him on the cover of NHL13! We all know how good Sens fans are at ballot stuffing now, lets keep stupid Phil Kessel off the cover!

It's kind of tough though because don't you have to vote for every match up? I'll be honest. I voted for Spezza haha

Nope. You can just vote for 1 player if you want. And it remembers your last choices when you choose to Vote Again.

Karlsson and Kane (WPG) have about 25 votes from me already. No one else.
Quote
 
 
+2 #264 WeAreSensFans! 2012-03-29 15:55
Quoting jasonontheoldsenschirp:
For anyone interested in watching Mika. Djurgarden is currently playing Orebro

http://www.sportlemon.tv/wv-2/18/80/v-388043.html

He has two goals


thanks for the virus asshole
Quote
 
 
+2 #265 senskarlsson57 2012-03-29 16:05
Quoting spezzerman:
Quoting miguel:
[quote name="Sandy"][quote name="57gord"]You kniow I always thought B Murray pretended like he wanted Kadri So Burke would take him. Burke is such a dummy. Why in the world would Murray ask Burke if he's going to leave Kadri on the table for him, it made no sense.


what the hell did we do before youtube?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kzgalcl3tD8

Since Burke stands up, it looks like Murray approached him but Burke certainly seemed high and mighty thinking he got the upper hand. What a cocky bastard, he deserves his humbling he is going through. (an aside, if he has been humbled at all I think he'll be a better GM without his giant ego getting in the way)

My hunch, based on Murray's quick response to the Question from Burke, "are you taking KAdri?" indicates Murray was surprised Burke brought up Kadri and probably didn't want him at all. He had absolutely no upset reaction or strong emotion to knowing he was picking Kadri. That is my completely baseless, unprofessional, homer-hunch. Or, this was scripted for good TV and they were "acting"


Look at the second top comment on that vid...yup thats mine!! I get into a big argument with some retarted leafs fan in the comments on that vid too! LOL

My comment is "Bryan Murray sayin' Look at me now bitch!"
Quote
 
 
0 #266 SwedishSens 2012-03-29 16:10
Hey chirp

Anyword on Ben Blood ?
Quote
 
 
+2 #267 PraiseAlfie84 2012-03-29 16:17
I also have to admit, I was wrong about Kuba this year. More than anything in the entire world I wanted him off the team at the start of the season, but I will give credit where credit is due. Kuba, good on ya buddy!
Quote
 
 
+1 #268 boom 2012-03-29 16:23
Quoting PraiseAlfie84:
I also have to admit, I was wrong about Kuba this year. More than anything in the entire world I wanted him off the team at the start of the season, but I will give credit where credit is due. Kuba, good on ya buddy!


I think we were all wrong on Kuba...
Quote
 
 
0 #269 Canucnik 2012-03-29 16:32
The Ghost is gone...one of the meanest and most disliked execs in hockey...Burkie is next, not everyone in Tranna is willing to give him another year (It ends quick for him next fall). But watch-out! It ain't goin' to get any easier if each of these three (include Quebec) new GMs use us as their model and target. Bryan may have to provide "Teaching Lessons!"
Quote
 
 
0 #270 WeAreSensFans! 2012-03-29 16:34
about kuba...

i was on the keep kuba train and see if he becomes worth anything then trade him for anything at the deadline.

after watching our defence this year, i think we will have him longer since he's not in the bottom 3 of our defence.
Quote
 
 
+1 #271 Dorkeiwicz 2012-03-29 16:44
Quoting Hax:


Tookie's rule #5 - he gets to have it both ways or else he'll just ignore you.


LMAO !
Quote
 
 
+1 #272 Hax 2012-03-29 16:47
Tonight's "glass half full" breakdown:

Washington @ Boston - If Boston wins we gain more breathing room between us and Washington. If Washington wins we've got a slim shot of catching Boston and/or having Boston drop to third and avoiding them in Round 1.

VERDICT: Go Boston - we're not catching them so may as well solidify our playoff spot.

Tampa Bay @ New Jersey - if TB loses it hurts the Leafs draft position, if NJ loses we still have an outside shot at passing them for 6th.

VERDICT: Go Jersey - again, we're not catching them so let's ruin the Leafs shot at the draft lottery.

Pittsburgh @ NY Islanders - If Islanders win it helps ensure we don't face Pittsburgh in round 1 (or maybe even round 2). If Islanders lose then it hurts the Leafs draft position.

VERDICT: Go Pittsburgh - I don't think they'll catch the Rangers so may as well mess with the Leafs again.

Philadelphia @ Toronto - If the Leafs win it hurts their draft position. And it's never a bad thing if they lose.

VERDICT: Go Leafs! The only thing sweeter than a Leafs loss is a win they don't want!

Florida @ Minnesota - If Florida wins they might pass Boston for 2nd and we could get them in Round 1 instead. If Florida loses it very minimally helps our chances of making the playoffs (If Washington were to pass us we'd need to pass Florida or Buffalo).

VERDICT: Go Panthers - while it's unlikely they'll catch Boston for 2nd there's still more chance of that than them dropping down to 8th/9th and possibly taking our spot in the playoffs. Plus the Wild could still drop below the Leafs in the overall standings.
Quote
 
 
+1 #273 senskarlsson57 2012-03-29 17:27
No Sens hockey for a while...

anyone in the mood??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRZmVTUKhfA

goosebumps every time!
Quote
 
 
0 #274 Canucnik 2012-03-29 17:28
Sandy:

We loved the pick of Jared Cowen but let's not forget Bryan Murray offered Burkie a later draft pick to move up for Kadri (Some of the Tranna scouts wanted Kowen and the draft pick) that's why the discussion went right to the last moment...Burkie , over ruled some of his scouts) and picked Kadri!

This was the second big SPIKE in our rebuild.
Quote
 
 
+3 #275 ZipZapRap 2012-03-29 17:43
Quoting senskarlsson57:
No Sens hockey for a while...

anyone in the mood??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRZmVTUKhfA

goosebumps every time!


Epic, thanks!


p.s. I just read a funny fact, The leafs have never played a playoff game in High Definition LOL
Quote
 
 
+1 #276 MoeDozer 2012-03-29 18:14
NHL 13 voting for cover player is on.

http://covervote.nhl.com/:b=firefox3/#/ballot

for sens you can chose karlsson or spezza.

outside of malkin and maybe lundqvuist, i cant think of someone better than karlsson to be on the cover.
Quote
 
 
+1 #277 NickG 2012-03-29 18:19
So... I'm watching Philly vs the Leafs, and I'm trying my hardest to cheer for the Leafs, but I think it's built-in too hard to hate them. I just cheered naturally as Philly scored. Haha.
Quote
 
 
0 #278 Sandy 2012-03-29 18:30
Quoting Tookie19:
Quoting miguel:
almost as bad as the Kessel trade for Seguin, Hamilton, and a second rounder.

Tookie how is that one working out for you :)


Not to burst your bubble but I would much rather have Kessel than Seguin.

Hamilton has yet to play a game in the NHL and the 2nd rounder I could care less.

Yes it looks bad, 3 guys for 1 but Kessel is a sniper! and who knows, Seguin and Hamilton on Leafs jerseys, you should be thanking Burke or the Leafs would probably be ahead of us in the rebuild phase.


Not doubting that Kessel is a good sniper.. BUT he does not have the #1 centre to play with. Sequin is that.

Burke was re-building the Leafs. What re-building team trades away 2 first round picks + a 2nd rounder. The issue was Burke believed his team was better than they were and that he never imagined both of those #1 picks would be in the top 10.

If you truly want to build a contending team... you do it through the draft.. that takes time and patience.

Burke rushed and it cost him the potential #1 centre he craved.

But he did the Kessel deal... good player but the trade was at the wrong time in his re-build.
Quote
 
 
0 #279 jasonontheoldsenschirp 2012-03-29 18:48
To those interested in watching the Mark Stone goal mentioned the other night, here's the game recap here

http://www.wheatkings.com/video/index/channel/19%2C20
Quote
 
 
0 #280 SensChirp 2012-03-29 18:59
As some of you may have heard, there is talk of an orchestrated ALfie chant at the next home game on Tuesday night. There is now a Facebook Event you can join. Check it out!

http://www.facebook.com/events/350123708356826/
Quote
 
 
0 #281 Hax 2012-03-29 19:09
Quoting Canucnik:
Sandy:

We loved the pick of Jared Cowen but let's not forget Bryan Murray offered Burkie a later draft pick to move up for Kadri (Some of the Tranna scouts wanted Kowen and the draft pick) that's why the discussion went right to the last moment...Burkie, over ruled some of his scouts) and picked Kadri!

This was the second big SPIKE in our rebuild.


Close - Murray wanted Cowen and would have offered a pick, but he never had a chance to offer anything to move up because Burkie blurted out that they were taking Kadri anyway.

Burke must be a great golfer by now.
Quote
 
 
0 #282 PaulMacLeansMustache 2012-03-29 19:36
Quoting Hax:
Quoting Canucnik:
Sandy:

We loved the pick of Jared Cowen but let's not forget Bryan Murray offered Burkie a later draft pick to move up for Kadri (Some of the Tranna scouts wanted Kowen and the draft pick) that's why the discussion went right to the last moment...Burkie, over ruled some of his scouts) and picked Kadri!

This was the second big SPIKE in our rebuild.


Close - Murray wanted Cowen and would have offered a pick, but he never had a chance to offer anything to move up because Burkie blurted out that they were taking Kadri anyway.

Burke must be a great golfer by now.


Seriously Murray was about to offer him a deal and he cut him off and told him they were picking Kahdri. Surprised he wouldn't even listen to the offer.
Quote
 
 
0 #283 Guillaume 2012-03-29 20:02
This Boston/Washingt on better NOT go to Overtime. -.-

Worst scenario = Washington winning in OT/SO
Quote
 
 
0 #284 MacK 2012-03-29 20:14
Quoting Guillaume:
This Boston/Washington better NOT go to Overtime. -.-

Worst scenario = Washington winning in OT/SO


well, it's looking like the caps are taking this one unfortunately. 2-0 with under 10 minutes to go. COME ON BRUINS, do us a favour!
Quote
 
 
0 #285 WeAreSensFans! 2012-03-29 20:16
whats up with boston, they should beat washington.
Quote
 
 
0 #286 Guillaume 2012-03-29 20:20
On a side note the Leafs are getting pummeled 7-1. Bahahaha. Although this helps them get a better draft pick, it's always funny to see them get owned like that. I bet the ACC is 90% empty now.
Quote
 
 
0 #287 MacK 2012-03-29 20:23
oh, bruins just made it 2-1 with 3min to go. I'll take an extra time game if it means the caps only get 1 point!
Quote
 
 
0 #288 WeAreSensFans! 2012-03-29 20:24
boston finally wakes up 2-2
Quote
 
 
0 #289 Guillaume 2012-03-29 20:25
I dunno, maybe it's just me but I'd rather see the Caps win in regulation than have a 3 point game...
Quote
 
 
0 #290 MacK 2012-03-29 20:27
YES!!! Bruins tied it up! They're pouring it up now! 30 sec to win it before OT!
Quote
 
 
0 #291 Guillaume 2012-03-29 20:30
Alright, well I'll cheer for the lesser of the two evils... go Bruins
Quote
 
 
0 #292 MacK 2012-03-29 20:33
Quoting Guillaume:
I dunno, maybe it's just me but I'd rather see the Caps win in regulation than have a 3 point game...

I'd take a bruins in OT over a caps win in regulation any day of the week! Why would you want to play with fire and possibly have the Sabres and Caps catch us!?
Quote
 
 
0 #293 Guillaume 2012-03-29 20:36
lol Ovechkin, always the same. Chokes on a super important play, then eats the puck for the rest of the shift.
Quote
 
 
+1 #294 Guillaume 2012-03-29 20:43
FUCK.....

Worst possible scenario.

What a goal by Matt Hendricks though.
Quote
 
 
0 #295 MacK 2012-03-29 20:43
bummer...now that was worst case scenerio...
Quote
 
 
+2 #296 MacK 2012-03-29 20:45
well...the only positive is that it wasn't a regulation or OT (ROW) win.
Quote
 
 
0 #297 Sandy 2012-03-29 20:45
So Tim Thomas looks like a worldbeater when the Sens play them... some of those shootout goals were crap.

If the Sens don't keep on winning.. they could be in trouble with the way both Buff & Wash are playing.

I really thought Wash would lose tonight.

Bastard Bruins.

Wash has more ROW than the Sens now anyway so the SO win tonight really does not matter.
Quote
 
 
+1 #298 No65* 2012-03-29 21:14
I am not worried about the Sens. They had a wake-up call against the Habs and they responded with great fashion. I believe in Paul MacClean and captain Alfie.

We are in a better position than Wash and Buf, we control our own destiny.

Go SENS Go
Quote
 
 
+1 #299 senskarlsson57 2012-03-29 21:22
don't you guys forget that we have played less games that WASH.

...man does it feel like a while that we can say we have played less games than any team
Quote
 
 
0 #300 WeAreSensFans! 2012-03-29 21:37
what the hell just happened in minni, unreal florida loses in ot.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Senschirp Blog Wednesday News and Notes

Contact SensChirp

About SensChirp

  • Welcome to the new and I believe, improved SensChirp. It's the same old blog - breaking news, insider info and everything Sens.