Feature Story

  • Game Day- Pittsburgh @ Ottawa Game 4

    Every game the Sens play from here on out could appropriately be labelled the biggest game of their season.

    The Ottawa Senators look to build off an electrifying win on Sunday night as they play Game 4 of their Eastern Conference semifinal series against the Pittsburgh Penguins. After a two day break, the Senators will be looking to use a raucous crowd at Scotiabank Place to draw even before heading back to Pittsburgh for Game 5 on Friday night.

    Written on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 10:02
    Comments (107) Read 2268 times
  • Sponsor

  • Sponsor 2

Monday, 28 November 2011 14:47

Sens Make First Trip to Winnipeg

After a brief stop at Scotiabank Place, the Ottawa Senators are back on the road, as they will play their next three away from SBP, including stops in Winnipeg, Dallas and Washington.

The Sens practiced in Winnipeg this afternoon.

Tomorrow's game, an 8:30 PM start, is the Senators first in Winnipeg this season.  The Jets are a game below .500 this season but have posted an impressive 5-3-0 record at the MTS Centre in Winnipeg.

If today's practice is any indication, it looks as though Paul MacLean will go with the same line up as last night against the Canes.  That means Brian Lee will likely be the healthy scratch and Nikita Filatov will get another shot on the team's top line with Spezza and Greening.  Lee was not at practice this afternoon for personal reasons

Chris Neil skated with the rest of the team but is still wearing a non-contact jersey. No timetable for his return just yet but he is getting closer.

  • Now that Nick Foligno has temporarily assumed the role of second line centre, you can expect Bryan Murray to continue his search for some help down the middle.  Derrick Brassard and Kyle Turris remain the names mentioned most often in the rumour mill.
  • The WHL's leading scorer and Sens prospect Mark Stone was among the 41 names invited to Team Canada's Selection Camp next month.  Jean Gabriel Pageau, who is injured, and Matt Puempel were both left off the list.  The full roster can be seen here and you can check out the latest prospect update right here.
  • The first clue has now been posted in the SensChirp Search.  The hunt will take place on December 8th with clues posted throughout the day.  The actual search does not begin until 6:00 PM.  Follow @SensChirp and @Wisers_Ottawa for contest updates and info.
Last modified on Monday, 28 November 2011 14:53

Comments   Jump to Last Post

 
+3 #1 Patrick 2.0 2011-11-28 14:51
I'm not sure what Filatov will accomplish, but I'm sure glad he's getting his "chance". I for one am rooting for him :)
Quote
 
 
+4 #2 NikoTn 2011-11-28 14:59
Filatov can't be any worse than Cheechoo...
Quote
 
 
+3 #3 Hax 2011-11-28 15:00
There's no reason at all not to let Filatov sit on that top line for an extended period of time (unless his attitude stinks). There's no rush at all and we may as well be 100% sure of what he might be capable of before we give up on him.

As for Stone - I hope his skating has improved and continues to improve. It's rare for a guy that old to make big improvements in his skating but it's not impossible. Even if he ends up as the next Hamel or Locke that helps Bingo, but it sure would be nice if he can skate at an NHL level since that would allow him to fight for a top 6 spot (or at least have that as a goal).
Quote
 
 
+2 #4 Sandy 2011-11-28 15:12
What do the Sens do when Regin & Neil come back... they have too many forwards... and they are looking for more?

Daug does not deserve to be demoted back to Bingo.. He's played really well.

Do the Sens trade one or more forwards combined with a D?

Could be an interesting month of December.
Quote
 
 
+2 #5 kingalfredsson 2011-11-28 15:12
Relax he's only played 7 games. People just need him to let him be
Quote
 
 
+2 #6 Hax 2011-11-28 15:16
Quoting Sandy:
What do the Sens do when Regin & Neil come back... they have too many forwards... and they are looking for more?

Daug does not deserve to be demoted back to Bingo.. He's played really well.

Do the Sens trade one or more forwards combined with a D?

Could be an interesting month of December.



Konopka is "scratchable" and they can cycle guys like Condra, Butler, Winchester etc through the pressbox to spread out the ice time.

A deal of course would help, but there's no rush to dump anyone really.
Quote
 
 
+2 #7 SkipOPot2Mus 2011-11-28 15:24
C'mon Mark Stone make us proud!!
Quote
 
 
+3 #8 John Q. Spartan 2011-11-28 15:58
I remember that one guy last year telling me Mark Stone will never make the NHL because he "couldn't skate". It's kinda funny to hear now that all of a sudden his skating has magically improved, funny how that works eh?

I believe his username was Meadowdog, and like I told him at the time, he was wrong.
Quote
 
 
+1 #9 boom 2011-11-28 16:11
Quoting John Q. Spartan:
I remember that one guy last year telling me Mark Stone will never make the NHL because he "couldn't skate". It's kinda funny to hear now that all of a sudden his skating has magically improved, funny how that works eh?

I believe his username was Meadowdog, and like I told him at the time, he was wrong.

I think what happens, especially with all the "extra" media these days, is players get labeled very early, and they have trouble shaking that label. We all tend to take whatever is being said about someone as gospel. Look how low Couturier's stock went last year, and how well he's doing, even compared to players taken higher than him. I also remember hearing that Tavares was a poor skater...he looks pretty good to me..
Quote
 
 
+1 #10 Hax 2011-11-28 16:23
Skating is usually one of the toughest things for a guy to improve on. It's far from impossible (and certainly scouts can be wrong on top of that) but for most kids - especially in Canada, if they're not outstanding skaters at the junior level they're really unlikley to compete at the NHL level eventually. Assuming they learned to skate young and have been in decent programs that would have fixed any glaring errors in their technique at a young age that is.

Again, not impossible, but if there's any singular trait you don't want to hear it's bad skating. Brick hands, poor vision, size, strength, attitude - all these things can be worked on with more success than raw skating ability.

Hopefully for Stone it's partly an unfair label on him and partly he's able to improve more than most. Seems like he's on his way to doing just that. Though it could be more that scouts are less down on his skating than him actually improving a lot (or some combination).
Quote
 
 
+2 #11 DenisVial 2011-11-28 16:33
Quoting Hax:
Skating is usually one of the toughest things for a guy to improve on.

Again, not impossible, but if there's any singular trait you don't want to hear it's bad skating. Brick hands, poor vision, size, strength, attitude - all these things can be worked on with more success than raw skating ability.

Hopefully for Stone it's partly an unfair label on him and partly he's able to improve more than most. Seems like he's on his way to doing just that. Though it could be more that scouts are less down on his skating than him actually improving a lot (or some combination).


I was listening to the play by play guy for the Calgary Hitmen the other night discussing how improved Stone's skating was compared to only a year ago. The thinking was he has size 14 feet and he grew so quickly, he just needed to adjust. He was saying how Tyler Myers had the same issue due to a quick growth spurt.
Quote
 
 
+1 #12 Sensnation 2011-11-28 16:46
Quoting John Q. Spartan:
I remember that one guy last year telling me Mark Stone will never make the NHL because he "couldn't skate". It's kinda funny to hear now that all of a sudden his skating has magically improved, funny how that works eh?

I believe his username was Meadowdog, and like I told him at the time, he was wrong.


With you on that one JQS. I think we were the only two standing up for him at the time, and there were other detractors as well. I still can't stop thinking about that goal he scored in the preseason and the fake he made.
Quote
 
 
+1 #13 jd2reeso 2011-11-28 17:06
When I saw stone play at the rookie tournament in oshawa his skating form looked awkward, but it in no way affected his game.

Surprised to see puemple and pageau left of the list. There are some good forwards on the roster, but I thought both those guys would at least get a better look.
Quote
 
 
0 #14 Hax 2011-11-28 17:25
Quoting DenisVial:

I was listening to the play by play guy for the Calgary Hitmen the other night discussing how improved Stone's skating was compared to only a year ago. The thinking was he has size 14 feet and he grew so quickly, he just needed to adjust. He was saying how Tyler Myers had the same issue due to a quick growth spurt.


Good info - though I hope he can skate better than Myers by the time he's in the NHL. Yikes.
Quote
 
 
0 #15 TyrantRoarrrrr 2011-11-28 17:35
I think it's pretty difficult to gauge the quality of Stone's skating when you watch him play in the junior ranks. Announcers are bound to talk positively about a guy putting two points per game.

The pre-season games showed Stone's skating was a significant step behind the NHL level. You would have to be blind or biased not to admit that fact. Until he proves he can skate in the big leagues I won't think otherwise. I hope like everyone else that he finds a way to get there. Just don't set lofty expectations for a 6th rounder who struggles with his skating too early. Let him prove himself at the NHL level before penciling him in as a future top six forward. Same goes for Puempel, Noesen, Pageau, and Prince.

Oh and for the guy talking about Tavares it's true that the big knock on him was his skating. However it was always considered good enough to play in the NHL. The question was whether it would hold him back from being an elite player.
Quote
 
 
0 #16 Sicilian 2011-11-28 18:07
Anyone know why Puempel was left off? I guess his numbers weren't good enough for the position he was natural at?
Quote
 
 
0 #17 SensChirp 2011-11-28 18:48
Quoting Sicilian:
Anyone know why Puempel was left off? I guess his numbers weren't good enough for the position he was natural at?

There are always going to be good players left off the invite list. Puempel has been good recently but had a bit of a slow start. It looks like the roster has plenty of goal scoring so perhaps that was part of the reasoning.

Here is Sens Assistant GM Tim Murray talking about the Team Canada announcement and in particular, Mark Stone.

http://video.senators.nhl.com/videocenter/console?catid=1141&id=138322
Quote
 
 
+1 #18 MoeDozer 2011-11-28 18:53
Quoting Sicilian:
Anyone know why Puempel was left off? I guess his numbers weren't good enough for the position he was natural at?

I heard that this years team canada roster is mainly consisted of players 19+. They tried to get all the more developed kids first. Puempel is still 18, so maybe next year instead. Just remeber, last year the nuge didn't make it to team canada either
Quote
 
 
0 #19 SkipOPot2Mus 2011-11-28 19:29
sounds like tim murray thinks stone is pretty much a lock with team canada so lets hope thats the case. Otherwise ill be watching team sweden and usa alot more then my own country. Of course still cheering for canada.
Quote
 
 
0 #20 timwrx 2011-11-28 20:06
I can't wait to see 3B towards the end of this year.
Quote
 
 
0 #21 Sicilian 2011-11-28 20:37
I don't think anyone's a lock for the team but I figured Puempel was a lock for a try out invite.

Anyway, I hope he takes this personal, and works even harder. :)
Quote
 
 
0 #22 sj21 2011-11-28 21:53
I watched Stone in the super series game a week or so ago, paying particular attention to his skating and it reminded me of how Heatly skates, unfortunately there are not too many guys who are poor skaters and still manage to score at the NHL level..... heres to hoping he proves me wrong!
Quote
 
 
-12 #23 conor smythe 2011-11-28 23:55
Murray should trade

2012 1st round pick
2013 1st round pick
DaCosta
Lee
Wiercioch
Foligno
Butler
Greening
puemple
noessen

for:

corey perry and ryan getzlaf



people will hate on this, but you've got to admit, its pretty bad when 8 prospects and 2 first round picks are worth less than 2 players.


yay rebuild........ ........ we shoulda traded our two first rounders for edmontons 1st overall. but BM has commitment issues.
Quote
 
 
+4 #24 kingalfredsson 2011-11-29 00:03
Conor Smythe ... you should try thinking next time
Quote
 
 
+1 #25 Andrews Theory 2011-11-29 00:08
if i'm Garth Snow, I 'm putting in a call to Boudreau first thing in the morning.

his coaching style would be a good fit with their roster in my opinion...when tavares hasnt put up a point in 5 freakin games, something has got to give!
Quote
 
 
-2 #26 MoeDozer 2011-11-29 00:22
i know i might get some negative for this. since our team is going to be in a logjam. (speaking about the D, ignore the offencive logjam for now). anaheim are supposedly shopping bobby ryan. i would be able to live with rundblad for ryan. (not too sure if thats under or over paying for ryan) but this will move our rebuild ahead very quickly. and we are still going to be OK without rundblad if this was to happen thanks to the league leader in assists karlsson is still here.
just a thought, i still love rundblad's paly as much as the next fan and ive been pumped about rundblad since we traded for him.
Quote
 
 
-2 #27 hq 2011-11-29 01:39
wow talk about proposing rash trades. ottawa needs to sit tight and go through the process the proper way. do the rebuild properly so that not only we get an uber-team soon enough (2 yrs) but also a prospect pool so deep that the elite level is maintained and sustained. making rash trades will never allow the sens the luxury of sustaining elite status and long term winning. sens Defense depth is something which is going to drive this league mad very soon, its already pretty evident. the forward depth is already coming with a string of prospects close to joining the nhl and more coming through.
Quote
 
 
0 #28 Johne 2011-11-29 08:23
http://twitter.com/dchesnokov - Vityaz tough guy Jeremy Yablonski is suspended by the #KHL until the end of the season for sucker-punching another player in a recent game.
Quote
 
 
-1 #29 spezzerman 2011-11-29 08:34
Quoting Andrews Theory:
if i'm Garth Snow, I 'm putting in a call to Boudreau first thing in the morning.

his coaching style would be a good fit with their roster in my opinion...when tavares hasnt put up a point in 5 freakin games, something has got to give!


Beadreau sucks - he is overrated as a coach. I can't wait to see him land his next job and s*it the bed. The best thing he could have done for the team is leave.

@HQ - I agree completely. There is absolutely no reason to trade away our young prospects, even for a guy like Bobby Ryan. we are above .500 1/4 of the way through with the team that everyone said would be the worst in the league. Still lots of games left, you never know how the season will end, but barely any of our young forward prospects are even playing and we seem to be scoring at a much better rate than predicted without them. I'd be happy to get a center for aging guys but never for a rundblad or cowan.
Quote
 
 
+1 #30 Andrews Theory 2011-11-29 09:19
Quoting spezzerman:
Quoting Andrews Theory:
if i'm Garth Snow, I 'm putting in a call to Boudreau first thing in the morning.

his coaching style would be a good fit with their roster in my opinion...when tavares hasnt put up a point in 5 freakin games, something has got to give!


Beadreau sucks - he is overrated as a coach. I can't wait to see him land his next job and s*it the bed. The best thing he could have done for the team is leave.


Washington needed a change...the guy couldn't transform an elite offensive team into a defensive team...so what!

that's not his style. nyi arent expected to challenge for the cup and different coaches make a good fit depending on where the team is at. coaches are hired to be fired.

Boudreau would immediately make the Islanders more competitive and would coach to their strengths.
Quote
 
 
0 #31 Johne 2011-11-29 09:39
http://twitter.com/wyshynski - RT @puckarinen: The kid came back - http://t.co/E25triTp My http://t.co/PWCjAjob story on Mika Zibanejad's return to Djurgården.
Quote
 
 
+1 #32 Floridasensfan 2011-11-29 09:54
Rundblad Cowan Karlsson is our future and part of our present, why trade your future.
Gonchar has another year to go with us and has been playing well and is a good mentor for all three of those guys, anyone other than those three I don't care if we trade.
Karlsson Rundblad on our power play are going to be deadly when Rundblad develops more, why trade that.

I hope Gonchar plays lights out this year and next and we get a first rounder and another pick for him.

Kuba is gone this year for a pick, glad he is playing well.
Quote
 
 
0 #33 DenisVial 2011-11-29 10:24
We are going to have to listen to Ryan to the Laffs rumours for the next month. Aarrgh!
Quote
 
 
0 #34 boom 2011-11-29 10:46
Quoting DenisVial:
We are going to have to listen to Ryan to the Laffs rumours for the next month. Aarrgh!

If it wasn't that, we'd have to listen to something else about them. It's sickening, isn't it?
Quote
 
 
0 #35 AlfieforMayor11 2011-11-29 10:51
Ryan would look awesome in a Sens jersey though. I don't believe the rumors however. I don't think Bob Murray is shopping Ryan, and if he is, I think he'd only deal him for another star player.

I don't know what's funnier, the guy suggesting that we could get Bobby Ryan for Rundblad, or the guys that said it would be stupid to trade Rundblad for Ryan lol
Quote
 
 
+2 #36 NikoTn 2011-11-29 11:01
Quoting conor smythe:
Murray should trade

2012 1st round pick
2013 1st round pick
DaCosta
Lee
Wiercioch
Foligno
Butler
Greening
puemple
noessen

for:

corey perry and ryan getzlaf



people will hate on this, but you've got to admit, its pretty bad when 8 prospects and 2 first round picks are worth less than 2 players.


yay rebuild................ we shoulda traded our two first rounders for edmontons 1st overall. but BM has commitment issues.


You're a lunatic.
Quote
 
 
0 #37 novascotian 2011-11-29 11:02
Nathan Mckinnon with no invite to Canada junior team??

I would defiantly trade rundblad for bobby ryan!
Quote
 
 
-1 #38 AlfieforMayor11 2011-11-29 11:06
Quoting conor smythe:
Murray should trade

2012 1st round pick
2013 1st round pick
DaCosta
Lee
Wiercioch
Foligno
Butler
Greening
puemple
noessen

for:

corey perry and ryan getzlaf



people will hate on this, but you've got to admit, its pretty bad when 8 prospects and 2 first round picks are worth less than 2 players.


yay rebuild................ we shoulda traded our two first rounders for edmontons 1st overall. but BM has commitment issues.


I wish....

Foligno-Getzlaf-Perry
Michalek-Spezza-Alfie

Can you say stanley cup?
Quote
 
 
0 #39 AlfieforMayor11 2011-11-29 11:08
Quoting novascotian:
Nathan Mckinnon with no invite to Canada junior team??

I would defiantly trade rundblad for bobby ryan!


Its only because MacKinnon is so young... what is he? 16? 17?

They wanted to go with an older team this year apparently. Mostly 19 y/o's.
Quote
 
 
-1 #40 spezzerman 2011-11-29 11:13
I wouldnt trade Rundblad for Bobby Ryan. immediate dividends, maybe, but that isnt really the goal right now. In three years we are kicking ourselves because Rundblad will be one of the top producing d-men in the league. plus, Ryan seems to have benefited from his linemates. so far this year it looks like as they go, so does he. plus, an American kid likely doesnt re-sign in Ottawa when he becomes a UFA. That means we pay him 5.1 million per for the next three years for 35-40 goals max. I think Rundblad has more future value than Bobby Ryan so I wouldnt trade him.
Quote
 
 
0 #41 BM KING 2011-11-29 11:21
I think those RYAN rumours arent far fetch... Anaheim is in need of a D...

So maybe teams like Nashville might be in and Def the leaf to reunite the USA olympic line of Kessel/Ryan
Quote
 
 
+1 #42 AlfieforMayor11 2011-11-29 11:26
Quoting BM KING:
I think those RYAN rumours arent far fetch... Anaheim is in need of a D...

So maybe teams like Nashville might be in and Def the leaf to reunite the USA olympic line of Kessel/Ryan


If the Leafs acquired Ryan I think I'd lose my mind.
Quote
 
 
+2 #43 DenisVial 2011-11-29 11:29
We just need to sit tight and let our prospects develop this year. Murray can always deal for a top six guy in the off season as he will be dealing from a position of strength. Our CHL prospects will have the full year to showcase themselves, and we will have a pretty good idea of what Butler, Greening, Condra and Filatov are worth to our lineup, or their trade value.
Quote
 
 
-4 #44 simple jack 2011-11-29 11:32
I would like to see michalek given the chance to play 2nd line center!

I think he has all the tools to be a great center, he tough, great hands, not scared and defensively responsible.
Quote
 
 
0 #45 AlfieforMayor11 2011-11-29 11:42
Sit tight? Guys Bobby Ryan isn't just a "top six" player. He's a legitimate #1 winger. The guy is a 24 year old, goal scoring power forward. He has three straight 30+ goal seasons and his point totals have steadily improved over the last three season, 57, 64, 71.

I'm not saying trade Rundblad for him, or a bunch of other prospects, because I don't know what it would take to acquire him.

None of our forward prospects currently have Ryan's upside or potential.

If Bryan Murray could make a deal for Ryan that he's comfortable with, you guys would prefer him to just sit tight?
Quote
 
 
+3 #46 miguel 2011-11-29 11:48
Quoting NikoTn:
Filatov can't be any worse than Cheechoo...

I think this is an excellent comment.
Why do we give such underachievers like Cheechoo, Kovalev, Gerber, Leclaire, so many chances, on a better Sens team at the time, then the team we have today.
Yet only a few games to Filatov? This is a rebuild, and this is a top 10 pick, that given the chance may turn out to be a top 6, and ever as projected a top 3.
It was driving me crazy that Cheechoo kept staying on the top 6, when he clearly could not skate anymore.
Give Filatove 20-30 games, to get a clear understanding of where he may fit in, then make the appropriate decision... IMO of course
Quote
 
 
-1 #47 DenisVial 2011-11-29 11:56
Quoting Alfieformayor

None of our forward prospects currently have Ryan's upside or potential.

If Bryan Murray could make a deal for Ryan that he's comfortable with, you guys would prefer him to just sit tight?

What do you think it would take to get it done then? Show me a reasonable trade that doesn't involve half of our team. I think they will expect a kings ransom for a guy who will probably leave when his contract is up. If he's only here for three years, I think it diminishes his value in a trade. I'm not saying Smericans refuse to play in Canada but many prefer to stay in the States.
Quote
 
 
-1 #48 spezzerman 2011-11-29 12:03
@alfieformayor - hey if we can steal bobby ryan away from anaheim great but it isnt happening. every team in the nhl would at least look at what it would take to get him and the majority likely have more to offer than ottawa. I wouldnt trade karlsson, cowan or rundblad for him and that is basically all that anaheim would take, so it is a bit of a moot point.
to play devils advocate, ryan, as a goal scoring power forward has seen his goals/game production decrease in teh past three seasons, while playing on what many considered the best scoring line in the NHL. if your points dont increase playing on a 50 goal scorers line, you are really doing something wrong.
anyhoo - I dont hate on Ryan, I would obviously love to have him but again, I think he only plays max three seasons before signing somewhere else and we'd have to give up too much to get him. but if a miracle happens, that would be great!!
Quote
 
 
0 #49 spezzerman 2011-11-29 12:11
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
Quoting BM KING:
I think those RYAN rumours arent far fetch... Anaheim is in need of a D...

So maybe teams like Nashville might be in and Def the leaf to reunite the USA olympic line of Kessel/Ryan


If the Leafs acquired Ryan I think I'd lose my mind.


Oh I know! Although sadly this could very well play out. I think Burke would do whatever it takes to get him, including potentially trading schenn (despite his recent turnaround) and someone like lombardi and a prospect to get him, which would free up the cap room to make it happen.
Quote
 
 
+5 #50 spezzerman 2011-11-29 12:13
I just realized that everytime I think of Ottawa's future prospects I always forget about Lehner! MAn, we are going to real good, real soon.
Quote
 
 
+2 #51 Alcatraz 2011-11-29 12:17
I feel Bobby Ryan is a pipedream. With his reasonable current salary, and someone has already used Nashville as an example, but if Im David Poille why aren't I beginning my trade negiation with Ryan Suter for Bobby Ryan (fill the rest of the deal in with picks/prospects)

No one in the league I believe can compete with that. Its almost already a given that Nashville can't keep suter-weber and rinne and be able to compete but having ryan-weber-rinn e is a huge start

If Ottawa wants Ryan, or lets extend that..If Ottawa wants any star young forward from any team that has already put up star numbers every team in the league will say your offer has to start with one of our young 3 d in karlsson/cowen/ rundblad and of course karlsson is going nowhere

Thats how I see it....
Quote
 
 
+1 #52 AlfieforMayor11 2011-11-29 12:21
@DenisVial,

I'm not going to show you a trade proposal for Ryan. I already stated I don't know what it would take. None of us do. We don't know what Bob Murray would be asking for and we don't know what Bryan Murray would be willing to give up. I'm not going to throw out fan trade proposals because quite honestly none of us know shit.

Also, it's ridiculous to speculate whether or not he'd leave us because he wouldn't want to play in Canada. It's a decent statement I guess, but if we're a contender in 3 years like most of us expect, then why wouldn't he stay?

@spezzerman, I don't know what you're talking about? His points have steadily INCREASED in his three seasons in the NHL prior to this year.

2008-09 Gp-64 G-31 A-26 Pts-57 +/-13
2009-10 Gp-81 G-35 A-29 Pts-64 +/-9
2010-11 Gp-82 G-34 A-37 Pts-71 +/- 15
Quote
 
 
0 #53 spezzerman 2011-11-29 12:26
alfieformayor - i didnt say his points have decreased, I said his goals/game have. HIs points have increased but is it him or his linemates? since his goals have decreased, I would be inclinded to think his linemates help his point totals. but again, i dont hate him, I just wouldnt trade what anaheim would want for him.
Quote
 
 
0 #54 spezzerman 2011-11-29 12:30
and you started this by saying it is laughable to suggest Ottawa wouldnt trade rundblad for bobby ryan. I wouldnt make that trade.
Quote
 
 
+1 #55 AlfieforMayor11 2011-11-29 12:31
Quoting spezzerman:
alfieformayor - i didnt say his points have decreased, I said his goals/game have. HIs points have increased but is it him or his linemates? since his goals have decreased, I would be inclinded to think his linemates help his point totals. but again, i dont hate him, I just wouldnt trade what anaheim would want for him.


His goals only decreased last season from two seasons ago, and they only decreased by 1??

By your same logic, no one should want Jason Spezza because his goal totals and point totals have been steadily decreased 2007-2008?

There are only 3 players on our current roster I wouldn't trade for him, and that's Spezza, Karlsson, and Cowen.
Quote
 
 
+2 #56 hq 2011-11-29 12:38
i think the goal here is to win the cup and it is increasingly evident that a team with no holes visible in any department (f,d,goal) is the team that gets through. Just look at boston, tons of depth and no visible holes anywhere in the lineup. All guys that can fulfill their roles and sustain that performance. Ryan is an elite talent and getting him on the sens via trade means trading atleast one of our top 3 dmen (karlsson/rblad /cowen) guaranteed. and that means opening up a hole on D which quite frankly is sealed shut TIGHT right now.

is the increased production from one guy (ryan) worth decreasing production and performance from our backend+more? i dont think so. the sens are soon going to have a logjam up front and thats a position i would rather be in with high-end D and a performance logjam up front than deal away a significant chunk for one guy in Ryan. Ryan alone cant win us the cup. we need a team and we are getting it.
Quote
 
 
-1 #57 BM KING 2011-11-29 12:41
Only 2 teams in my mind can have the inside track...

Nashville and Toronto we all know that Burke would trade his 1st and more to get a player.... and nashvile will need to do something amout their D.

Toronto has a good trade record with anaheim...

Komi/1st/Prospect

Nashville

Ryan Ellis/Sutter for Bobby ( it would start with Ellis/Sutter)
Quote
 
 
+1 #58 Sensnation 2011-11-29 12:42
I really like that the Michalek-Folign o-Alfie line has been reunited, it's a great line to stop the opposition's scorers while still creating plenty of chances on their own. Foligno is a playmaker and having two hard working scorers on his wings is a great recipe!

With respect to the Ryan trade rumors, I'd be happy if we got him, but I also don't expect it to happen. I agree with AFM as I also would not trade Spezza, Karlsson or Cowen in a deal, but anyone else in a reasonable trade sounds good.
Quote
 
 
0 #59 AlfieforMayor11 2011-11-29 12:43
^^^^ Anaheim wouldn't take Komi, the Leafs are stuck with that guy.
Quote
 
 
0 #60 BM KING 2011-11-29 12:46
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
^^^^ Anaheim wouldn't take Komi, the Leafs are stuck with that guy.



stricly for salary... and think about it, trading ryan would make anaheim weaker and most likely get a top 5 pick plus a first from TML... komi is just to help them at D even if he is a pylon
Quote
 
 
0 #61 AlfieforMayor11 2011-11-29 12:48
Quoting BM KING:
Quoting AlfieforMayor11:
^^^^ Anaheim wouldn't take Komi, the Leafs are stuck with that guy.



stricly for salary... and think about it, trading ryan would make anaheim weaker and most likely get a top 5 pick plus a first from TML... komi is just to help them at D even if he is a pylon


Still doesn't mean they'd take Komi. His salary makes him one of the worst deals in the league and he's a 5th/6th dman now.

That would never happen.

If Burke pulled off a deal for Ryan including Komi, he would have to be considered the best GM in hockey, and I hate that guy lol
Quote
 
 
-3 #62 TyrantRoarrrrr 2011-11-29 12:48
Do you want to be the Leafs? A team that lives in mediocrity precisely because they lack the patience to build a team the right way. Sure we could package a bunch of high value prospects and acquire a player like Ryan. Bobby would make us a better team today but don't forget the cost of that. He'd make us just good enough to finish 6th-8th in the East and get bounced in the first round. Who really wants that? I'd much rather get another top five pick this year who might be as good as Ryan eventually, for free. There is little long-term value in making this deal for Ottawa. We're around a .500 team right now which basically puts us 23rd overall. After the tough series of games in December I'd expect we'll be at .400-.450 on points percentage. That would put Ottawa in the bottom 5. Any serious injury to Spezza, Michalek, Karlsson, or Anderson and we're dead last.
Quote
 
 
0 #63 spezzerman 2011-11-29 12:51
im not trying to get into a big argument so here are my last couple points for clarification.

Ryan scored those 31 goals in like 67 games. He scored his 34 and 35 goal totals in 81 and 82 games respectively. SO again, his goals/game output has decreased each year of the last three. yes it is a marginal difference but so are his point increases you mentioned. and he is 24, his production should be going the other way, no matter how marginal an difference it is.

I didnt say no one should want ryan, I just said I wouldnt want him at the cost of the three players mentioned. If the situation were possible, I wouldnt trade Spezza for any of those players either. but generally speaking I would love to have ryan if sens can steal him from anaheim.

I agree with you, I wouldnt trade #19, #2 or #65 either but I'd add RUndblad to my list. He will be just like Karlsson in three years except he will have a more physical upside.
Quote
 
 
0 #64 boom 2011-11-29 13:03
Quoting TyrantRoarrrrr:
Do you want to be the Leafs? A team that lives in mediocrity precisely because they lack the patience to build a team the right way. Sure we could package a bunch of high value prospects and acquire a player like Ryan. Bobby would make us a better team today but don't forget the cost of that. He'd make us just good enough to finish 6th-8th in the East and get bounced in the first round. Who really wants that? I'd much rather get another top five pick this year who might be as good as Ryan eventually, for free. There is little long-term value in making this deal for Ottawa. We're around a .500 team right now which basically puts us 23rd overall. After the tough series of games in December I'd expect we'll be at .400-.450 on points percentage. That would put Ottawa in the bottom 5. Any serious injury to Spezza, Michalek, Karlsson, or Anderson and we're dead last.

You had me at "Do you want to be the Leafs?"
Quote
 
 
0 #65 DenisVial 2011-11-29 13:05
If Anaheim is serious about making a run at the cup while they still have Selanne then the only player they want from us is Karlson. CoweRundbland are not ready to provide the type of impact they would need right now. I could definitely see them talking to Nashville about Suter if he's willing to do a sign and trade. They would probably have to throw in something else to make it worthwhile for Poile to move Suter. Maybe Fowler? Would that be too steep if Suter signed a long term deal?
Quote
 
 
0 #66 Alcatraz 2011-11-29 13:10
Quoting DenisVial:
If Anaheim is serious about making a run at the cup while they still have Selanne then the only player they want from us is Karlson. CoweRundbland are not ready to provide the type of impact they would need right now. I could definitely see them talking to Nashville about Suter if he's willing to do a sign and trade. They would probably have to throw in something else to make it worthwhile for Poile to move Suter. Maybe Fowler? Would that be too steep if Suter signed a long term deal?


IMO Suter is great but is a by-product of playing on a trotz-run system that has always had weber and a great goalie pipeline.

Ryan>Suter or at the very least Ryan=Suter
Quote
 
 
0 #67 DenisVial 2011-11-29 13:18
Quoting Alcatraz:
Quoting DenisVial:
If Anaheim is serious about making a run at the cup while they still have Selanne then the only player they want from us is Karlson. CoweRundbland are not ready to provide the type of impact they would need right now. I could definitely see them talking to Nashville about Suter if he's willing to do a sign and trade. They would probably have to throw in something else to make it worthwhile for Poile to move Suter. Maybe Fowler? Would that be too steep if Suter signed a long term deal?


IMO Suter is great but is a by-product of playing on a trotz-run system that has always had weber and a great goalie pipeline.

Ryan>Suter or at the very least Ryan=Suter


I disagree. Suter to me is a franchise defenceman regardless of where he plays. I think he has more value than Ryan. I think he is the next Pronger.
Quote
 
 
+2 #68 Hax 2011-11-29 13:18
Quoting TyrantRoarrrrr:
Do you want to be the Leafs? A team that lives in mediocrity precisely because they lack the patience to build a team the right way. Sure we could package a bunch of high value prospects and acquire a player like Ryan. Bobby would make us a better team today but don't forget the cost of that. He'd make us just good enough to finish 6th-8th in the East and get bounced in the first round. Who really wants that? I'd much rather get another top five pick this year who might be as good as Ryan eventually, for free. There is little long-term value in making this deal for Ottawa....


THANK YOU! (Though I don't think we *need* a lottery pick and I don't think we'll get one either.)

Patience boys, patience. Ryan is great and all but he's not worth half our prospects.
Quote
 
 
+7 #69 Alcatraz 2011-11-29 13:20
TSN at their best again:

"After finishing October strong, the current month hasn't been as kind to the Ottawa Senators."

"The Jets try to run their winning streak at MTS Centre to four straight while denying the Senators a .500 record for the month in tonight's battle between Canadian clubs."

The on the side of the page under facts they quietly list:
OTT:
OTT has gone 4-1-1 over their past 6 games, despite going 2/23 on the PP

So we have played poor in November, but yet Winnipeg gets the "Jets try to run their streak..etc" But no acknowledgement that in the past 8 games the only teams we lost to were Van(OT) and Pitt..

Hardly "November hasn't been kind" LOL laughable at best
Quote
 
 
0 #70 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 13:49
I hope Murray takes Joakim Lindstrom just went on waivers be a great pick up every unrated and has great hands
Quote
 
 
0 #71 Ryan 2011-11-29 14:02
What are do you guys think of derick brassard?
Should we trade for him if the price is right?
And lastly Chirp have you heard anything about this? or updates on it?
Quote
 
 
+2 #72 Sensfan1741 2011-11-29 14:10
I agree with the patience comments. I love to see the boys win, but there is no sense in wasting away prospects to try and squeeze into the playoffs. I like to call that "Leafs Syndrome". Its been ejoyable to watch this young crop being creative and trying their asses off in contrast to the sinking ship patched up with underachieving veterans we've had for the past couple of years.

P.S. I absolutely love the way Zach Smith is playing.
Quote
 
 
+1 #73 -zs 2011-11-29 14:20
Kessel just jumped ahead of Karlsson and Alfy in Allstar votes. Phaneuf also jumped into 2nd for D just behind Karlsson.

Get out there and vote!
Quote
 
 
+3 #74 miguel 2011-11-29 14:27
I do not understand all the talk around trading for Brassard.
Already we have enough experiments within our own group, which by the way is doing much better than all of the pundits were predicting.
Yes we may be in need of another top 6 player, but with a whole bunch more prospects coming in next year, should we not give our existing ones their fair shake?
I am really curious to see how Filatov pans out, Lets see if Butler can crack the top 6, can Regin be the one, will DaCosta go down and be lights out.
We do not need another failure from another team, when we are doing quite well, and need to find out more about our own kids... IMO
Quote
 
 
+1 #75 Hax 2011-11-29 14:43
Just logged another 30 votes. I put Thomas for goalie since Riemer is 3rd currently and I wanted to help make sure he doesn't somehow get voted in. Considered dropping Gonchar in favor of Chara to try and keep Phaneuf out as well.

vote.nhl.com
Quote
 
 
+1 #76 -zs 2011-11-29 14:52
Quoting Hax:
Just logged another 30 votes. I put Thomas for goalie since Riemer is 3rd currently and I wanted to help make sure he doesn't somehow get voted in. Considered dropping Gonchar in favor of Chara to try and keep Phaneuf out as well.

vote.nhl.com


I'm going to drop Gonch for Chara/Letang also
Quote
 
 
-6 #77 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 14:54
I hope the Murrays are talking Bobby Ryan ...Cause could be Centrepiece player for this team a Rebuild closer I dont think theres a player untouchable besides #19 #65 ...

Rundblad Butler Foligno 1st 2012 for Bobby Ryan

-Ducks 2 blue chips (Rundblad and 2012 pick ) Butler young snipper Folingo play top 6-9

- Bobby Ryan topend talent plays pp pk can play LW C RW hands speed skill 2nd overall ...Would be amazing to have number 9

Greening Spezza Alfredsson
MM9 Ryan Stone
Filatov Zibby Silfverberg
Condra Smith Neil

Karlsson Cowen
Gonchar Philips
Lee Gryba

Lehner
Andy
Quote
 
 
0 #78 Sens of Peskyville 2011-11-29 15:05
Quoting Silfverberg:
I hope the Murrays are talking Bobby Ryan ...Cause could be Centrepiece player for this team a Rebuild closer I dont think theres a player untouchable besides #19 #65 ...

Rundblad Butler Foligno 1st 2012 for Bobby Ryan

-Ducks 2 blue chips (Rundblad and 2012 pick ) Butler young snipper Folingo play top 6-9

- Bobby Ryan topend talent plays pp pk can play LW C RW hands speed skill 2nd overall ...Would be amazing to have number 9

Greening Spezza Alfredsson
MM9 Ryan Stone
Filatov Zibby Silfverberg
Condra Smith Neil

Karlsson Cowen
Gonchar Philips
Lee Gryba

Lehner
Andy



Can you say "OVER PAYMENT BY A BUTTLOAD"???
Quote
 
 
0 #79 ImNotJoJo 2011-11-29 15:13
With all these terrible trade proposals you would think this was HFBoards or something...
Quote
 
 
0 #80 Sandy 2011-11-29 15:17
Trading draft picks and young prospects was the way John Muckler ran a team... look where that got the Sens.

When Murray took over... those young players were not in the farm system... and he had to go the UFA route... which resulted in bad signings. It took almost 4 yrs for Murray to re-build what Muckler tore down...

Don't lose track of the re-build. Keep your young players and picks and develop them.

Bobby Ryan is a good player... BUT if he is only in Ottawa for 3 yrs and you give up a 1st round pick... Rundblad & Butler (as someone suggested) SENS LOSE BIG on that one.

Stay the course... draft well... Sens will be fine.

If Burke gives up his 1st rounder for Ryan... good luck to him..
Quote
 
 
+1 #81 MoeDozer 2011-11-29 15:30
great day for the swedes. zibanejad added an assist today in a 3-5 loss (if im not mistaken thats now a 3game point streak). and silfverberg having probably his best game as a SEL player with 1g3a in a 4-3 win. with this win for brynas (silfverberg's team) they are now first place. and djurgarden tied for the 8th and final playoff spot.
Quote
 
 
+4 #82 boom 2011-11-29 15:30
@Sandy,
Exactly. I think there's no way that Murray will overpay for Ryan, Turris, Brassard, or anyone else, for that matter.
Any deal he makes, will have more to do with the future, than any supposed glaring need they have right now.
Regarding Burke, I think he has a five year plan, but it collides with his five minute attention span...
Quote
 
 
-2 #83 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 15:36
@Blue

Wow Over payment really ..Butler plays on are 4th line .. Rundblad is a copy of Karlsson and mid pack first 13- 18 ...for a top end player is a overpayment ..

@Sandy

Yeah got us to Stanley Cup finals .. stop with the Muckler complaining he traded players he traded 2 draft picks (2nd rd and 6th rd) and got 2nd rd back in Havlat trade ...
Yeah Murray took over how far have we got ?
The farm got loaded up in the past 2 years with trade for core players ....See Muckler and Murray did the same thing traded the core but the outcome was different one got to the CUP and another is Rebuilding for scratch ...
Quote
 
 
+1 #84 comic_dude 2011-11-29 15:44
http://vote.nhl.com/
Quote
 
 
0 #85 Hax 2011-11-29 15:58
@Silfverberg - dude you can't just add up the draft positions of players to determine value. And if Rundblad is a copy of Karlsson (which isn't really accurate but...) then we should not be trading him. Karlsson is in his third year and leading all D in All-Star votes and assists. Wouldn't you want two of those guys?

If Ryan is such a cup magnet then we can sign him when becomes a UFA. And we'd still have Rundblad, our 2012 first, Butler and Foligno. We're not likely going to be ready to make a serious cup run much before then anyway.
Quote
 
 
0 #86 Sensnation 2011-11-29 15:59
Quoting Silfverberg:
@Blue

Wow Over payment really ..Butler plays on are 4th line .. Rundblad is a copy of Karlsson and mid pack first 13- 18 ...for a top end player is a overpayment ..

@Sandy

Yeah got us to Stanley Cup finals .. stop with the Muckler complaining he traded players he traded 2 draft picks (2nd rd and 6th rd) and got 2nd rd back in Havlat trade ...
Yeah Murray took over how far have we got ?
The farm got loaded up in the past 2 years with trade for core players ....See Muckler and Murray did the same thing traded the core but the outcome was different one got to the CUP and another is Rebuilding for scratch ...


Rundblad is not a copy of Karlsson. Watch some games, they may both be OFDs but their game is different!

As for Muckler, he not only traded those picks, he also drafted almost no NHL worthy players during his entire reign as GM.
Quote
 
 
-1 #87 Sensnation 2011-11-29 16:04
Quoting Silfverberg:
I hope the Murrays are talking Bobby Ryan ...Cause could be Centrepiece player for this team a Rebuild closer I dont think theres a player untouchable besides #19 #65 ...

Rundblad Butler Foligno 1st 2012 for Bobby Ryan

-Ducks 2 blue chips (Rundblad and 2012 pick ) Butler young snipper Folingo play top 6-9

- Bobby Ryan topend talent plays pp pk can play LW C RW hands speed skill 2nd overall ...Would be amazing to have number 9

Greening Spezza Alfredsson
MM9 Ryan Stone
Filatov Zibby Silfverberg
Condra Smith Neil

Karlsson Cowen
Gonchar Philips
Lee Gryba

Lehner
Andy


Do you realize you're giving away more than Burke gave to get Kessel, who is a better offensive player.
Quote
 
 
0 #88 PraiseAlfie84 2011-11-29 16:08
Are you guys kidding? As someone already mentioned, there are so many more teams out there with much, MUCH better pieces for a trade for Bobby Ryan, the Sens won't even be considered unless they pull a Burke move like he made for Kessel, and I would feel very uneasy about giving away 2 first round picks....
Quote
 
 
0 #89 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 16:11
@Sensnation

Yeah I agree his draft skills horrible missing on Staal and Kopitar but Muckler didnt trade away are picks and and top prospects as Sandy stated ...

Karlsson and Rundblad are the same player OFD high skilled puck moving dman weak in defensive but Karlsson just has more experience in NHL
Quote
 
 
+1 #90 Donovan 2011-11-29 16:19
I'll be at the game tonight. I was a Die Hard Sens fan in between Jets franchises, so I'm excited to see my new-old team play my old team! ;)

Here's hoping for an OT thriller so BOTH my teams get at least a point!

Go Jets Go!
Quote
 
 
0 #91 Sensnation 2011-11-29 16:21
Quoting Silfverberg:
@Sensnation

Yeah I agree his draft skills horrible missing on Staal and Kopitar but Muckler didnt trade away are picks and and top prospects as Sandy stated ...

Karlsson and Rundblad are the same player OFD high skilled puck moving dman weak in defensive but Karlsson just has more experience in NHL


Actually Muckler traded Havlat, Hossa and Salo as they were approaching their prime and gave Laich away as well as the previously mentioned picks.

There are different types of OFDs, Rundblad and Karlsson are not the same type. Also, I would not consider either of them weak in the defensive zone, they're just not Sutton style bruisers. Rundblad has more physical play in his game, Karlsson is more positional and stick work.
Quote
 
 
0 #92 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 16:22
Do you realize you're giving away more than Burke gave to get Kessel, who is a better offensive player.

Come on man seriously ? Tyler Seguin 2nd overall and Dougie Hamilton 9th overall compared too Rundbald and who butler or Folingo ...or maybe that 13-18 selection pick ?
Quote
 
 
0 #93 Sensnation 2011-11-29 16:25
Quoting Silfverberg:


Come on man seriously ? Tyler Seguin 2nd overall and Dougie Hamilton 9th overall compared too Rundbald and who butler or Folingo ...or maybe that 13-18 selection pick ?


Rundblad, Foligno and our 2012 are all 1st round picks. Add Butler to that and you want to give 3 firsts and a prospect for Ryan. It's a ridiculous offer man, that's why no one agrees with it.
Quote
 
 
+1 #94 Patrick 2.0 2011-11-29 16:28
No game day post yet.

Sooo...COME ON SENS!!!! 3-2 Win tonight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please find your place Filatov, with a nice goal tonight!

My opinion:
1) We're not going after Ryan
2) We're not trading Karlsson
3) We're not trading Rundblad
4) We're not trading Foligno
Quote
 
 
-2 #95 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 16:30
Karlsson and Rundblad are the same player OFD high skilled puck moving dman weak in defensive but Karlsson just has more experience in NHL

Actually Muckler traded Havlat, Hossa and Salo as they were approaching their prime and gave Laich away as well as the previously mentioned picks.

There are different types of OFDs, Rundblad and Karlsson are not the same type. Also, I would not consider either of them weak in the defensive zone, they're just not Sutton style bruisers. Rundblad has more physical play in his game, Karlsson is more positional and stick work.

Karlsson was a -30 last year ..Rundblad is at -7 already 14 games played ..you say there arent bad in defensive zone ??
So Havlat for spare parts .. and Hossa for Heatley ... right ?
Murray ..Vermette Kelly Fisher Meszaros Eaves 3 didn't come close to there prime... for ?
Quote
 
 
+1 #96 jasonontheoldsenschirp 2011-11-29 16:32
bobby ryan being shopped?

MURRAY, GET ON THAT SHIT.
Quote
 
 
+2 #97 John Q. Spartan 2011-11-29 16:32
Phew, didn't look at SensChirp all day and thought I might have missed something...

lucky all I missed was a bunch of fantasy trade proposals.
Quote
 
 
+1 #98 DenisVial 2011-11-29 16:33
Quoting Sensnation:
Quoting Silfverberg:


Come on man seriously ? Tyler Seguin 2nd overall and Dougie Hamilton 9th overall compared too Rundbald and who butler or Folingo ...or maybe that 13-18 selection pick ?


Rundblad, Foligno and our 2012 are all 1st round picks. Add Butler to that and you want to give 3 firsts and a prospect for Ryan. It's a ridiculous offer man, that's why no one agrees with it.


Exchange Spartacat and Garrioch in place of Rundbland and our 2012 1st and now we're talking.
Quote
 
 
0 #99 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 16:34
Quoting Sensnation:
Quoting Silfverberg:


Come on man seriously ? Tyler Seguin 2nd overall and Dougie Hamilton 9th overall compared too Rundbald and who butler or Folingo ...or maybe that 13-18 selection pick ?


Rundblad, Foligno and our 2012 are all 1st round picks. Add Butler to that and you want to give 3 firsts and a prospect for Ryan. It's a ridiculous offer man, that's why no one agrees with it.


That might be true but the fact that people over value are players cause player like folingo was draft in the 1st rd doesnt make him 1st rd talent ....Who drafted Folingo ? lol

I look at as 1st and blue chipper ( Rundblad) and top 9 player ....dont over valve ...
Quote
 
 
0 #100 Sensnation 2011-11-29 16:36
Quoting Silfverberg:

Karlsson was a -30 last year ..Rundblad is at -7 already 14 games played ..you say there arent bad in defensive zone ??
So Havlat for spare parts .. and Hossa for Heatley ... right ?
Murray ..Vermette Kelly Fisher Meszaros Eaves 3 didn't come close to there prime... for ?


So +/- purely means whether you are good or bad defensively? That's your take on the stat category? Man come on, there's so much more to the +/- picture then whether you are good or bad defensively. If you score mainly on PP while playing on a bad 5 on 5 team, your +/- will not be good, you can't purely blame the player. It's the worst stat category to use to support a point, and if you're over 20yrs old you should know that by now.

No clue what u were trying to say with your last 2 sentences.
Quote
 
 
0 #101 Sandy 2011-11-29 16:37
@Silfverberg -- yes Sens went to the SCF under Muckler... BUT he did not build that team. The key pieces were in place before he managed the team. All he did was bring in Heatley for Hossa. Heatley had a great run during the SCF BUT would Hossa have been better. He really added nothing to the Cup winning team.. Saprakin(sp?), Comrie, Preissing.. Corvo was okay.

Muckler made mistakes on key players -- Hossa, Chara, Havlat, Laich and he made bad signings as well.

Murray has made his mistakes - he is not blameless.. but Muckler has to take some responsibility for what has happened. He left the team with no future.. that's probably why he was fired.

6 yrs of bad drafting and no real prospects (other than 2 or 3) is not enough to sustain an NHL team.
I just think, personally, that this team would have been better off, if Muckler had not been a GM.
Quote
 
 
0 #102 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 16:41
@Sensnation

Stats are stats man if you wanna fight them by all means do it but anyone who watches time know players like Karllson and Rundblad are off gifted ...and the def changed ..If you choice not too believe it thats your call no need too fight about it cause man cause if stats dont mean anything why have them
Quote
 
 
0 #103 Sensnation 2011-11-29 16:43
Quoting Silfverberg:

That might be true but the fact that people over value are players cause player like folingo was draft in the 1st rd doesnt make him 1st rd talent ....Who drafted Folingo ? lol

I look at as 1st and blue chipper ( Rundblad) and top 9 player ....dont over valve ...


First, please take the time to type your shit out, i can't undestand half of what you're saying.

Second, I'm not overvaluing Foligno, I just recognize he still has not only value, but plenty of room to keep growing and improving. You're selling him way too soon and short. Fortunately, Murray would disagree with you too.

Not 1 person on here supports your trade offer, I think it's obvious it wasn't that good and you are undervaluing our players and over valuing Ryan.
Quote
 
 
0 #104 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 16:44
@Sandy

Thats your call but some people see there where mistakes done by both Gm's one made trades and another drafts well ... I just wish we had a GM that could make that bold trade and drafted for the future as well
Quote
 
 
0 #105 Sensnation 2011-11-29 16:46
Quoting Silfverberg:
@Sensnation

Stats are stats man if you wanna fight them by all means do it but anyone who watches time know players like Karllson and Rundblad are off gifted ...and the def changed ..If you choice not too believe it thats your call no need too fight about it cause man cause if stats dont mean anything why have them


No, you are misunderstandin g what +/- means and also taking it without any context of the team they are on. So you're saying if Karlsson and Rundblad were on Washington and thus had a +/- in the positive, which they likely would, it's because they're all of a sudden good defensively? You get my point, the team around the player impacts that stat as much as the player himself.
Quote
 
 
+1 #106 boom 2011-11-29 16:46
Chiming in on the Muckler debate....

Do any of you remember who was the 1st player they almost always called up from Binghamtom during the Muckler years?

How about Josh Hennessy?

Josh Hennessy wouldn't even make the current Binghamton team.

Murray has done a far better job keeping the farm stocked than did Muckler.
Quote
 
 
0 #107 jasonontheoldsenschirp 2011-11-29 16:49
Take back my recent comment abut Murray getting Ryan.

Getting Bobby Ryan would be counter-intuiti ve to the rebuild. The Sens have such good team chemistry right now on all four lines, it would be a shame to see anyone go.

That being said however, getting Ryan would make our team's playoff chances a ton better. The question is who would have to we give up?
Quote
 
 
0 #108 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 16:49
@sensnation

Why you worried about what other people think so much ... Scared to have you own idea and stick by it ... You definitely over valve are players and thats why you will be happy with whatever happens.. No point in keep going you dont want are team too get better thats your call .
Quote
 
 
0 #109 Sensnation 2011-11-29 16:53
Quoting Silfverberg:
@sensnation

Why you worried about what other people think so much ... Scared to have you own idea and stick by it ... You definitely over valve are players and thats why you will be happy with whatever happens.. No point in keep going you dont want are team too get better thats your call .


Worried about what other people think? Sorry can we not have a discussion here without coming across as insecure? I can't keep trying to figure out what you're saying. Try to type out your words properly, it would help a lot.

This team is getting better and will continue to get better, your trade proposal just wouldn't accomplish that.

Also, since you obviously just say stuff instead of worrying about accuracy, I am one of the ones that has suggested trading for a current NHL high end scorer, so in no way am I happy with whatever happens as you put it.
Quote
 
 
-1 #110 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 16:55
Quoting boom:
Chiming in on the Muckler debate....

Do any of you remember who was the 1st player they almost always called up from Binghamtom during the Muckler years?

How about Josh Hennessy?

Josh Hennessy wouldn't even make the current Binghamton team.

Murray has done a far better job keeping the farm stocked than did Muckler.


We all agree that Muckler was awful in drafting but making trades and getting us too are goal to Stanley Cup Finals he did ...
Quote
 
 
+1 #111 DenisVial 2011-11-29 16:58
Quoting Silfverberg:
@sensnation

Why you worried about what other people think so much ... Scared to have you own idea and stick by it ... You definitely over valve are players and thats why you will be happy with whatever happens.. No point in keep going you dont want are team too get better thats your call .


The English language has officially been butchered! The Swedish Chef from the Muppets was more coherent. Bork, bork, bork!
Quote
 
 
0 #112 Sensnation 2011-11-29 16:59
Quoting Silfverberg:
Quoting boom:
Chiming in on the Muckler debate....

Do any of you remember who was the 1st player they almost always called up from Binghamtom during the Muckler years?

How about Josh Hennessy?

Josh Hennessy wouldn't even make the current Binghamton team.

Murray has done a far better job keeping the farm stocked than did Muckler.


We all agree that Muckler was awful in drafting but making trades and getting us too are goal to Stanley Cup Finals he did ...


Did I miss when the goal became 2nd place? I was pretty sure the goal was to WIN the Stanley Cup, not be the outmatched runner up.
Quote
 
 
0 #113 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 17:01
Worried about what other people think? Sorry can we not have a discussion here without coming across as insecure? I can't keep trying to figure out what you're saying. Try to type out your words properly, it would help a lot.

This team is getting better and will continue to get better, your trade proposal just wouldn't accomplish that.


Whatever you say kid ...Bobby Ryan wont help this team 24 year old 2nd overall pick wont help this team lol ..sorry about my writing on my new iphone first time user from blackberry so if you wanna be grammar coach be my guest ..this is dead issue cant trade anyone when al are players a valued more Sidney Crosby ...

@Sensnation

So its Mucklers fault the team he built to get the Cup got there and they lost right lol
Quote
 
 
0 #114 TyrantRoarrrrr 2011-11-29 17:07
One foolish trade proposal by Silfverberg and the entire comment section has been taken over by discussion of what he'd do in NHL 2012 on his X-Box.

1. If Rundblad continues to develop he could become a perennial 50+ point defender who uses skill and hockey IQ to defend equally well. Those are worth just as much as a Bobby Ryan, perhaps more. Ask Nashville.

2. Giving up a 1st in 2012 is a huge gamble. That could end up being a lottery pick. Ryan in the lineup would likely make it in the 10-15 range but still a very valuable pick.

Overall your proposal is horrible. Even just trading Rundblad alone could be a negative result. Add in other assets and you're all but guaranteeing Ottawa loses that deal. You should consider what Ottawa stands to gain with that 2012 1st rounder without Ryan in the lineup. It stands to become a very good player for the organization. That reason alone is enough not to waste assets to acquire him.
Quote
 
 
0 #115 Sensnation 2011-11-29 17:08
Quoting Silfverberg:

Whatever you say kid ...Bobby Ryan wont help this team 24 year old 2nd overall pick wont help this team lol ..sorry about my writing on my new iphone first time user from blackberry so if you wanna be grammar coach be my guest ..this is dead issue cant trade anyone when al are players a valued more Sidney Crosby ...


First I'm not a kid. Second it's not grammar coach, I honestly couldn't figure out several of your sentences because of the misspelling/aut o correct or whatever it is you are using. Finally, no one here values any of our players higher then Sidney Crosby, we just see them as having value where you see little.

Yes the issue is dead, we are not giving up that much for Ryan, if anything.
Quote
 
 
0 #116 boom 2011-11-29 17:11
Debating the merits of the Sens trading for Bobby Ryan is kinda like the dork in high school wondering if he should ask the hot cheerleader out...no matter what he decides, it ain't gonna happen. The cheerleader will wait for a better offer...
Quote
 
 
0 #117 NotwinninforM­acKinnon 2011-11-29 17:12
Quoting DenisVial:
Quoting Silfverberg:
@sensnation

Why you worried about what other people think so much ... Scared to have you own idea and stick by it ... You definitely over valve are players and thats why you will be happy with whatever happens.. No point in keep going you dont want are team too get better thats your call .


The English language has officially been butchered! The Swedish Chef from the Muppets
was more coherent. Bork, bork, bork!



I talking hockey with a guy that still watches sesame street...JC lol
Quote
 
 
+1 #118 MoeDozer 2011-11-29 17:12
zibanejad and silfverberg's games highlights are here http://www.hockeyligan.se/elitserien-arena/37848/highlights/

zib's is the second tab and silfver's is the 4th.

summary of highlights:
zibanejad was all over the ice with several great chances, he couldnt burry a 2 on 1 (looked like the dman or goalie just saved it on the line). zib couldnt bury a breakaway. he got a wicked onetimer that i thought went in but apparently it went off the post and his team mate finished the rebound giving zib the assist.

silfver had 1g3a. well i think that speaks for its self
Quote
 
 
0 #119 John Q. Spartan 2011-11-29 17:13
I refuse to partcipate, if I was I'd mention that Bobby Ryan is a UFA in 3 years...

which is exactly when we are supposed to become competitive. Oh wait, we've traded Rundblad and our 1st...

Guess we need to start all over, just like the Leafs when Kessel leaves as a UFA in 2 years.

I'm not participating, but if I were, I'd strongly advocate staying on our current course.
Quote
 
 
0 #120 DenisVial 2011-11-29 17:14
Quoting TyrantRoarrrrr:
One foolish trade proposal by Silfverberg and the entire comment section has been taken over by discussion of what he'd do in NHL 2012 on his X-Box.


Overall your proposal is horrible. Even just trading Rundblad alone could be a negative result. Add in other assets and you're all but guaranteeing Ottawa loses that deal. You should consider what Ottawa stands to gain with that 2012 1st rounder without Ryan in the lineup. It stands to become a very good player for the organization. That reason alone is enough not to waste assets to acquire him.


Thank you Tyrant. Hopefully that ends the debate. Rundbland has a tremendous amount of potential and there is no way we move him except for an equal talent straight up. And since we don't know his full value until he plays a few seasons, he is going nowhere.
Quote
 
 
0 #121 DenisVial 2011-11-29 17:16
Quoting Silfverberg:
Quoting DenisVial:
Quoting Silfverberg:
@sensnation

Why you worried about what other people think so much ... Scared to have you own idea and stick by it ... You definitely over valve are players and thats why you will be happy with whatever happens.. No point in keep going you dont want are team too get better thats your call .


The English language has officially been butchered! The Swedish Chef from the Muppets
was more coherent. Bork, bork, bork!



I talking hockey with a guy that still watches sesame street...JC lol


Will someone translate please?
Quote
 
 
+2 #122 TyrantRoarrrrr 2011-11-29 17:19
Silfverberg no offense but you're very badly misinformed about plus minus. If one of the other five players on the ice makes a mistake you get a minus. How is that a fair assessment of an individual's defensive ability? Everyone gets a minus when a goaltender gives up a soft goal. Everyone gets a minus when some idiot changes early and causes a 2-on-1. It's a completely useless stat.

Karlsson's defensive play has greatly improved this season. He uses his skill and hockey IQ to defend at a very high level. He plays the PK and 25+ minutes a night for a reason. If you look at advanced statistics on other sites Ottawa consistently benefits from when he is on the ice. The coaching staff considers him one of the teams best penalty killers. Go ahead though, spout your garbage. I'll trust the NHL coaching staff rather than some guy on a message board who thinks he gets the game. You'd be laughed out of the room by real hockey people.
Quote
 
 
+1 #123 Hax 2011-11-29 17:48
Quoting John Q. Spartan:
I refuse to partcipate, if I was I'd mention that Bobby Ryan is a UFA in 3 years...

which is exactly when we are supposed to become competitive. Oh wait, we've traded Rundblad and our 1st...

Guess we need to start all over, just like the Leafs when Kessel leaves as a UFA in 2 years.

I'm not participating, but if I were, I'd strongly advocate staying on our current course.


That was my point exactly JQS!
Quote
 
 
+2 #124 Hax 2011-11-29 17:53
Quoting Silfverberg:
@sensnation

Why you worried about what other people think so much ... Scared to have you own idea and stick by it ... You definitely over valve are players and thats why you will be happy with whatever happens.. No point in keep going you dont want are team too get better thats your call .


Roughly translated:

"Why you worried" = "Why are you worried"
"you own idea" = "your own idea"
"over valve" = "over value"
"are players" = "our players"
"No point in keep going" = "No point continuing"
"are team" = "our team"
"too get better" = "to get better"

Not that hard after you read it 50 times.
Quote
 
 
+1 #125 Hax 2011-11-29 18:05
(To clarify, someone asked for a translation and I wrote one up - not trying to pick on Silfverberg for his/her rushed grammar/spelling.)

Go Sens Go!
Quote
 
 
+1 #126 DenisVial 2011-11-29 18:07
Quoting Hax:
Quoting Silfverberg:
@sensnation

Why you worried about what other people think so much ... Scared to have you own idea and stick by it ... You definitely over valve are players and thats why you will be happy with whatever happens.. No point in keep going you dont want are team too get better thats your call .


Roughly translated:

"Why you worried" = "Why are you worried"
"you own idea" = "your own idea"
"are players" = "our players"
"No point in keep going" = "No point continuing"
"are team" = "our team"
"too get better" = "to get better"

Not that hard after you read it 50 times.


Thank you for translating Hax. I thought I was on Swedeschirp for a minute there.
Quote
 
 
+1 #127 Sensnation 2011-11-29 18:14
Quoting Hax:
(To clarify, someone asked for a translation and I wrote one up - not trying to pick on sensnation for his/her rushed grammar/spelling.)

Go Sens Go!


I think you mean Silfverberg lol, but well done. Also I think "over vavle" means "overvalue".
Quote
 
 
+1 #128 John Q. Spartan 2011-11-29 18:15
Quoting Hax:
(To clarify, someone asked for a translation and I wrote one up - not trying to pick on sensnation for his/her rushed grammar/spelling.)

Go Sens Go!



And you mean Silfverberg, not Sensation.
Quote
 
 
+1 #129 Hax 2011-11-29 18:34
Quoting Sensnation:
Quoting Hax:
(To clarify, someone asked for a translation and I wrote one up - not trying to pick on sensnation for his/her rushed grammar/spelling.)

Go Sens Go!


I think you mean Silfverberg lol, but well done. Also I think "over vavle" means "overvalue".


Yes - apologies.
Quote
 
 
0 #130 Sandy 2011-11-29 18:52
Quoting Silfverberg:
@Sensnation

Stats are stats man if you wanna fight them by all means do it but anyone who watches time know players like Karllson and Rundblad are off gifted ...and the def changed ..If you choice not too believe it thats your call no need too fight about it cause man cause if stats dont mean anything why have them


Karlsson is who he is... I have no problem with that. Rundblad is a rookie still trying to adjust to the NHL game... give him a break.
Quote
 
 
-1 #131 Sandy 2011-11-29 18:55
Quoting Silfverberg:
@Sandy

Thats your call but some people see there where mistakes done by both Gm's one made trades and another drafts well ... I just wish we had a GM that could make that bold trade and drafted for the future as well



I did say in my post that Murray has made mistakes as well and is not blameless in this whole situation... but Muckler also did his part to contribute to it.

Just because you don't like Murray.... you can't see it's all his fault.
Quote
 
 
0 #132 Sandy 2011-11-29 19:00
@Silfverberg... Muckler did not build the team that went to the Cup final. Most of those key players were on the team or drafted before Muckler arrived.
He brought in Heatley, Comrie, Corvo, Preissing, Saprikin -- I think that's about it. (I'm not sure if I missed anybody). Heatley was great in that run to the Cup final.. but we don't know if Hossa would have been better. The rest -- well not exactly difference makers.

What killed Ottawa was lack of depth after the first line.. once they were shut down... Sens were toast.

Let's say we agree to disagree.
Quote
 
 
0 #133 John Q. Spartan 2011-11-29 20:13
2006 Stanley Cup Roster:

(* - denotes players Muckler directly drafted/brought-in)

Emery
Gerber*

Nycholat*
Phillips
Redden*
Corvo*
Meszaros*
Volchenkov
Preissing*

Schubert
Alfredsson
Fisher
McGratton*
Spezza
Vermette
Kelly
Neil
Schaefer*
McAmmond*
Eaves*
Saprykin*
Comrie*
Heatley*

This isn't even considering all the choices he made keeping players, and not getting others to replace certain guys, that we will never know about.

To suggest that Muckler doesn't deserve credit for building a team that went to the Cup Finals is laughable... give the poor old man some credit.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Senschirp Blog Sens Make First Trip to Winnipeg

Contact SensChirp

About SensChirp

  • Welcome to the new and I believe, improved SensChirp. It's the same old blog - breaking news, insider info and everything Sens.