<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>More Draft Talk</title>
		<description>Discuss More Draft Talk</description>
		<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:54:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.senschirp.ca/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>MethotToMyMadness says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10801</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey guys Gonchar - I think Ottawa could get a lot if he was willing to clear the NMC, but he won't and I'm not upset about it. Gonchar is still an elite offensive D (even at 37) in the NHL. It's amazing how one year can skew the view of a player. This is a guy (barring injury) that has continually put up numbers in the 50 to 60 point range and he's a killer on the PP. With the expected addition of Rundblad to the lineup this year, we'll have someone else that Gonchar can play with if not Karlsson, so our 2nd unit will be upgraded. Draft - As much as we talk about Ottawa moving up, I don't see it happening. Too many teams interested in too many players. Normally, when you have a superstar at the top, like a Crosby, Stamkos, it changes things and moving around for any other position is somewhat easy. But this year there are many great names in the top 10. I sound like Pierre Mcguire here, but the draft this year for each time will come down to organizational need.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MethotToMyMadness</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:02:10 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10801</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RUSHRLZ says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10761</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ He was awesome!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RUSHRLZ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:15:15 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10761</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaMo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10758</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I had a nightmare. They drafted Landeskog. That doesn't sound like a nightmare at all.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CaMo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:05:24 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10758</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>WhoIsUsingMyName says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10757</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wouldn't waste any assets moving up in the draft. By all accounts Couturier will be available at #6 and that's who Ottawa should realistically be aiming for. For one you can't teach big. Responsible two-way player with soft hands and size, what's not to like?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>WhoIsUsingMyName</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:04:54 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10757</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jasonontheoldsenschirp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10752</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I had a nightmare. They drafted Landeskog.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jasonontheoldsenschirp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:40:59 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10752</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>conservativeHippie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10751</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mat, Yes...too much depth. Too many 3-4 line forwards, too few top 6 players. Were you under a rock last season?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>conservativeHippie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:39:05 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10751</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gauts26 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10750</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Chirp, Any news if Murray will look at these twins Ponthus and Pathrik Westerholm, they dominated the J20 Elite league. 6th or 7th round pick Maybe the next Sedin twins.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>gauts26</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:24:12 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10750</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>xDa_Ghost says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10749</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I had a dream last night, The sens Drafted Huberdeau]]></description>
			<dc:creator>xDa_Ghost</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 06:38:27 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10749</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SensFanInMTL says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10748</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Shannon is not coming back which is sad for him since he had the best season in his career despite not making the playoffs. Regin is on his last year and will not be resigned for next year. Neither is Winchester next year. Leaves room for Wacey Hamilton and others to crack the team. Hopefully once Strome is drafted we can contact Landeskog's agent and try to convince him to ask for a year extension, 1 eay contract with whichever team drafts him, play for that team just one year, then sign long term with us!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SensFanInMTL</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:26:09 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10748</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Captain Alfie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10747</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think Lee makes a great spare D which is where he stands in the depth of our D core but I would not want him as anything more.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Captain Alfie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:28:09 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10747</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10746</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Lee isn't bad. He's become a pretty reliable D over the last few years. Reminds me of Tom Preissing. He's just carrying the weight of expectations from the past, and unfortunate for him, has to claw his way through a deep Defensive corps. If he gets traded, most likely, we would get short end of the stick...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:10:12 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10746</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10745</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would expect Da Costa and Condra to spend most of their time in Bingo (pretty sure they are on 2 way contracts) and will be called up in the case of injury. Shannon, if re-signed, will be on a one way contract and depending on his play, will help with the press box rotation. We have 1, maybe 2 holes to fill in the forward position. I expect 2 UFA signings. 1 for a top 6 forward and the other we know will be the back goalie. If prospect is couturier, he won't crack the lineup this year. All and all, this year's team and competitive level will depend on Foligno, Regin and Michalek having major turnarounds as well as Philips and Gonchar. If those guys can't find it in them to step it up, its going to be another long one...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:04:54 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10745</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10744</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Too much depth?!?!? Too much hilarity.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:54:04 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10744</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10743</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Jay Mohr was actually hilarious. Can't blame him for the fact that the awards can only attract a bunch of B Celebs.. Donny Osmond? Reality tv Bimbos?? Really??? Was Rachel Griffith busy?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:52:30 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10743</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>EMG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10742</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Chirp, I know I'm breaking an unwritten rule here by bringing up an Ek rumour... Ek just won't let his "Calgary / Ottawa major trade" go. Have you heard anything about this?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>EMG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:51:55 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10742</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaMo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10741</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Popcorn and traffic lights dont take 6 years chief, neither should a 9th overall pikc. That's my point. Brian Lee =Bad Draft pick @ 9th overall.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CaMo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:38:39 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10741</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lambchops says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10740</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If anyone has friends who are leaf fans and they keep shoving the Brian Lee over Staal and Kopitar in your face (I have 3 of them. Too bad you can't break up with friends eh?) Just let them know that in 2006 The Laughs took jiri Tlusty (who?) over Grabner AND Claude Giroux, I know Giroux was a steal and Grabner wasn't proven also, but still who the fuck is Jiri Tlusty? http://www.mynhldraft.com/2006]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lambchops</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:27:33 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10740</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JackLaytonsMustache says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10739</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As far as the Senators d for next season is concerned, I would like to see Kuba get a chance to redeem himself. I think he was hindered most of the season because of his broken leg. If he can regain his old form (a decent puck moving defenceman who is average in his own zone), the Sens might be able to get a second round pick for him at the trade deadline. What do they really have to lose? I see the defence starting like this Kuba Karlsson Phillips Lee Gonchar Cowen Carkner coming in against the Sabres and Leafs. I think Cowen makes it over Rundblad because of his physical maturity and NHL/AHL experience. Unless Rundblad comes in and absolutely wows the coaching staff, he will start the season in Bingo to adjust to the North American game. Caveat - If Murray can somehow manage to get rid of Kuba or Gonchar before the season starts for a decent return, all bets are off.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JackLaytonsMustache</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:04:22 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10739</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JackLaytonsMustache says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10738</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You have to give some players a chance to mature. Lee can skate, he just needed to fill in a bit and learn how to play at the NHL level. I think he will be a solid d-man for us going forward. Same with Khadri. People are throwing him under the bus because he hasn't produced consistently at the NHL level at 20. He will be a solid NHLer down the road.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JackLaytonsMustache</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:48:53 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10738</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sandy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ it's only in las vegas because most players don't show up. Las Vegas is a place people want to come too Well at least give them the right pronunciation of the player names. Those two bimbos... englishized (if that's a word) St. Louis. It must be the bleach went to their brain... not 1 minute before the video pronounced his name correctly and they still got it wrong... Bleach...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:43:55 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10737</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>conservativeHippie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10736</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree that we have too much depth. I have no problem using our depth players to get a top 6 player or two if at all possible. Having a dramatic deal in the draft to get 3 and 6 would fast track this team. I don't think I'm telling tales by saying we are missing 3 top 6 players.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>conservativeHippie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:38:40 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10736</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dork says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10735</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry, that should read "10 other teams could have had Kopitar" 11 other teams for Staal... Anyway, my point is that Lee isn't a piece of shit and you have no patience.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dork</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:19:22 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10735</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dork says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10734</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It should also be noted how many other teams passed on Anze Kopitar (we weren't the only ones). I think almost every team could have picked him, if I'm not mistaken.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dork</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:17:10 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10734</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dork says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10733</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Calm down CaMo - you totally missed my point. Lots of people here have been calling him a bust. My point is that he's going to get better. Never said he was better than Staal of Setoguchi. All I'm saying is he's not the complete shit draft choice you make him out to be. Patience. He's young and proving himself. I'm guessing you have a tough time waiting for the traffic lights to change, your popcorn to pop etc...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dork</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:15:54 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10733</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mitchell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10732</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I agree, and he was amazing with phillips during his first year. did most of phillips work. which phillips likes.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mitchell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:32:19 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10732</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaMo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10731</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I didn't read the word bust anywhere. But how can you not see that Lee was just an awful draft pick? I remember when San Jose picked setoguchi and Marc Stall was still on the board, I was celebrating before the pick happened. Next thing I know Lees name is called - BOOM Nightmares. They drafted him out of a high school in minnesota if I'm not mistaken? How could they not take the 2nd Staal brother? Lee should have been drafted in the 2nd round... not 9th overall ... ahead of T.J Oshie and Cogliano. Embarrassing draft choice.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CaMo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:31:38 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10731</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dork says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10730</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Way too early to call Lee a bust. For fuck's sake, give the kid some more time. He's had a rough ride with our franchise and JUST started to turn his game around at the end of last season.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dork</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:19:08 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10730</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mitchell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10729</link>
			<description><![CDATA[it must be a bunch of leaf fans wanting a 6 round. burke will kill the leafs. just like every other team he left. he only makes trades to make himself known. his a joke. kadri isn't worth anything. we've seen him prefrom. thanks leafs for helping us chose jared cowen.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mitchell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:14:49 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10729</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>willie_008 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10728</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If the Sens are moving up, I could honestly see it being Colorado's pick at 2 they move to which no-one seems to be talking about. Think about this, they obviously have a relationship there having made the Anderson trade, Colorado also has a pick at 11 so they are still getting 2 quality picks. Also, Weircoch went to school at Denver, coincidence?? What about Weircoch, the 6th, and the 35th for the 2nd? (Ideally) OR Weircoch, the 6th and 21st for the 2nd and 32nd? That would give Colorado 3 first rounders. I think they might do that. Especially if EDM takes Larsson first (Hello RNH) Thoughts?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>willie_008</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:12:35 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10728</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sensational Sens Fan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10727</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What do people think about a Kadri for 6th overall pick swap? They're talking about it over on hf, but I think it's nonsense, lol.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sensational Sens Fan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:11:05 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10727</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mitchell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10726</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ it's only in las vegas because most players don't show up. Las Vegas is a place people want to come too]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mitchell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:06:05 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10726</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sandy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10725</link>
			<description><![CDATA[On another note... get the NHL Awards back to Canada. Did you here them butcher Martin St. Louis? They know nothing about hockey.... what a bad show.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:01:51 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10725</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mitchell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10724</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Colin Greening - Jason Spezza - Daniel Alfredsson Nick Foligno - Peter Regin - Milan Michalek/Ryan Shannon Eric Condra - Stephane Da Costa - Bobby Butler Jesse Winchester - Zack Smith - Chris Neil Chris Phillips - Sergei Gonchar/Jared Cowen David Rundblad - Erik Karlsson Matt Carkner - Brian Lee Craig Anderson Someone Else What I'm saying with this... were would anyone draw in. regardless of this year, nothing is gonna happen unless we move more bodies out. we have TOO MUCH DEPTH]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mitchell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:00:05 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10724</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DrSens says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10723</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think this is the best and cheapest scenario for us as well. no point in dealing with Col cause they are looking for the same thing we are. We could trade with NJ and get either of the 2 guys we want, Huberdeau or Landeau Win Win if we can trad up 2]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DrSens</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:44:44 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10723</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DrSens says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10722</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yes Praise it was a huge mistake to take him over those 2 you mentioned. namely staal. But lee isnt that bad, it just took him longer to develop. better to have lee than campoli.\]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DrSens</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:41:12 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10722</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mitchell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[is it just me or is there some sort of stupid commerical being played?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mitchell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:29:34 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10721</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HKYcountry says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10720</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The ONLY way Ottawa even thinks about pulling the trigger on a deal to move to #3 is if Colorado picks someone other than Landeskog. Which at this point doesn't look likely. I myself have been saying Ottawa will stand pat at #6 and take Zibanejad or Couturier. I've been thinking they will take Zibanejad...but the more I think about it, I feel that Couturier might be the better choice. This guy has the skills that positioned him as the presumptive 1st overall ranking going into the season...a slow start hurt his rank and in my opinion has been OVER scouted all year. Despite a slow start (which was because of mono) he still put up 96 points (the same as the year prior)...given the effects mono can have that's pretty good. I think the fact he fought through mono and related symptoms and had the year he did, says a lot about him. He would be a good compliment at center to Spezza.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>HKYcountry</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:13:08 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10720</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>EMG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10719</link>
			<description><![CDATA[All this draft talk is making me thirsty]]></description>
			<dc:creator>EMG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:11:16 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10719</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dirtysweetness says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10718</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Maybe Murray has all of us fooled. After all, he is the master of "disinformation ". Maybe he'll draft Hamilton? No other General Manager has been this vocal or transparent about their drafting plans. Plus, the Senator's management did say that this is a 2-3 year rebuild and it looks like they are building from the back end out.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dirtysweetness</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:09:49 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10718</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TheTyrantWee says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10717</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thoughts Cont'd 3. The Devils aren't a stupid organization. Yes they have a need for defense and centers but at this point Lando would clearly be the best player available. Unless they trade down to get Ziggy at 6 due to organizational preference I can't see them passing on him. 4. The Islanders get to take Couturier who few would suggest is less valuable than Murray or Hamilton. They need defense and there is probably as much as a 50% chance they'll take one but how do you pass on a 6'4 high end center prospect who plays both ends of the rink when he's clearly the best on the board at this point. The only scenario I can see for the Sens moving up without overpaying by a landslide is if the Devils are as high on Ziggy as they're rumoured to be. In that situation I can see them flipping spots with Ottawa for a 2nd // 2nd + 3rd // 2nd + prospect and taking Ziggy with 6th overall leaving Lando to Ottawa.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TheTyrantWee</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:07:55 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10717</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TheTyrantWee says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10716</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My Mock Draft: 1. EDM - RNH 2. COL - Larsson 3. FLA - Huberdeau 4. NJD - Landeskog 5. NYI - Couturier 6. OTT - Strome/Ziggy Thoughts that lead me to this mock draft: 1. Colorado has lots of young forward talent and probably can't pass up a potential Larsson-Johnson top pairing for years to come. 2. Florida took two very solid defense prospects in Kulikov and Gudbranson. Outside of Weiss and Booth they're extremely thin in terms of high end forward talent. I don't see how they can pass up Huberdeau in this situation and if they do I see it being to take Lando.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TheTyrantWee</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:05:58 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10716</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaMo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10715</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Anderson was signed for 4 years to give Lehner Time to develop. I'm not even going to address the rest of your argument because it doesn't have much logic behind it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CaMo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:03:21 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10715</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RUSHRLZ says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10714</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ For that alone, if the deal isn't signed, if I were Murray I would tear that shit up and get someone else. If even the slightest scent of Melnyk meddling isn't worrisome enough for the culture of our franchise, then I agree with you, that is a big red flag that they should nip in the bud.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RUSHRLZ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:00:43 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10714</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Al2 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10713</link>
			<description><![CDATA[re Cameron. I thought it was a done deal that he'd be assistant. It sounds like he's a good coach but I'm a little upset that Cameron announced it on Sat at a banquet without waiting for team announcement. Big time red flag, IMO. Suggests that he may not be a team player. Did he say (on Sat at banquet) he was going to Sens or going to NHL? Think Murray et al might be unhappy at this behaviour (announcing it before the team does)?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Al2</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:55:59 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10713</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>WeAreSensFans! says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10712</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i think huberdeau got hot at the right time, but i think he'll be the top 5 bust in this years draft. i would huberdon't on that pick]]></description>
			<dc:creator>WeAreSensFans!</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:42:50 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10712</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JasonK says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10711</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey guys I really do believe that Lehner is a good goalie prospect however I don't believe he is an elite goaltender right now he is just a prospect. My point with Spezza for Schneider and a 1st was to show how everyone would say Schneiders just a good goalie prospect and Spezza is worth more than him and a 1st.... My thought is that Spezza and Statsny are of similar talent and I believe that Murray would jump at Statsny as it may be undervalued and if you follow the Colorado rumors they are looking for a goalie. Why did Murray sign Anderson for 3 million plus 4 year deal to be a back up? We have 2 nd round pics that could get us a new goalie prospect. Just my thoughts right or wrong thanks for updating the website Chirp!!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JasonK</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:42:15 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10711</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hamany says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10710</link>
			<description><![CDATA[1.EDM-RNH 2.COL-LANDESKOG 3.FLA-HUBERDEAU 4.NJ-LARSSON 5.-NYI-COUTRIER 6.OTT-STROME/ZI BANEJAD 7.JETS-STROME/Z IBANEJAD THATS IF OTTAWA DOESNT TRADE....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hamany</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:10:37 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10710</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Bauer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10709</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I know everyone thinks COL will take Lando, but really, how can you pass on two better players in Larsson and Huberdeau?? Imagine if Edm fools everyone and was to take Larsson, then how do they pass on RNH or Huberdeau... I just dont see it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mike Bauer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:36:48 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10709</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Bauer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10708</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My MOCK draft with trades: Top 8 1. EDM - RNH 2. COL - Larsson 3. FLA - Huberdeau 4. OTT (trades NJ for 6th overall, 4th rounder and P.Wiercoch) - Landeskog 5. NYI - Strome 6. NJ - Couturier 7. WPG - Hamilton 8. CLB - Zibanejad I also think Ottawa will be active in trying to jump into that 8 spot if MZ is actually there...im not sure who or what they would part with in order to make that jump]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mike Bauer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:33:31 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10708</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>digital sens fan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10707</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would say try to move up from 6 but if not, take Strome (Martin Havlat type player but Canadian) and try to move up from 21 to 15 or so and grab the 6 foot 7 defencemen. Oleksiak or something like that who is compared to Tyler Myers. This could be very exciting to watch! With Lehner in net in 3-4 years imagine the top 4 defencement. Karlsson - Cowen Rundblad - Oleksiak Thats a pretty steady combo of toughness and skill on the back end.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>digital sens fan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:09:38 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10707</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dork says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10706</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I like it. It's not farfetched either.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dork</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:06:33 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10706</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul MacLean says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10705</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm gonna say that Lee is another guy we should keep soon. His benching increased his maturity tenfold. He handled it like a pro and came back playif solid hockey. He has a strong frame and is a decent, balance D. I can see him getting slowly better as his confidence increases. He's also still very young. Often defencemen can take a little longer to develop. Inunderstand that fans have little to no patience, but there are a lot of stupid things impatience can cause you to do in a rebuild... fans are giving up way too easily on our prospects. Regin's a guy with value that I would get rid of first - but even Regin I'd still rather keep another year. He just needs to be stronger which is definitely achievable.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul MacLean</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:03:17 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10705</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jasonontheoldsenschirp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10704</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Naaa]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jasonontheoldsenschirp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:39:53 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10704</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GinosandApples says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10703</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What about NO.....? That is a horrible trade... How? Yeah Seguin has a lot of potential, but are you telling me that with Lucic, Krecji, Marchand, Hornton, Bergeron, Caron, Hamill, Knight, Spooner and Arniel etc. Boston wouldn't trade him if they had the opportunity to solidify the future of their D? Especially if they could add Larsson/Hamilto n, Wiercioch and say a guy like Musil, Morrow etc. at 35 with a single trade?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GinosandApples</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:37:16 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10703</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jasonontheoldsenschirp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10702</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So Chirp, what of the resigning of Condra and Butler? I'm assuming Murray will address those after the draft/before Free Agency?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jasonontheoldsenschirp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:36:53 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10702</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Round Leaf says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10701</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If any defenseman is moved at the draft, its going to be Wiercioch. The guy is a solid D prospect that a team like the Devils or Panthers might consider as part of a package to move down. something like: to Ottawa: 3rd overall + mid-round pick to Florida: 6th overall + Wiercioch Then Murray is free to take either Landeskog or Huberdeau at #3.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Round Leaf</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:29:15 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10701</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Luke McQueen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10700</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Not sure that deal is so bad. Tyler is the real deal. Maybe the 6th, early third, and Lee (see my theme here?) if we cannot move up. On second thought are Z-bad, Strome, Coutourier that much worse than Tyeler Seguin? Man, too many options.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Luke McQueen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:23:22 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10700</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>383 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10699</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Not sure if this has already been mentioned, because there have been so many trade proposals... It seems like our only realistic chance to trade up in the draft is with Florida. Do you think trading 6th/Wiercoch for Florida's 3rd too much? not enough? They need dmen, well, hell Florida needs everything...th ink they would do it?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>383</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:21:01 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10699</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaMo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10698</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What about NO.....? That is a horrible trade... For the bruins. I'd make that trade in 2 seconds if it was an option.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CaMo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:18:20 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10698</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PraiseAlfie84 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10697</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What about NO.....? That is a horrible trade...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PraiseAlfie84</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:16:11 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10697</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GinosandApples says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10696</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What about 6th, 35th and Wiercioch for Tyler Seguin?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GinosandApples</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:15:04 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10696</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sandy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10695</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Two more sleeps fellas. Let's talk about a dream scenario. Back a few months ago the top 5 in this draft were just floating from 1 to 5 to 3 to 2, etc. There was no set #1 until the last couple of months. So let's say that Ottawa can 'sucker' Florida to move down 3 spots for 6th overall & Sens 35th (48th would be preferable though). Edmonton realizes, after watching the mock draft on TSN last night that Pierre MacGuire was right. Edmonton needs defense. So they flip & take Larsson with their 1st pick. It is rumoured that the Avs really want Landeskog & they take him. Now sitting there in 3rd ready to pick - the Sens with RNH staring them in the face. Wow, what a dream indeed. 99% chance that won't happen but a 1% chance it might? How about Gonchar to Detroit? Would he be the right fit? I say he would wave the NTC to move there with a good chance at the Cup. What do the Sens get back? A 2nd rounder?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:12:28 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10695</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sensnation says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10694</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Continuing along that line of thinking, if the Sens could get 2 top 10 picks, but could not move up from 6th, would you draft Hamilton if he was still available at 6th and then just hope 1 of Strome or Zibanejad are still available at the last pick?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sensnation</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:07:17 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10694</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dork says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10693</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm with Paul MacLean - package picks and upgrade as many as possible. We should be able to get another first rounder, maybe even two top ten picks. As much as we don't NEED Dmen, I wouldn't mind drafting one of the more complete D in the draft. Cowen, Karlsson and to a lesser extent Rundblad are not likely complete D. Also, it would mean that we still have a KILLER d in a few years even if one of our best prospects doesn't pan out as expected.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dork</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:01:25 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10693</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>my2sens says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10692</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well... yes anything is better then Lee... but then we would have to throw in picks no?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>my2sens</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:00:53 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10692</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PraiseAlfie84 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10691</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, whoever we draft at 6th will be better than Brian freakin' Lee....Can't believe Muckler took him over Marc Stall and Anze Kopitar still...So glad to be moving on from the remnants of the Muckler era...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PraiseAlfie84</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:58:23 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10691</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>my2sens says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10690</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is 6th pick that much worse then 1st, that we should give up so much to get it?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>my2sens</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:57:07 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10690</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Luke McQueen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10689</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Replace Lee with Karlsson, and that's probably what Edmonton wants, so it doesn't happen. And if you're moving up to #1, it's to draft Nugent-Hopkins, not Landeskog. Can't see Edm asking for Karlsson and our 1st for theirs that would be totaly unreasonable. I admit that Lee is not the biggest fish one might be able to dangle but surely a deal could get done without giving up our cornerstone. Honestly, I think BM wants character as much as any amount of skill and would definately take Lando first overall. Just my opinion.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Luke McQueen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:55:32 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10689</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sensnation says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10688</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Finally someone that agrees with me on Couturier! If he's left 6 I'm definitely happy and excited for what he can bring.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sensnation</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:54:14 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10688</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>my2sens says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10687</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Huh?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>my2sens</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:54:09 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10687</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JasonK says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10686</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Would you trade Spezza for Cory Schneider and Vancouver's 1st round pic if they can trade for a top 10 pic + Trade of Elliot for Anderson will now make sense Are you NUTS?!?! Lehner is our only solid goalie prospect! Stasny is a superstar in his own right there's no doubt about that but I wouldn't give that much up for him... You're being too kind to Stastny. He's not even close to being a superstar. Look at his stats. He's a solid 1st line C in the NHL, but not a superstar. And definitely not worth Lehner AND the #6 pick.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JasonK</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:50:30 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10686</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tookie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10685</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Let's see... Reasonable top line NHL'er For A pick that will become a reasonable top line NHL'er AND the best goaltending prospect the organization has ever had. Did you seriously propose this? Are you mental? HA! Good one TBT, that gave me a nice laugh, thx bro! That will ease the trip back home and that damn traffic!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tookie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:42:40 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10685</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>THEBLACKTERROR says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10684</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ He's close to a point per game over his career, which makes him a solid 1st liner. I consider superstars to be guys like Crosby and Ovechkin and even Stamkos, Stastny is not in that category. Bizarre trade proposal. Goalies like Lehner do not grow on trees.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>THEBLACKTERROR</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:39:23 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10684</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaMo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10683</link>
			<description><![CDATA[WOOWWWWWWWWWWWW Can we just stop responding to propositions such as JasonK's? Holy Smokes. That. Was. Brutal.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CaMo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:38:18 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10683</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PraiseAlfie84 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10682</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From what I recall Stasny has the ability to put up 70-80 if he's healthy, but I think that seems to be the problem...And god no definitely not worth Lehner + 6th....Hey-Zeus !]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PraiseAlfie84</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:36:30 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10682</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Apostle says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10681</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Let's see... Reasonable top line NHL'er For A pick that will become a reasonable top line NHL'er AND the best goaltending prospect the organization has ever had. Did you seriously propose this? Are you mental? Excellent use of the word mental.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The Apostle</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:34:38 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10681</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>THEBLACKTERROR says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10680</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Are you NUTS?!?! Lehner is our only solid goalie prospect! Stasny is a superstar in his own right there's no doubt about that but I wouldn't give that much up for him... You're being too kind to Stastny. He's not even close to being a superstar. Look at his stats. He's a solid 1st line C in the NHL, but not a superstar. And definitely not worth Lehner AND the #6 pick.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>THEBLACKTERROR</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:34:22 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10680</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>THEBLACKTERROR says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10679</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Let's see... Reasonable top line NHL'er For A pick that will become a reasonable top line NHL'er AND the best goaltending prospect the organization has ever had. Did you seriously propose this? Are you mental?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>THEBLACKTERROR</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:32:08 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10679</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>THEBLACKTERROR says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10678</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Replace Lee with Karlsson, and that's probably what Edmonton wants, so it doesn't happen. And if you're moving up to #1, it's to draft Nugent-Hopkins, not Landeskog.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>THEBLACKTERROR</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:31:01 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10678</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PraiseAlfie84 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10677</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Are you NUTS?!?! Lehner is our only solid goalie prospect! Stasny is a superstar in his own right there's no doubt about that but I wouldn't give that much up for him...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PraiseAlfie84</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:30:32 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10677</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JasonK says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10675</link>
			<description><![CDATA[To Ottawa Paul Statsny To Colorado Ottawa's 1st Robin Lehner Trade of Elliot for Anderson will now make sense]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JasonK</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:38 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10675</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaMo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10674</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It's going to take a hell of a lot more than that to get a 1st overall pick. I would not want to give up what EDM is asking for that pick.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CaMo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:24:45 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10674</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Luke McQueen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10673</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Like most, I want to move up in this draft to get Lando. Here`s my suggestion: Give Edm - Lee, 6th overall and a 3rd rounder For Edm 1st overall Seems steep but I think that would be the asking price minimum and something I would be comfortable with for sure. I would even make it our last 2nd rounder if we had to. Lee is not going to find any time on our D this year. Carkner should be the 7th man.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Luke McQueen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:21:40 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10673</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>oakster15 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10672</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I Like it. Especially since it's a new one & Realistic. Not really as Fla would lose their shot at landing Landeskog or Huberdeau, trading down doesnt make sens for them. It does if they want a defenceman.. Hamilton/Murphy /Beaulieu will be available then. Also they need a power forward? They can draft Couturier]]></description>
			<dc:creator>oakster15</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:20:36 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10672</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mitchell says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10671</link>
			<description><![CDATA[all in all if senators don't trade up to number 1 RNH is gone. 2ndly, Landeskog seems to skip fall and jump back up again therefore i believe it could be chance-able that we could draft Landeskog so he for sure is right in front of are iron sight thirdly larsson would be right under landeskog because he is potentially a number 1 choice in defense being the BPA. Fourth Mika Z is much more versatile then strome. i don't dislike strome but his not as much as a complete player as MIka Z is. the rest on my list are player that senators could have a shot at and are more then likely the ones they'll take considering if there selected or not. Larsson over anyone else Landeskog comes first.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mitchell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:13:16 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10671</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>THEBLACKTERROR says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10670</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think Florida would start with it, but they need players, so I'd bet they would want a roster player as well. All in all, I'm not convinced that the prospect at #3 is any better than the prospect at #6. I kind of feel like Couturier is getting no respect at all right now, and it's unwarranted. It wasn't long ago that people were talking about the guy as a sure-fire #1, and he still had a great year, he was just sick for part of it. I completely get why people are ballwashing Huberdeau and Landeskog, but I kind of feel like Couturier is the better prospect and people have been blinded by this past season. I'll be thrilled if Ottawa gets to pick Couturier, especially because I think he'll make the team next year and will be centering a line between Alfie and Michalek.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>THEBLACKTERROR</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:07:52 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10670</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RUSHRLZ says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10669</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I Like it. Especially since it's a new one & Realistic. Not really as Fla would lose their shot at landing Landeskog or Huberdeau, trading down doesnt make sens for them. ^^ this It is more liklely a similar deal might fly with a team looking for quantity over quality, aka the Devils.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RUSHRLZ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:03:38 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10669</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tookie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10668</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My rebuild version Departures: Da Costa 21st 35th Arrivals: T.J Oshie via sign & trade Draft: Landeskog, with the 2nd pick (traded 21st, Da Costa, 35th) Strome, with the 6th pick Landeskog Spezza Butler Michalek Regin Alfie Greening Foligno Condra Bass Smith Neil With Strome, Silfverberg, Stone, Petersson, Sorensson coming up.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tookie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:02:21 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10668</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaMo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10667</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I Like it. Especially since it's a new one & Realistic. Not really as Fla would lose their shot at landing Landeskog or Huberdeau, trading down doesnt make sens for them. I can see Florida moving down. Especially if they'd be happy with Strome, Couturier or Zibenijad. The key part of this trade for them would be moving up to 21 from 33. They probably would have their eye on a player who is likely to be gone before the 33rd but is available at 21.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CaMo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:01:54 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10667</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10666</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Cams: I'd gladly go for two picks in the top 6. Sadly, highly unlikely though... @HKYcountry: I have no problems with getting back Brooks Laich but I think Washington will find a way to get him under contract. If they don't, you can expect to pay double for the same production, same age, more grit and less speed. That's pretty much your choice between the two. Both are capable playoff performers... Overmind: You could say Jokinen is injury prone, missing 5-9 games/year a few times in his career. I think as Sens fans, we've tolerated way worse with our current crop of players. It would be nice to have a healthier bunch for sure, but I still think Jokinen is the best bang for your buck in this year's crop of UFAs. People will fight and overpay for Laich and Leino (that is, if they are available...)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:59:06 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10666</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tookie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10665</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I Like it. Especially since it's a new one & Realistic. Not really as Fla would lose their shot at landing Landeskog or Huberdeau, trading down doesnt make sens for them.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tookie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:53:03 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10665</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tookie says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10664</link>
			<description><![CDATA[At first I also wanted Leino, he's a great 2nd line player and would be great with Alfie. But we are rebuilding, no room for him, unless we were to get Parise or Carter, then we could maybe justify his signing and make the rebuild shorter but just him alone makes no sense. Now with the extra 4Mil everyone got, Philly could have room for Carter now and all other teams have more flexibility to sign a player they couldnt before. My fast track back to the playoffs and contending looked like this (bare with me here) Departures: Regin, traded for a 4th rounder 2012 Michalek, traded for a 3rd rounder 2012 Arrivals: Laich, via FA, 2 years 9Mil Leino, via FA, 2 years 7mil Carter, traded for Foligno our 21st and our 35th Draft: Landeskog, move up from 6th Landeskog Spezza Butler Leino Carter Alfie Greening Laich Condra Bass Da Costa Neil]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tookie</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:50:49 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10664</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaMo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10663</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I Like it. Especially since it's a new one & Realistic.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CaMo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:47:20 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10663</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gauts26 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10662</link>
			<description><![CDATA[To FLA:#6 AND #21 To Ott: #3 and # 33 and then Move up with the #33 and #35]]></description>
			<dc:creator>gauts26</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:40:50 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10662</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Harry Pubes says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10661</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think the draft goes one of two ways if nobody trades up in the top 6. one has the Avs taking Landeskog and one is if based on the Avs taking Larsson. Edmonton - Hopkins Avs - Landeskog Florida - Huberdeau Jersey - Larsson Islanders- Zibanejad/Strom e/Couturier Ottawa - Zibanejad/Strom e/Couturier Or Edmonton - Hopkins Avs - Larsson Florida - Huberdeau Jersey - Zibanejad Islanders- Landeskog/Strom e/Couturier Ottawa - Landeskog/Strom e/Couturier So my opinion is if the Avs take Larsson, we have a chance at Landeskog. If the Avs take Landeskog, we will have a chance to get Zibanejad. But most likely we will be making a decision between Strome and Couturier. I hope we get Strome. I am all about this kid still. then no matter who we take in 6th. I want to trade up to get mark Mcneil. Harry.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Harry Pubes</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:37:56 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10661</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PraiseAlfie84 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10660</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Probably, but I bet you dollars to doughnuts Gonchar is not interested in Florida....Thos e pesky NMC's sort of stop quality players from being traded to shitty teams...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PraiseAlfie84</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:27:08 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10660</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>11PalladiumDrive says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10659</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Winnepeg won't move up in the draft. Book it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>11PalladiumDrive</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:22:47 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10659</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CaMo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10658</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I would agree with you on the contract side of things but his two glass knees bother me. I would put his odds of playing 50 games at about 37%. Number crunching machine.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>CaMo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:21:15 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10658</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dirtysweetness says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10657</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Would Florida be interested in Gonchar?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dirtysweetness</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:21:01 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10657</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PraiseAlfie84 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10656</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yep, just wouldn't be a day on Senschirp without this comment right here...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PraiseAlfie84</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:17:27 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.senschirp.ca/blog/item/335-more-draft-talk#comment-10656</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
